Upload
jmpcalcao
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 1/34
PFMEAProcess Failure Mode and Effects
AnalysisJames Davis, General Dynamics
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 2/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 2
Purpose
The purpose of this presentation is to
share the benefits of a detailed ProcessFlow Diagram, conducted during aProcess Failure Mode and Effects
Analysis, that will ensure productquality in the manufacturing/assemblyprocess.
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 3/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 3
Introduction
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 4/34
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 5/34Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 5
Most COMMON Types of FMEA's
Design (Potential) Failure Modes andEffects Analysis-DFMEA• Focus is on potential design- related failures
and their causes.
Process (Potential) Failures Modes and
Effects Analysis-PFMEA
• Focuses is on potential process failures andtheir causes.
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 6/34Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 6
Value of FMEA's
Aids in improving designs for products andprocess Increased safety
Enhances Customer Satisfactiono Better Quality
o Higher Reliability
Contributes to cost savingsDecreases warranty costs
Decreases waste, non-value added operations
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 7/34Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 7
PFMEA's
Focus is on potential process –relatedfailures and their causes.Main drive is to understand the process through theidentification of as many potential failures as possible.
o e.g. Incorrect material used
PFMEA typically assumes that the design
is sound.Development of Recommended Actions is
targeted at eliminating the Root Cause ofthe potential failures.
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 8/34Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 8
PFMEA
Three Parts:
Process Flow Diagram (PFD)Process Failure Mode and Effects
Analysis (PFMEA)Process Control Plan (PCP)
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 9/34Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 9
Product Definition:Key Product Characteristics, DFMEA
Process Definition:Process Flow Diagram (PFD),
Failure Mode Analysis:PFMEA
Control Strategy:Control Plan,Error proofing
Customer Requirements:
Manufacturing:Work Instructions & Process Monitoring
Information Flow
SOR, Vehicle Tech Specs,System Technical Specs
Product and Process Characteristics
DFMEA/PFMEA I f ti
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 10/34Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 1 0
DFMEA/PFMEA Information
Interrelationships
DFMEA
Design FMEA
Process Flow
Diagram
PFMEA
Process FMEA
Boundary (Block)
Diagram, P- Diagram,
Etc.
Design Verification
Plan & Report
(DVP&R)
Process Control
Plan
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 11/34Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 1 1
Process Flow Diagrams
The Process FlowDiagram provides alogical (visual)depiction of theprocess that is beinganalyzed.
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 12/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 1 212
The SAE/AIAG PFMEA guidelines describe twomethods of defining process functions.
Either or both may be used.Process Functions may be described in terms of:
The product features/characteristics that arecreated
or
The process actions that are performed
Process functions should be identified in detailas necessary to provide information for the
PFMEA to develop effective Process Controls
Process Function / Requirement
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 13/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 1 313
Consider a simple operation to drill a hole in ametal part
The product characteristics & requirements are: Hole size: 4.00 mm +/- 0.13
Hole Location:X = 28.0 mm +/- 0.2
Y = 15.0 mm +/- 0.2
Perpendicular to surface, no burrs, etc.
The process operation must create theseproduct characteristics and meet therequirements
Process Function / Requirement
X
Y
4.00
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 14/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 1 4
To drill the correct hole size in thespecified location, the process must:
Position and hold the part Align the part fixturing
with the drill position Assure the correct drill
bit size is used Set and control drill speed Anticipate tool wear and
schedule preventive maintenance
If the Function/Requirement is defined in
the PFMEA as “Drill Hole” could any ofthese be missed?
Process Function / Requirement
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 15/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 1 5
Process Flow Diagram (PFD)
Process Flow Diagram is the foundation The process must be defined step by step, including
interfaces
The PFD provides the structure to document what productcharacteristics and requirements (OUTPUTS) are affectedby a given operation and how these characteristics andsources of variation are controlled (INPUTS)
PFD is a graphical representation of every possible path apart can take through the anticipated manufacturingprocess
A well defined PFD establishes the foundation for thePFMEA
Helps in developing equipment specifications. How will the process control non-conforming material? How and when will inspections be performed, what is
required?
How and when will parts be re-introduced into theprocess?
