14
Toshihiro Fujii, Max Malacari, Jose A. Bellido, Bruce Dawson, Pavel Horvath, Miroslav Hrabovsky, Jiaqi Jiang, Dusan Mandat, Ariel Matalon, John N. Matthews, Pavel Motloch, Libor Nozka, Palatka, Miroslav Pech, Paolo Privitera, Petr Schovanek, Stan B. Thomas, Petr Travnicek 日本物理学会 第71回年次大会 東北学院大学 2016319FAST実験2:新型大気蛍光望遠鏡の性能評価 arXiv: 1504.00692 http://www.fast-project.org

FAST実験2:新型大気蛍光望遠鏡の性能評価

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Toshihiro Fujii, Max Malacari, Jose A. Bellido, Bruce Dawson, Pavel Horvath, Miroslav Hrabovsky, Jiaqi Jiang, Dusan Mandat, Ariel Matalon, John N. Matthews, Pavel Motloch, Libor Nozka, Palatka, Miroslav Pech,

    Paolo Privitera, Petr Schovanek, Stan B. Thomas, Petr Travnicek712016319

    FAST2

    arXiv: 1504.00692http://www.fast-project.org

    http://www.fast-project.orghttp://www.fast-project.org

  • Fine pixelated camera

    Low-cost and simplified/optimized FD

    Target : > 1019.5 eV, ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECR) and neutral particles

    Huge target volume Fluorescence detector array Too expensive to cover a huge area

    2

    Single or few pixels and smaller optics

    Fluorescence detector Array of Single-pixel Telescopes

    Segmented mirror telescope Variable angles of elevation steps.

    construction is still in development

    15 deg 45 deg

    Joint Laboratory of Optics Olomouc March 2014 7

  • 3

    20 km UHECRs

    16

    56 EeV zenith 500

    1

    2

    3

    1

    3 2

    Pho

    tons

    at d

    iaph

    ragm

    P

    hoto

    ns a

    t dia

    phra

    gm

    Pho

    tons

    at d

    iaph

    ragm

    Fluorescence detector Array of Single-pixel Telescopes Each telescope: 4 PMTs, 3030

    field of view (FoV).

    Reference design: 1 m2 aperture, 1515 FoV per PMT

    Each station: 12 telescopes, 48 PMTs, 30360 FoV.

    Deploy on a triangle grid with 20 km spacing, like Surface Detector Array.

    If 500 stations are installed, a ground coverage is ~ 150,000 km2.

    Geometry: Radio, SD, coincidence of three stations being investigated.

  • FAST Exposure

    4

    1.E+2

    1.E+3

    1.E+4

    1.E+5

    1.E+6

    1.E+7

    1.E+8

    1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040

    Expo

    sure

    s (L

    =km

    ^2*s

    r*yr

    )

    Year

    Fly's Eye

    AGASA

    HiRes

    Auger

    JEM-EUSO nadir

    TAx4

    JEM-EUSO tilt

    TA

    Conventional operation of FD under 15% duty cycle

    Target: >1019.5 eV

    Observation in moon night to achieve 25% duty cycle,

    Target: >1019.8 eV = Super GZK events (Hotspot/Warmspot)

    R&D by Auger FD

    Ground area of 150,000 km2 with 25% duty cycle = 37,500 km2 (12Auger, cost ~50 MUSD)

    Auger

    Preliminary

    FAST

  • 1

    FAST - today

    Accepted for publication in Astroparticle Physics

    R&D for FAST Project

    5

    FAST prototype measurements at Utah

    Stable operation under high night sky backgrounds.

    UHECR detection.

    Published in Astroparticle Physics 74 (2016) 64-72

    Next milestones by new full-scale FAST prototype

    Establish the FAST sensitivity.

    Detect a shower profile including Xmax with FAST

    FAST meeting in December 2015 (Olomouc, Czech Republic)

    EUSO-TA telescope + FAST camera

  • FAST - progress in design and construction

    UV Plexiglass Segmented primary mirror 8 inch PMT camera (2 x 2)

    1m2 aperture FOV = 25x 25

    variable tilt

    Joint Laboratory of Optics Olomouc Malargue November 2015 3

    Prototype - October 2015

    15

    45

    6Joint Laboratory of Optics in Olomouc, Czech Republic

    Full-scale FAST Prototype

  • Possible Application of FAST Prototype

    7

    1. Introduction

    The hybrid detector of the Pierre Auger Observatory [1] consists of 1600surface stations water Cherenkov tanks and their associated electronics and24 air fluorescence telescopes. The Observatory is located outside the city ofMalargue, Argentina (69 W, 35 S, 1400 m a.s.l.) and the detector layout isshown in Fig. 1. Details of the construction, deployment and maintenance ofthe array of surface detectors are described elsewhere [2]. In this paper we willconcentrate on details of the fluorescence detector and its performance.

