Upload
dophuc
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Surface Engineering for Increased Durability
and Energy Efficiency in Extreme Conditions
Mark Gee
National Physical Laboratory
9th December 2009
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
2
Summary
• Introduction to Surface Engineering
• Benefits of surface engineering
• Examples from manufacturing
– Dies
– WC/Co hardmetal tools
• Thermal barrier coatings (TBCs)
• Sliding wear
• Conclusions
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
3
Surface Engineering• The design of surface and substrate together as a functionally
graded system to give a cost effective performance enhancement of which neither is capable on its own
• Many applications often in aggressive environments
• Many different types of surface engineering
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
4
Benefits for Surface Engineering
• Mechanical– Wear
• Decrease - most rubbing surfaces in equipment, abrasion resistant
• Control - abradable seals
• Increase - when used in manufacturing (grinding, polishing)
– Friction
• Increase - anti-slip surfaces
• Control - brakes
• Decrease - efficient engines
• Chemical– High Temperatures
• Oxidation - power plant
• Corrosion - power plant
• Direct reaction - cutting tools
– Low temperatures
• Corrosion - bridges
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
5
• Physical– Electrical - lacquer on wires, generating plant
– Thermal - TBCs on turbine blades
– Optical - anti reflectance coatings on lenses
• Decorative– Taps
– Jewelry
Benefits for Surface Engineering
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
6
Summary
• Introduction to Surface Engineering
• Benefits of surface engineering
• Examples from manufacturing
– Dies
– WC/Co hardmetal tools
• Thermal barrier coatings (TBCs)
• Sliding wear
• Conclusions
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
7
Press DiesRequirements
• High stresses -substrate deforms
• Low friction
• Low wear
• Flat and smooth surface
Areas needing SE
• Working surface of die
SE Solution
• PVD coatings – DLC and MoS2
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
8
Testing for Dies – Scratch Testing
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
10
20
30
40
Friction F
orc
e, N
Load, N
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
2
4
6
8
10
Friction F
orc
e, N
Applied Load, N
A
A
B
B
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
9
WC/Co Hardmetals
• Two phase composites of WC and metal binder
• Used as tool materials, wear parts
• Subject to high stresses, high impact loading, corrosion, high
temperature
• In abrasion surface acts “smart” by fragmenting and re-embedding to form more wear resistant surface
Normal microstructure
Abraded surface
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
10
Flexure Elements
Micro-scratch Test System
• Deadweight loading
• Fibre-optic probe measurement of friction flexures
• Flexures, servo, ball screw are all leading commercially available technologies
Lever arm
LVDT
Servo
Height and position
adjustment
Friction measurement
flexures
IndenterCounterweight
Sample
Lever arm
LVDT
Servo
Height and position
adjustment
Friction measurement
flexures
IndenterCounterweight
Sample
Flexure pivots
Outer ring
Inner ring
Middle ring
Lever arm
Flexure pivots
Outer ring
Inner ring
Middle ring
Lever arm
Miniature Lead Screw
Gimbal
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
11
MA11 Single Scratch 300 mN 25 µµµµm Radius Indenter
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
12
50 pass 30 micrometre
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
13
100 pass 30 micrometre
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
14
Gas Borne Particle Erosion – Stepwise Analysis
Supply tube
Mixing
cha mber
Gas
supply
Abra sive
reservoir
Nozzle tube
Spec imen
Workingdista nce
Ga s bla st erosion test
Nozzle
length
Schema tic diagra m of ga s bla st erosion test system, ASTM G 76 (11)
� 75 ms-1
� 200 µm sand
� Normal incidence
� 20 mm stand-off
� 5 mm nozzle
� Increments from 0.1 gm to 4 or 15 gm (later stages)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
Ma
ss L
oss, g
Mass of Erodant, g
M4
M6
Erosion Damage
Area Examined
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
15
Stepwise Erosion Large Grain WC/Co Hardmetal
8 µm
27.5 g27.5 g 33.5 g33.5 g
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
16
Summary
• Introduction to Surface Engineering
• Benefits of surface engineering
• Examples from manufacturing
– Dies
– WC/Co hardmetal tools
• Thermal barrier coatings (TBCs)
• Sliding wear
• Conclusions
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
