Upload
saurabh-arora
View
173
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
In the past few years, US FDA has implemented the concepts of Quality by Design (QbD) into its approval processes. FDA is insisting that quality should be built into a product with an understanding of the product and process, through development and manufacturing. QbD is a successor to the "quality by QC" (or "quality after design") approach.
Citation preview
KEY COMPONENTS OF PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY BY DESIGN (QBD) – AN INTRODUCTION
By Dr. Saurabh Arora
Managing DirectorAuriga Research Limited
CONTENTS
Introduction Current approach vs QbD Why QbD is Win-Win Implications of QbD Overview of QbD Key Components Conclusion
HOW DO WE ESTABLISH PRODUCT QUALITY?Then and Now
HISTORICAL APPROACH TO QUALITY
No testing required Testing of final products Testing of ingredients and final product Extensive testing of ingredients, final
products and control of process parameters Testing and control based on process
validation and strict adherence to process
JUST GET FROM A TO B
Traditional approach focused on achieving compliance to product specifications
Only minor variations studied to established that the product is reproducible
Not necessarily the best way to get from A to B
A BETTER WAY TO CROSS THE RIVER?
QBD
What is the best way to get from A to B? What are the other routes can I take to safely
get from A to B? It is like having a GPS navigation system for
your product and process!
NEW LEVEL OF QUALITY
Systematic development process Moving away from “hit and trial” Quality is built into the product not only
controlled by testing
CURRENT VS. QBD APPROACH TO PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT
Current Approach QbD Approach
Quality assured by testing and inspection
Quality built into the product & process by design, based on scientific understanding
Data intensive submission – disjoined information without “big picture”
Knowledge rich submission – showing product knowledge & process understanding
Specifications based on batch history
Specifications based on product performance requirements
“Frozen Process” discouraging changes
Flexible process within design space, allowing continuous improvement
Focus on reproducibility – often avoiding or ignoring variations
Focus on robustness – understanding and controlling variations
THINK WIN-WINQbD is good for both the manufacturers and the regulators
QBD IS WIN-WIN
Wins for the regulatorMore pharmaceutical products approved in shorter timelineBetter quality products reaching the marketLower-cost products available to the consumerReduced audit frequency
QBD IS WIN-WIN
Wins for the manufacturer
Reduced time to market
Space and flexibility for more innovation
Reduced documentation
Better communication between authorities and industry
Guaranteed quality for every unit produced
Decreased cost of production by improved productivity
Competitive advantage in the market
Image improvement
Creating value using existing data and resources
Better knowledge management
IMPLICATIONS ON THE ORGANISATIONImplications on of QbD
QBD IMPLICATIONS
QbD
Organization Process
Management
Personnel
QA/QC
IT
Technology
Understanding
IMPLICATIONS ON PERSONNEL
Employees need new skills Scientific data analysis Statistics Process control Very similar to 6 Sigma training structure
Master black belts Black belts Green belts
IMPLICATIONS ON PERSONNEL
Structural changes might be required There might be need for new Department There is a need for increased collaboration
between departments and functions Increased contact with regulatory authorities Clearly defined to accountability roles and
responsibility Interdisciplinary project team, QA, R&D, IT,
manufacturing
IMPLICATIONS ON MANAGEMENT
Commitment of management Initial phase will require more investment,
though there will be saving in the long run. Define the QbD development strategy, team,
goals, objectives, commit to resources, expected benefits
Might be risky to ignore QbD Regular review of the progress Choice of outsourcing partner Ensuring proper communication
IMPLICATIONS ON QA
Must be aware of changes in the regulatory process
The structure of audits will changeScrutiny will challenge scientific
understanding of quality factors and risk mitigation
More focus on the development Department
Comparison between real design space and documented design space
Documentation of improvements, changes and deviations
IMPLICATIONS ON QA
Validation Validation to focus on management of critical
to quality parameters Could be, real-time using PAT instead of three
batch Better process understanding Reduced
validation effort Software validation
Documentation Better process understanding may change
specifications Submissions would need to include design
space and control space
LINKING 4 AREAS OF PROCESS UNDERSTANDING
Risk managemen
t
QA/QC
Technology
IT
QbD
BASIC TERMINOLOGYDefinitions and acronyms
WHAT IS PQ?
What is Pharmaceutical Quality (PQ)? According to USFDA – a product should be called as of
pharmaceutical quality when it is - Free of Contamination Reproducibly delivers the therapeutic benefits
promised in the label to the consumer
Pharmaceutical Quality = f (Properties of Drug Substance, excipients, Mfg. Process, Packaging)
WHAT IS PHARMACEUTICAL QBD ?
It is a systematic approach to pharmaceutical development that begins with predefined objectives and emphasizes product and process understanding and process control, based on sound science and quality risk management.
