TMS v. EMI - Complaint

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    1/64

    THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

    EASTERN DIVISION

    TACTICAL MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. ))

    Plaintiff ) Civil Action No.)

    vs. ))

    DR. RONALD KARL, EMI EMERGENCY )MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL A/K/A )EMERGENCY MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS, )

    AND Copquest, Inc. ))

    Defendants ))

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 33 PageID #:1

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    2/64

    PARTIES

    2. Tactical Medical Solutions, Inc. (TMS) is a Corporation organized and e

    under the laws of the State of South Carolina, with its principal place of business a

    North Park Drive, Andersen, South Carolina 29625.

    3. Defendant Ronald Karl purports to be the President and CEO of EMI. Mr.

    believed to reside at 42 W. 550 Hawk Circle, St. Charles, Illinois.

    4. Defendant EMI purports to be a company with a place of business at 44 W

    Rte. 64, Lily Lake, Illinois 60151. See http://emiinternational.net/ . Howeve

    reasonably diligent search, no corporate registration for EMI has been located.

    f d l f b l d b d

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 33 PageID #:2

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    3/64

    9. Upon information and belief, Defendants Karl and EMI each have a place

    business in this judicial district.

    10. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), (c) a

    1400(b) since it is the judicial district in which Defendants conduct continuous and

    systematic business, advertise, and have caused the injuries complained of herein.

    STATEMENT OF FACTS

    A. TMS and It s Products

    11. TMS is a veteran-owned small business that designs and sells a var

    products for first responders, emergency medical personnel, law enforcement and

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 3 of 33 PageID #:3

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    4/64

    resellers and suppliers to maintain the highest levels of integrity in their marketing

    sales efforts.

    15. Throughout its existence, TMS has continuously and actively prom

    itself, its products, and its services through various channels in the trade including

    notably, the ongoing production and distribution of product catalogs, ongoing use

    website, ongoing promotion through distributors and resellers, and by regularly

    attending industry trade shows. TMS also enjoys substantial word-of-mouth mark

    from its many satisfied customers. As a result of its programs and efforts, over th

    decade, TMS has established very substantial goodwill and a correspondingly

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 4 of 33 PageID #:4

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    5/64

    20. The TMS Tourniquet was tested by the United States Army Institut

    Surgical Research and found to be 100% effective on both upper and lower extrem

    B. TMS Patents

    21. On August 17, 2010, United States Patent No. 7,776,064 B2 (the

    patent), entitled Tourniquet Article, was duly and legally issued by the United S

    Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the 064 patent is attached hereto as Exh

    22. TMS is the owner of the 064 patent by assignment.

    23. TMS provides notice of the 064 patent in accordance with 35 U.S.

    287.

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 5 of 33 PageID #:5

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    6/64

    30. TMS, which is commonly referred to in the trade as TACMED, is a

    nationally and internationally known manufacturer and distributor of a wide range

    products particularly in the emergency medical service (EMS), first responder and

    military medical fields. TMS promotes and sells its products in a variety of ways,

    including but not limited to directly through its website at www.tacmedsoluti

    through booths at trade shows, and through government contracts. TMS also uses

    network of national and international resellers and distributors to actively promote

    sell its products.

    31. At a minimum, since before 2009, TMS has consistently and contin

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 6 of 33 PageID #:6

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    7/64

    individual users alike. The TMS Tourniquet is characterized by a unique, non-fun

    overall look and feel including a distinct handle design featuring an elongated cyli

    rod having two ends in the shape of truncated cones and having a knurled interme

    section, a base and strap having a woven look and texture and a label disposed on

    underside of the strap proximate to an end (the TMS Trade Dress). The look an

    of the TMS Tourniquet is unique and serves to immediately identify the tournique

    coming from just one source.

    34. Since its inception, TMS has sold over 1.25 million tourniquets to

    customers worldwide.

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 7 of 33 PageID #:7

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    8/64

    police-use-new-survival-kits-in-field , and http://www.kristv.com/news/officers

    in-shootout-in-good-spirits-/ .

    39. The TMS Tourniquet was worn by Mark Wahlbergs character and

    others in the feature film entitled Lone Survivors.

    40. The TMS Trade Dress is non-functional.

    41. The TMS Trade Dress distinguishes the TMS Tourniquet from its

    competition.

    42. The TMS Trade Dress is unique and has acquired secondary meanin

    that tourniquet users and purchasers, when seeing tourniquets bearing the TMS Tr

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 8 of 33 PageID #:8

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    9/64

    45. The foregoing photograph constitutes an original work of authorship w

    is the subject of United States Copyright Registration No. Vau 1-161-333. A true and

    correct copy of the registration certificate is attached hereto as Exhibit D.

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 9 of 33 PageID #:9

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    10/64

    F. Defendants Karl and EMI

    48. Upon information and belief, Defendants Karl and EMI (hereinaftereferred to collectively as the Karl Defendants) design, manufacture, advertise,

    promote, distribute, sell and/or offer for sale products for EMS, fire and police

    professionals.

    49. Upon information and belief, long subsequent to adoption of the TA

    mark and trade name by TMS and without TMS consent, the Karl Defendants

    intentionally adopted, and began prominent use of the TACMED mark on or in

    connection with a line of products in direct competition with TMS. Among the pr

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 10 of 33 PageID #:10

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    11/64

    55. The Karl Defendants advertise, promote, sell and/or distribute their

    products to a similar class of customers as TMS, including Internet resellers anddistributors.

    56. Relevant consumers are highly likely to be confused as to the sourc

    sponsorship, or affiliation of the Karl Defendants products due to the similarity be

    the products offered by the Karl Defendants and TMS and due to the similarity be

    TMS TACMED trade name and mark and the Karl Defendants TACMED mark.

    57. Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of a two pages downloaded from

    EMI website. Exhibit F incorporates and displays multiple copies of the Tourniqu

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 11 of 33 PageID #:11

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    12/64

    EMI TACMED Law Enforcement Combat Gunshot Trauma Kit, EMI TACMED R

    Packs Complete Kit, and EMI TACMED Response Kit Complete.61. Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of a page downloaded from

    Copquests website (www.copquest.com). Exhibit G displays a web page that

    incorporates a copy of the Tourniquet Photo and the Camouflage Photo.