17
Rolls Royce TRENTgas turbine
The Modern Gas TurbineHigh
Pressure Turbine Blade
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
18
EB-PVD ZrO2-8wt%Y2O3
thermal barrier coatings
Electron Beam Physical Vapour Deposited Thermal Barrier
Coating (EB-PVD TBC)
100 µµµµm
Hot Gas
Temperature
CoolantTemperature
Metal WallCeramic
Temperature Profilewith TBC
Temperature Profilewithout TBC
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
19
19
TGO Fluorescence
• TBC transparent to laser
light
• TGO (alumina) flouresces
• Peak shifts when alumina is stressed
– In-situ measurement of TGO
residual stress
• Spectral deconvolution
TGO (Al2O3)
METAL
TBC(ZrO2/Y2O3)
Bondcoat
488 nm20492 cm-1
694 nm14400 cm-1
Air
515 nm19436 cm-1
About 20 µm diameter interrogated
Laser
d8111
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
14250 14300 14350 14400 14450 14500 14550
Original
Fitted
R1a
R2a
R1b
R2b
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
20
Stress Mapping and Debonding
• Coupons exposed in laboratory furnace
• Stress maps
• Potential for non-contact evaluation
• Thermography is alternative
High stress,
R2b
Low stress,
R2a
100 h 600 h
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
21
Summary
• Introduction to Surface Engineering
• Benefits of surface engineering
• Examples from manufacturing
– Dies
– WC/Co hardmetal tools
• Thermal barrier coatings (TBCs)
• Sliding wear
• Conclusions
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
22
Dry Running Properties of Sliding Materials
Sliding distance [m]
Coefficient of friction
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 500100 200 300 400 600 700
Coating
with PTFE
Coating
with MoS2
MoS2
PVD
BALINIT® C (WC/C)nearly no wear
x x x
xx
CuSnPbbronze
Ni-PTFE
x End of test due to adhesive wear
Sliding distance [m]
Coefficient of friction
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 500100 200 300 400 600 700
Coating
with PTFE
Coating
with MoS2
MoS2
PVD
BALINIT® C (WC/C)nearly no wear
x x x
xx
CuSnPbbronze
Ni-PTFE
x End of test due to adhesive wear
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
23
Transmission Applications – Gear Wear by Seizure
FZG-Test
Test dataSpeed: 1,000 rpmSurface pressure:1,000 N/mm²carb. 16MnCr5
Lubricant: ESSO CL46B(on biological base)
Source:IMM, TU Dresden
Tolerated load changes
Uncoateddry
Uncoatedlubricated
BALINIT® Cdry
BALINIT® Clubricated
Oil quantity:1 drop per Minute
29,000
1,400
106
107
105
104
103
102
10
1
Interruption after 2,000,000
150,000
29,000
1,400
140°C 90 °C 60 °C
FZG-Test
Test dataSpeed: 1,000 rpmSurface pressure:1,000 N/mm²carb. 16MnCr5
Lubricant: ESSO CL46B(on biological base)
Source:IMM, TU Dresden
Tolerated load changes
Uncoateddry
Uncoatedlubricated
BALINIT® Cdry
BALINIT® Clubricated
Oil quantity:1 drop per Minute
29,000
1,400
106
107
105
104
103
102
10
1
Interruption after 2,000,000
150,000
Interruption after 2,000,000Interruption after 2,000,000
150,000150,000
29,000
1,400
140°C 90 °C 60 °C
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
24
•wrist pins
•followers• roller, bucket, lifter, fingers•cams•rocker shafts
Highly Loaded Applications of Carbon Coatings
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
25
Reduced Valve Train Power
Consumption, Trucks
(DLC coated) cast iron tappet
uncoatedBALINIT® DLC coated
engine speed (rpm)
Power consumption (kW)
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
26
1980 1990 2000
1E-3
0.01
0.1
Friction C
oeffic
ient
Transfer film contact
After I L Singer
S Hogmark
Ball on disc, smooth surfaces
Tribochemical film
Low friction
Ultralow friction
Atomic friction
Superlow frictionNear frictionless
carbonNFC
MoS2
DLC
MoS2
Teflon
Development of Low Unlubricated Friction
Context
• Methods to generate low friction
– Low friction carbon films
– Low friction CN films
– Low friction fullerene like
materials
– Quasi-crystalline materials
– Non-wetting films
– Superlubricity
– Tribochemistry
Issues
• Achieving it
• Getting correct conditions
• Keeping it
• Measuring it
Future Vision
• Develop measurement methods for the characterisation and prediction
of performance of these coatings
• Develop durable materials
• Use them
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
27
Near Frictionless Films
A Erdimir, Tribology International, 37(2004)1005-1012
Dry nitrogen
Chhowalla and Amaratunga, Nature 207(2000)164-167
Wednesday, 06 January 2010
28
Conclusions
• Surface engineering is all pervasive
• Surface engineering has potential for tackling issues of performance or endurance in many applications
• Challenge is to move from largely empirical approach to knowledge based design