Upload
muhammad-ali-danish
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 1/35
OHT 10.1
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Chapter 10
Change management
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 2/35
OHT 10.2
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Learning objectives
• Identify the different types of change that needto be managed for e-commerce;
• Develop an outline plan for implementing e-
commerce change;• Describe alternative approaches to
organisation structure resulting fromorganisational change.
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 3/35
OHT 10.3
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Issues for managers
• Should we change organizational structure inresponse to e-business? If so, what are theoptions?
•
How do we manage the human aspects of theimplementation of organizational change?
• How do we share knowledge between staff inthe light of high staff-turnover and rapidchanges in market conditions?
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 4/35
OHT 10.4
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Key change management issues
• Schedule – what are the suitable stages for introducing change?• Budget – how do we cost e-business?• Resources needed – what type of resources do we need, what are
their responsibilities and where do we obtain them?•
Organizational structures – do we need to revise organizationalstructure?• Managing the human impact of change – what is the best way to
introduce large-scale e-business change to employees?• Technologies to support e-business change – the role of
knowledge management, groupware and intranets are explored.• Risk management approaches to e-business led change.
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 5/35
OHT 10.5
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Key factors in achievingchange
Figure 10.1 Key factors in achieving change
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 6/35
OHT 10.6
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Scale of change
• Hammer and Champy (1993) defined BPR as
the fundamental rethinking and radical redesign of business processes toachieve dramatic improvements in critical, contemporary measures of performance, such as cost, quality, service, and speed.
•
Fundamental rethinking – re-engineering usually refers to changing of significant business processes such as customer service, sales order processing or manufacturing.
• Radical redesign – re-engineering is not involved with minor, incrementalchange or automation of existing ways of working. It involves a completerethinking about the way business processes operate.
• Dramatic improvements – the aim of BPR is to achieve improvementsmeasured in tens or hundreds of percent. With automation of existingprocesses only single figure improvements may be possible.
• Critical contemporary measures of performance – this point refers to theimportance of measuring how well the processes operate in terms of thefour important measures of cost, quality, service and speed.
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 7/35
OHT 10.7
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Different scales of change
Term Involves Intention Risk of failure
Business processre-engineering
Fundamental redesign of all main company
processes
Large gains inperformance
(>100%?)
Highest
Business processimprovement
Targets key processes insequence for redesign
(<50%) Medium
Business processautomation
Automating existingprocess
(<20%) Lowest
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 8/35
OHT 10.8
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Project management activities
• Estimation – identifying the activities involved in theproject, sometimes referred to as a work breakdownstructure (WBS).
• Resource allocation – after the initial WBS,appropriate resources can be allocated to the tasks.
• Schedule/plan – after resource allocation, the amountof time for each task can be determined according tothe availability and skills of the people assigned to thetasks.
• Monitoring and control – monitoring involves ensuringthe project is working to plan once it has started.Control is taking corrective action if the projectdeviates from the plan. In particular the projectmanager will want to hit milestones
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 9/35
OHT 10.9
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Stages in developing ane-business solution
Figure 10.2 Stages in developing an e-business solution
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 10/35
OHT 10.10
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
An example web site developmentschedule for the B2C Company
Figure 10.3 An example web site development schedule for The B2C Company
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 11/35
OHT 10.11
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Automating the employeedevelopment process
Figure 10.4 Automating the employee development process
Source: Confirmit Copyright © 2003 FIRM
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 12/35
OHT 10.12
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Organisational structures for e-business and e-commerce
Organizational structure Circumstances Advantages Disadvantages
(a) No formal structure for e-commerce
Initial response to e-commerce or poor leadership with noidentification of need for change.
Can achieve rapid response to e-commerce service responses (e-mail, phone). Priorities notdecided logically. Insufficientresources
Poor quality site in terms of content quality and customer
(b) A separate committeeor department managesand coordinates e-commerce
Identification of problem andresponse in (a)
Coordination and budgeting andresource allocation possible.
May be difficult to get differentdepartments to deliver their
input due to other commitments
(c) A separate businessunit with independent
budgets
Internet contribution (Chapter 6)is sizeable (>20%)
As for (b), but can set own targetsand not be constrained by
resources. Lower risk option than(d)
Has to respond to corporatestrategy. Conflict of interests
between department andtraditional business
(d) A separate operatingcompany
Major revenue potential or flotation. Need to differentiatefrom parent
As for (c), but can set strategyindependently. Can maximizemarket potential
High risk if market potential isoverestimated due to start-upcosts
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 13/35
OHT 10.13
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Summary of alternative organizational structures for e-commerce suggested in Parsons et al .
