25
An Overview of the OWASP Top Ten Web Application Risks and Threat Modeling THREAT MODELING FOR WEB APPLICATIONS (AND OTHER DUTIES AS ASSIGNED)

Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

An Overview of the OWASP Top Ten Web Application Risks and Threat Modeling

THREAT MODELING FOR WEB APPLICATIONS (AND OTHER

DUTIES AS ASSIGNED)

Page 2: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ Who is Mike Tetreault? ● Twenty five years of IT experience ● Primarily web application development and team leadership, but also

includes network, server, and database administration ⦿ Security background

● Lifelong interest in physical and data security ● Security is the one constant across all of my roles ● Certification Activities ○ 2003 – Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) ○ 2009 – Certified Secure Software Lifecycle Professional (CSSLP) ○ 2013 – Healthcare Information Security and Privacy Practitioner (HCISPP)

Introduction

2

Page 3: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ Why focus on web applications? ● We all have them and we all use them ● This is why they have the largest threat profile

⦿ Why are web applications everywhere? ● Quickly installed and updated ● Work across devices and operating systems

⦿ Why is this bad? ● Data is accessible from anywhere ● Clients do some hidden processing

⦿ This is what leads to vulnerabilities

Presentation Overview

3

Page 4: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ According to the 2015 Global Information Security Workforce Study by (ISC)2, 72% of the over 14,000 IT professionals surveyed believe that application vulnerabilities are the number one security issue for 2013.

⦿ Heartland Payment Systems suffered a SQL injection attack in 2008 which cost them $170 million, by their own admission.

⦿ 2016 “Cost of Data Breach” study by IBM and Ponemon puts the overall cost of a data breach at $154 to $158 per record.

Why It Matters

4

Page 5: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

OWASP Top Ten Web Application Security Risks

5

Injection Sensitive Data Exposure

Broken Data Authentication and Session Management

Missing Function Level Access Control

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Cross-Site Request Forgery

Insecure Direct Object References

Using Components With Known Vulnerabilities

Security Misconfiguration Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards

Page 6: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ What it is: ● Injection flaws, such as SQL, OS, and LDAP injection occur when

untrusted data is sent to an interpreter as part of a command or query. The attacker’s hostile data can trick the interpreter into executing unintended commands or accessing data without proper authorization.

⦿ What it looks like: ● String query = "SELECT * FROM accounts WHERE custID='" +

request.getParameter("id") + "'"; ⦿ How to mitigate:

● Keep untrusted data separate from commands and queries. ● Use a safe API with parameterized inputs. ● Scrub inputs to escape special characters (eg, SQL’s ‘:’ operator).

A1: Injection

6

Page 7: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

How Popular is SQL Injection?

7

Page 8: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ What it is: ● Application functions related to authentication and session

management are often not implemented correctly, allowing attackers to compromise passwords, keys, or session tokens, or to exploit other implementation flaws to assume other users’ identities.

⦿ What it looks like: ● http://example.com/saleitems?

jsessionid=2P0OCLPSKHCJUN2JVdest=Hawaii ⦿ How to mitigate:

● Use a single set of strong authentication and session management controls that has a simple interface for developers.

● Strong efforts should also be made to avoid Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) flaws which can be used to steal session IDs.

A2: Broken Data Authentication and Session Management

8

Page 9: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ What it is: ● XSS flaws occur whenever an application takes untrusted data and

sends it to a web browser without proper validation or escaping. XSS allows attackers to execute scripts in the victim’s browser which can hijack user sessions, deface web sites, or redirect the user to malicious sites.

⦿ What it looks like: ● page += "<input name='creditcard' type='TEXT' value='" +

request.getParameter("CC") + "'>"; ⦿ How to mitigate:

● Properly escape all untrusted (ie, user supplied) data based on the HTML context (body, attribute, JavaScript, CSS, or URL) that the data will be placed into.

A3: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

9

Page 10: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ What it is: ● A direct object reference occurs when a developer exposes a

reference to an internal implementation object, such as a file, directory, or database key.

⦿ What it looks like: ● Valid: http://example.com/app/accountInfo?acct=myacct ● Not Valid: http://example.com/app/accountInfo?acct=notmyacct

⦿ How to mitigate: ● Use per-user or per-session indirect references. ○ This means that the reference is only valid for a single user or

session, and means nothing to a different user or session.

