Upload
lola
View
57
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
國際溫室氣體減量 認證驗證程序與發展趨勢介紹. 簡偉華 技術總監 DNV 大中華區氣候變化服務. 課程摘要. 國際間 GHG 減量計畫之查驗與查證需求 UNFCCC EU ETS GHG 減量計畫之查核 查驗 (validation) 查證 (verification) 與驗證 (certification) 產業溫室氣體排放查證程序與要求簡介. UN Framework Convention on Climate Change 聯合國氣候變化綱要公約. Annex I countries ( 工業化國家 ) 承諾將減少其 GHG 排放量. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Slide 1 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
國際溫室氣體減量認證驗證程序與發展趨勢介紹
簡偉華 技術總監DNV 大中華區氣候變化服務
Slide 2 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
課程摘要
國際間 GHG 減量計畫之查驗與查證需求UNFCCC
EU ETS
GHG 減量計畫之查核查驗 (validation)
查證 (verification) 與驗證 (certification)
產業溫室氣體排放查證程序與要求簡介
Slide 3 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
UNFCCC 之附件一國家 - Annex I countries
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change聯合國氣候變化綱要公約
Annex I countries( 工業化國家 )
承諾將減少其 GHG 排放量
Annex I
Non-Annex I countries( 開發中國家 )
Slide 4 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
京都議定書 (Kyoto Protocol)
GHGCO2 、 CH4 、 N2O 、 HFC 、 PFC 、 SF6
2008-2012 年 5 年年平均回歸至 1990 年水平以下 5.2%區域減量目標
美國 : -7%歐盟 : -8%日本 : -6%加拿大 : -6%澳大利亞 : +8%俄羅斯聯幫 : 0所有 Annex B 締約國 : -5.2%
京都議定書將於 2005.02.16 生效
Slide 5 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
國際間之 GHG 排放標準計算
被允許的排放量 (AAU)
京都議定書之目標值
1990 年排放量
預計達成之排放減量
A 國家20
10年實際排放量
排放減量之需求
B 國家
實際排放量
可交易之 AAU
Slide 6 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
清潔發展機制 - Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)
附件 I/B
出資者
執行者資助 CDM 計畫
認可之排放減量單位
CERs
Slide 7 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
附件 I/B 附件 I/B
出資者 執行者
資助 JI 計畫
ERUs
減少排放單位
共同減量 - Joint Implementation (JI)
Slide 8 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
1990 2000 2010 2020
80
100
120
指標排放目標量
可以銷售排放額度
A 國家
B 國家
必須購買排放額度
排放額度交易市場目前排放量
國際排放權交易 - Emission Trading (ET)
Slide 9 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
第三者查核 - The Third Party
第一者計畫投資者計畫執行者
排放額度供應者
DNV
認證單位
規範與準則 ( 標準 )
信任與信心 ?
第二者買方
第三者
Slide 10 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
第三者查核 - Baseline and Credit (CDM & JI)
年
GH
G 排
放量
[t C
O2-
eq]
BAU 排放基礎值
改善計畫之排放量
額外之排放減量
改善計畫
改善計畫量測所得之排放基礎值
需被查證之數量
Slide 11 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
第三者查核 - Cap & Trade (ET)
需被查證之數量
需被查證之數量
基礎年之 GHG 排放值
許可排放值
第 x 年之 GHG 排放值
可交易之排放量
Slide 12 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
GHG 減量計畫之查核需求
計畫設計
登錄
執行
監督
查驗
報告
查證
驗證
計畫執行前
計畫執行後查驗 : validation查證 : verification驗證 : certification
Slide 13 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
查驗、查證及驗證之目的
查驗 (validation)CDM 之強制要求, JI 之自願性要求由獨立的指定經營實體 (Designated Operational Entity, 簡稱 DOE)
計畫之設計基礎值與額外性方法學
檢驗並提供客觀證據,以確保所有預計達成的實際、可量測、額外性以及長期之排放減量要求均具體存在。
查證 (verification)審查並確認計畫或操作績效如監督計畫或報告議定書所描述之要求 根據事先確定的準則,藉由檢驗及客觀證據,來確認已達成之實際、可量測、額外以及長期之排放減量值
驗證 (certification)為確認操作過程或計畫已達成某一特定要求之結果的書面化保證證書為驗證之書面結果之一證書應描述計畫所達成之實際、可量測、額外以及長期排放減量之認可排放減量單位 (CERs)
Slide 14 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
結果
查驗 觀點 (Opinion)
( 例 ) In our opinion, the project as planned is likely to achieve the estimated emission reductions as given in the project design documentation…The project will be recommended by DNV for registration with the UNFCCC.
