Upload
sarah-burstein
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
1/64
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
TACTICAL MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. ))
Plaintiff ) Civil Action No.)
vs. ))
DR. RONALD KARL, EMI EMERGENCY )MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL A/K/A )EMERGENCY MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS, )
AND Copquest, Inc. ))
Defendants ))
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 33 PageID #:1
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
2/64
PARTIES
2. Tactical Medical Solutions, Inc. (TMS) is a Corporation organized and e
under the laws of the State of South Carolina, with its principal place of business a
North Park Drive, Andersen, South Carolina 29625.
3. Defendant Ronald Karl purports to be the President and CEO of EMI. Mr.
believed to reside at 42 W. 550 Hawk Circle, St. Charles, Illinois.
4. Defendant EMI purports to be a company with a place of business at 44 W
Rte. 64, Lily Lake, Illinois 60151. See http://emiinternational.net/ . Howeve
reasonably diligent search, no corporate registration for EMI has been located.
f d l f b l d b d
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 33 PageID #:2
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
3/64
9. Upon information and belief, Defendants Karl and EMI each have a place
business in this judicial district.
10. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), (c) a
1400(b) since it is the judicial district in which Defendants conduct continuous and
systematic business, advertise, and have caused the injuries complained of herein.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. TMS and It s Products
11. TMS is a veteran-owned small business that designs and sells a var
products for first responders, emergency medical personnel, law enforcement and
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 3 of 33 PageID #:3
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
4/64
resellers and suppliers to maintain the highest levels of integrity in their marketing
sales efforts.
15. Throughout its existence, TMS has continuously and actively prom
itself, its products, and its services through various channels in the trade including
notably, the ongoing production and distribution of product catalogs, ongoing use
website, ongoing promotion through distributors and resellers, and by regularly
attending industry trade shows. TMS also enjoys substantial word-of-mouth mark
from its many satisfied customers. As a result of its programs and efforts, over th
decade, TMS has established very substantial goodwill and a correspondingly
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 4 of 33 PageID #:4
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
5/64
20. The TMS Tourniquet was tested by the United States Army Institut
Surgical Research and found to be 100% effective on both upper and lower extrem
B. TMS Patents
21. On August 17, 2010, United States Patent No. 7,776,064 B2 (the
patent), entitled Tourniquet Article, was duly and legally issued by the United S
Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the 064 patent is attached hereto as Exh
22. TMS is the owner of the 064 patent by assignment.
23. TMS provides notice of the 064 patent in accordance with 35 U.S.
287.
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 5 of 33 PageID #:5
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
6/64
30. TMS, which is commonly referred to in the trade as TACMED, is a
nationally and internationally known manufacturer and distributor of a wide range
products particularly in the emergency medical service (EMS), first responder and
military medical fields. TMS promotes and sells its products in a variety of ways,
including but not limited to directly through its website at www.tacmedsoluti
through booths at trade shows, and through government contracts. TMS also uses
network of national and international resellers and distributors to actively promote
sell its products.
31. At a minimum, since before 2009, TMS has consistently and contin
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 6 of 33 PageID #:6
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
7/64
individual users alike. The TMS Tourniquet is characterized by a unique, non-fun
overall look and feel including a distinct handle design featuring an elongated cyli
rod having two ends in the shape of truncated cones and having a knurled interme
section, a base and strap having a woven look and texture and a label disposed on
underside of the strap proximate to an end (the TMS Trade Dress). The look an
of the TMS Tourniquet is unique and serves to immediately identify the tournique
coming from just one source.
34. Since its inception, TMS has sold over 1.25 million tourniquets to
customers worldwide.
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 7 of 33 PageID #:7
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
8/64
police-use-new-survival-kits-in-field , and http://www.kristv.com/news/officers
in-shootout-in-good-spirits-/ .
39. The TMS Tourniquet was worn by Mark Wahlbergs character and
others in the feature film entitled Lone Survivors.
40. The TMS Trade Dress is non-functional.
41. The TMS Trade Dress distinguishes the TMS Tourniquet from its
competition.
42. The TMS Trade Dress is unique and has acquired secondary meanin
that tourniquet users and purchasers, when seeing tourniquets bearing the TMS Tr
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 8 of 33 PageID #:8
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
9/64
45. The foregoing photograph constitutes an original work of authorship w
is the subject of United States Copyright Registration No. Vau 1-161-333. A true and
correct copy of the registration certificate is attached hereto as Exhibit D.
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 9 of 33 PageID #:9
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
10/64
F. Defendants Karl and EMI
48. Upon information and belief, Defendants Karl and EMI (hereinaftereferred to collectively as the Karl Defendants) design, manufacture, advertise,
promote, distribute, sell and/or offer for sale products for EMS, fire and police
professionals.
49. Upon information and belief, long subsequent to adoption of the TA
mark and trade name by TMS and without TMS consent, the Karl Defendants
intentionally adopted, and began prominent use of the TACMED mark on or in
connection with a line of products in direct competition with TMS. Among the pr
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 10 of 33 PageID #:10
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
11/64
55. The Karl Defendants advertise, promote, sell and/or distribute their
products to a similar class of customers as TMS, including Internet resellers anddistributors.
56. Relevant consumers are highly likely to be confused as to the sourc
sponsorship, or affiliation of the Karl Defendants products due to the similarity be
the products offered by the Karl Defendants and TMS and due to the similarity be
TMS TACMED trade name and mark and the Karl Defendants TACMED mark.
57. Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of a two pages downloaded from
EMI website. Exhibit F incorporates and displays multiple copies of the Tourniqu
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 11 of 33 PageID #:11
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
12/64
EMI TACMED Law Enforcement Combat Gunshot Trauma Kit, EMI TACMED R
Packs Complete Kit, and EMI TACMED Response Kit Complete.61. Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of a page downloaded from
Copquests website (www.copquest.com). Exhibit G displays a web page that
incorporates a copy of the Tourniquet Photo and the Camouflage Photo.
62. Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of a shopping cart web page
downloaded from Copquests website. Exhibit H includes a copy of the Tourniqu
Photo falsely identified as the knock off T.a.t. tourniquet.
63. By displaying photographs of the TMS tourniquet on its website, C
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 12 of 33 PageID #:12
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
13/64
66. Defendants infringement has been, and continues to be, deliberate,
and knowing.67. By reason of the acts and practices of Defendants, they have caused
causing and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by the Court, will continu
cause, immediate and irreparable harm to TMS, for which there is no adequate rem
at law and for which TMS is entitled to injunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. 283.
68. As a direct and proximate consequence of the acts and practices of
Defendants, TMS has also been, is being, and unless such acts and practices are
enjoined by the Court, will continue to be injured in its business, and property righ
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 13 of 33 PageID #:13
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
14/64
are thus liable for infringement of the 620 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(a).
72. Defendants infringement has been, and continues to be, deliberate,and knowing.
73. By reason of the acts and practices of Defendants, they have caused
causing and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by the Court, will continu
cause, immediate and irreparable harm to TMS, for which there is no adequate rem
at law and for which TMS is entitled to injunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. 283.
74. As a direct and proximate consequence of the acts and practices of
Defendants, TMS has also been, is being, and unless such acts and practices are
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 14 of 33 PageID #:14
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
15/64
Tourniquet. See the chart below.
TMS Tourniquet T.a.t. Tourniquet
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 15 of 33 PageID #:15
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
16/64
that it should have been known to Defendants. Defendants infringement of the 6
Patent has been willful, deliberate and objectively reckless.83. By reason of the acts and practices of Defendants, they have caused
causing and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by the Court, will continu
cause, immediate and irreparable harm to TMS, for which there is no adequate rem
at law and for which TMS is entitled to injunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. 283.
84. Defendants infringement of the 642 Patent has injured TMS and T
entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate it for such infringement, but i
event less than a reasonable royalty, as permitted under 35 U.S.C. 284, as well a
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 16 of 33 PageID #:16
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
17/64
91. Defendants sales and marketing of T.a.t. tourniquets is likely to cau
confusion among consumers.92. Defendants actions constitute trade dress infringement in violation
Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a). TMS has been and will continue to be injured as
result of Defendants conduct. TMS has no adequate remedy at law for these inju
Unless Defendants are restrained by this Court from continuing to infringe the TM
trade dress, these injuries will continue.
COUNT V FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)(TACMED Mark)(All Defendants)
93. TMS realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contain
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 17 of 33 PageID #:17
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
18/64
injury and damage will continue unless and until Defendants are enjoined by this C
Accordingly, TMS is entitled to an injunction under 15 U.S.C. 1116, prohibitingDefendants from further actions in violation of the Lanham Act.
96. Defendants use of a mark confusingly similar to TMS TACMED
and trade name was and is willful, knowing, malicious and/or intentional, thereby
making this case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. 1117(a).
COUNT VI UNFAIR COMPETITION ILLINOIS COMMON LAW(TACMED Mark)(All Defendants)
97. TMS realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contain
paragraphs 1through 96.
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 18 of 33 PageID #:18
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
19/64
102. Defendants unfair competition was and is willful, knowing, malici
and/or intentional.103. TMS does not have a fully adequate remedy at law.
104. Defendants acts complained of herein constitute unfair competition
deceptive trade practices under Illinois common law.
105. Defendants use of a mark confusingly similar to TMS TACMED
trade name was and is willful, knowing, malicious and/or intentional.
COUNT VII COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT(Tourniquet Photo)(All Defendants)
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 19 of 33 PageID #:19
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
20/64
111. Defendants knowingly, deliberately and willingly use the Tourniqu
on their respective websites and in their marketing materials to sell the knock off Ttourniquet in direct competition with TMS, thereby causing TMS monetary and ot
damages.
112. TMS is entitled to recover from Defendants the damages TMS has
sustained and will sustain, and any gains, profits and advantages obtained by
Defendants as a result of Defendants acts alleged herein pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 5
113. TMS is also entitled to an injunction prohibiting Defendants from fu
infringement of the Tourniquet Photo pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 502.
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 20 of 33 PageID #:20
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
21/64
119. Defendants use of the Tourniquet Photo is material to consumers
purchasing decisions.120. Upon information and belief, Defendants misrepresentations have
and will continue to cause immediate and irreparable injury and damage to TMS.
has no adequate remedy at law for these injuries. Such immediate and irreparable
injury and damage will continue unless and until Defendants are enjoined by this C Accordingly, TMS is entitled to an injunction under 15 U.S.C. 1116, prohibiting
Defendants form further actions in violation of the Lanham Act.
121. Defendants false and/or misleading descriptions and/or representat
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 21 of 33 PageID #:21
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
22/64
125. Defendants marketing and false and/or misleading descriptions and
representations regarding the T.a.t. tourniquet exemplified by use of the TourniquePhoto as described herein is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to
deceive as to the origin, sponsorship and/or approval of the T.a.t. tourniquet by TM
126. As a result of Defendants conduct, TMS has suffered and will cont
suffer monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial, and damage to TMgoodwill causing serious and irreparable injury to TMS, its products and its reputa
for which TMS has no adequate remedy at law.
127. Defendants marketing and use of the Tourniquet Photo and Defend
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 22 of 33 PageID #:22
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
23/64
130. Defendants acts complained of herein constitute unfair competition
deceptive trade practices under 815 ILCS 510 also because Defendants have usedeceptive representations in connection with the T.a.t. tourniquet and have engage
other conduct which creates a likelihood of confusion or misunderstanding.
131. As a consequence of Defendants acts of unfair competition as set f
herein, TMS has suffered and will continue to suffer monetary damages in an amobe determined at trial.
132. Defendants have profited from Defendants unfair competition as s
herein.