    62. Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of a shopping cart web page

    downloaded from Copquests website. Exhibit H includes a copy of the Tourniqu

    Photo falsely identified as the knock off T.a.t. tourniquet.

    63. By displaying photographs of the TMS tourniquet on its website, C

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 12 of 33 PageID #:12

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    13/64

    66. Defendants infringement has been, and continues to be, deliberate,

    and knowing.67. By reason of the acts and practices of Defendants, they have caused

    causing and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by the Court, will continu

    cause, immediate and irreparable harm to TMS, for which there is no adequate rem

    at law and for which TMS is entitled to injunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. 283.

    68. As a direct and proximate consequence of the acts and practices of

    Defendants, TMS has also been, is being, and unless such acts and practices are

    enjoined by the Court, will continue to be injured in its business, and property righ

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 13 of 33 PageID #:13

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    14/64

    are thus liable for infringement of the 620 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(a).

    72. Defendants infringement has been, and continues to be, deliberate,and knowing.

    73. By reason of the acts and practices of Defendants, they have caused

    causing and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by the Court, will continu

    cause, immediate and irreparable harm to TMS, for which there is no adequate rem

    at law and for which TMS is entitled to injunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. 283.

    74. As a direct and proximate consequence of the acts and practices of

    Defendants, TMS has also been, is being, and unless such acts and practices are

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 14 of 33 PageID #:14

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    15/64

    Tourniquet. See the chart below.

    TMS Tourniquet T.a.t. Tourniquet

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 15 of 33 PageID #:15

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    16/64

    that it should have been known to Defendants. Defendants infringement of the 6

    Patent has been willful, deliberate and objectively reckless.83. By reason of the acts and practices of Defendants, they have caused

    causing and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by the Court, will continu

    cause, immediate and irreparable harm to TMS, for which there is no adequate rem

    at law and for which TMS is entitled to injunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. 283.

    84. Defendants infringement of the 642 Patent has injured TMS and T

    entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate it for such infringement, but i

    event less than a reasonable royalty, as permitted under 35 U.S.C. 284, as well a

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 16 of 33 PageID #:16

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    17/64

    91. Defendants sales and marketing of T.a.t. tourniquets is likely to cau

    confusion among consumers.92. Defendants actions constitute trade dress infringement in violation

    Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a). TMS has been and will continue to be injured as

    result of Defendants conduct. TMS has no adequate remedy at law for these inju

    Unless Defendants are restrained by this Court from continuing to infringe the TM

    trade dress, these injuries will continue.

    COUNT V FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)(TACMED Mark)(All Defendants)

    93. TMS realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contain

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 17 of 33 PageID #:17

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    18/64

    injury and damage will continue unless and until Defendants are enjoined by this C

    Accordingly, TMS is entitled to an injunction under 15 U.S.C. 1116, prohibitingDefendants from further actions in violation of the Lanham Act.

    96. Defendants use of a mark confusingly similar to TMS TACMED

    and trade name was and is willful, knowing, malicious and/or intentional, thereby

    making this case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. 1117(a).

    COUNT VI UNFAIR COMPETITION ILLINOIS COMMON LAW(TACMED Mark)(All Defendants)

    97. TMS realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contain

    paragraphs 1through 96.

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 18 of 33 PageID #:18

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    19/64

    102. Defendants unfair competition was and is willful, knowing, malici

    and/or intentional.103. TMS does not have a fully adequate remedy at law.

    104. Defendants acts complained of herein constitute unfair competition

    deceptive trade practices under Illinois common law.

    105. Defendants use of a mark confusingly similar to TMS TACMED

    trade name was and is willful, knowing, malicious and/or intentional.

    COUNT VII COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT(Tourniquet Photo)(All Defendants)

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 19 of 33 PageID #:19

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    20/64

    111. Defendants knowingly, deliberately and willingly use the Tourniqu

    on their respective websites and in their marketing materials to sell the knock off Ttourniquet in direct competition with TMS, thereby causing TMS monetary and ot

    damages.

    112. TMS is entitled to recover from Defendants the damages TMS has

    sustained and will sustain, and any gains, profits and advantages obtained by

    Defendants as a result of Defendants acts alleged herein pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 5

    113. TMS is also entitled to an injunction prohibiting Defendants from fu

    infringement of the Tourniquet Photo pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 502.

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 20 of 33 PageID #:20

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    21/64

    119. Defendants use of the Tourniquet Photo is material to consumers

    purchasing decisions.120. Upon information and belief, Defendants misrepresentations have

    and will continue to cause immediate and irreparable injury and damage to TMS.

    has no adequate remedy at law for these injuries. Such immediate and irreparable

    injury and damage will continue unless and until Defendants are enjoined by this C Accordingly, TMS is entitled to an injunction under 15 U.S.C. 1116, prohibiting

    Defendants form further actions in violation of the Lanham Act.

    121. Defendants false and/or misleading descriptions and/or representat

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 21 of 33 PageID #:21

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    22/64

    125. Defendants marketing and false and/or misleading descriptions and

    representations regarding the T.a.t. tourniquet exemplified by use of the TourniquePhoto as described herein is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to

    deceive as to the origin, sponsorship and/or approval of the T.a.t. tourniquet by TM

    126. As a result of Defendants conduct, TMS has suffered and will cont

    suffer monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial, and damage to TMgoodwill causing serious and irreparable injury to TMS, its products and its reputa

    for which TMS has no adequate remedy at law.

    127. Defendants marketing and use of the Tourniquet Photo and Defend

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 22 of 33 PageID #:22

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    23/64

    130. Defendants acts complained of herein constitute unfair competition

    deceptive trade practices under 815 ILCS 510 also because Defendants have usedeceptive representations in connection with the T.a.t. tourniquet and have engage

    other conduct which creates a likelihood of confusion or misunderstanding.

