Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Engaging learning environments and
learning contents for the future
Marko Kuuskorpi
Principal, researcher
INTRODUCTION
FUTURE CHALLENGES IN OUR SOCIETY
• Blogalisation (new communities based on new technology)
• New democracy created by citizens (blogs, internet petitions etc.)
• Open-source thinking
• On-line web community and learning
• Virtual reality
Alvesalo 2008, Hietanen 2010, Häkkinen ym. 2011
NEW PRINCIPLES OF LEARNING
•Learning can as well be quiet and random as conscious and intentional
•Learning might be harmful
•Learning refers to both process and result
•Learning is interactive
•Learning is different at different times
Alexander, P:A; Schallert, D.L. & Reynolds, R.E. 2009.
What is Learning Anyway? A Topographical Perspective Condidered Educational Psychologist
44(3): 176-192
ENGAGED LEARNING – REAL LIFE ORIENTATION
• Studets pariticipate actively • The teacher serves as a ”coach” • Studets vigorously research and create
projects • Studets use new technology to make
discoveries based on their choises
TRIALOGICAL LEARNING
• Learning is creating knowledge (shared agency)
• Teaching is constructing knowledge together (guidance)
• Working based more on networks (shared space and shared target)
• ”Storing” knowledge in physical objects, devices and networks
(iCloud,Dropbox,Gmail)
Hakkarainen ym. 2004
EXPANDING LEARNING ENVIRONMET
Nuikkinen, 2009
OPEN AND ASSIMILATIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
OPEN LEARNING ENVIRONMENT = Teaching and learning process opens towards more interactive environments and outside school.
ASSIMILATIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT= New elements and processes of teaching are integrated into learning environment and are applied when needed
Piispanen 2008; Joutsenvirta & Kukkonen, 2009
Kuuskorpi 2012
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT DIMENSIONS
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT DIMENSIONS
Kuuskorpi 2012
Seppälä-Pänkäläinen 2007
CHANGING SCHOOLS OPERATIONAL CULTURE
PHYSICAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
VILLAGE SCHOOLS, NETHERLADS 1670 VILLAGE SCHOOL, GERMANY 1848
OECD, 2012
SCHOOL BUILDING IN FINLAND IN THE 1950s
SCHOOL BUILDING IN FINLAND IN THE 1960s
SCHOOL BUILDING IN FINLAND IN THE 1970s
SCHOOL BUILDING IN FINLAND IN THE 1980s
SCHOOL BUILDING IN FINLAND IN THE 21st CENTURY
Classroom 1950 -2000
PHYSICAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT TODAY
Classroom shape is from the 19th century
Supports a style of teaching
where teacher is a leader
Supports individualism
Schoolbook-oriented
see. Dudek, 2000, Sanoff, 2009, Vitikka 2009
VISION IN FINLAND IN 2020
”Finnish schools are in the frontline in international comparison of the usage of communication and information technology. Professional teachers and other staff and motivated pupils and students use up-to-date and echologigal technology of high quality in different environments as part of their studies. Flexible services that promote life-long learning have been created to support a student and the community. Interacion and other cooperation with education, society and working life is rich and open. Education services, supporting administration and jurisdiction have been organised effectively and in a financially stable way”
Koulutuksen tietoyhteiskuntakehittäminen 2020. Parempaa laatua, tehokkaampaa yhteistyötä ja
avoimempaa vuorovaikutusta. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön työryhmämuistioita ja selvityksiä 2010:12.
QUALITY CRITERIA OF BASIC EDUCATION AND PPHYSICAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
Fascilities, furniture and equipment are appropriate and support flexible usage.
Communication and information technology are well
planned and meet the needs of development. Teachers and pupils have affected the organisation of
space. Spaces in school adapt easily to different ways of
teaching and other uses.
Opetusministeriön julkaisuja 2010:6
STUDENT PLANS (294 pieces)
Kuuskorpi 2012
Kuuskorpi 2012
Kuuskorpi 2012
Kuuskorpi 2012
Kuuskorpi 2012
Kuuskorpi 2012
THE INTERNAL ENVIRONMENTS IN THE TEACHING SPACE
Kuuskorpi 2012
INNER SPACES OF A LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
FUTURE TEACHING SPACE
Kuuskorpi 2012
FROM A CLASSROOM TO A TEACHING SPACE
Kuuskorpi 2012
ADAPTABILITY AND FLEXIBILITY?
• New space (two dimensional)
• New sound attenuation
• New lighting (automation)
• New furniture thinking (adaptability)
• New technology (touch screens)
SOUND ENVIRONMENT
4360 mm
Lamp c/c 2180 mm
4060 mm
4060 mm
Lamp c/c 2180 mm
Lamp c/c 2180 mm
Lamp c/c 2180 mm
Lamp c/c 2180 mm
9647001
9646000
= 9648001 + 9173015
= T5 lamp VHO 95W (2-lamp Philips HF-R II 2 95-120 ballast/luminaire unit)
4360 mm
Lamp c/c 2180 mm
4060 mm
4060 mm
Lamp c/c 2180 mm Lamp c/c 2180 mm
Lamp c/c 2180 mm
Lamp c/c 2180 mm
9647001
9646000
9646000
9646000
9647001
9647001
LIGHTING
STRENGTH OF LIGHTING
LIGHTING ADJUSTMENT
• Lutron Energy Saving Node
– Programming between 1-10V
– Daylight-programming
– Two sensors
– Manual adjustment
• In the roof there are two wireless sensors for movement and one for daylight
• The program in use is absence-guided (lights will be turned on manually, but shut off automatically)
• Programming with iPad
FUTURE DESK – new possibilities?
FUTURE DESK – new possibilities?
FUTURE DESK – new possibilities?
FUTURE WORKSTATION?
REFLECTIONS
” The stability of the classroom and the invariability of the physical learning enviornment prevent the comprehensive renewal of the school’s operational culture”
Kuuskorpi 2012
ON THE OTHER HAND…
… WHAT ABOUT KLUSTERS?
Sanoff 2009, Tulevaisuuden kouluhanke 2009
… AND WHAT ABOUT THE USERS?
THANK YOU!
Marko Kuuskorpi, principal
City of Kaarina
Piikkiö comprehensive school