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 23 of 33 PageID #:23
l d f
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
24/64
137. Defendants acts complained of herein constitute unfair competition
deceptive trade practices under Illinois common law also because Defendants have
used deceptive representations in connection with the T.a.t. tourniquet and have
engaged in other conduct which creates a likelihood of confusion or misunderstan
138. As a consequence of the Defendants acts of unfair competition as s
forth herein, TMS has suffered and will continue to suffer monetary damages in anamount to be determined at trial.
139. Defendants have profited from Defendants unfair competition as s
herein.
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 24 of 33 PageID #:24
C 1 14 06035 D # 1 Fil d 08/06/14 P 25 f 33 P ID # 25
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
25/64
146. Defendant Copquests use of the Camouflage Photo as described he
misrepresents the nature, characteristics, and/or qualities, of the T.a.t. tourniquet.
147. Defendant Copquests use of the Camouflage Photo is material to
consumers purchasing decisions.
148. Upon information and belief, Defendant Copquests misrepresentati
have injured and will continue to cause immediate and irreparable injury and damTMS. TMS has no adequate remedy at law for these injuries. Such immediate an
irreparable injury and damage will continue unless and until Defendant Copquest i
enjoined by this Court. Accordingly, TMS is entitled to an injunction under 15 U
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 25 of 33 PageID #:25
C 1 14 06035 D t # 1 Fil d 08/06/14 P 26 f 33 P ID # 26
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
26/64
Camouflage Photo as described herein is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mis
or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection and/or association of the source of th
T.a.t. tourniquet with the source of the TMS tourniquet.
153. Defendant Copquests marketing and false and/or misleading descri
and/or representations regarding the T.a.t. tourniquet exemplified by use of the
Camouflage Photo as described herein is likely to cause confusion, or to cause misor to deceive as to the origin, sponsorship and/or approval of the T.a.t. tourniquet b
TMS.
154. As a result of Defendant Copquests conduct, TMS has suffered and
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 26 of 33 PageID #:26
Case: 1:14 cv 06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 27 of 33 PageID #:27
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
27/64
has caused a likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding as to source, sponsors
approval, or certification of Defendant Copquests T.a.t. tourniquet, and as to Defe
Copquests affiliation, connection and association with and certification by TMS.
158. Defendant Copquests acts complained of herein constitute unfair
competition and deceptive trade practices under 815 ILCS 510 also because
Defendant Copquest has used deceptive representations in connection with the T.atourniquet and has engaged in other conduct which creates a likelihood of confusio
misunderstanding.
159. As a consequence of the Defendant Copquests acts of unfair compe
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 27 of 33 PageID #:27
Case: 1:14 cv 06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 28 of 33 PageID #:28
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
28/64
of confusion or of misunderstanding as to source, sponsorship, approval, or certifi
of Defendant Copquests T.a.t. tourniquet, and as to Defendant Copquests affiliati
connection and association with and certification by TMS.
165. Defendant Copquests acts complained of herein constitute unfair
competition and deceptive trade practices under Illinois common law also because
Defendant Copquest has used deceptive representations in connection with the T.atourniquet and has engaged in other conduct which creates a likelihood of confusio
misunderstanding.
166. As a consequence of the Defendants acts of unfair competition as s
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 28 of 33 PageID #:28
Case: 1:14 cv 06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 29 of 33 PageID #:29
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
29/64
172. Upon information and belief, Defendant Copquest had access to the
Camouflage Photo which is and/or was displayed on many of TMS authorized
distributors websites.
173. Defendant Copquest copied the Camouflage Photo has displayed an
currently displaying the copied Camouflage Photo on its website at www.c
174. Defendant Copquest knowingly, deliberately and willingly copied tCamouflage Photo.
175. Defendant Copquest knowingly, deliberately and willingly uses the
Camouflage Photo on its website and in its marketing materials to sell the knock o
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 29 of 33 PageID #:29
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 30 of 33 PageID #:30
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
30/64
COUNTS I-III PATENT INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS
A. An award of damages adequate to compensate TMS for the infring
that has occurred, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty as permitte
35 U.S.C. 284, together with prejudgment interest from the date the
infringement began;
B. Additional damages for design patent infringement as permitted un
U.S.C. 289;
C. Increased damages as permitted under 35 U.S.C. 284;
D. A finding that this case is exceptional and an award to TMS of its
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 30 of 33 PageID #:30
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 31 of 33 PageID #:31
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
31/64
(i) from selling, offering to sell, marketing, promoting, or adve
any goods and/or services under the TACMED mark or any
confusingly similar thereto; and
(ii) from making or publishing any false and/or misleading des
and/or representations concerning TMS or the TMS Tourni
and/or any false and/or misleading descriptions or represenstating, suggesting or implying that the T.a.t. tourniquet is a
with, sponsored, approved or in any way associated with TM
H. Directing Defendants to deliver up to TMS all things in their posse
Case: 1:14 cv 06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 31 of 33 PageID #:31
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 32 of 33 PageID #:32
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
32/64
L. Declaring that this case is exceptional and awarding to TMS the att
fees it has incurred in investigating, bringing, and prosecuting this action,
pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a) and any relevant Illinois state law provisio
M. Awarding TMS the costs and disbursements of this action;
N. Awarding TMS punitive damages pursuant to any relevant Illinois
provisions;
COUNTS VII and XVI COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS
O. A preliminary and permanent injunction immediately restraining
Defendants, together with their respective officers, agents, servants, emplo
Case: 1:14 cv 06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 32 of 33 PageID #:32
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 33 of 33 PageID #:33
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
33/64
Respectfully submitted,
/S/ James B. Zaczek_____________James B. Zaczek, Esq. (ID No. 6217Law Office of Bert Zaczek311 N. Aberdeen St.Suite 300B
Chicago, IL 60607(312) 527-1090(312) 527-1082 (Facsimile)[email protected]
Frederick N. Samuels, Esq.CAHN & SAMUELS, LLP1100 17th Street N.W., Suite 401
Case: 1:14 cv 06035 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 33 of 33 PageID #:33
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:34
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
34/64
g g
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:35
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
35/64
US007776064B2
1 2 )Ul l l t ed S ta t e s P a t e n t 1 0 )P a t e n tN 0 . : U S 7 ,J e n n i f e r e t a l . ( 4 5 )Date o f P a t e n t : A
( 5 4 ) TOURNIQUET ARTICLE 2 0 0 5 / 0 0 4 9 8 3 0A1 3 / 2 0 0 5 A m b a c h
( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s :J o h n s o nJ e n n i f e r , R a e f o r d ,NC U S ) ; OTHER UBLICATIONJohnson R 0 5 5 ,R a e f o l ' d ,NC U s ) C o m b a tA p p l i c a t i o n T o u r n iq u e t s ,T h e C o m b a
q u e t B r o c h u r e .( 7 3 ) A s s i g n e e : T a c t i c a l Medical S o l u t i o n s , I n c . , P a r s o n s ,D o n a l dL . , e ta l . ,To u r n i q u e t s i L i f e
A n d e r s o n ,SC ( U ) ? e l d ,a r t i c l e( d a t eu n k n o w n ) .
