Tuned-Mass Absorber Case Studies

  • Upload
    kenryou

  • View
    56

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

case studies

Citation preview

  • Principle of tuned-mass vibration absorber:

    Problem: Periodic excitation of vibrating system (resonant or not)

    Forced vibration can be cancelled by adding an auxiliary mass tunedsuch that

    11 mk=

  • 210101

    11

    011

    1111

    011

    )cos(0

    )cos(

    0)()cos()(

    ==

    ==

    =

    =+=++

    mFkFA

    tAxx

    tFxk

    xxkxmtFxxkkxxm

    &&

    &&

    For auxiliary mass vibrates in such a manner that the force exerted on m compensates the external force:

    11 mk=

  • Problems/Limits of tuned-mass vibration absorbers:

    Amplitude of auxiliary mass is limited by absorber design.Above critical force amplitude absorber becomes saturated and absorber action disappears.

    If we try to remove resonant excitation (202=k/m): Adding theauxiliary mass m1

  • Case study 1: North Stand, Highbury Stadium (Arsenal), 1993-2006

    1992-93 Demolition of old stand and replacement by new all-seaterstand using lightweight construction methods.

    natural frequency of vertical vibration mode of upper tier of the fullyoccupied stand slightly above 1 Hz

  • Problem: Resonant excitation of vertical mode by periodic vertical motionsof the Arsenal supporters.

    Solution: Attachment of tunable vibration absorbers to the upper tier

  • ( ) )( elongation spring ntdisplaceme mass :relations Kinematic 1BCABABA BC1 xxlllxxlx

    ==

    +=

    ( )( )2BCAB1eff1eff11

    1BCABAB1BC11

    1

    ,0)(0)(

    : massfor motion ofequation :moments of Balance

    llkkxxkxmxxlllklxm

    m

    ==+=+

    &&

    &&

    k1

  • ( )

    BC

    1eff

    01eff

    2BCABeff1eff11

    changingby tunedbecan constant spring effective , if cancelled is stand of vibration

    )cos()(,0)(

    :mass)absorber (stand system for total system of Equations

    lmk

    tFkxxxkxmllkkxxkxm

    =

    =++==+

    +

    &&

    &&

  • Solution of vibration problem by frustrating anthropogenic excitation:absorber is automatically tuned to dominant vibration frequency.

    In spite of ~ 5000 supporters on stand: only small auxiliary mass is needed(~ 2% of mass of the structure) since lack of feedback prevents the supportersfrom synchronising their motions.

  • Case study 2: The worlds largest tuned mass vibration absorber:

    http://www.taipei-101.com.tw/en/OB/about/damper.asp

    Taipei 101:

    Until 2009 the worlds tallest building Situated near a major earthquake fault Situated in a Typhoon area

    Use of a tunable pendulum to control vibration of the building under extremewind loads.

    Pendulum mass: 730 tonsPendulum length (tunable) around 12m

  • How does it work?

    lxx

    mgmgmgl

    xx

    =

    1

    1

    tan

    sin

    0)(

    0)cos()(

    11

    01

    =+

    =+

    xxl

    mgxm

    tFxxl

    mgKxxM

    &&

    &&

  • lg

    km

    lmgk

    xxkxmtFxxkKxxM

    xxl

    mgxm

    tFxxl

    mgKxxM

    ==

    =

    =+=++

    =+

    =+

    1

    1

    111

    011

    11

    01

    0)()cos()(

    0)(

    0)cos()(

    &&

    &&

    &&

    &&

    These equations are equivalent to those for a vibration absorber:

    with spring stiffness

    The forced vibration of the main mass is eliminated if

    The absorber can be tuned to changing frequenciesby adjusting the free length of the pendulum

  • In Taipei 101: pendulum natural frequency (about 1/7 Hz) corresponds tofrequency of the fundamental flexural mode of the tower structure

    -> control of resonant excitation by gusting winds