    131. As a consequence of Defendants acts of unfair competition as set f

    herein, TMS has suffered and will continue to suffer monetary damages in an amobe determined at trial.

    132. Defendants have profited from Defendants unfair competition as s

    herein.

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 23 of 33 PageID #:23

    l d f

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    24/64

    137. Defendants acts complained of herein constitute unfair competition

    deceptive trade practices under Illinois common law also because Defendants have

    used deceptive representations in connection with the T.a.t. tourniquet and have

    engaged in other conduct which creates a likelihood of confusion or misunderstan

    138. As a consequence of the Defendants acts of unfair competition as s

    forth herein, TMS has suffered and will continue to suffer monetary damages in anamount to be determined at trial.

    139. Defendants have profited from Defendants unfair competition as s

    herein.

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 24 of 33 PageID #:24

    C 1 14 06035 D # 1 Fil d 08/06/14 P 25 f 33 P ID # 25

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    25/64

    146. Defendant Copquests use of the Camouflage Photo as described he

    misrepresents the nature, characteristics, and/or qualities, of the T.a.t. tourniquet.

    147. Defendant Copquests use of the Camouflage Photo is material to

    consumers purchasing decisions.

    148. Upon information and belief, Defendant Copquests misrepresentati

    have injured and will continue to cause immediate and irreparable injury and damTMS. TMS has no adequate remedy at law for these injuries. Such immediate an

    irreparable injury and damage will continue unless and until Defendant Copquest i

    enjoined by this Court. Accordingly, TMS is entitled to an injunction under 15 U

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 25 of 33 PageID #:25

    C 1 14 06035 D t # 1 Fil d 08/06/14 P 26 f 33 P ID # 26

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    26/64

    Camouflage Photo as described herein is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mis

    or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection and/or association of the source of th

    T.a.t. tourniquet with the source of the TMS tourniquet.

    153. Defendant Copquests marketing and false and/or misleading descri

    and/or representations regarding the T.a.t. tourniquet exemplified by use of the

    Camouflage Photo as described herein is likely to cause confusion, or to cause misor to deceive as to the origin, sponsorship and/or approval of the T.a.t. tourniquet b

    TMS.

    154. As a result of Defendant Copquests conduct, TMS has suffered and

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 26 of 33 PageID #:26

    Case: 1:14 cv 06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 27 of 33 PageID #:27

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    27/64

    has caused a likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding as to source, sponsors

    approval, or certification of Defendant Copquests T.a.t. tourniquet, and as to Defe

    Copquests affiliation, connection and association with and certification by TMS.

    158. Defendant Copquests acts complained of herein constitute unfair

    competition and deceptive trade practices under 815 ILCS 510 also because

    Defendant Copquest has used deceptive representations in connection with the T.atourniquet and has engaged in other conduct which creates a likelihood of confusio

    misunderstanding.

    159. As a consequence of the Defendant Copquests acts of unfair compe

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 27 of 33 PageID #:27

    Case: 1:14 cv 06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 28 of 33 PageID #:28

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    28/64

    of confusion or of misunderstanding as to source, sponsorship, approval, or certifi

    of Defendant Copquests T.a.t. tourniquet, and as to Defendant Copquests affiliati

    connection and association with and certification by TMS.

    165. Defendant Copquests acts complained of herein constitute unfair

    competition and deceptive trade practices under Illinois common law also because

    Defendant Copquest has used deceptive representations in connection with the T.atourniquet and has engaged in other conduct which creates a likelihood of confusio

    misunderstanding.

    166. As a consequence of the Defendants acts of unfair competition as s

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 28 of 33 PageID #:28

    Case: 1:14 cv 06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 29 of 33 PageID #:29

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    29/64

    172. Upon information and belief, Defendant Copquest had access to the

    Camouflage Photo which is and/or was displayed on many of TMS authorized

    distributors websites.

    173. Defendant Copquest copied the Camouflage Photo has displayed an

    currently displaying the copied Camouflage Photo on its website at www.c

    174. Defendant Copquest knowingly, deliberately and willingly copied tCamouflage Photo.

    175. Defendant Copquest knowingly, deliberately and willingly uses the

    Camouflage Photo on its website and in its marketing materials to sell the knock o

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 29 of 33 PageID #:29

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 30 of 33 PageID #:30

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    30/64

    COUNTS I-III PATENT INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS

    A. An award of damages adequate to compensate TMS for the infring

    that has occurred, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty as permitte

    35 U.S.C. 284, together with prejudgment interest from the date the

    infringement began;

    B. Additional damages for design patent infringement as permitted un

    U.S.C. 289;

    C. Increased damages as permitted under 35 U.S.C. 284;

    D. A finding that this case is exceptional and an award to TMS of its

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 30 of 33 PageID #:30

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 31 of 33 PageID #:31

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    31/64

    (i) from selling, offering to sell, marketing, promoting, or adve

    any goods and/or services under the TACMED mark or any

    confusingly similar thereto; and

    (ii) from making or publishing any false and/or misleading des

    and/or representations concerning TMS or the TMS Tourni

    and/or any false and/or misleading descriptions or represenstating, suggesting or implying that the T.a.t. tourniquet is a

    with, sponsored, approved or in any way associated with TM

    H. Directing Defendants to deliver up to TMS all things in their posse

    Case: 1:14 cv 06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 31 of 33 PageID #:31

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 32 of 33 PageID #:32

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    32/64

    L. Declaring that this case is exceptional and awarding to TMS the att

    fees it has incurred in investigating, bringing, and prosecuting this action,

    pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a) and any relevant Illinois state law provisio

    M. Awarding TMS the costs and disbursements of this action;

    N. Awarding TMS punitive damages pursuant to any relevant Illinois

    provisions;

    COUNTS VII and XVI COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS

    O. A preliminary and permanent injunction immediately restraining

    Defendants, together with their respective officers, agents, servants, emplo

    Case: 1:14 cv 06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 32 of 33 PageID #:32

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 33 of 33 PageID #:33

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    33/64

    Respectfully submitted,

    /S/ James B. Zaczek_____________James B. Zaczek, Esq. (ID No. 6217Law Office of Bert Zaczek311 N. Aberdeen St.Suite 300B