查證聲明書 (Statement)
( 例 ) Based on the information that was presented to DNV and evaluated by DNV, it is our opinion that 498,710 tons of CO2-equivalents have been abated by the project during the years 1993 - 1999.
驗證證書 (Certificate)
Slide 15 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
CDM 與 JI 之認可與驗證機制
Slide 16 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
CDM 組織架構
UNFCCC 缔约國會議 (COP/MOP) Conference of Parties to the UNFCCC
Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol ( COP/MOP)
CDM 執行理事會CDM Executive Board (CDM-EB)
認可專家組Accreditation Panel
林業工作組Afforestation and Reforestation Working Group/Panel
方法學專家組Methodology Panel
小型計畫專家組Small scale CDM Panel
Slide 17 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
CDM-EB 之組成與執掌
CDM 執行理事會( EB )是在 COP/MOP 下負責 CDM活動之機構CDM-EB 由 10 位專家組成
5 位分别代表五個聯合國官方區域
非洲、亞洲、拉丁美洲、加勒比海地區、中東歐、OECD 國家
1 位來自小島國組織2 位來自附件Ⅰ國家2 位來自非附件Ⅰ國家。
CDM-EB 之執掌批准建議的基準線與監測方
法學認可經營實體 (OE )維 護 CDM 註 冊 處 (CDM
registry )
簽發 CERs
Slide 18 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
指定經營實體 (DOE) 之任務
CDM 計畫查證Validation of CDM projects
計畫註冊送件Presentation of projects for registration
監測報告查證Verification of monitoring reports
推薦 CERs 之簽發Recommendation for CER issuance.
Slide 19 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
CDM-EB 對 OE 認可之產業別
Sector 01 Energy industries (renewal - / non-renewable resources)Sector 02 Energy distributionSector 03 Energy demandSector 04 Manufacturing industriesSector 05 Chemical industriesSector 06 ConstructionSector 07 TransportSector 08 Mining/mineral productionSector 09 Metal production Sector 10 Fugitive emissions from fuels (solid, oil and gas)Sector 11 Fugitive emissions from production and consumption of
halocarbons and sulphur hexafluorideSector 12 Solvent useSector 13 Waste handling and disposalSector 14 Afforestation and ReforestationSector 15 Agriculture
Slide 20 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
DOE 認可現況
目前 CDM-EB 已認可 4 個 DOEsDNV (11 sectors - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12 and 13)TÜV Süd GRUPPE (3 sectors - 1, 2 and 3) JQA (7 sectors - 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 10, 11 and 12)SGS (7 sectors - 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 10, 11 and 12)
20 個申請實體 (applicant entity, AE)Asahi and Co. British Standards Institution (BSI) BVQI Holdings Ltd. ChuoAoyama PwC Research Institute Corporation (CSRI)) Clouston Environmental Sd. Bhd. Conestoga Rovers & Associates Limited. (CRA) ERM Certification and Verification services Limited. (ERM CVS) Japan Audit and Certification Organisation for Environment and Quality Japan Consulting Institute (JCI) KPMG Certification B.V. Nexant Inc Spanish Association for Standardisation and Certification(AENOR) SGS UK Ltd. (SGS = Société Générale de Surveillance) The Korea Energy Management Corporation (Kemco) Tohmatsu Evaluation and Certification Organization (TECO) TÜV Anlagentechnik GmbH URS Corporation LimitedPricewaterhouseCoopers Certification B.V. (application withdrawn)
資料來源 : http://cdm.unfccc.int/DOE/list
Slide 21 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
查驗作業之相關方 - Validation
Solid lines indicate contractual relationships. Dashed lines indicate possible communication channels during validation.Note: Other relationships are possible.
