Upload
yoga-tokuyoshi
View
275
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Development of an intervention program based on Creative Problem Solving Coaching (CPSC) in the Creative Flow Scale in Skills and Self-efficacy
Yoga TOKUYOSHI
31st International Congress of Psychology (ICP2016)
Tuesday, July 26 2016
【Objective】
Recently, the Intervention studies of
Coaching have increased.
However, there have been few studies that focus and evaluate an intervention program of the Creative Coaching based on Psychology. This study focuses and reports on the development and evaluation of a short interventionprogram of Creative Problem SolvingCoaching based on Psychology.
September, 2013 Tokyo and Sendai in Japan
This Study was conducted to assess the effect
of the short intervention program using a semi-structured interview, a self-report questionnaires
based on the CREATIVE model
(Tokuyoshi et al., 2014).
■CFS was developed for evaluation of the Creative Skills and Self –efficacy at necessitates an approach based on a Creativity and Psychology.
【12 items with 5-point Likert scale. 2 subscales】
◆【Creative Skills】: 7 items(e.g., “I feel that I have skills to create something.”)
◆【Creative Self-efficacy】 : 5 items(e.g., “I feel that I have a confidence of Creativity.”)
Creative Flow Scale in Skills and Self-Efficacy (CFS) (Tokuyoshi, 2016)
【Material】1: Scale
CFS was developed on Creative Flow model
Creative Self –efficacy【High】
CreativeSkill【High】
•This Creative flow model is hypothesized that the person who has skills and self-efficacy of Creativity will be able to demonstrate a high performance in Creativity.
VentureCreativ
e Flow
Apathy Wasteful
(Only Skill)
(Only Self-efficacy)
Creative Flow Scale in Skills and Self efficacyItem I feel that … F1 F2 Hi Dsc
Q1:I can imagine some new things to add or put something together.
.74 .05 .55 2.7
Q2:I can imagine some new things making modifications or applying.
.85 -.12 .56 2.9
Q3:I can imagine some new things using new methods.
.73 .05 .58 2.8
Q4: I can imagine some new things making it simple.
.54 .05 .45 1.7
Q5: I can imagine some new things changing viewpoints.
.72 -.05 .55 2.4
Q6: I can imagine some new things using new tools.
.58 .06 .50 1.8
Q7: I can imagine some new things using something from other domains.
.79 -.06 .57 2.8
Q8: I have the ability to challenge myself to new things.
.05 .77 .62 3.0
Q9: I want to challenge myself to new things. .17 .51 .51 1.7
Q10: I can carry out new things. -.12 .95 .64 3.6
Q11: I can imagine various ideas. .24 .54 .55 2.2
Q12: I am ready to begin new things. -.08 .68 .52 1.7
“Creative Skills” Factor was based on CREATIVE Model(Tokuyoshi et al.,2014)
C: Curiosity Purpose or ConceptR: Research, Resources & ReframeE: Expand or EliminateA: Adapt, Attach, Apply to combineT: Technique or ToolI : Import from different fields or cultures V: Venture and PreparationE: Evaluation※Applying of Creative Problem Solving, Cognitive Behavioural
and Solution focused approach
Interview Sheet -CREATIVE based on Creative Problem Solving Coaching
(Tokuyoshi, Iwasaki & Palmer, 2014)
【Material】2 : Work sheet of Coaching
Interview Sheet of the CREATIVE
We made an Interview Sheet of
Creative Problem Solving Coaching.
Applying the CREATIVE model (Tokuyoshi et al., 2014).
◆What is the difference between this Interview sheet
and Practice model?
IS-CREATIVE worksheet
(1) It is used within one coaching session.
(2)The imagery technique was added to run a simulation.
(3) The Cognitive behavioural and Solution focused approach (Grant et al., 2013) concept was added.
(4) The evaluation of Self-efficacy of Creative Problem
Solving Coaching was added.
【Method of the experiment 】
Participants (N=25) were randomlyassigned to Intervention and Control group.
Conditions of the intervention◆Intervention Group filled out the interview sheet and then was interviewed by the Coach. ◆Control Group did not do anything
during the intervention.
The effect of the intervention was assessed with Creative Flow Scale by comparing pre- and post-intervention scores.