A4: Insecure Direct Object References

10

Page 11: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ What it is: ● Good security requires having a secure configuration defined and

deployed for the application, frameworks, application server, web server, database server, and platform. Secure settings should be defined, implemented, and maintained, as defaults are often insecure. Additionally, software should be kept up to date.

⦿ How to mitigate: ● Maintain a repeatable hardening process that makes it fast and

easy to deploy another environment that is properly locked down. ● Implement a process for keeping abreast of and deploying all new

software updates and patches in a timely manner.

A5: Security Misconfiguration

11

Page 12: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ What it is: ● Many web applications do not properly protect sensitive data.

Attackers may steal or modify such weakly protected data to conduct credit card fraud, identity theft, or other crimes. Sensitive data deserves extra protection such as encryption at rest or in transit, as well as special precautions when exchanged with the browser.

⦿ How to mitigate: ● Encrypt all sensitive data at rest and in transit. ● Use standard algorithms with proper key management. ● Do not store sensitive data unnecessarily. ● Disable autocomplete and caching on pages that collect or display

sensitive information.

A6: Sensitive Data Exposure

12

Page 13: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ What it is: ● Most web applications verify function level access rights before making that

functionality visible in the UI. However, applications need to perform the same access control checks on the server when each function is accessed. If requests are not verified, attackers will be able to forge requests in order to access functionality without proper authorization.

⦿ What it looks like: ● http://example.com/app/getappInfo ● http://example.com/app/admin_getappInfo

⦿ How to mitigate: ● Implement a consistent and easy to analyze authorization module in your application.

○ Consider the process for managing entitlements to make sure it can be easily updated and audited.

○ The default state should be “deny all” with explicit authorizations. ● Don’t rely on presentation logic alone to hide options from the user.

○ Authorization checks must also be implemented in the controller or business logic.

A7: Missing Function Level Access Control

13

Page 14: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ What it is: ● A CSRF attack forces a logged-on victim’s browser to send a forged HTTP request,

including the victim’s session cookie and any other automatically included authentication information, to a vulnerable web application. This allows the attacker to force the victim’s browser to generate requests the vulnerable application thinks are legitimate requests from the victim.

⦿ What it looks like: ● http://example.com/app/transferFunds?amount=1500&destinationAccount=4673243243 ● Embedded link in malicious page: <img src="http://example.com/app/transferFunds?

amount=1500&destinationAccount=attackersAcct#" width="0" height="0" /> ⦿ How to mitigate:

● Include a unique token, individual to each user or session, in every page as a hidden field. ○ Verify that this token is returned with every request. If it is not, destroy the session and force

the user to reauthenticate. ● Require an explicit user authentication for high-value transactions.

○ This ensure the user is aware of the activity.

A8: Cross-Site Request Forgery

14

Page 15: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ What it is: ● Components, such as libraries, frameworks, and other software

modules, almost always run with full privileges. If a vulnerable component is exploited, such an attack can facilitate serious data loss or server takeover. Applications using components with known vulnerabilities may undermine application defenses and enable a range of possible attacks and impacts.

⦿ How to mitigate: ● Don’t use external, third-part components. It’s not realistic, but it

will work. ● Identify all components and versions you are using. Keep up to

date with both releases by the components maintainers and identified vulnerabilities on security mailing lists and databases.

A9: Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities

15

Page 16: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ What it is: ● Web applications frequently redirect and forward users to

other pages and websites, sometimes using untrusted data to determine the destination pages. Without proper validation, attackers can redirect victims to phishing or malware sites, or use forwards to access unauthorized pages.

⦿ How to mitigate: ● Don’t use redirects or forwards. ● If you do have to, use tokens instead of the URL or a portion

of the URL. This allows server-side code to translate the mapping to the target URL.

A10: Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards

16

Page 17: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ First, are there any questions about the OWASP Top Ten vulnerabilities?

⦿ Web applications present a big target ● Broad profile with rich data

⦿ Where do you begin with your security efforts? ⦿ Enter: Threat Modeling!