諮詢顧問
計畫主辦國之 DNA
指定經營實體指定經營實體(DOE)(DOE)
計畫提出方
查驗作業合約
計畫實體計畫實體 CDM EB /
JI SC
締約國之利害相關者或 NGOs
地方利害相關者
Slide 22 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
CDM 計畫週期
設計
查驗 / 註冊監督
查證 / 驗證
簽發 CERs
PP: 計畫參與方
DOE: 指定經營實體
EB: CDM 執行理事會
CER: 認可之排放單位
Slide 23 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
CDM 查驗程序 - Validation Process
查驗報告草案
Draft Validation Report
查驗小組遴選Validation Team
Selection
選擇計畫查驗單位ValidatorSelection
簽訂查驗合約Validation Contract
Establishment
準備計畫文件Develop ProjectDocumentation
完成矯正措施要求Resolution of Corrective
Action Requests
最終查驗報告與意見Final Validation
Report and Opinion
背景調查
Background Investigations
文件審查
Document Review
追蹤訪查
Follow-up Interviews
EB 批准之方法學
EB Approval ofMethodologies
利害相關者公聽
Public Stakeholder Comment Process (30 days)
向 EB 註冊 Registration
of project
基準線與監測
方法學審查
Baseline & Monitoring Methodology Check
Slide 24 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
CDM 查證準則 - Validation Criteria
計畫主辦國之要求Host country criteria
京都議定書準則Kyoto Protocol criteria
馬拉喀什決議 Marrakech Accords modalities
執行理事會之決定Decisions by the CDM EB
計畫活動之特定準則Project specific criteria
方法學之特定準則Methodology specific criteria
Slide 25 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
查驗之一般性原則
完整性 Completeness
精確性 Accuracy
可比性 Comparability
透明性 Transparency
Slide 26 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
查驗議定書 - Validation Protocol
Validation Protocol Table 1: Mandatory Requirements for CDM Project Activities
Requirement Reference Conclusion Cross reference
The requirements the project must meet.
Gives reference to the legislation or agreement where the requirement is found.
This is either acceptable based on evidence provided (OK), a Corrective Action Request (CAR) of risk or non-compliance with stated requirements or a request for Clarification (CL) where further clarifications are needed.
Used to refer to the relevant checklist questions in Table 2 to show how the specific requirement is validated. This is to ensure a transparent Validation process.
Validation Protocol Table 2: Requirement Checklist
Checklist Question Reference Means of verification (MoV)
Comment Draft and/or Final Conclusion
The various requirements in Table 1 are linked to checklist questions the project should meet. The checklist is organised in seven different sections. Each section is then further sub-divided. The lowest level constitutes a checklist question.
Gives reference to documents where the answer to the checklist question or item is found.
Explains how conformance with the checklist question is investigated. Examples of means of verification are document review (DR) or interview (I). N/A means not applicable.
The section is used to elaborate and discuss the checklist question and/or the conformance to the question. It is further used to explain the conclusions reached.
This is either acceptable based on evidence provided (OK), or a Corrective Action Request (CAR) due to non-compliance with the checklist question (See below).A request for Clarification (CL) is used when the validation team has identified a need for further clarification.
Validation Protocol Table 3: Resolution of Corrective Action Requests and Requests for Clarification
Draft report clarifications and corrective action requests
Ref. to checklist question in table 2
Summary of project owner response
Validation conclusion
If the conclusions from the draft Validation are either a Corrective Action Request or a Clarification Request, these should be listed in this section.