Pre-Test
◆Intervention Group(N=15)1.Educated about the creativity.Filled out the Interview Sheet-CREATIVE.2.Practice of Coaching using
Interview Sheet-CREATIVE.
Post-Test
【Questionnaire】
Creative Flow ScaleIn Skills and Self efficacy (CFS)
【Questionnaire】
Creative Flow Scale
Figure Flow chart of this study.
◆Control Group(N=10)
Main Subject
Random assignment (RCT)
◆N=25Mean age=39.5(SD=12.5)
◆Data analysis
1: ANCOVA:
Post-test (Bound variables), Pre-test (Covariate), 2 conditions(Fixed Factor)
2: Effect Size (Cohen’s d) :It was derived from & Intervention phase (Pre, Post)
Result N=25, Mean age=39.5(SD=12.5)
◆Pre data :
◆Anova between the pre total score of CFS and 2 conditions:
F(1, 23)=10.4, p < .01 (significance)
◆Anova between the pre total score of CFS in low score group and 2 conditions
F(1, 13)=2.1, n.s.(No significance)
Condition NIntervention 15Control 10
considering preliminary survey in pre-test.
Results of the total score of CFS
Control
(N=10)
Intervention
(N=15)
CFS Pre Post d Pre Post d F
CFS
TotalM 43.0 42.8 -.04 48.2 50.9 .51 12.4**
SD 5.0 5.1 5.8 4.9
Creative
SkillsM 26.0 26.3 .09 29.1 30.6 .43 5.3*
SD 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.1
Self efficacy
of CreativityM 17.0 16.5 -.14 19.1 20.3 .54 15.3***
SD 3.7 3.3 2.6 2.0
ANCOVA
CFS Total Score
43
48
43
51
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
Control Intervention
Tota
l sco
re o
f C
FS
Pre Post
d=.51, p<.01
Control < Intervention** p <.01
Results of the CFS in Low
Control Intervention
CFS Pre Post d Pre Post d F
CFS
TotalM 41.0 40.8 -.09 43.1 2.6 1.49 13.4**
SD 3.0 2.9 47.3 2.9
Creative
SkillsM 25.0 25.3 .20 25.8 28.3 1.40 6.8*
SD 1.6 1.8 1.5 2.1
Self efficacy
of CreativityM 26.3 26.6 .07 26.6 28.3 .85 2.0
SD 4.2 4.2 2.1 1.9
ANCOVA
CFS Total Score of Low Group (pre score)
41
43
41
47
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
Control InterventionPre Post
Control(N=8)<Intervention(N=7)** p <.01
d=1.49, p<.05Considering for a ceiling effect
Discussion ■On the part of Coachee, The scores of CFS
and CFS Subscales were statistically
significant.
【Middle effect】Total Score of CFS
【High effect】Total Score of CFS in low group.
■However, it will be necessary to conduct a
psychological experiment based on Creativity.
(Ex: Using Creativity Methods)
Main Reference
• Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
• Tokuyoshi,Y, Iwasaki,S, & Palmer,S. (2013). Development of an Interview Sheet based on the CREATIVE model for Coaching Psychology Practice. Coaching Psychology International, 7(1), 4-10.
The Creative Flow in Skills and Efficacy Scale (Tokuyoshi,Y., 2016)
Please rate the following statements on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
1: Strongly Disagree 2: Disagree 3: Neutral 4: Agree 5: Strongly Agree
I feel that...
__Q1: I can imagine some new things to add or put something together.
__Q2: I can imagine some new things making modifications or applying.
__Q3: I can imagine some new things using new methods.
__Q4: I can imagine some new things making it simple.
__Q5: I can imagine some new things changing viewpoints.
__Q6: I can imagine some new things using new tools.
__Q7: I can imagine some new things using something from other domains.
__Q8: I have the ability to challenge myself to new things.
__Q9: I want to challenge myself to new things.
__Q10:I can carry out new things.
__Q11:I can imagine various ideas.
__Q12:I am ready to begin new things.
■Total Score ( ) ■Creative Skills ( ) ■Creative Self-efficacy ( )
Factor M SD α Ht
CFS All (Q01-12) 46.2 9.4 .90 .48
Creative Skills (Q01-Q07) 28.7 5.5 .87 .54
Creative Self-efficacy (Q08-Q12) 17.5 4.9 .84 .57