18
1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 [email protected] IEEE PES 2002 Summer Meeting Chicago, Illinois Palmer House Hilton – Private Dining Room 9 Monday, July 22, 2002 – 2:00 to 5:00 PM

1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 [email protected] IEEE

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

1

A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities

Dan Kowalewski630-437-2905

[email protected]

IEEE PES 2002 Summer Meeting

Chicago, Illinois

Palmer House Hilton – Private Dining Room 9

Monday, July 22, 2002 – 2:00 to 5:00 PM

Page 2: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

2

Overview

Criteria and Desired Elements Analysis

– Approach– Alternatives Considered– Proposed Application Rules– Calculation Specifics– Analysis Results

Conclusions

Page 3: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

3

Event Criteria

Create Event Exclusion Criteria

– Facilitates Consistent Exclusions

– Allows “Fair” Benchmarking

– Provides Information to Understand Performance Trends

– Repeatability of Results

Page 4: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

4

Desired Elements

Has Clear Rules for Application and Exclusion Removes Subjectivity Scales to Various Sized Utilities Removes Outlying Events Removes Major Weather Variability Allows Trends to Appear Balances Operational Concerns

– Frequency– Duration

Allows for Consistent Results Ease of Calculation

Page 5: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

5

Analysis: Approach

Compare Proposed Methods to Understand– Consistency and Understandability– Differences of Exclusions– Impacts on Different Sized Companies– Variability of Results

A Great Deal of Confusion Initially

– Methodology and Calculation Approach was Not Clear 3 Years vs 5 Years of Historic Data Log vs Non-Log Data Basis Unclear: SAIDI, SAIFI, Customer Minutes

– Had to Apply Data to Understand

Traded Methodology and Results– Ensures Consistent Application– Expanded Understanding with Broader Data Set

Page 6: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

6

Analysis: Alternatives Considered

Traditional 10% IEEE Definition– ComEd Region– ComEd– PECO

Bootstrap– 3 Year Historic

– 5 Year Historic

2.5 or 3 Beta (SAIDI per Day)– 3 Year Historic– 5 Year Historic

6 Beta (SAIDI per Day)

Other Analysis

– SAIDI per Calendar Day Start Time of Interruption Customer Interruption Minutes Experienced per Day Rolling 24 Hour Window

Page 7: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

7

Alternative Comparison

Scala

bilit

yR

emov

es O

utlie

rs

Rem

oves

Wea

ther

Var

iabi

lity

Allo

ws

Tren

ding

Bal

ance

s D

urat

ion

Bal

ance

s Fr

eque

ncy

Cle

ar R

ules

for E

xclu

sion

Ease

of C

alcu

latio

n

Rem

oves

Sub

ject

ivity

10% Sys/Region x x x

Boot Strap x x x x x

2.5 or 3 Beta x x x x ! x x x x x

6 Beta x x x

Page 8: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

8

ComEd Major Event Days

METHOD 1998 1999 2000 2001

Exelon Energy 11 8 10 16

10% Regional 3 0 2 0

10% System 2 0 0 0

Bootstrap 7 2 3 0

3 Beta (SAIDI / Day) 10 3 5 0

3 Beta (SAIDI / Day) 10 2 6 0

3 Beta (SAIDI / Day) 17 4 11 06 Beta (SAIDI / Day) 0 0 0 0

Hypothetical Application of 1998 - 2001 Threshold Values

*

* * *

* Based On Outage Start Date* * Customer Interruption Minutes by Calendar Day

* *

* * * Based on 24 hour rolling customer outages

Page 9: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

9

ComEd Major Event Days

METHODExelon Energy10% Regional10% System

Beta (SAIDI / Day) 2.5 3 2.5 3 2.5 3 2.5 3Major Event Days 15 10 6 3 7 5 6 0

6 Beta (SAIDI / Day) 0 0 0 0

2000 200111 8 10 16

1998 1999

Hypothetical Application of 1998 - 2001 Threshold Values

3 02 0

2 00 0

*

* Based On Outage Start Date

Page 10: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

10

3 Beta SAIDI Day -Threshold Calculation

IEEE data (all outages > 5minutes) Five years of most recent historic SAIDI per day data Take the log of SAIDI per day values Calculate the mean Calculate the population standard deviation Calculate the mean plus 3 times the standard deviation Convert back to SAIDI per day values by taking the exponential

of the calculated mean plus 3 times the standard deviation number

Results in a Threshold Exclusion value– Threshold value is applied to the year following the five-year data

analysis period– All days with SAIDI greater than or equal to the calculated

Threshold value are considered Major Event Days

Page 11: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

11

8.13

9.25

7.27

8.308.51

7.07

7.50

8.46

5.25

8.88

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

7.50

8.00

8.50

9.00

9.50

10.00

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

YEAR

SA

IDI(

MIN

) P

ER

DA

Y PECO

COMED

Thresholds of Daily SAIDI (3 Year Rolling)