Reference to the checklist question number in Table 2 where the Corrective Action Request or Clarification Request is explained.
The responses given by the Client or other project participants during the communications with the validation team should be summarised in this section.
This section should summarise the validation team’s responses and final conclusions. The conclusions should also be included in Table 2, under “Final Conclusion”.
Slide 27 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
查證作業之相關方 - Verification
查證員查證員計畫提出方
查證作業合約
計畫實體計畫實體CDM EB /
JI SC
Solid lines indicate contractual relationships. Dashed lines indicate possible communication channels during validation.Note: Other relationships are possible.
Slide 28 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
查證程序 - Verification Process
查證小組遴選Verification
Team Selection
選擇查證單位Verifier Selection
簽訂查證合約Establish Contract
查證報告Verification
Report
文件審查Desk Review, including publicising
the monitoring report
驗證並公開驗證報告Certification and
publicising of Certification Report
EB 簽發 CERs Issuance of CERs by
Executive Board
現場審查On-Site
Assessment
Slide 29 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
Risk Based Assessment Approach
報告範圍
GHG 目標 GHG 報告要求
GHG 排放
瞭解控制風險的管理系統
識别其他風險
追蹤審查
查證意見 改善要求
瞭解計畫運作之基本要求
瞭解數據產生系統與可能之風險
瞭解計畫之運作瞭解監督之需求
總覽客戶 GHG數據來源、計算方向及報告系統
瞭解客户每年之結構性主要變更
Slide 30 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
報告風險
完整性 Completeness排放源的遺漏 Omission of a source錯誤的定義邊界 Incorrectly defined boundary泄漏的影響 Leakage effects
精確性 Accuracy重複計算 Double counting重要數據的大量人工轉換 Significant manual transfer of key data不正確的排放因子 Inappropriate use of emission factors缺乏路逕稽核 Lack of audit trail 重要量測 / 監測設備缺乏作業管制或本質不確定性Lack of operational control or inherent uncertainties over key measurement/monitoring equipment數據管理控制不佳 Poor management control over the data
一致性 Consistency未文件化 /未說明之方法學變更Undocumented/unexplained methodology changes or other changes
Slide 31 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
查證意見
Slide 32 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
實質性 - Materiality
實質性乃為檢測重要的温室氣體資訊是否被遺漏或誤陳述,並對報告資訊使用者之決定可能造成之潛在影響之涉獵。
2.Materiality
4. Quality of
Evidence
1.Monitoring
plans and
records
3. Coverage
Opinion
Slide 33 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
簽發 CERs
EB 在收到簽發申請之 15 天內簽發 CERs
EB 將指示 CDM 註册處簽發特定數量之 CERs扣除總 CERs 的的 2% 作為 CDM 管理收益分成 (CDM Levy)
根據締約國與計畫參加者之要求,撥交剩餘之 CERs到其之帳戶內
原則上 CERs 之簽證期間自計畫註冊後開始算起但自 2000 年到第一個 CDM 計畫註冊 (2004.11) 期間開始之 CDM 計畫活動並於 2005.12.31 前向 EB 申請註冊者,其CERs 之認證期間可追溯至該計畫活動開始之日後 (但不早於 2000.01.01)
Slide 34 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
簽發審查 - Issuance Review
如計畫活動參與者或至少 3 名 EB 成員要求審查已建議之 CERs僅限於對其 DOE 之方法、要求與能力進行審查
若收到此類審查要求, EB 應於其下一次會議中討論並決議是否重審或簽發該筆 CERsEB 應在在其決議完成 30天內完成必要之重審EB 應通知計畫參與者其是否簽發該筆 CERs 之決定
Slide 35 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
歐盟排放權交易之查核要求
Slide 36 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
European Directive 2003/87/EC
European Directive on Emission Trading (EU ETS)From 2005.01.01 companies from sectors / installations in the EU and accession countries must limit their CO2 emissions to allocated levels in 2 periods (2005-2007 & 2008-2012)
Energy SectorCombustion (>20 MW thermal input), excluding combustion of hazardous or municipal wasterMineral oil refineriesCoke ovens
Metals SectorMetal ore roasting or sintering installationsPig iron and steel
Minerals sectorCementLimeGlassCeramics
OthersPulpPaper
The EU ETS may cover emission credits from JI & CDM projects into EU allowance in the period of 2008-2012.