    Figure 1: Status of the Pierre Auger Observatory as of March 2009. Gray dots show thepositions of surface detector stations, lighter gray shades indicate deployed detectors, whiledark gray defines empty positions. Light gray segments indicate the fields of view of 24fluorescence telescopes which are located in four buildings on the perimeter of the surfacearray. Also shown is a partially completed infill array near the Coihueco station and theposition of the Central Laser Facility (CLF, indicated by a white square). The descriptionof the CLF and also the description of all other atmospheric monitoring instruments of thePierre Auger Observatory is available in [3].

    The detection of ultra-high energy (! 1018 eV) cosmic rays using nitrogenfluorescence emission induced by extensive air showers is a well establishedtechnique, used previously by the Flys Eye [4] and HiRes [5] experiments. It isused also for the Telescope Array [6] project that is currently under construction,and it has been proposed for the satellite-based EUSO and OWL projects.

    Charged particles generated during the development of extensive air showersexcite atmospheric nitrogen molecules, and these molecules then emit fluores-cence light in the 300 430 nm range. The number of emitted fluorescencephotons is proportional to the energy deposited in the atmosphere due toelectromagnetic energy losses by the charged particles. By measuring the rate

    7

    a r t i c l e i n f o

    Article history:Received 25 December 2011Received in revised form25 May 2012Accepted 25 May 2012Available online 2 June 2012

    Keywords:Ultra-high energy cosmic raysTelescope Array experimentExtensive air shower array

    a b s t r a c t

    The Telescope Array (TA) experiment, located in the western desert of Utah, USA, is designed for theobservation of extensive air showers from extremely high energy cosmic rays. The experiment has asurface detector array surrounded by three fluorescence detectors to enable simultaneous detection ofshower particles at ground level and fluorescence photons along the shower track. The TA surfacedetectors and fluorescence detectors started full hybrid observation in March, 2008. In this article wedescribe the design and technical features of the TA surface detector.

    & 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    1. Introduction

    The main aim of the Telescope Array (TA) experiment [1] is toexplore the origin of ultra high energy cosmic rays (UHECR) usingtheir energy spectrum, composition and anisotropy. There are twomajor methods of observation for detecting cosmic rays in theenergy region above 1017.5 eV. One method which was used at theHigh Resolution Flys Eye (HiRes) experiment is to detect airfluorescence light along air shower track using fluorescencedetectors. The other method, adopted by the AGASA experiment,is to detect air shower particles at ground level using surfacedetectors deployed over a wide area ( ! 100 km2).

    The AGASA experiment reported that there were 11 eventsabove 1020 eV in the energy spectrum [2,3]. However, theexistence of the GZK cutoff [4,5] was reported by the HiRes

    experiment [6]. The Pierre Auger experiment confirmed thesuppression on the cosmic ray flux at energy above 4"1019 eV[7] using an energy scale obtained by fluorescence light tele-scopes (FD). The contradiction between results from fluorescencedetectors and those from surface detector arrays (SD) remains tobe investigated by having independent energy scales usingboth techniques. Hybrid observations with SD and FD enableus to compare both energy scales. Information about core locationand impact timing from SD observation improves accuracy ofreconstruction of FD observations. Observations with surfacedetectors have a nearly 100% duty cycle, which is an advantageespecially for studies of anisotropy. Correlations between arrivaldirections of cosmic rays and astronomical objects in this energyregion should give a key to exploring the origin of UHECR [8] andtheir propagation in the galactic magnetic field.

    Fig. 1. Layout of the Telescope Array in Utah, USA. Squares denote 507 SDs. There are three subarrays controlled by three communication towers denoted by triangles. Thethree star symbols denote the FD stations.

    T. Abu-Zayyad et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 689 (2012) 879788

    Pierre Auger Collaboration, NIM-A (2010) Telescope Array Collaboration NIM-A (2012)

    Identical simplified FD

    Telescope Array Experiment

    Pierre Auger Observatory

    log(E(eV))18 18.2 18.4 18.6 18.8 19 19.2 19.4 19.6

    Effic

    ienc

    y

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1 ProtonIron

    log(E(eV))18 18.2 18.4 18.6 18.8 19 19.2 19.4 19.6

    Ener

    gy R

    esol

    utio

    n [%

    ]

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    Proton

    Iron

    log(E(eV))18 18.2 18.4 18.6 18.8 19 19.2 19.4 19.6

    ]2 R

    esol

    utio

    n [g

    /cm

    max

    X 0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Proton

    Iron

    Energy

    Xmax

    Install FAST at Auger and TA for a cross calibration.