Page 12: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

12

Thresholds of Daily SAIDI (5 Year Rolling)

7.53

8.45

7.77

7.06

7.70

6.07

8.087.78

7.97

8.58

5.93

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

7.50

8.00

8.50

9.00

9.50

10.00

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

YEAR

SA

IDI(

MIN

) P

ER

DA

Y

PECO

COMED (4 yr average)

Page 13: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

13

Variability of Thresholds

ComEd & PECO2.5 and 3 Beta versus Bootstrap Daily SAIDI Thresholds

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

SA

IDI(

MIN

) P

ER

DA

Y

ComEd Bootstrap 1 - 4 yrs

ComEd 3 Beta 1 - 4 yrs

PECO 3 Beta 5 yrs

PECO Bootstrap 5 yrs

ComEd 2.5 Beta 1 - 4yrs

PECO 2.5 Beta 5 yrs

Page 14: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

14

SAIDI/Day Thresholds5 yrs of Data

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

SA

IDI(M

IN) P

ER D

AY

SAIDI/Day Thresholds3 yrs of Data

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

SA

IDI(

MIN

) P

ER

DA

Y

Bootstrap Thresholds can be highly volatile, especially with few years of data (the saturation effect).

PECO - Variability of Thresholds

3 Beta

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

3 Beta

Page 15: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

15

ComEd Daily SAIDI (1998 - 2001)

ComEd Daily SAIDI (1998-2001)

07/31/99

07/30/9907/19/98

06/18/98 04/08/0003/10/98

05/28/9806/26/98

09/07/98

08/24/98

11/10/98

03/09/98

09/11/00

05/18/0008/06/00

05/08/00

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

110.0

120.0

130.0

140.0

150.0

160.0

170.0

180.0

190.0

200.0

Date

SAID

I

Non-Storm Days

Storm Days

2.5 BETA = 4.3 (34 days)

3 BETA = 7.70 (18 days)

10% IEEE (System) 2 days

10% IEEE (Region) 5 days

Page 16: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

16

ComEd Daily SAIDI (1998 - 2001)

ComEd Daily SAIDI (1998-2001)

07/31/99

07/30/99

07/21/9908/25/9807/19/9806/18/98 09/11/0004/08/00

05/08/0005/28/98

06/26/9809/07/9803/10/98

08/06/00

05/18/00

08/24/98

11/10/98

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

Date

SA

IDI

Non-Storm Days

Storm Days

(RESCALED)

2.5 BETA = 4.30 (34 days)

3 BETA = 7.70 (18 days)

10% IEEE (System) 2 days

10% IEEE (Region) 5 days

Page 17: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

17

ComEd Daily SAIDI (1998 - 2001)

ComEd Daily SAIDI (1998-2001)

06/06/99

11/11/98

10/25/0108/09/01

07/23/01

07/22/01

06/12/01

04/07/0110/08/00

05/09/00

05/17/99

06/11/99

06/28/98

07/20/98

06/25/98

05/29/98

04/08/00

07/21/99

08/25/98

07/19/98

06/18/98

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

Date

SA

IDI

Non-Storm Days

Storm Days

(RESCALED)

2.5 BETA = 4.30 (34 days)

10% IEEE (System) 2 days

10% IEEE (Region) 5 days

3 BETA = 7.70 (18 days)

Page 18: 1 A Comparable Method for Benchmarking the Reliability Performance of Electric Utilities Dan Kowalewski 630-437-2905 daniel.kowalewski@exeloncorp.com IEEE

18

Conclusions

Recommend 3 Beta SAIDI per Day

Achieves Objectives– Consistent

– Facilitates Fair Benchmarking

– Provides Information to Understand Performance

Trends

– Repeatability of Results

Proven with REAL Data