Slide 37 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
Cap & Trade
Cap (via NAP)
Baseline Year
Cap (via NAP)
EmissionsYear X
Baseline Year
EmissionsYear X
Year X Year X
Company/Installation A
Company/Installation B
€ XXX
Allowances
tCO2/y
Slide 38 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
EU Emission Trading Scheme
GovernmentCO allocations2
Company with emission permit
-----Emission monitoring &
reporting-----
EmissionTrading
- buy- sell
Yearly handoverof allowances
corresponding toverified
emissions
Independentverification of emissions
Loseallowances
OK
NO
Slide 39 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
EU ETS 目前所涵蓋之製程數Country Installations
Germany 3.000
France 1.500
UK 1.500
Italy 1.900
Netherlands 335
Belgium 325
Spain 600
Portugal 200
Greece 150
Denmark 350
Sweden 300
Finland 300
Ireland 100
Austria 230
Luxemburg 13
Country Installations
Poland 1100
Czech Rep. 420
Slovakia 300
Hungary 300
Slovenia 100
Estonia 50
Latvia 90
Lithuania 50
Cyprus 20
Malta 10
Norway 120
Switzerland 50
TOTAL 13.413
Slide 40 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
IET
EEA
EEA
EU 25
EU-15
JapanRussia
Other umbrella
EU ETS 之中長期意圖
Slide 41 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
EU 國家產業之對策
一般性查核行政管理對分配額度進行瞭解與回應瞭解排放資訊及符合性差異建立並實施監測計畫獲得排放相關許可開立並管理註冊帳戶準備並提交已查證之排放報告 (每年 3月底前 ) 瞭解帳戶情形與稅務篩選現有合約 ( 排放許可之所有權,如 JI 之情況 ) 定義責任 (符合性、交易及監測等 ) 設計 /調整並實施程序與內控
辨識市場定位並訂定策略預估內部減排成本與所需時間根據計畫排放量訂定分配額度模型比較內部減排成本與現有及預期市場價格以最佳之經營策略設計交易與投資替代案
Slide 42 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
EU ETS 對產業之衝擊
贏家 輸家
碳密集度低碳成本較競爭對手之低
碳密集度高碳成本較競爭對手之高產
業市
場
國家與 KP同步•取得較高之分配額市場先機•從買賣分配額市場中獲利
國家較 KP慢需花費較高之成本取得分配額之
滿足
分配額市
場
市場佔有率
分配額
Slide 43 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
Baseline Year
Cap (via NAP)
EmissionsYear X
Cap (via NAP)
Baseline Year
EmissionsYear X
Year X Year X
Company/Installation A Company/Installation B
€ XXX
Allowances
tCO2/y
Independent 3rd Party
Verification
EU ETS 之查證要求
Slide 44 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
查證步驟
會計與報告系統查核
排放基準線查證
目前排放盤查之審查
年度排放盤查之審查
Slide 45 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
EU 監測與報告指導綱要
The EU Monitoring and Reporting Guidelines
The guideline comprises XI annexes:Annex I: general guidelines
Annex II: guidelines for combustion emissions
Annex III – XI: activity specific guidelines
Mineral Oil Refineries
Coke Ovens
Metal Ore Roasting & Sintering Installations
Production of Pig Iron and Steel incl. continuous casting
Production of Cement Clinker
Production of Lime
Manufacturing of Glass
Manufacturing of Ceramic Products
Paper and Pulp producing Installations
Slide 46 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
EU 監測與報告指導綱要
Annex I: General Guidelines, sections:
1. Introduction2. Definitions3. Monitoring and Reporting Principles4. Monitoring5. Reporting6. Retention of Information7. Quality Assurance and Control8. Emission Factors9. List of CO2 neutral biomass10. Determination of activity-specific data and factors11. Reporting Format12. Reporting Categories
Slide 47 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
EU 監測與報告指導綱要Introduction Each monitoring methodology shall be approved by the competent authority (and again after any change to the monitoring methodology applied to an installation) before the start of the reporting period.