    Profile reconstruction with geometry given by SD (smearing gaussian width of 1 in direction, 100 m in core location).

    Energy: 10%, Xmax : 35 g/cm2 at 1019.5 eV

    Independent cross-check of Energy and Xmax scale between Auger and TA

    (E (eV))10

    log17.5 18 18.5 19 19.5 20 20.5

    )-1 s

    -1 sr

    -2 m2

    (eV

    24/1

    03

    E

    Flux

    -110

    1

    10Preliminary

    TA ICRC 2015

    Auger ICRC 2015

  • Ray-Trace Simulation

    8420mm x 420 mm

    The spherical surface on PMT has complicated point spread function.

    We need to calculation efficiency of optics.

    It will be used in the offline analysis after data-taking is started.

    Focal plane Bottom plane

  • PMT Calibration

    9

    Wavelength [nm]200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600

    Effic

    ienc

    y [%

    ]

    5

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    Hamamatsu QE0.85Data

    Detection Efficiency (QECE)

    6""

    Figure 3: Diagram of experimental setup for the measurement of wavelength-dependent

    detection efficiency using a deuterium lamp. The monochromator can be replaced by a mirror, shown in gray, for measurements of absolute detection efficiency using the laser source. The

    number labels correspond to equipment information listed in Table 1 and referenced in the text.

    (1) PMT Hamamatsu Photomultiplier Tube, Type

    H7195P(R329P) (2) Detector Newport 918D-UV Photodiode Detectors (3) Powermeter Newport 2936-C Powermeter (4) Laser Newport Excelsior 375 CW Laser (5) Integrating Sphere Newport General Purpose Integrating Sphere, Model

    70675 (6) Spectrum Lamp Newport Deuterium Lamp, Model 60000 (7) Lamp Power Supply Newport Deuterium Lamp Power Supply, Model

    68840 (8) Monochromator Newport Cornerstone 130TM Motorized 1/8m

    Monochromator, Model 74000 (9) Spectrophotometer Newport Spectrophotometer, Model 77700 (10) Calibration Lamp Newport Pencil Style HgAr Calibration Lamp, Model

    6047

    Table 1: Equipment List, numbers correspond to diagram in Figure 3

    (used in AirFly)Astroparticle Physics 42 (2013) 90102

    PMTSingle photo-electronGainQECEDynamic range

    Preliminary

  • UV Band-pass Filter

    10

    UV band pass filter used in

    MAGIC

    http://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.02048v2.pdf

    Using UV-pass filters for bright Moon observations with MAGIC D. Guberman

    Wavelenght [nm]300 350 400 450 500 550 600

    Ph

    oto

    n f

    lux

    [a.u

    .]

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    Filte

    r tr

    an

    sm

    issio

    n

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1Direct Moonlight

    Diffuse Moonlight

    Cherenkov light

    Filter transmission

    Figure 1: The blue curve shows the typical Cherenkov light spectrum for a vertical shower initiated by aTeV g-ray, detected at 2200 m a.s.l.[7]. The black solid curve shows the shape of direct moonlight spectrum.The dashed black curve, the spectrum from diffuse moonlight. The three curves are scaled by an arbitrarynormalization factor. The filters transmission curve is plotted in red.

    ing close to the moon, Mie-scattering of moonlight dominates and its intensity is higher at higherwavelengths (direct moonlight). The actual shape of the spectrum depends on the aerosol contentand distribution and the zenith angle of the Moon. The diffuse and direct moonlight spectra canboth be obtained by folding the solar spectrum with the Albedo of the Moon. This was done usingthe code SMARTS[9, 10] and is shown in figure 1.

    The spectrum of Cherenkov light of showers depends mainly on the altitude of the showermaximum, but also on the nature of the incident particle (whether is a g-ray or a hadron) and itsenergy. For a vertical shower initiated by a TeV g-ray, detected at 2200 m a.s.l, it peaks at 330nm, as shown in figure 1. Taking all into account, we selected commercial inexpensive UV-passfilters produced by Subei (model ZWB3) with a thickness of 3mm and a wavelength cut at 420 nm.Its transmission curve was measured and is also shown in figure 1. These filters transmit 45% ofCherenkov light and 20% direct moonlight.

