View
878
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Panel Presentation: Getting Technologies to Farmers -- Fixing Regulatory Systems for Agricultural Technologies by Judith Chambers, Ph.D., Director – Program for Biosafety Systems at IFPRI. Presented at Food Security in a World of Growing Natural Resource Scarcity event February 12, 2014.
Citation preview
Food Security in World of Changing Climate and Natural Resource Scarcity:
The Role of Agricultural Technologies
Panel Presentation: Getting Technologies to FarmersFixing Regulatory Systems for Agricultural Technologies
Judith Chambers, Ph.D.Director – Program for Biosafety Systems
Newseum Conference CenterFebruary 12, 2014
Factors Influencing Farmer Access
• Market systems and forces• Infrastructure• Institutional factors (i.e. extension, public vs.
private sector)• Intellectual property rights
• Regulatory/Biosafety Policies
Conventionally Bred Varieties Introduced with Minimal “Safety Review”
• Evaluated for efficacy/performance to assess the desired trait or traits that was the objective of the breeding event
• New variety not evaluated from a safety perspective as it is “assumed” to pose no additional health or environmental risk since the genetics are manipulated within the species
Crop Protection Products
Evaluation of crop protection chemicals for environmental and human/animal health safety
• recognized part of the product development cycle
• costs and time for evaluating the toxicological profile of these chemicals are factored in to the overall product development cost and cycle
GM Crop Varieties
Regulatory factors have been a rate limiting step in introduction and farmer access despite:• Nearly 2 decades of safe use• FASTEST ADOPTED AG TECHNOLOGY IN
HISTORY Biotech crop hectares increased 1000 fold from 1.7 M (1996) to 170 M (2012) (ISAAA, 2013)
$$$$ TIME NEW SKILLS
UNIQUE CHALLENGES FOR GM CROPS
REGULATORY IPR OUTREACH STEWARDSHIP
General Product Development CycleSlide Courtesy of Donna Ramaeker-Zahn
1 – 3 years 1 – 3 years 1 – 3 years
Product Concept
Discovery Early Product Testing & Development
Integration & Product Selection
Product Ramp Up
Market Introduction
Post Market Activities
1 2 3 4 5 6
CFTs
Stakeholder Engagement Intensity
Biotech Crop Countries and Mega-Countries, 2012
Impact: India emerged as 2nd largest exporter of cotton
Source: Cotton Advisory Board 2009
India: Bt Cotton contributed to doubling of yields in 5 years
Source: Cotton Advisory Board
Page 11
Impact at the Farm Level: Average effects of Bt cotton vs non-Bt in India
Yield Increase 39%*
Reduction in insecticide sprays
33%*
Profit Increase/ha 70.9%*
* Significantly different from zero at 5% level
Source: Gruere, Mehta-Bhatt and Sengupta 2008
Based on peer-reviewed published studies
Current Status in India
GM Moratorium No additional products approved
CONTROVERSY AND NON-SCIENCE ISSUES HAVE IMPACTED REGULATORY PROCESS FOR GM
TECHNOLOGIES
• Trade competition and retaliation• First generation products without direct consumer benefit• Technological disparity• Science literacy• Religious and cultural concerns• Food system control, consumer right to know• Cartagena Protocol – expanded scope; de facto regulatory system
RESULT TRADE DISRUPTIONS, MARKET REJECTION, REGULATORY IMPACT AND DELAY !!!!
Regulatory Delays and Inefficiencies – A “Chilling” Effect in Africa
• Despite growing technical capacity and products in development (often from public/private partnerships) – uneven progress
• Stuck on the CFT treadmill—still no commercial products after nearly 15- 20 years of biosafety work
• Regulatory system-- Expensive; time consuming; unpredictable (subject to political “whimsy”) Often heavily focused on risk; doesn’t reflect global experience and evolving science Lack of product experience to test system Problematic provisions (liability, socio-economics) -- a disincentive to technological
progress Inter-ministerial turf Lack of capacity and resources Lack of access to accurate information esp. for the political process Lack of political will to move forward
Biosafety Issues and Impacts on Adoption InDeveloping Countries
Focus of Biosafety Capacity Building• Start from a perspective of Goals/Objective and Strategy• Legal framework development and adopted policy• Regulations• Theory and practical training – workshops, study tours, one
on one advisory services• Practical experience – dossier reviews, field tests, de-
regulation, monitoring, inspections• Reconciliation with other laws• Communications and outreach• Understanding of political process• Broad ministry focus – Agr, Env, S&T, Health, Trade, Judicial
Remedies for Ineffective Regulatory Systems
• Integrated approach – technical, legal, communications, research
• Capacity building• Strategy and innovative problem solving• Relationship building• Patience; long term engagement• Policy voice from broad-based stakeholder groups and
coalitions• Involvement of women• Harmonization• Reposition or redefine international/regional regulatory
frameworks (Cartagena Protocol, AU Model Law)
THANK YOU!!!!!