    Chicago, IL 60607(312) 527-1090(312) 527-1082 (Facsimile)[email protected]

    Frederick N. Samuels, Esq.CAHN & SAMUELS, LLP1100 17th Street N.W., Suite 401

    Case: 1:14 cv 06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 33 of 33 PageID #:33

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:34

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    34/64

    g g

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:35

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    35/64

    US007776064B2

    1 2 )Ul l l t ed S ta t e s P a t e n t 1 0 )P a t e n tN 0 . : U S 7 ,J e n n i f e r e t a l . ( 4 5 )Date o f P a t e n t : A

    ( 5 4 ) TOURNIQUET ARTICLE 2 0 0 5 / 0 0 4 9 8 3 0A1 3 / 2 0 0 5 A m b a c h

    ( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s :J o h n s o nJ e n n i f e r , R a e f o r d ,NC U S ) ; OTHER UBLICATIONJohnson R 0 5 5 ,R a e f o l ' d ,NC U s ) C o m b a tA p p l i c a t i o n T o u r n iq u e t s ,T h e C o m b a

    q u e t B r o c h u r e .( 7 3 ) A s s i g n e e : T a c t i c a l Medical S o l u t i o n s , I n c . , P a r s o n s ,D o n a l dL . , e ta l . ,To u r n i q u e t s i L i f e

    A n d e r s o n ,SC ( U ) ? e l d ,a r t i c l e( d a t eu n k n o w n ) .

    * ) N o t i c e : S u b j e c tt o a n y d i s c l a i m e r , t h e t e r m o f h i s * C i t e dby e x a m i n e rp a t e n t i s e x t e n d e do r a d j u s t e d u n d e r 3 5 Primary Examiner iMichae l M i l a n o

    U - S ~ C ~1 5 4 G )b y 2 8 2d a y s - A s s i s t a n tE x a m i n e r i V i c t o rX guyen( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y ,A g e n t ,o r F i r m 4 C a h n a

    ( 2 1 ) A p p l . N 0 . :1 0 / 8 3 0 , 1 4 4_ (57 ) ABSTRACT

    ( 2 2 ) F r l e d : A p r . 2 1 ,2 0 0 4_ _ _ The resen t i nven t ion e l a t e s genera l ly o ?

    ( 6 5 ) Pnor Pubhcatlon Data more s p e c i ? c a l l y t o u m i q u e t s . One emU s 2 0 0 5 / 0 2 4 0 2 1 7A 1 O c t 2 7 , 2 0 0 5 c l a i m e ds u b j e c t m a t t e ri n c l u d e s at o u r n i q

    i n g a b a s e , a c a p d i s p o s e do n s a i d b a s e , a s t r( 5 1 ) I n t , C l , end and one end a t t a c h e d t o s a i d b a s e , a

    A61B 7 / 0 0 (200601) s a i d b a s e , ah a n d l e W i t han p e r t u r et o a c c o

    g g

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:36

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    36/64

    US. P a t e n t A u g .1 7 ,2 0 1 0 S h e e t1 o f 2 U S 7 ,

    g g

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:37

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    37/64

    U S 7 ,

    1 0

    S h e e t 2 0 f 2u g . 1 7 ,2 0 1 0. P a t e n t

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    38/64

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:39

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    39/64

    U S 7 , 7 7 6 , 0 6 4B23

    b i n g B and Webbing C a n e a c h b e c o n s t r u c t e do f s c u b aWebbing a n d a d d i t i o n a l l y , e a c h s e c t i o n o f b a s e 1 2 c a n b el e n g t h e n e d ,s h o r t e n e d ,n a r r o W e do r W i d e n e d .A d d i t i o n a lp a d

    d i n gc a n a l s o be added o b a s e 1 2 , o r i n d i v i d u a l l yt o s e c t i o n A ,Webbing B r Webbing C . One o r m o r e a d h e s i v es t r i p sm a ya l s o b e u sed o b o n d one o r m o r e o f h e s e s e c t i o n s o f base 1 2 .

    I n t h i se m b o d i m e n t ,c a p F s p o s i t i o n e da n da t t a c h e dt o t h et o p o f b a s e 1 2 . Cap F m a i n t a i n st h e s t r a pH n p r o x i m i t yt o t h eb a s e 12 and a s s u c h m a i n t a i n s s t r a p H n ? a t o r i e n t a t i o n i nr e l a t i o n t ob a s e 1 2 . Cap F s a 2 i n c hby 2 i n c h s e c t i o no f y l o ns c u b a Webbing seWn on t o b a s e 1 2 a l o n gt h e tWo e d g e s o ro u t e r s i d e s o f Webbing B . Cap F can l s o b e m a d e o f a p l a s t i cs l e e v e , o r a c o m b i n a t i o n o fp l a s t i c and p o l y p r o p y l e n eWe bb i n g Which c a n b eu s e dt o i n c r e a s et h e r i g i d i t y o f c a p F . CapF can a l s o b e b o n d e d o r attached i n any s u i t a b l e m a n n e r t ob a s e 1 2 . Cap F h e l p s m a i n t a i nt h e f o r mo f s t r a pH hen t r a pH s b e i n g t i g h t e n e da n d i t a l s oh e l p s p r e v e n tt Wi s t i n go f t h es t r a pH e f o r e s t r a pH s t i g h t e n e da r o u n dt h e t o p o f b a s e 1 2 .Cap F m a i n t a i n st h e f o r mo f s t r a pH y W o r k i n gi nc o n j u n ct i o n With base 12 a c t i n g a s a r i g i d s l e e v e o r a sandWich i nWhich t r a pH ust a s s t h r o u g hb e f o r emaking c o n t a c tW i t ht h e l i m b .