What now?

17

Page 18: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ A systematic approach for understanding, classifying, and assigning risk to threats and vulnerabilities

⦿ Security becomes what it should be: A cost/benefit analysis.

⦿ Based on two different classification schemes: ● STRIDE ○ STRIDE classifies threat

● DREAD ○ DREAD classifies risks

What is Threat Modeling?

18

Page 19: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ Identify your security objectives ● All security can be characterized as being related to

Confidentiality, Integrity, or Availability. ● An objective can be tied to one or all of those characteristics

⦿ High Level Objective Categories ● Identity ● Financial ● Reputation ● Privacy and Regulatory ● Availability Guarantees

How do you start?

19

Page 20: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ Application Overview ● Understand the Components, Data Flows, and Trust Boundaries. ● UML Use Case diagrams are handy for this.

⦿ Decompose the Application ● Identify the features and modules with security impacts. ● Understand: ○ How data enters the module. ○ How the module validates and processes the data. ○ Where the data flows. ○ How the data is stored. ○ What fundamental decisions and assumptions are made by the module.

⦿ Now that you know what the application looks like, you can classify its threats using the STRIDE model.

What does the application look like?

20

Page 21: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ Spoofing ● Users cannot become another user or assume their attributes.

⦿ Tampering ● Applications should never send internal data to users, and should always verify inputs before

storing or processing it. ⦿ Repudiation

● An application needs to be able to prove that authorized activities are initiated by authenticated users.

⦿ Information Disclosure ● Applications should only store sensitive data if proper controls are in place.

⦿ Denial Of Service ● Large, resource-intensive queries should only be accessible to properly authorized and

authenticated users. ⦿ Elevation of Privileges

● Users should only be able to access information and processing capabilities appropriate for their role in a system.

⦿ Each threat receives a DREAD score.

STRIDE – Characterizing Known Threats

21

Page 22: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ Each threat is scored on a 1-10 scale, added together, and divided by 5.

⦿ Damage ● If a threat exploit occurs, how much damage will it cause?

⦿ Reproducibility ● How easy is it to reproduce a threat exploit?

⦿ Exploitability ● How difficult are the steps needed to exploit the threat?

⦿ Affected Users ● How many users are affected if a threat is exploited?

⦿ Discoverability ● How easy is it to discover the threat? ● Often set to 10 by default, with the assumption that it will be discovered.

DREAD – Classifying, Quantifying, Comparing, and Prioritizing Risk

22

Page 23: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ Analyze the DREAD score for each threat ⦿ Understand the remediation for each threat, and what you need

to do with the risk presented by each: ● Acceptance – Not all security is “worth it” ○ You don’t spend $50,000 on security controls for a hot dog cart.

● Avoidance – Just don’t do it ○ Not typically feasible in application development.

● Limitation – Take steps to minimize risk ○ Most common risk management strategy. ○ Example: Disk drives may fail, so we maintain RAID and backups.

● Transference – Let someone else take the risk ○ Outsource common functions that are not a core competency . ○ Purchasing insurance can be an option.

Next Steps

23

Page 24: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ Let’s say you have a space station, and it has a highly exploitable exhaust port… What would its DREAD score look like?

⦿ Or you have a big invading space ship, and you allow unauthenticated access to your network (and don’t have host security)…

⦿ If you run a highly virtualized environment with potentially hostile VM’s, be sure you monitor hosts breaking out of the sandbox (and take quick action).

Other Uses!

24

Page 25: Threat Modeling for Web Applications (and other duties as assigned)

10/28/2016 Mike Tetreault, CISSP, CSSLP, HCISPP

⦿ Twitter: @6502 ⦿ Email: [email protected] ⦿ Resources:

● OWASP – The Open Web Application Security Project ○ https://www.owasp.org/

● Threat Modeling, Frank Swiderski and Window Snyder, Microsoft Press, June 2004

● Threat Modeling Web Applications, J.D. Meier, Alex Mackman, Blaine Wastell, Microsoft Press, May 2005

● Mailing Lists and other resources: ○ Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures Database - http://cve.mitre.org ○ Microsoft Security Response Center ○ SANS – http://www.sans.org

Questions / Comments / Resources

25