* ) N o t i c e : S u b j e c tt o a n y d i s c l a i m e r , t h e t e r m o f h i s * C i t e dby e x a m i n e rp a t e n t i s e x t e n d e do r a d j u s t e d u n d e r 3 5 Primary Examiner iMichae l M i l a n o
U - S ~ C ~1 5 4 G )b y 2 8 2d a y s - A s s i s t a n tE x a m i n e r i V i c t o rX guyen( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y ,A g e n t ,o r F i r m 4 C a h n a
( 2 1 ) A p p l . N 0 . :1 0 / 8 3 0 , 1 4 4_ (57 ) ABSTRACT
( 2 2 ) F r l e d : A p r . 2 1 ,2 0 0 4_ _ _ The resen t i nven t ion e l a t e s genera l ly o ?
( 6 5 ) Pnor Pubhcatlon Data more s p e c i ? c a l l y t o u m i q u e t s . One emU s 2 0 0 5 / 0 2 4 0 2 1 7A 1 O c t 2 7 , 2 0 0 5 c l a i m e ds u b j e c t m a t t e ri n c l u d e s at o u r n i q
i n g a b a s e , a c a p d i s p o s e do n s a i d b a s e , a s t r( 5 1 ) I n t , C l , end and one end a t t a c h e d t o s a i d b a s e , a
A61B 7 / 0 0 (200601) s a i d b a s e , ah a n d l e W i t han p e r t u r et o a c c o
g g
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:36
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
36/64
US. P a t e n t A u g .1 7 ,2 0 1 0 S h e e t1 o f 2 U S 7 ,
g g
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:37
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
37/64
U S 7 ,
1 0
S h e e t 2 0 f 2u g . 1 7 ,2 0 1 0. P a t e n t
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
38/64
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:39
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
39/64
U S 7 , 7 7 6 , 0 6 4B23
b i n g B and Webbing C a n e a c h b e c o n s t r u c t e do f s c u b aWebbing a n d a d d i t i o n a l l y , e a c h s e c t i o n o f b a s e 1 2 c a n b el e n g t h e n e d ,s h o r t e n e d ,n a r r o W e do r W i d e n e d .A d d i t i o n a lp a d
d i n gc a n a l s o be added o b a s e 1 2 , o r i n d i v i d u a l l yt o s e c t i o n A ,Webbing B r Webbing C . One o r m o r e a d h e s i v es t r i p sm a ya l s o b e u sed o b o n d one o r m o r e o f h e s e s e c t i o n s o f base 1 2 .
I n t h i se m b o d i m e n t ,c a p F s p o s i t i o n e da n da t t a c h e dt o t h et o p o f b a s e 1 2 . Cap F m a i n t a i n st h e s t r a pH n p r o x i m i t yt o t h eb a s e 12 and a s s u c h m a i n t a i n s s t r a p H n ? a t o r i e n t a t i o n i nr e l a t i o n t ob a s e 1 2 . Cap F s a 2 i n c hby 2 i n c h s e c t i o no f y l o ns c u b a Webbing seWn on t o b a s e 1 2 a l o n gt h e tWo e d g e s o ro u t e r s i d e s o f Webbing B . Cap F can l s o b e m a d e o f a p l a s t i cs l e e v e , o r a c o m b i n a t i o n o fp l a s t i c and p o l y p r o p y l e n eWe bb i n g Which c a n b eu s e dt o i n c r e a s et h e r i g i d i t y o f c a p F . CapF can a l s o b e b o n d e d o r attached i n any s u i t a b l e m a n n e r t ob a s e 1 2 . Cap F h e l p s m a i n t a i nt h e f o r mo f s t r a pH hen t r a pH s b e i n g t i g h t e n e da n d i t a l s oh e l p s p r e v e n tt Wi s t i n go f t h es t r a pH e f o r e s t r a pH s t i g h t e n e da r o u n dt h e t o p o f b a s e 1 2 .Cap F m a i n t a i n st h e f o r mo f s t r a pH y W o r k i n gi nc o n j u n ct i o n With base 12 a c t i n g a s a r i g i d s l e e v e o r a sandWich i nWhich t r a pH ust a s s t h r o u g hb e f o r emaking c o n t a c tW i t ht h e l i m b .
