by Jongsoo(Jay) Yooniwillbe99@gmail.com

twitter @iwillbe99www.jayyoon.kr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/60648084@N00/2462966749/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.ko

IPRIPR andand

CommonsCommons

Analysis

텍스트

텍스트Tragedy of the Commons

http://s0.geograph.org.uk/photos/01/34/013499_d958cc19.jpghttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

commonscommonscommonscommons

non exclusionbut rivalry

Tragedy of the Commons

private ownership

government regulation

self regulation

overconsumption

private ownership

government regulation

self regulation

Elinor Ostrom

privatizationwith the market

pine tree protection association

“Governing the Commons”

transaction costmonopoly of the infrastrucure

common goodsas the infrastructure

Tragedy of the Commons

control by public authorities

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3045/2961565820_3d59b7bdfb_b.jpghttp://creativehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/commons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

Free Ride on the Commons

commonscommonscommonscommons

non exclusionand non rivalry

intellectualproperty

supply bygoverment

publicsubsidies

underproduction

Free Ride on the Commons

intellectual propertyas the exclusive right

public supply

public subsidies

public funds

privatizationwith the market

patronage system

open science

public goodsas the infrastructure

financial incentivefor innovation and creativity

Free Ride on the Commons

through public organizations

non exclusionrivalry

non exclusionnon rivalry

underprodutionoverconsumptionincentiveregulation

Physical Commons and Intellectual Commons

infrastructure infrastructure

ICICICIC IPIPIPIPinnovationcreativity

infrastructure

resource

IC(intellectual commons) and IP(intellectual property)

economy

IC(intellectual commons) and IP(intellectual property)

IC is different from PC(physical commons), as IP is different

from PP(physical property)

IC is not by-product of IP

IP is from IC

IC is infrastructure for IP itself as well as innovation

and creativity

IP should be IC asap

Both IP and IC are for innovation and creativity

Scheme

CreativityCreativityInnovationInnovationCreativityCreativityInnovationInnovation

ResourceResourceResourceResource

AccessAccessUseUse

AccessAccessUseUse

텍스트텍스트

IPR

IPR

Intellectual Property Scheme

Ownership

exclusive rights

get permission

or

DIEhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/mickal/9503734

/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

talentstalentscraftscrafts

talentstalentscraftscrafts

productioproductionn

IPRIPR

creativitycreativityinnovationinnovationcreativitycreativityinnovationinnovation

centralized

industrialized

exclusive

CreativityCreativityInnovationInnovationCreativityCreativityInnovationInnovation

ResourceResourceResourceResource

AccessAccessUseUse

AccessAccessUseUse

텍스트텍스트

open

open

Open Culture & Science Scheme

with or without pay

experienceexperience&&

informationinformation

experienceexperience&&

informationinformation

insightinsightinsightinsight

free free thinkingthinking

realizatiorealizationn

creativitycreativityinnovationinnovationcreativitycreativityinnovationinnovation

decentralized

diversity

freedom of information

freedom of communication

exclusive exclusive creativitycreativity

openopencreativitycreativity

collaboraticollaborativeve

creativitycreativity

freefreecreativitycreativity

Balance

Out of the Balance

transaction costs

monopoly of the Infrastrucutre

increasing costs for the innovation and creativityobstacles to the incremental and cumulative innovationhindrance to the cultural diversity

market failure

extension of objects and periods patent for software and BM TPM micky mouse act

putting the cart before the horse patent troll patent as a defensive measure copyright against free expression

destruction of the commons aggressive IP policy e.g. Bay-Dole Act glovalization of IP digital contents on the internet

Out of the Balance

http://www.papermasters.com/images/national-infrastructure.jpgnot licensed by CCL

Tragedy of the Non Commons

property rule

exclusive right

liability rule

compulsory licenseACS (alternative compensation system) free use with compensation various schemesopt-in, opt-out or mandatory by the law

right for the compensation

(1) trying to keep the Balance

enjoy

but

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/26/61056391_31343afdc6_b.jpghttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0

IPR to exclude

IPR to prevent the exclusion

(2) trying to keep the balance

new strategy with various motives

satisfy conditions

and

FREEhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/josefgrunig/

1732787905/p://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

http://www.greenxchange.cc/not licensed under CCL

www.wbcsd.org/web/epc

World Business Council for Sustainable Development)

http://www.wipo.int/portal/index.html.ennot licensed by CCL

Blues Sky Commissionproposed by Prof. Lessig

http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/DSCF0886-1024x588.jpghttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

1. In the short term, to ‘actively support voluntary licensing’ schemes like Creative Commons

2. Secondly, for WIPO to establish a ‘blue sky commission’ to look into reforming copyright for the digital age.

http://www.ip.qut.edu.au/blueskyhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/au/deed.en

ICICICIC IPIPIPIPinnovationcreativity

infrastructure

resource

economy

Copyright by Jay Yoon(www.jayyoon.kr)Except where otherwise noted, content on this work is

licensed under a creative commons attribution South Korea 2.0 license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/kr) .