    I n t h i se m b o d i m e n t ,c a p F a l s o p r o v i d e sa p o i n t o f a t t a c hment o rt h e s e c o n dl o c k i n gr i n g W i t h o u ti n t e r f e r i n gW i t ht h e

    20

    4can range f r o m 1 i n c h i n Width t o 2 . 5 i n c ha l s o b e l o n g e r o r s h o r t e r t h a n 4 6 i n c h e sm a t e r i a l i t i s m a d e o f c a n b e n y l o n W

    p o l y p r o p y l e n e .One n d o f s t r a pH s r o u t er e l e a s eb u c k l eand t t a c h e dt o b a s e 1 2 . I n t hm e n t , S t r a p H s seWn t o b a s e 1 2 . The f r e e? r s t r o u t e dt h r o u g hr i n g K n d a t t a c h e dt op o i n t o f a t t a c h m e n tt o b a s e 1 2 , t h e f r e e e nr o u t e dt h r o u g ht h e a p e r t u r ei n h a n d l eGi t s e l ff o r m i n ga s m a l l l o o p t h a th o l d s t h eW i t hs t r a pH . T h i s l o o pi s d e s i g n e dt op r o vt h a t t W i s t i n ghandle G oes o t cause baseOnce s t r a pH s p o s i t i o n e d t o h o l d h a nthrough t h e a r e a above b a s e 12 and beloWo t h e r end e m a i n sf r e e t o u s e by h e u s e r t oq u i c k r e l e a s e b u c k l e D n o r d e r t o t i g ha r t i c l e1 0 . S t r a p H a n a l s o be s e c u r e dd i r e ca t a ? r s t p o i n t upstream f r o m h a n d l eG nddoWns t ream f rom h a n d l e G ,W i t h an a l l or u n t h r o u g h ha n d l e G .

    A s shoWn n FIGS. 1 and , r i n g s K ndp r e s e n tembodiment o s e c u r es t r a p H o b ar i n g n e e d s t o be s e d . The r i n g s a r e usedp l a c e When t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e1 0 i s i n u s

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:40

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    40/64

    U S 7 , 7 7 6 , 0 6 4B25

    b l e e d i n gi s c o n t r o l l e dand h e nh a n d l eG s l a t c h e di n t o one o rb o t h r i n g s K nd . I t i sn o t n e c e s s a r yt o l a t c h b o t h e n d so f h eh a n d l e G .T h e a p screW E o c a t e do n quick e l e a s e b u c k l eD

    i s t h e n t i g h t e n e d t o h e l p p r e v e n ta c c i d e n t a l l o o s e n i n g ,a n df u r t h e r m e d i c a lt r e a t m e n ti s s o u g h t .

    While t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o nh a s b e e n i l l u s t r a t e dandd e s c r i b e dby means o f s p e c i ? ce m b o d i m e n t s a n dl t e r n a t i v e s ,i t i s t o be u n d e r s t o o dt h a t numerous c h a n g e sand m o d i ? c at i o n s c a nb e m a d e i t h o u t d e p a r t i n gf rom h e s p i r i tand s c o p eo f t h e i n v e n t i o n . T h e r e f o r e ,i t s h o u l db e u n d e r s t o o dt h a t t h ei n v e n t i o ni s n o t t o be i m i t e di n any Wa y x c e p ti n a c c o r d a n c eW i t ht h e a p p e n d e dc l a i m sa n dt h e i re q u i v a l e n t s .

    W h a t s c l a i m e di s :

    1 .A o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l ec o m p r i s i n g :A u b s t a n t i a l l y r i g i db a s e ;a h a n d l e ; anda s t r a p i nc o m m u n i c a t i o nW i t hs a i d h a n d l e , t h es t r a pb e i n g

    engaged i t h s a i d b a s e a ta ? r s t p o i n tup t r e a mf rom s a i dh a n d l eand ? x e d l ya t t a c h e dt o s a i d b a s e a t a s e c o n d p o i n tdoWnst ream f r om s a i d h a n d l e s u c ht h a t s a i d h a n d l e i sm a i n t a i n e di n a p o s i t io n r e l a t i v e t o s a i d s u b s t a n t i a l l yr i g i d b a s e t o r e d u c e b i n d i n go f s a i d b a s e When s a i dh a n d l ei s t W i s t e d ,h h d l i d l d h d d

    5

    20

    61 1 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 f

    b u c k l ec o n n e c t e dt o s a i d s u b s t a n t i a l l yr i gb e i n g a d a p t e dt oe n g a g es a i d s t r a pt o s e c u ra d e p l o y e da r r a n g e m e n t ,s a i d b u c k l e b e i nscreW t o secure s a i d s t r a p t o s a i d b a s e .

    1 2 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 Wi n c l u d e s a n a p e r t u r ed i s p o s e di n t h e c e n ts t r a pi s t h r e a d e dt h r o u g hs a i d a p e r t u r e

    1 3 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 Wi n c l u d e smeans f o r h o l d i n gs a i d t o u r n i q u ef a c i l i t a t eu s e r a p p l i c a t i o no f s a i d t o u r n i qh a n d .

    1 4 .A o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l ec o m p r i s i n g :a n e l o n g a t e dh a n d l e ;

    a s u b s t a n t i a l l y r i g i db a s e ;a s t r a p d i s p o s e d c o n t i g u o u st o s a i d b a s

    c a t i o n W i t h s a i d h a n d l e ; a n da s t r u c t u r a l m e m b e r h a v i n g ? r s t and

    s t r u c t u r a lm e m b e r e i n g ? x e d l ya t t al e a s ta t ? r s t and s e c o n dp o i n t s a l o n ges e c o n ds i d e s ,s a i d s t r a pb e i n g s a n dl e a s tp o r t i o n o f s a i d s t r u c t u r a lm e m bm i n i m i z et Wi s t i n go f s a i d s t r a p .

    1 5 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 4 W

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:41

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    41/64

    UNITED S TAT E S PATENT AND TRADEMARK F F I C E

    CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION

    PATENT O. : 7 , 7 7 6 , 0 6 4B 2APPLICATION O. : 10/830144

    DATED : A u g u s t1 7 ,2 0 1 0I N V E N T O R ( S ) : J e n n i f e rJ o h n s o na n d R o s s J o h n s o n

    I t i s c e r t i f i e dt h a t e r r o r appears i n t h e a b o v e - i d e n t i f i e dp a t e n t and t h a t s a i d L e t t e r s P a t e n t i s h e r e b y c o r r e c

    I n t h e c o v e rp a g e , i t e m [ 7 ] t h e f i r s ti n v e n t o r J o h n s o nJ e n n i f e r s ho u l d r e a d- - J e n n i f es e c o n di n v e n t o r J o h n s o n R o s s s h o u l dr e a d - - R o s sJ o h n s o n - - .