OVERVIEW OF QBD
Labeled Use
Safety & Efficacy
Identify
Critical Material Attributes (CMA) &
Critical Process Parameters (CPP)
Design Formulation
Design Process
Define
Target Product Quality Profile (TPQP)
Knowledge Space
Establish
Control Strategy
Monitor & Update Process
Target --------------------------- Design ----------------------- Implementation
KEY COMPONENTS OF QBD
Target Product Profile (TPP) It is patient & labeling centered concept It includes
Route of administration Dosage form and size Max. & Min. Doses Pharmaceutical elegance (appearance) Target patient population
KEY COMPONENTS OF QBD
Target Product Quality Profile (TPQP) It is quantitative surrogate for aspects
of clinical safety & efficacy It includes quantitative targets for
Impurities & stabilityDissolution release profile & Other product specific performance
requirements e.g. Bioequivalence to the RLD for generic products Resuspendability for an oral suspension Adhesion for a transdermal system Viscosity for a topical cream etc.
KEY COMPONENTS OF QBD
Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) These are Physical, chemical, biological or
microbiological properties or characteristics of final product that need to be controlled (directly or indirectly) to ensure product quality e.g. Dissolution test
CQAs include both Aspects of product performance Determinants of product performance
KEY COMPONENTS OF QBD
Critical Material Attributes (CMAs) These are Physical, chemical, biological
or microbiological properties or characteristics of raw materials & mfg. process parameters that need to be controlled to ensure product quality
These are independent of each other e.g. Particle Size & Hardness areCMAs
CQA of RM & Mfg. Process Parameters = CMA
KEY COMPONENTS OF QBD
Process Parameters (PP) It is any input operating parameter (mixing
speed, flow rate) and process state variable (temperature, pressure) of a process or unit operation
Classification of PP for a Unit Operation Unclassified Process Parameters (UPP) Critical Process Parameters (CPP) Non-critical Parameters (non-CPP)
CLASSIFICATION OF PROCESS PARAMETERS
Parameter Type Definition Sensitivity
non-CPP Not critical • No failure in target product quality profile (TPQP) observed or predicted in the potential operating space (POS), and• No interactions with other parameters in the proven acceptable range (PAR)
UPP Criticality Unknown
• Not established• The default in the absence of pharmaceuticalDevelopment
CPP Critical (control needed to ensure quality)
• Failure in target product quality profile (TPQP) observed or predicted in the potential operating space (POS), or• Interactions with other parameters in the proven acceptable range (PAR)
IDENTIFICATION OF PROCESS PARAMETERS
Wet Granulation
Material AttributesDrug Substance
DS AmountDS Form
DS Particle SizeDS Moisture Content
DS Bulk Density
Material AttributesExcipients
Exp. AmountExp. Particle SizeExp. Bulk Density
GranulationOperating ParametersChopper Configuration
Impeller SpeedGranulation TimeOrder of Addition
TemperatureSpray Nozzle Type
Binder Addition Rate
GranulationState Conditions
Power ConsumptionTemperature
Material AttributesAfter GranulationBlend Uniformity
Granule Size DistributionAgglomerate Size
MoistureBulk Density
Flow Properties
KEY COMPONENTS OF QBD
Design Space The multidimensional combination and
interaction of input variables (e.g., material attributes) and process parameters that have been demonstrated to provide assurance of quality
A design space may be constructed for a single unit operation, multiple unit operations, or for the entire process
TOOLS TO IMPLEMENT QBD
Design of experiments (DOE) Risk assessment Process analytical technology (PAT)
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT (DOE)
Structured, organized method for determining the relationship between factors affecting a process and the response of that process
DOE Methodology1. Choose Experimental Design (e.g. Full
Factorial design)2. Conduct randomized experiments3. Analyze data4. Create multidimensional surface model
RISK ASSESSMENT
Risk It is defined as the combination of the
probability of occurrence of harm and the severity of that harm
Risk assessmentA systematic process of organizing
information to support a risk decision to be made within a risk mgmt process.
It consists of the identification of hazards and the analysis and evaluation of risks associated with exposure to those hazards
PROCESS ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY (PAT) A system for designing, analyzing and
controlling manufacturing through timely measurements (i.e. during processing) of critical quality and performance attributes of raw & in process materials and processes with the goal of ensuring final product quality.
The term analytical in PAT is viewed broadly to include chemical, physical, microbiological, mathematical and risk analysis conducted in an integrated manner.
CONCLUSIONThe End
CONCLUSION
Quality by design is an essential part of the modern approach to pharmaceutical quality
QbD is Win-Win
PAT, DOE and Risk Assessments are tools to facilitate the implementation of QbD.
THANK YOU!
Dr. Saurabh AroraPresentation will be available for download @
WWW.Lab-Training.Com