Jan 2005, start monitoring
OKApproval monitoring methodology by Competent
Authority
Operator to prepare detaileddescription of monitoring
methodology
NO
Mar 31th 2006, submit verified emission report
Verification
Slide 48 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
EU 監測與報告指導綱要
IntroductionSimplified overview of the verification process:
Monitoring Report
Copy GHG permit
Other Relevant info
Monitoring Methodology ~ permit
Principles & Report ~ Guidelines
section 3
VerificationReport/Statement
Complete?
No
Yes
Slide 49 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
查證活動
EU Directive, Annex V, Verification Methodology:
1. Risk analysis
2. Process Analysis
3. Risk Analysis
4. Report
1.Strategic Analysis
Statement
4. Close Out
2. Process Analysis
3. Verification & Testing
Slide 50 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
查證活動 - 工作手冊
Strategic Analysis
Process Analysis
Remaining Verification Procedures and Reporting
Close Out
D1. Data Management Systems and Controls (I dentification of risks associated with controls over GHG reporting processes)
D2. GHG calculation procedures (Mapping of the data generation,
aggregation/consolidation and reporting Process. I dentif ying reporting risks and
associated controls,)
D2. Control Testing (Testing the operation of the key
controls identified to enable us to place reliance on these controls to detect and correct any significant misstatements in the reported data.)
E1. Verification “Substantive” Testing (Consider procedures such as re - performance of Calculations, agreeing to source etc)
D3. Remaining Area’s of Uncertainty (Based on the information flow analysis and control testing, iden tif y the remaining
areas of uncertainty which require further “substantive” testing )
F. Verification conclusions and reporting (Complete the “site score - card”. Collate the improvement requirements)
G. H. Close Out (Any High priority fi ndings identified during the site visit will be followed up
and a fi nal Scorecard issued)
-
A. Site overview
B. Emission Breakdown
C. Sampling Strategy
E2. Movements Analysis
Slide 51 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
查證報告
From the work book, notes and evidence prepare the DNV GHG Report using template.
Opportunity to provide added value through improvement opportunities.
Report and statement are DNV product.
EU Directive, Annex V
11. The verifier shall prepare a report on the validation process stating whether the report [from client of emissions] is satisfactory. This report shall specify all issues relevant to the work carried out. A statement that the report is satisfactory may be made, if in the opinion of the verifier, the total emissions are not materially misstated
Slide 52 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
聲明書之簽發
DNV Independent technical review of:
DNV GHG work book and
DNV GHG Report
Participant Emissions Report
Participant Permit
Issue Verification Statement
Request for statement approved
Slide 53 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
補充資料
UNFCCC網站http://unfccc.int
IETA (International Emission Trading Association)Validation & Verification Manual for CDM & JI Projects
http://www.ieta.org/VVM/VVM_4.htm
The EU Emission Trading Schemehttp://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/emission.htm
European Pollutant Emission Registerhttp://www.eper.cec.eu.int/
Slide 54 © 2005 Det Norske Veritas GHG Project Validation & Verification, Rev.0, 2005.01.17
敬請指教 ………
簡偉華Technical Director,
DNV Climate Change Services, Greater China
Tel: +86-21-6278 8086 x 3585
Fax: +86-21-6278 8090
Mobile: +86-1350 168 0405
E-Mail: [email protected]
Website: www.dnv.com
張芳賓Climate Change Project Manager, DNV Taiwan
Tel: +886-2-8253 7800
Fax: +886-8253 7666
Mobile: +886-918 297 210
E-Mail: [email protected]
Website: www.dnv.com.tw