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:42

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    42/64

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:43

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    43/64

    1 2 )U n i t e d States D e s i g n Patent 1 0 )P a t e n tN 0 . :

    U S O 0 D 6 4 9 6 4 2 S

    U SJohnson ( 4 5 )D a t e o f P a t e n t : 1 1 * N

    (54 ) TOURNIQUET HANDLE 6 , 8 9 9 , 7 2 0 B1* 5/2005 M c M i l l a n . .D516,901 s * 3 / 2 0 0 6 Murray . . . . . . .D 5 2 7 , 9 8 1 S * 9/2006 S t

    ( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r : Ross Johnson, Anderson, SC US) 1 3 5 4 5 6 6 3S * 7 / 2 0 0 7 S i t s _ _ _ _ D592,484 s * 5/2009 Ricereto . . . . . .

    ( 7 3 ) A s s 1 g n e e : T a c t i c a l Medica l S o l u t i o n s ,I n c . , 7 , 7 7 6 , 0 6 4 B2 8 / 2 0 1 0 J e n n i f e re r a 1A n d e r s o n ,NC U S ) 7 , 8 4 2 , 0 6 7 B2* 1 1 / 2 0 1 0 E s p o s i t o

    2007/0005107 A1 1 / 2 0 0 7 J a n o t a . . . . . . . . .

    * * 2 0 0 9 / 0 0 2 4 1 5 9 A1* 1 / 2 0 0 9 Nee t a l .( ) Te r m 1 4 Years 2010/0137900 A 1 * 6 /2010 C 1 1 3 0. . . . . . . .

    ( 2 1 ) A p p l .N 0 . : 2 9 / 3 6 7 , 9 1 2 O T H E RPUBLICATION

    ( 2 2 ) F i l e d : Aug 6 2 0 1 0 G o o g l eI m a g eR e s u l tf o rh t t p : / / c h b - t e c h S 0 p s t - 0 2 G . j p g .1 p a g e . Vi e w e d o n D e c . 2 0 , 201

    R e l a t e dU S . p p l i c a t i o nD a t a * C i t e dby e x a m i n e r

    ( 6 3 ) Continuation of a p p l i c a t i o nN o . 1 0 / 830,144 , ? l e d o n _ _A p r . 2 1 , 2 0 0 4 , n o w a t . No. 7 , 7 7 6 , 0 6 4 . Prlmary E x a m m e an a y m o n

    ( 5 1 ) LOC 9 ) Cl 2 4 _ 0 2 ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y ,A g e n t , o r Fi rm ahn

    ( 5 2 ) US. l . . . . . . . . D 2 4 / 1 4 3 ; D 2 4 / 1 6 9 ( 5 7 ) CLAIM( 5 8 ) F i e l d o f Classi?cation Sea rch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D 2 4 / 4 3 , T h e Ornamental d e s i g nf o r a t o u r n i q u e t h a

    D 2 4 / 1 3 3 ,1 4 7 , 1 6 9 , 1 8 8 ;6 0 6 / 2 0 3 ,2 0 1 , 2 0 2 , d e s c r i b e d

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:44

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    44/64

    US. P a t e n t N o v .2 9 ,2 0 1 1 S h e e t1 0 1 2 US

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:45

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    45/64

    US. P a t e n t N o v .2 9 ,2 0 1 1 S h e e t2 o f 2 US

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:46

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    46/64

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:47

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    47/64

    US008303620B2

    1 2 )U n i t e d Sta tes P a t e n t 1 0 )P a t e n tN 0 . 2 U S 8 ,( 4 5 )Date o f P a t e n t *ohnson e t a l .

    ( 5 4 ) TORNIQUET RT I C L E ( 5 8 ) F i e l d o f C l a s s i ? c a t i o nS e a r c h

    S e ea p p l i c a t i o n? l e f o rc o m p l e t es e7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s : J e n n i f e r L . J o h n s o n ,A n d e r s o n ,SC

    ( 5 6 ) R e f e r e n c e s Ci t e dU S ) ;R o s s J o h n s o n ,A n d e r s o n ,SC ( U S )

    ( 7 3 ) A s s i g n e e : Ta c t i c a lM e d i c a lS o l u t i o n s ,I n c . , U S . PATENT DOCUMENTS

    n,mkmM 1mrrBM503010000222///5002

    1

    2BBA00452617 0 296978 7 067WSfo dmgh5.]rm m. m)

    Si m1mSmmiae m. 1m* ) N o t i c e :

    * c i t e d b y examiner. S . C . 1 5 4 ( b )b y 0 d a y s .T h i s p a t e n t i s s u b j e c t t o a t e r m i n a l d i sc l a i m e r .

    P r i m a r y E x a m i n e r i c t o r N g u y e n

    ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y ,A g e n t ,o r Fi rm ahn

    ( 5 7 ) A B S T R A C TThe r e s e n t i n v e n t i o nr e l a t e sg e n e r a l l yt o ?m o r e s p e c i ? c a l l y t o u m i q u e t s . One em

    ( 2 1 ) A p p 1 . N o . :1 2 / 8 4 1 , 4 7 5

    ( 2 2 ) F i l e d : J u l .2 2 , 2 0 1 0_ _ _ c l a i m e d subject m a t t e r i nc ludes a tourn ique

    ( 6 5 ) Pnor P u b h c a t l o nData s u b s t a n t i a l l yr i g i db a s e . A a n d l ei s p r o v iUS 011/0178546 A 1 J u l 2 1 2011 ? r s t and s e c o n de n d sand s l o td i s p o s e dbe

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:48

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    48/64

    US. P a t e n t N o v .6 ,2 0 1 2 S h e e t1 o f 2 US ,

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:49

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    49/64

    U . P a t e n t N o v .6 ,2 0 1 2 S h e e t2 o f 2 U S 8 ,

    3 0

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:50

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    50/64

    U S 8 , 3 0 3 , 6 2 0B21

    TORNIQUET RT I C L E

    CROSS-REFERENCES TO OTHER RELATED

    PATENT APPLICATIONS

    T h i s a p p l i c a t i o ni s a c o n t i n u a t i o no f a p p l i c a t i o nS e r .N o .1 0 / 8 3 0 ,1 4 4 ? l e dA p r . 2 1 ,2 0 0 4 , noW l l o w e d ,W h i c hi s i n c o rp o r a t e dh e r e i nb y r e f e r e n c e .

    STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLYSPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

    N o tA p p l i c a b l e .

    R E F E R E N C E T OSEQUENCE ISTING, ATA B L E , OR A COMPUTER PROGRAM I S T I N G

    COMPACT DISK APPENDIX

    N o tA p p l i c a b l e .

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

    1 . F i e l d o f t h e I n v e n t i o nThe p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o nr e l a t e s t o m e d i c a ld e v i c e s u s e d i n

    1 5

    20

    2I n s t i l la n o t h e r embodiment o f t h e i n v

    a r t i c l ei n c l u d e s a h a n d l e h a v i n g? r s t andh a v i n g a s l o td i s p o s e dbetWeen t h e ? r s t a

    s u b s t a n t i a l l y r i g i db a s e u n d e r l y i n gt h eh a nu r e d t o b e t i g h t e n e da b o u t a n i n j u r e d l i mh a n d l e , t h es t r a pb e i n g e n g a g e dW i t ht h ehe n g a g e dW i t h t h e s u b s t a n t i a l l y r i gb a s eu p s t r e a mf rom s a i d h a n d l ea n d i i ) a t a s es t r e a mf r o mt h e h a n d l e s u c ht h a ts a i d s u b si s m a i n t a i n e di nu n d e r l y i n gr e l a t i o n s h i pt or e d u c i n g b i n d i n go f t h e s u b s t a n t i a l lr ih a n d l e i s t W i s t e d ; and a means f o r l o c kp l a c e .

    H a v i n gt h u s d e s c r i b e de m b o d i m e n t so f

    t i o n ,i t i s t h e p r i n c i p a l o b j e c to f t h e p rp r o v i d ean improved t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e t h al i m b u s i n go n ehand o p l a c eand s e c u r e t h

    B R I E F DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVVIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

    The b o v e a n do t h e r o b j e c t s ,a d v a n t a g ep r e s e n t i n v e n t i o nW i l l b e m o r e r e a d i l y af o l l o W i n gd e s c r i p t i o n ,When r e a d i n c o n

    h

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:51

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    51/64

    U S 8 , 3 0 3 , 6 2 0B23

    W i t ht h e u s e o f t h e t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e1 0 . Sect ionA l s o h e l p st h e u s e r i n a p p l y i n gt o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e1 0 b y h o l d i n g t h et o u r n i q u e ti n p l a c e a n d a l l o w i n gt h e u s e r t o a p p l ya r t i c l e1 0

    Wi t h o n e hand.Webbing C s a t t a c h e dt o t h e u p p e rf a c i n g s i d e o f WebbingB a b o u t 2 i n d i s t a n c e f r o m t h e end o f t h e Webbing B b a s ep o s i t i o n e db e n e a t ht h e h a n d l e G .S c u b a n y l o nW e b b i n gi su s e df o r Webbing C n t h e p r e s e n tembodiment o i n c r e a s e t h er i g i d i t yo f t h e b a s e 1 2 a n d t o p r e v e n tb i n d i n go r c r u s h i n go fb a s e 12 W h e n h a n d l e G s t W i s t e d o r t u r n e d . I n a n o t h e re m b o d i m e n t ,s e v e r a l s e c t i o n s o f s c u b aWebbing c a n a l s o b eused t o g e t h e r a s Webbing C n s t e a d o n one s e c t i o n , and t h i sc a n f u r t h e r f a c i l i t a t et h e n e e d s o fr i g i d i t yW h i l e s t i l lb e i n g? e x i b l e enough f o r u s e W i t h a l i m b i n a d d i t i o n t o m a k i n g

    a r t i c l e 1 0 e a s i e r t o s t o r e and c a r r y. Ve l c r o s e c t i o nA , We bb i n g B and Webbing C a n e a c h b e c o n s t r u c t e do f s c u b aWebbing a n d a d d i t i o n a l l y , e a c h s e c t i o n o f b a s e 1 2 c a nb el e n g t h e n e d ,s h o r t e n e d ,n a r r o W e do r W i d e n e d .A d d i t i o n a lp a dd i n gc a n a l s o be added o b a s e 1 2 , o r i n d i v i d u a l l yt o s e c t i o n A ,Webbing B r Webbing C . One o r m o r e a d h e s i v es t r i p sm a ya l s o b e u sed o b o n d one o r m o r e o f h e s e s e c t i o n s of base 1 2 .

    I n t h i se m b o d i m e n t ,c a p F s p o s i t i o n e da n da t t a c h e dt o t h et o p o f b a s e 1 2 . Cap F m a i n t a i n st h e s t r a pH n p r o x i m i t yt o t h eb a s e 12 and a s s u c h m a i n t a i n s s t r a p H n ? a t o r i e n t a t i o n i n

    20

    4and t can l s o be d i f f e r e n t s i Z eand i m e nscreW t h r e a d s i n t o t h e t o p o f h e buckle andt h e b a s e o f t h e b u c k l e .W h e n e n g a g e d ,B

    a c c i d e n t a ll o o s e n i n go f t h e t o u r n i q u e ts ha c c i d e n t a l l ybumped o r moved W h i l e t ht r a n s p o r t e d . F u r t h e r , c a p s c r e WB a n be umovement o f t h e s t r a pH . I n t h i se m b o d iscreW B s p o s i t i o n e di n t h e t o p o f cap P s ot o t i g h t e n t h e s c r e Wd o W n t h e s t r a p H us t r a p H g a i n s t u n i n t e n d e dl o o s e n i n g .Cap5 / 8 s o c k e thead cap s c r e W,b u t i t can be anyl e n g t h .