I n t h i se m b o d i m e n t ,c a p F a l s o p r o v i d e sa p o i n t o f a t t a c hment o rt h e s e c o n dl o c k i n gr i n g W i t h o u ti n t e r f e r i n gW i t ht h e
20
4can range f r o m 1 i n c h i n Width t o 2 . 5 i n c ha l s o b e l o n g e r o r s h o r t e r t h a n 4 6 i n c h e sm a t e r i a l i t i s m a d e o f c a n b e n y l o n W
p o l y p r o p y l e n e .One n d o f s t r a pH s r o u t er e l e a s eb u c k l eand t t a c h e dt o b a s e 1 2 . I n t hm e n t , S t r a p H s seWn t o b a s e 1 2 . The f r e e? r s t r o u t e dt h r o u g hr i n g K n d a t t a c h e dt op o i n t o f a t t a c h m e n tt o b a s e 1 2 , t h e f r e e e nr o u t e dt h r o u g ht h e a p e r t u r ei n h a n d l eGi t s e l ff o r m i n ga s m a l l l o o p t h a th o l d s t h eW i t hs t r a pH . T h i s l o o pi s d e s i g n e dt op r o vt h a t t W i s t i n ghandle G oes o t cause baseOnce s t r a pH s p o s i t i o n e d t o h o l d h a nthrough t h e a r e a above b a s e 12 and beloWo t h e r end e m a i n sf r e e t o u s e by h e u s e r t oq u i c k r e l e a s e b u c k l e D n o r d e r t o t i g ha r t i c l e1 0 . S t r a p H a n a l s o be s e c u r e dd i r e ca t a ? r s t p o i n t upstream f r o m h a n d l eG nddoWns t ream f rom h a n d l e G ,W i t h an a l l or u n t h r o u g h ha n d l e G .
A s shoWn n FIGS. 1 and , r i n g s K ndp r e s e n tembodiment o s e c u r es t r a p H o b ar i n g n e e d s t o be s e d . The r i n g s a r e usedp l a c e When t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e1 0 i s i n u s
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:40
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
40/64
U S 7 , 7 7 6 , 0 6 4B25
b l e e d i n gi s c o n t r o l l e dand h e nh a n d l eG s l a t c h e di n t o one o rb o t h r i n g s K nd . I t i sn o t n e c e s s a r yt o l a t c h b o t h e n d so f h eh a n d l e G .T h e a p screW E o c a t e do n quick e l e a s e b u c k l eD
i s t h e n t i g h t e n e d t o h e l p p r e v e n ta c c i d e n t a l l o o s e n i n g ,a n df u r t h e r m e d i c a lt r e a t m e n ti s s o u g h t .
While t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o nh a s b e e n i l l u s t r a t e dandd e s c r i b e dby means o f s p e c i ? ce m b o d i m e n t s a n dl t e r n a t i v e s ,i t i s t o be u n d e r s t o o dt h a t numerous c h a n g e sand m o d i ? c at i o n s c a nb e m a d e i t h o u t d e p a r t i n gf rom h e s p i r i tand s c o p eo f t h e i n v e n t i o n . T h e r e f o r e ,i t s h o u l db e u n d e r s t o o dt h a t t h ei n v e n t i o ni s n o t t o be i m i t e di n any Wa y x c e p ti n a c c o r d a n c eW i t ht h e a p p e n d e dc l a i m sa n dt h e i re q u i v a l e n t s .
W h a t s c l a i m e di s :
1 .A o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l ec o m p r i s i n g :A u b s t a n t i a l l y r i g i db a s e ;a h a n d l e ; anda s t r a p i nc o m m u n i c a t i o nW i t hs a i d h a n d l e , t h es t r a pb e i n g
engaged i t h s a i d b a s e a ta ? r s t p o i n tup t r e a mf rom s a i dh a n d l eand ? x e d l ya t t a c h e dt o s a i d b a s e a t a s e c o n d p o i n tdoWnst ream f r om s a i d h a n d l e s u c ht h a t s a i d h a n d l e i sm a i n t a i n e di n a p o s i t io n r e l a t i v e t o s a i d s u b s t a n t i a l l yr i g i d b a s e t o r e d u c e b i n d i n go f s a i d b a s e When s a i dh a n d l ei s t W i s t e d ,h h d l i d l d h d d
5
20
61 1 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 f
b u c k l ec o n n e c t e dt o s a i d s u b s t a n t i a l l yr i gb e i n g a d a p t e dt oe n g a g es a i d s t r a pt o s e c u ra d e p l o y e da r r a n g e m e n t ,s a i d b u c k l e b e i nscreW t o secure s a i d s t r a p t o s a i d b a s e .
1 2 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 Wi n c l u d e s a n a p e r t u r ed i s p o s e di n t h e c e n ts t r a pi s t h r e a d e dt h r o u g hs a i d a p e r t u r e
1 3 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 Wi n c l u d e smeans f o r h o l d i n gs a i d t o u r n i q u ef a c i l i t a t eu s e r a p p l i c a t i o no f s a i d t o u r n i qh a n d .
1 4 .A o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l ec o m p r i s i n g :a n e l o n g a t e dh a n d l e ;
a s u b s t a n t i a l l y r i g i db a s e ;a s t r a p d i s p o s e d c o n t i g u o u st o s a i d b a s
c a t i o n W i t h s a i d h a n d l e ; a n da s t r u c t u r a l m e m b e r h a v i n g ? r s t and
s t r u c t u r a lm e m b e r e i n g ? x e d l ya t t al e a s ta t ? r s t and s e c o n dp o i n t s a l o n ges e c o n ds i d e s ,s a i d s t r a pb e i n g s a n dl e a s tp o r t i o n o f s a i d s t r u c t u r a lm e m bm i n i m i z et Wi s t i n go f s a i d s t r a p .
1 5 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 4 W
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:41
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
41/64
UNITED S TAT E S PATENT AND TRADEMARK F F I C E
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
PATENT O. : 7 , 7 7 6 , 0 6 4B 2APPLICATION O. : 10/830144
DATED : A u g u s t1 7 ,2 0 1 0I N V E N T O R ( S ) : J e n n i f e rJ o h n s o na n d R o s s J o h n s o n
I t i s c e r t i f i e dt h a t e r r o r appears i n t h e a b o v e - i d e n t i f i e dp a t e n t and t h a t s a i d L e t t e r s P a t e n t i s h e r e b y c o r r e c
I n t h e c o v e rp a g e , i t e m [ 7 ] t h e f i r s ti n v e n t o r J o h n s o nJ e n n i f e r s ho u l d r e a d- - J e n n i f es e c o n di n v e n t o r J o h n s o n R o s s s h o u l dr e a d - - R o s sJ o h n s o n - - .