    The filters were bought in tiles of 20 30 cm2, and mounted on a light-weight frame. Thisframe consists on an outer aluminium ring that is screwed to the PMT camera and steel 66 mm2

    section ribs that are placed between the filter tiles (see figure 2). The filter tiles are fixed to the ribsby plastic pieces and the space between tiles and ribs is filled with silicone. This gives mechanicalstability to the system and prevents light leaks. Two people can mount or dismount the filters in thePMT camera in about 15 minutes.

    3

    Using UV-pass filters for bright Moon observations with MAGIC D. Guberman

    Figure 2: On the left, the filters installed in the camera of one of the MAGIC telescopes. On the right, theframe design that holds the filters. The outer Al ring is screwed to the camera. Filter tiles are held by plasticpieces to steel 66 mm2 section ribs.

    3. Data sample and analysis procedure

    After data quality selection a total of almost 15 observation hours of Crab Nebula with the UV-pass filters were recorded. The data were taken in the standard L1-L3 trigger condition[3], in theso-called wobble mode[8], with a standard wobble offset of 0.4. All the data analysed correspondto zenith angles lower than 35.

    The data was divided into four samples with different NSB conditions and it is summarizedin table 1. The brightness of the sky in each situation is expressed in units of Dark NSB. Thetwo samples of highest NSB include situations in which observations without filters are currentlyimpossible in MAGIC. The mean current measured (DC) in one of the telescopes (MAGIC 1) isalso shown in table 1 and compared to the expected one under the same brightness conditions,but without filters (Eq. DC). The ratio between both of them depends on how close to the Moonthe telescopes are pointing: the background transmission is higher far from the Moon where thediffuse moonlight regime dominates. Close to the Moon the measured DCs with filters can be 5times lower than the expected one without filters, which is consistent with a moonlight transmissionof 20%.

    To analyse the data and to evaluate the energy threshold, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations areneeded. The MC for standard analysis in MAGIC (without filters and in dark conditions) wastuned to include the filters transmission, the shadowing in some pixels that is produced by theribs of the frame and the increased NSB. With these modified MC simulations, the data has beenanalysed using the standard MAGIC analysis and reconstructions software, MARS[2, 12]. Due tothe relatively high brightness of the sky, the image cleaning settings for each sample were modifiedwith respect to the standard ones[1].

    4

    http://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.02048v2.pdfhttp://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.02048v2.pdf

  • 15

    FAST components

    UV PMMA windowin octagonal aperture

    4 PMTscamera8 inch

    UV filterglass

    cover = black shroud

    DUST and STRAY LIGHT protection

    cabling

    electronics

    mirrors4

    Building - ground plan required dimensions

    Cca

    3000

    mm

    Cca 3500 mm

    600

    mm

    FOV

    5Cc

    a 30

    00 m

    m

    Cca 3500 mm

    FOV

    Building height elevation 15required dimensions

    Cca 1000 mm

    Design of Hut and Shutter

    11

    8

    shutter like sectional garrage doors

    closed

    open

    roof window

    Possible solution of building40

    00 m

    mC

    ca 3

    000

    mm

    closed

    open

    Adjustable elevation 15 or 45, like HEAT and TALE, to enlarge the FoV of the current FD.

    Robust design for maintenance free and stand-alone observation.

  • FAST Prototype in February 2016

    12

  • FAST Hut and Shutter being constructed

    !!"#$%&'&($)*+,-./($-01!('23$#4$)5642"3.7"582+

    !"#$%&$'()*+,$#%-.

    !ELS

    Black Rock Mesa FD Station

    2012118 Many activities, EUSO-TA, Radio

    We will plan to install the full-scale FAST telescope on June 2016.

    Telescope Array experiment, Black Rock Mesa site

    !!"#$%&'&($)*+,-./($-01!('23$#4$)5642"3.7"582+

    !"#$%&$'()*+,$#%-.

    !

    FAST

  • Summary and Future Plans

    14

    Fluorescence detector Array of Single-pixel Telescopes (FAST)

    Deploy the economical fluorescence detector array.

    Detect UHECRs and neutral particles.

    The full-scale FAST prototype is being constructed, and almost ready to ship to Utah.

    We plan to install in June 2016.

    Expected resolution using the FAST + SD combined analysis:

    Energy: 10%, Xmax: 35 g/cm2 at 1019.5 eV

    http://www.fast-project.org

    http://www.fast-project.orghttp://www.fast-project.org