    S t r a pH s made o f 1 6 p o i n th e a v y WeWebbing h a t i s 1 i n c h i n W i d t hand 4 6 i n c h

    a l s o b e m a d e o f any s u i t a b l e s i Z e o r m a t e r ican range f r o m 1 i n c h i n Width o 2 and / 2c a n a l s o be o n g e ro r s h o r t e r t h a n 4 6 i n c h em a t e r i a l i t i s m a d e o f c a n b e n y l o n Wp o l y p r o p y l e n e .One n d o fs t r a pH s r o u t er e l e a s eb u c k l eand t t a c h e dt o b a s e 1 2 . I n t hm e n t , S t r a p H s seWn t o b a s e 1 2 . The f r e e? r s t r o u t e dt h r o u g hr i n g K n d a t t a c h e dt op o i n t o f a t t a c h m e n tt o b a s e 1 2 , t h e f r e e e nr o u t e dt h r o u g ht h e a p e r t u r ei n h a n d l eG

    l f h

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:52

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    52/64

    U S 8 , 3 0 3 , 6 2 0B25

    widened o g i v e a g r e a t e r t i s s u e a r e a a l l o w i n gl e s s p r e s s u r et obe used o a c h i e v e h e m o st a s i s .

    I n i t i a l l y ,t o u r n i q u e t a r t i c l e1 0 s h o u l d b e b r o k e ni n b y

    a p p l y i n ga r t i c l e1 0 t o a s o l i d o b j e c t a n dt i g h t e n i n g t h eh a n d l etWo t o t h r e e t i m e s t o l o o s e n t h e W e b b i n g .T h i s b r e a k i n gi nf a c i l i t a t e s l a t e r one handed s e . A r t i c l e 1 0 s s t o r e d i n a b a g o rp o u c hW i t hs t r a pH u n n i n gt h r o u g hb u c k l eD n d s a f e t yc a ps c r e WE l i g h t l yl o o s e n e d .T o d e p l o yt o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e1 0 i na s i t u a t i o nWhere one i m b i s d i s a b l e d , s t r a p H s g r a s p e dW i t ht h e u n i n j u r e da r m and t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e1 0 i s s l i do v e r t h ei n j u r e d e x t r e m i t y. S t r a p H s p u l l e da s q u i c k l ya s p o s s i b l e t or e m o v e e x c e s s s l a c k i n s t r a p H nd o i n i t i a l l yt i g h t e n a r t i c l e1 0 a r o u n dt h e i n j u r e d l i m b . H a n d l eG s t W i s t e d u n t i lt h eb l e e d i n gi s c o n t r o l l e dand h e n ha n d l eG s l a t c h e di n t o one o r

    b o t h r i n g s K nd . I t i sn o t n e c e s s a r yt o l a t c h b o t h e n d s o f h eh a n d l e G .T h e a p screW E o c a t e do n quick e l e a s e b u c k l eDi s t h e n t i g h t e n e d t o h e l p p r e v e n ta c c i d e n t a l l o o s e n i n g , a n df u r t h e r m e d i c a lt r e a t m e n ti s s o u g h t .

    While t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o nh a s b e e n i l l u s t r a t e dandd e s c r i b e dby means o f s p e c i ? ce m b o d i m e n t s a n dl t e r n a t i v e s ,i t i s t o be u n d e r s t o o dt h a t numerous c h a n g e sand m o d i ? c at i o n s c a nb e m a d e i t h o u t d e p a r t i n gf rom h e s p i r i tand s c o p eo f t h e i n v e n t i o n . T h e r e f o r e ,i t s h o u l db e u n d e r s t o o dt h a t t h ei n v e n t i o ni s n o t t o be i m i t e di n any Wa y x c e p ti n a c c o r d a n c e

    h i

    20

    62 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 f u

    l o c k i n gr i n g a t t a c h e dt o s a i d s t r u c t u r a lm e3 . The o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e of l a i m 2 Whe

    t h e ? r s t and s e c o n de n d s o f s a i d h a n d l e is e c t i o n c o n ? g u r e dt o e n g a g eW i t h s a i d l o c

    4 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 f ul o c k i n g r i n g o p e r a t i v e l y a s s o c i a t e d W i tWherein t l e a s t one of h e ? r s t and secondi n c l u d e s a l a t c h i n g s e c t io nt h a te n g a g e ss a

    5 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 W ht i a l l yr i g i db a s e i n c l u d e s ahook a n d l o o p

    6 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 W ht i a l l yr i g i db a s e i n c l u d e s a n o n - s l i pf a b r i

    7 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 W ht i a l l yr i g i db a s e i n c l u d e sm e a n sf o r p r e v e ns u b s t a n t i a l l yr i g i db a s e When s a i d h a n d l e

    8 . A o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l ec o m p r i s i n g :a h a n d l e h a v i n g ? r s t and s e c o n de n d s

    d i s p o s e di n a c e n t e r o f s a i d h a n d l e ,r o t a t a b l eW i t hr e s p e c tt o a s u b s t a n t i a

    t h es u b s t a n t i a l l yr i g i db a s e u n d e r l y i n gsa s t r a pc o n ? g u r e dt o b e t i g h t e n e da b o u t

    t W i s t i n gs a i dh a n d l e ,s a i ds t r a pb e i n gh a n d l e da n db e i n ge n g a g e dW i t hs a ib a s e a t i ) a ? r s t p o i n t u p s t r e a mf r o m

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-4 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:53

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    53/64

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-4 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:54

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    54/64

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:55

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    55/64

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:56

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    56/64

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:57

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    57/64

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-6 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:58

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    58/64

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-6 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:59

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    59/64

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-6 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:60

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    60/64

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-7 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:61

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    61/64

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    62/64

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-8 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:63

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    63/64

    Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-8 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:64

  • 8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint

    64/64