Figure 10.5 Summary of alternative organizational structures for e-commerce
suggested in Parsons et al. (1996)
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 14/35
OHT 10.14
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Hallowell on scalability 1
‘described as “virtual’’ (either pure information or automated) and “physical’’ (requiring some degree of humanintervention).
… because the nature and quantity of physical servicenecessary to deliver value to customers influences thequantity of human intervention required, it also influences a
firm’s ratio of variable to fixed costs, which alters its“scalability’’.
The paradox comes in that while reduced scalability isviewed negatively by many venture capitalists and proponents of ecommerce, the cause of that reduction in
scalability, human intervention, may help a firm todifferentiate its offering to customers, thus providing a sourceof competitive advantage.’
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 15/35
OHT 10.15
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Hallowell on scalability 2
‘For firms that are very high on the scalability continuum, the need for physical service does not present a “scalability” problem.
At these firms, information is the core service offering. Physical service isrelatively insignificant, both from customers’ perspectives (use of physical service is infrequent,if at all) and from the firm’s perspective (it represents a
very small portion of total costs).
Thus, these firms do not rely on physical service (and the employees it requires) to differentiate their offering; their differentiation tends to come fromthe quality of their content and the ease with which users can access it.
In contrast, firms that sell non-information services such as travel, or goodssuch as books, toys, or antiques require significantly more complex physical service operations. The degree to which they need more physical service isinversely proportional to the degree to which they are “scalable”.’
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 16/35
OHT 10.16
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Outsourcing example
Amazon:
‘manages customer relationships through its
website while relying on publishers for productdevelopment, Visa and Mastercard for revenuecollection and UPS, the parcel service, for logistics. It also outsources much of its call-
centre management to specialist suppliers’.
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 17/35
OHT 10.17
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Outsourcing benefits – activity
• • • • •
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 18/35
OHT 10.18
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
BUT…
• ‘The snag, as many failed internet venturesdiscovered, is that it is hard to co-ordinate theactivities of business partners without a large
supporting bureaucracy. Poor customer service and higher-than-anticipated costsoften resulted. Amazon is one of the fewcompanies of its generation that made the
idea work.’
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 19/35
OHT 10.19
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Outsourcing risks - activity
• • • • •
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 20/35
OHT 10.20
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Outsourcing - Hagel’s view
Companies try to excel at three differenttypes of activity:
managing customer relationships,
routine processing of information and
development of new products.
He believes that companies will in future tendto concentrate on just one, while buying in theothers as required.
Examples?
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 21/35
OHT 10.21
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Oticon
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 22/35
OHT 10.22
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Transition curve indicating thereaction of staff through time from
when change is first suggested
Figure 10.7 Transition curve indicating the reaction of staff through time fromwhen change is first suggested
Source: Bocij et al . (2003)
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 23/35
OHT 10.23
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Key staff in systems acceptance
•
System sponsors –
• System owners –
• System users –
• Stakeholders –
•
Legitimizer –
• Opinion leaders –
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 24/35
OHT 10.24
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
The role of organisational culture
• Survival (outward-looking, flexible) – the external environmentplays a significant role (an open system) in governing companystrategy. The company will likely be driven by customer demands and will be an innovator. It may have a relatively flatstructure.
• Productivity (outward-looking, ordered) – interfaces with theexternal environment are well structured and the company istypically sales-driven and is likely to have a hierarchicalstructure.
• Human relations (inward-looking, flexible) – this is theorganization as family, with interpersonal relations moreimportant than reporting channels, a flatter structure and staff
development and empowerment is thought of as important bymanagers.• Stability (inward-looking, ordered) – the environment is
essentially ignored with managers concentrating on internalefficiency and again managed through a hierarchical structure.
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 25/35
OHT 10.25
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Knowledge Management – Saunders (2000)
‘Every day, knowledge essential to your business walks out of your door, and much of it never comes back. Employees leave, customers
come and go and their knowledge leaves withthem. This information drain costs you time,money and customers.’