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:42
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
42/64
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:43
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
43/64
1 2 )U n i t e d States D e s i g n Patent 1 0 )P a t e n tN 0 . :
U S O 0 D 6 4 9 6 4 2 S
U SJohnson ( 4 5 )D a t e o f P a t e n t : 1 1 * N
(54 ) TOURNIQUET HANDLE 6 , 8 9 9 , 7 2 0 B1* 5/2005 M c M i l l a n . .D516,901 s * 3 / 2 0 0 6 Murray . . . . . . .D 5 2 7 , 9 8 1 S * 9/2006 S t
( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r : Ross Johnson, Anderson, SC US) 1 3 5 4 5 6 6 3S * 7 / 2 0 0 7 S i t s _ _ _ _ D592,484 s * 5/2009 Ricereto . . . . . .
( 7 3 ) A s s 1 g n e e : T a c t i c a l Medica l S o l u t i o n s ,I n c . , 7 , 7 7 6 , 0 6 4 B2 8 / 2 0 1 0 J e n n i f e re r a 1A n d e r s o n ,NC U S ) 7 , 8 4 2 , 0 6 7 B2* 1 1 / 2 0 1 0 E s p o s i t o
2007/0005107 A1 1 / 2 0 0 7 J a n o t a . . . . . . . . .
* * 2 0 0 9 / 0 0 2 4 1 5 9 A1* 1 / 2 0 0 9 Nee t a l .( ) Te r m 1 4 Years 2010/0137900 A 1 * 6 /2010 C 1 1 3 0. . . . . . . .
( 2 1 ) A p p l .N 0 . : 2 9 / 3 6 7 , 9 1 2 O T H E RPUBLICATION
( 2 2 ) F i l e d : Aug 6 2 0 1 0 G o o g l eI m a g eR e s u l tf o rh t t p : / / c h b - t e c h S 0 p s t - 0 2 G . j p g .1 p a g e . Vi e w e d o n D e c . 2 0 , 201
R e l a t e dU S . p p l i c a t i o nD a t a * C i t e dby e x a m i n e r
( 6 3 ) Continuation of a p p l i c a t i o nN o . 1 0 / 830,144 , ? l e d o n _ _A p r . 2 1 , 2 0 0 4 , n o w a t . No. 7 , 7 7 6 , 0 6 4 . Prlmary E x a m m e an a y m o n
( 5 1 ) LOC 9 ) Cl 2 4 _ 0 2 ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y ,A g e n t , o r Fi rm ahn
( 5 2 ) US. l . . . . . . . . D 2 4 / 1 4 3 ; D 2 4 / 1 6 9 ( 5 7 ) CLAIM( 5 8 ) F i e l d o f Classi?cation Sea rch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D 2 4 / 4 3 , T h e Ornamental d e s i g nf o r a t o u r n i q u e t h a
D 2 4 / 1 3 3 ,1 4 7 , 1 6 9 , 1 8 8 ;6 0 6 / 2 0 3 ,2 0 1 , 2 0 2 , d e s c r i b e d
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:44
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
44/64
US. P a t e n t N o v .2 9 ,2 0 1 1 S h e e t1 0 1 2 US
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:45
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
45/64
US. P a t e n t N o v .2 9 ,2 0 1 1 S h e e t2 o f 2 US
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:46
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
46/64
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:47
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
47/64
US008303620B2
1 2 )U n i t e d Sta tes P a t e n t 1 0 )P a t e n tN 0 . 2 U S 8 ,( 4 5 )Date o f P a t e n t *ohnson e t a l .
( 5 4 ) TORNIQUET RT I C L E ( 5 8 ) F i e l d o f C l a s s i ? c a t i o nS e a r c h
S e ea p p l i c a t i o n? l e f o rc o m p l e t es e7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s : J e n n i f e r L . J o h n s o n ,A n d e r s o n ,SC
( 5 6 ) R e f e r e n c e s Ci t e dU S ) ;R o s s J o h n s o n ,A n d e r s o n ,SC ( U S )
( 7 3 ) A s s i g n e e : Ta c t i c a lM e d i c a lS o l u t i o n s ,I n c . , U S . PATENT DOCUMENTS
n,mkmM 1mrrBM503010000222///5002
1
2BBA00452617 0 296978 7 067WSfo dmgh5.]rm m. m)
Si m1mSmmiae m. 1m* ) N o t i c e :
* c i t e d b y examiner. S . C . 1 5 4 ( b )b y 0 d a y s .T h i s p a t e n t i s s u b j e c t t o a t e r m i n a l d i sc l a i m e r .
P r i m a r y E x a m i n e r i c t o r N g u y e n
( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y ,A g e n t ,o r Fi rm ahn
( 5 7 ) A B S T R A C TThe r e s e n t i n v e n t i o nr e l a t e sg e n e r a l l yt o ?m o r e s p e c i ? c a l l y t o u m i q u e t s . One em
( 2 1 ) A p p 1 . N o . :1 2 / 8 4 1 , 4 7 5
( 2 2 ) F i l e d : J u l .2 2 , 2 0 1 0_ _ _ c l a i m e d subject m a t t e r i nc ludes a tourn ique
( 6 5 ) Pnor P u b h c a t l o nData s u b s t a n t i a l l yr i g i db a s e . A a n d l ei s p r o v iUS 011/0178546 A 1 J u l 2 1 2011 ? r s t and s e c o n de n d sand s l o td i s p o s e dbe
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:48
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
48/64
US. P a t e n t N o v .6 ,2 0 1 2 S h e e t1 o f 2 US ,
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:49
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
49/64
U . P a t e n t N o v .6 ,2 0 1 2 S h e e t2 o f 2 U S 8 ,
3 0
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:50
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
50/64
U S 8 , 3 0 3 , 6 2 0B21
TORNIQUET RT I C L E
CROSS-REFERENCES TO OTHER RELATED
PATENT APPLICATIONS
T h i s a p p l i c a t i o ni s a c o n t i n u a t i o no f a p p l i c a t i o nS e r .N o .1 0 / 8 3 0 ,1 4 4 ? l e dA p r . 2 1 ,2 0 0 4 , noW l l o w e d ,W h i c hi s i n c o rp o r a t e dh e r e i nb y r e f e r e n c e .
