14
DID YOU GET THE BUZZ? ARE DIGITAL NATIVE MEDIA BECOMING MAINSTREAM? Lu Wu University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

Lu Wu

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lu Wu

DID YOU GET THE BUZZ?

ARE DIGITAL NATIVE MEDIA BECOMING MAINSTREAM?

Lu WuUniversity of North Carolina-

Chapel Hill

Page 2: Lu Wu

BACKGROUND

• Digital native media were born, and grown entirely online.

• Some started as online content aggregators. • Some digital native media are taking actions

in repositioning themselves to be original content generators.

• They are known for creating viral content online.

• They are popular among Millennials.

Page 3: Lu Wu

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK• Digital Native sites are fledgling in the news reporting

business. • They need to build a trustworthy news brand. • Media ecology scholars suggested that nascent media

would adopt organizational forms in order to survive the uncertainty in the media environment (Lowrey, 2012).

Page 4: Lu Wu

Organizational forms

Hiring skilled employeesAdopti

ng routinesCreating rules and regulations Specializ

ing workforces

Page 5: Lu Wu

HYPOTHESES• Some of the changes can be observed, but some are internal

and are embedded. • If the media organization did adapt news production routines, we

can expect to see:– a greater number of sources per story– a greater number of official sources – more hard news than soft news– more political news in hard news format

Page 6: Lu Wu

METHOD

• A content analysis of news articles published by BuzzFeed.

• Two constructed weeks of each year from January 1, 2007  to October 31, 2015.

• The final sample consists of a total of 912 articles.

Page 7: Lu Wu

FINDINGS

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Total Source

Total Source

2007200

8200

9201

0201

1201

2201

3201

4201

50

20406080

100120140160180200

Official Sources

Official Sources

1. Changes in News Sourcing before and after 2012

Page 8: Lu Wu

Topics Years Total  Before 2012 (%)

(n=104)After 2012 (%) (n=808)

 

Politics 52.9 49.8 49.4Economy/business 18.3 10.5 9.5Technology 15.4 5.8 4.6Crime 2.9 10.4 11.4War and related crisis 2.9 4.2 4.3Lifestyle 2.9 2.1 2.0Entertainment 1.9 6.5 7.1Accidents/disasters 1 3.5 3.8Human-interest 1 3.3 3.6Science 1 0.8 0.7Sports 0 1.6 1.9Education 0 1.5 1.7Total 100 100 100

2. Changes in News Topic before and after 2012

Page 9: Lu Wu

Hard News 37%Soft

News64%

Before 2012

Hard New

s 59%

Soft New

s41%

After 2012

3. Changes in News Categories before and after 2012

Page 10: Lu Wu

Hard News 31%

Soft News69%

Before 2012

Hard News 67%

Soft News33%

After 2012

4. Change in Political News Reporting before and after 2012

Page 11: Lu Wu

Source

26%No Source

75%

Before 2012

Source96%

No Source4%

After 2012

5. Change in Political News Sourcing before and after 2012

Page 12: Lu Wu

DISCUSSION

• This study shows that BuzzFeed, though it is in the early stages of establishing status as a news organization, has made significant progress.

• BuzzFeed has gradually adopted routines resulting in more hard news stories, and more official sources.

• The increasing amount of news coverage after 2012 is consistent with the anticipated result from increasing newsroom resources: more beat reporters were hired to cover news in culture, and society; more international bureaus were opened to provide on-the-ground news feeds.

• BuzzFeed News has demonstrated the opposite of the trend toward a “softening of news.”

Page 13: Lu Wu

• This study provides a unique look at the organizational norms and rules adopted by digital news media. It’s promising that they will keep growing into a much bigger force in news business especially online and targeting younger users. It is important to continue learning more about those news organizations and learning about how they will influence the democratic process from time on.

Page 14: Lu Wu

THANK YOU!

Lu WuUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

[email protected]