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 26/35
OHT 10.26
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
IDC – objectives of KM
• Improving profit/growing revenue (67 per cent)• Retaining key talent/expertise (54 per cent)• Increasing customer retention and/or satisfaction (52
per cent)•
Defending market share against new entrants (44 per cent)• Gaining faster time to market with products (39 per
cent)• Penetrating new market segments (39 per cent)• Reducing costs (38 per cent)• Developing new products/services (35 per cent)
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 27/35
OHT 10.27
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Differences between knowledge management, dataprocessing and information management
• Consider a retail manager analysing their sales figures.• Raw data on sales figures consist of figures in each
individual store for a given month. IS can present thisdata within the context of sales compared to previous
months as information.• This information is of little value if the manager does not
know how to act in response to it. Managers apply their knowledge to decide how to respond if the sales in oneregion are much lower than others, or if one store is
underperforming against budget.• Thus knowledge is the processing of information and is a
skill based on previous understanding, procedures andexperience.
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 28/35
OHT 10.28
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Explicit and tacit knowledge
• Knowledge Management - Techniques and tools for capturing and disseminating knowledge within anorganization.
• Explicit – details of processes and procedures. Explicitknowledge can be readily detailed in proceduralmanuals and databases. Examples include records of meetings between sales representatives and keycustomers, procedures for dealing with customer service queries and management reporting processes.
• Tacit – less tangible than explicit knowledge, this is
experience on how to react to a situation when manydifferent variables are involved. It is more difficult toencapsulate this knowledge, which often resides in theheads of employees.
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 29/35
OHT 10.29
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Binney – classes of KM applications
1. Transactional . Help desk and customer serviceapplications.2. Analytical . Data warehousing and data mining for CRM applications.
3. Asset management . Document and contentmanagement.4. Process support . TQM, benchmarketing, BPR, SixSigma.5. Developmental . Enhancing staff skills, competencies –
training and e-learning.6. Innovation and creation. Communities, collaborationand virtual teamwork.
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 30/35
OHT 10.30
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
2 perspectives on KM
• It is impossible to achieve full benefits fromknowledge management unless individualsare willing and motivated to share their knowledge or unless organizations lose their structural rigidity to permit information and knowledge flow - IDC 2000
•
Knowledge can only be volunteered – it cannot be conscripted Snowden 2002
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 31/35
OHT 10.31
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Chevron example – connections in $2 billion saving
1. Connection to the explicit knowledge via an intranetwith a portal with search tools and a directory of information.
2. Connection of people to people with specialized
knowledge through an expertise locator; a type of phonedirectory with people in different expertise categories,again also accessed via search tools.
3. Connection to communities of practice which canhelp sharing and learning between people.
4. Connection of knowledge and people with processes,products and services.
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 32/35
OHT 10.32
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Risk Management
1. Identify risks including their probabilities andimpacts.
2. Identify possible solutions to these risks.
3. Implement the solutions, targeting thehighest impact, most likely risks.
4. Monitor the risks to learn for future riskassessment.
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 33/35
OHT 10.33
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
OpenText Livelink(www.opentext.com)
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 34/35
OHT 10.34
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Activity – identify risks for e-business project
Risk Probability Impact Solution
Insufficient senior managementcommitment
5 7 Education/training/lobbying by e-business manager toachieve buy-in
High staff turnover/key staff leave 6 5 Use monetary incentives and improve workingenvironment
Project milestones not met,overrun budget
8 6 Appoint experienced project manager and provide supportand resources needed. Manager will perform risk
management such as this
Problems with new technologydelaying implementation (bugs,speed, compatibility)
8 8 Allow sufficient time for volume, performance testing
Staff resistance to change 4 4 Education, training identification of change facilitatorsamongst staff
Problem with integrating withpartner’s systems (e.g. customersor suppliers)
6 8 Tackle these issues early on, identify one contactpoint/manager for each of partnerships
New system fails after changeover (too slow or too many crashes)
9 See solution to delayed implementation
8/2/2019 0273684515_pp10
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/0273684515pp10 35/35
OHT 10.35
© Marketing Insights Limited 2004
Barriers to KM – IDC survey
• Lack of understanding of KM and its benefits (55 per cent)
• Lack of employee time for KM (45 per cent)• Lack of skill in KM techniques (40 per cent)•
Lack of encouragement in the current culture for sharing (35 per cent)• Lack of incentives/rewards to share (30 per cent)• Lack of funding for KM initiatives (24 per cent)• Lack of appropriate technology (18 per cent)• Lack of commitment from senior management (15 per
cent)