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLYSPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
N o tA p p l i c a b l e .
R E F E R E N C E T OSEQUENCE ISTING, ATA B L E , OR A COMPUTER PROGRAM I S T I N G
COMPACT DISK APPENDIX
N o tA p p l i c a b l e .
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1 . F i e l d o f t h e I n v e n t i o nThe p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o nr e l a t e s t o m e d i c a ld e v i c e s u s e d i n
1 5
20
2I n s t i l la n o t h e r embodiment o f t h e i n v
a r t i c l ei n c l u d e s a h a n d l e h a v i n g? r s t andh a v i n g a s l o td i s p o s e dbetWeen t h e ? r s t a
s u b s t a n t i a l l y r i g i db a s e u n d e r l y i n gt h eh a nu r e d t o b e t i g h t e n e da b o u t a n i n j u r e d l i mh a n d l e , t h es t r a pb e i n g e n g a g e dW i t ht h ehe n g a g e dW i t h t h e s u b s t a n t i a l l y r i gb a s eu p s t r e a mf rom s a i d h a n d l ea n d i i ) a t a s es t r e a mf r o mt h e h a n d l e s u c ht h a ts a i d s u b si s m a i n t a i n e di nu n d e r l y i n gr e l a t i o n s h i pt or e d u c i n g b i n d i n go f t h e s u b s t a n t i a l lr ih a n d l e i s t W i s t e d ; and a means f o r l o c kp l a c e .
H a v i n gt h u s d e s c r i b e de m b o d i m e n t so f
t i o n ,i t i s t h e p r i n c i p a l o b j e c to f t h e p rp r o v i d ean improved t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e t h al i m b u s i n go n ehand o p l a c eand s e c u r e t h
B R I E F DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVVIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
The b o v e a n do t h e r o b j e c t s ,a d v a n t a g ep r e s e n t i n v e n t i o nW i l l b e m o r e r e a d i l y af o l l o W i n gd e s c r i p t i o n ,When r e a d i n c o n
h
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:51
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
51/64
U S 8 , 3 0 3 , 6 2 0B23
W i t ht h e u s e o f t h e t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e1 0 . Sect ionA l s o h e l p st h e u s e r i n a p p l y i n gt o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e1 0 b y h o l d i n g t h et o u r n i q u e ti n p l a c e a n d a l l o w i n gt h e u s e r t o a p p l ya r t i c l e1 0
Wi t h o n e hand.Webbing C s a t t a c h e dt o t h e u p p e rf a c i n g s i d e o f WebbingB a b o u t 2 i n d i s t a n c e f r o m t h e end o f t h e Webbing B b a s ep o s i t i o n e db e n e a t ht h e h a n d l e G .S c u b a n y l o nW e b b i n gi su s e df o r Webbing C n t h e p r e s e n tembodiment o i n c r e a s e t h er i g i d i t yo f t h e b a s e 1 2 a n d t o p r e v e n tb i n d i n go r c r u s h i n go fb a s e 12 W h e n h a n d l e G s t W i s t e d o r t u r n e d . I n a n o t h e re m b o d i m e n t ,s e v e r a l s e c t i o n s o f s c u b aWebbing c a n a l s o b eused t o g e t h e r a s Webbing C n s t e a d o n one s e c t i o n , and t h i sc a n f u r t h e r f a c i l i t a t et h e n e e d s o fr i g i d i t yW h i l e s t i l lb e i n g? e x i b l e enough f o r u s e W i t h a l i m b i n a d d i t i o n t o m a k i n g
a r t i c l e 1 0 e a s i e r t o s t o r e and c a r r y. Ve l c r o s e c t i o nA , We bb i n g B and Webbing C a n e a c h b e c o n s t r u c t e do f s c u b aWebbing a n d a d d i t i o n a l l y , e a c h s e c t i o n o f b a s e 1 2 c a nb el e n g t h e n e d ,s h o r t e n e d ,n a r r o W e do r W i d e n e d .A d d i t i o n a lp a dd i n gc a n a l s o be added o b a s e 1 2 , o r i n d i v i d u a l l yt o s e c t i o n A ,Webbing B r Webbing C . One o r m o r e a d h e s i v es t r i p sm a ya l s o b e u sed o b o n d one o r m o r e o f h e s e s e c t i o n s of base 1 2 .
I n t h i se m b o d i m e n t ,c a p F s p o s i t i o n e da n da t t a c h e dt o t h et o p o f b a s e 1 2 . Cap F m a i n t a i n st h e s t r a pH n p r o x i m i t yt o t h eb a s e 12 and a s s u c h m a i n t a i n s s t r a p H n ? a t o r i e n t a t i o n i n
20
4and t can l s o be d i f f e r e n t s i Z eand i m e nscreW t h r e a d s i n t o t h e t o p o f h e buckle andt h e b a s e o f t h e b u c k l e .W h e n e n g a g e d ,B
a c c i d e n t a ll o o s e n i n go f t h e t o u r n i q u e ts ha c c i d e n t a l l ybumped o r moved W h i l e t ht r a n s p o r t e d . F u r t h e r , c a p s c r e WB a n be umovement o f t h e s t r a pH . I n t h i se m b o d iscreW B s p o s i t i o n e di n t h e t o p o f cap P s ot o t i g h t e n t h e s c r e Wd o W n t h e s t r a p H us t r a p H g a i n s t u n i n t e n d e dl o o s e n i n g .Cap5 / 8 s o c k e thead cap s c r e W,b u t i t can be anyl e n g t h .
S t r a pH s made o f 1 6 p o i n th e a v y WeWebbing h a t i s 1 i n c h i n W i d t hand 4 6 i n c h
a l s o b e m a d e o f any s u i t a b l e s i Z e o r m a t e r ican range f r o m 1 i n c h i n Width o 2 and / 2c a n a l s o be o n g e ro r s h o r t e r t h a n 4 6 i n c h em a t e r i a l i t i s m a d e o f c a n b e n y l o n Wp o l y p r o p y l e n e .One n d o fs t r a pH s r o u t er e l e a s eb u c k l eand t t a c h e dt o b a s e 1 2 . I n t hm e n t , S t r a p H s seWn t o b a s e 1 2 . The f r e e? r s t r o u t e dt h r o u g hr i n g K n d a t t a c h e dt op o i n t o f a t t a c h m e n tt o b a s e 1 2 , t h e f r e e e nr o u t e dt h r o u g ht h e a p e r t u r ei n h a n d l eG
l f h
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:52
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
52/64
U S 8 , 3 0 3 , 6 2 0B25
widened o g i v e a g r e a t e r t i s s u e a r e a a l l o w i n gl e s s p r e s s u r et obe used o a c h i e v e h e m o st a s i s .
I n i t i a l l y ,t o u r n i q u e t a r t i c l e1 0 s h o u l d b e b r o k e ni n b y
a p p l y i n ga r t i c l e1 0 t o a s o l i d o b j e c t a n dt i g h t e n i n g t h eh a n d l etWo t o t h r e e t i m e s t o l o o s e n t h e W e b b i n g .T h i s b r e a k i n gi nf a c i l i t a t e s l a t e r one handed s e . A r t i c l e 1 0 s s t o r e d i n a b a g o rp o u c hW i t hs t r a pH u n n i n gt h r o u g hb u c k l eD n d s a f e t yc a ps c r e WE l i g h t l yl o o s e n e d .T o d e p l o yt o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e1 0 i na s i t u a t i o nWhere one i m b i s d i s a b l e d , s t r a p H s g r a s p e dW i t ht h e u n i n j u r e da r m and t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e1 0 i s s l i do v e r t h ei n j u r e d e x t r e m i t y. S t r a p H s p u l l e da s q u i c k l ya s p o s s i b l e t or e m o v e e x c e s s s l a c k i n s t r a p H nd o i n i t i a l l yt i g h t e n a r t i c l e1 0 a r o u n dt h e i n j u r e d l i m b . H a n d l eG s t W i s t e d u n t i lt h eb l e e d i n gi s c o n t r o l l e dand h e n ha n d l eG s l a t c h e di n t o one o r
b o t h r i n g s K nd . I t i sn o t n e c e s s a r yt o l a t c h b o t h e n d s o f h eh a n d l e G .T h e a p screW E o c a t e do n quick e l e a s e b u c k l eDi s t h e n t i g h t e n e d t o h e l p p r e v e n ta c c i d e n t a l l o o s e n i n g , a n df u r t h e r m e d i c a lt r e a t m e n ti s s o u g h t .
While t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o nh a s b e e n i l l u s t r a t e dandd e s c r i b e dby means o f s p e c i ? ce m b o d i m e n t s a n dl t e r n a t i v e s ,i t i s t o be u n d e r s t o o dt h a t numerous c h a n g e sand m o d i ? c at i o n s c a nb e m a d e i t h o u t d e p a r t i n gf rom h e s p i r i tand s c o p eo f t h e i n v e n t i o n . T h e r e f o r e ,i t s h o u l db e u n d e r s t o o dt h a t t h ei n v e n t i o ni s n o t t o be i m i t e di n any Wa y x c e p ti n a c c o r d a n c e
h i
20
62 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 f u
l o c k i n gr i n g a t t a c h e dt o s a i d s t r u c t u r a lm e3 . The o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l e of l a i m 2 Whe
t h e ? r s t and s e c o n de n d s o f s a i d h a n d l e is e c t i o n c o n ? g u r e dt o e n g a g eW i t h s a i d l o c
4 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 f ul o c k i n g r i n g o p e r a t i v e l y a s s o c i a t e d W i tWherein t l e a s t one of h e ? r s t and secondi n c l u d e s a l a t c h i n g s e c t io nt h a te n g a g e ss a
5 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 W ht i a l l yr i g i db a s e i n c l u d e s ahook a n d l o o p
6 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 W ht i a l l yr i g i db a s e i n c l u d e s a n o n - s l i pf a b r i
7 . The t o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l eo f c l a i m 1 W ht i a l l yr i g i db a s e i n c l u d e sm e a n sf o r p r e v e ns u b s t a n t i a l l yr i g i db a s e When s a i d h a n d l e
8 . A o u r n i q u e ta r t i c l ec o m p r i s i n g :a h a n d l e h a v i n g ? r s t and s e c o n de n d s
d i s p o s e di n a c e n t e r o f s a i d h a n d l e ,r o t a t a b l eW i t hr e s p e c tt o a s u b s t a n t i a
t h es u b s t a n t i a l l yr i g i db a s e u n d e r l y i n gsa s t r a pc o n ? g u r e dt o b e t i g h t e n e da b o u t
t W i s t i n gs a i dh a n d l e ,s a i ds t r a pb e i n gh a n d l e da n db e i n ge n g a g e dW i t hs a ib a s e a t i ) a ? r s t p o i n t u p s t r e a mf r o m
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-4 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:53
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
53/64
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-4 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:54
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
54/64
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:55
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
55/64
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:56
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
56/64
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:57
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
57/64
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-6 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:58
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
58/64
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-6 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:59
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
59/64
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-6 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:60
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
60/64
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-7 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:61
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
61/64
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
62/64
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-8 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:63
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
63/64
Case: 1:14-cv-06035 Document #: 1-8 Filed: 08/06/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:64
8/12/2019 TMS v. EMI - Complaint
64/64