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 16/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 1 6
Process Flow Diagram (PFD)
Hidden Factories: Interfacing Processes
Quality Audits Product/tooling Changeovers
Rework Processes Part Ident./Labeling
Alternative Processes TeardownScrap Gauging Stations
Part Buffers Reject Handling
Part Movement
Interface process issues affect quality performance
o Rework and scrap parts bypass process controlso Mixed parts in the manufacturing process at changeovers
Need for common systems Part of the overall Quality Strategy must include
o Common content, common format, common approach
Quality strategy must extend to suppliers
o Considered an extension of the Total Quality processes
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 17/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 1 7
SAE J1739 March 2009
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 18/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 1 8
Micro Level PFD Example
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 19/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 1 9
Process Characteristics
PFD Feeds PFMEA
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 20/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 2 0
PFD Feeds PFMEAIdentify the Function(s)
Function is a description of what theProcess does to meet the requirements
Related to process specification and productcharacteristics
Comes from the PFD operation description column
Functions can be described as:Do this operation…
To this part or material…
With this tooling or equipment…
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 21/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 2 1
PFD Feeds PFMEA
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 22/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 2 2
Linkage to PFMEA
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 23/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 2 3
PFMEA Example continued..
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 24/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 2 4
Sources and Types of Manufacturing Variation
Source of Variation Types of Variation Typical Process Controls
OperatorOperator Skill,Ergonomic Factors
Training, instructions, visual aids, feedbacklayout, motion analysis, human factors
Component /
Material
Incoming raw material, purchased
parts, previous operations
Supplier management, internal controls, error
proofing
Equipment /Machine
Machine capability, adjustment,wear over time
Equipment specifications, closed-loopmachine controls, preventive maintenance
EnvironmentTemperature, humidity, dust, noise Climate control, air filtration, clean room,
sound insulation
Methods & Systems Sequence, procedure, layoutIndustrial Engineering techniques,Lean Flow analysis
Set Up(for stableprocesses)
Initial set up or adjustment
Process specification, first / last piece check,automated controls
ToolWear over time, breakage,tool-to-tool differences
Predictive maintenance, detection error-proofing, tooling specifications
MaintenanceRepair, replacement, reassembly,adjustment
Instructions, error-proofing, machinequalification, production trial run
Fixture / PalletPosition tolerance, adjustment,wear over time
Predictive maintenance, prevention anddetection error-proofing
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 25/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 2 5
PCP will be based on the previousactivities in PFD and PFMEA.
Review the PFMEA informationdeveloped & supplied and use to identify:
Specific controls that may be needed due to the
information added Identify which controls are Product or Process
o Note any Special Characteristics
o Identify evaluation methods, frequency and ControlMethods
o Note Reaction Plans (particularly related to NC parts)
Process Control Plan
Process Control Plan Example
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 26/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 2 6
Process Control Plan Example
Part/ ProcessNumber
Process Name / Operation Description
Machine,Device, Jig,
Tools for Mfg.
CharacteristicsSpecialChar.Class.
Methods
ReactionPlan
No. Product ProcessProduct / Process
Specification / Tolerance
EvaluationMeasurement
Technique
SampleControl Method
Size Frequency
300 Initiate weld sequence /
Perform TIG weld offrame parts.
Robotic Armcontroller.TIG welders.
Weld beadsper designspecification.
Tube welds meetpull test withfailure in parentmaterial.
Pull testusing testfixture 20-1.
1 pc. Per shift. Hydraulic pull testinstruction TI21-01
Process monitoringform PMF-20-01
Quarantinematerialsince lastgood pulltest.
Good welds,no visibledefects.
yes Weld appearancemeets visualstandard.
Operatorevaluation toVisual StdTB20-VS1
100% Eachpiece. Visual inspection OWI#20-01. Remove partand send torepair.
Weld voltage yes 24 Volts AC+/- 2.0 volts
MachineControl
100% Each weldcycle.
Closed-loop machinecontrol.
Scrap part &Re-startwelder.
Weld voltage yes 24 Volts AC+/- 2.0 volts
Visual Onceeach
Shift startorchange-over or
maint.event.
Set-up OWI #20-02 &Form PMF-20-02
Periodicmaintenance per PM-
WI #20.
Scrapcurrent part.Shut down.Notify
maintenance.
Inert gas flowrate
yes 5 cubic feet / min.+/- 0.5 cfm
Visual twice Per shift. Operator cleans gascup twice per shiftPM-WI-20. Processmonitoring form PMF-20-01
Notifymaintenance.
Inert gas flowrate
yes 5 cubic feet / min.+/- 0.5 cfm
Visual ofverification
of FlowMeter
Onceeach
Shift startor
change-over ormaint.event
Set-up OWI #20-02 &Form PMF-20-02.
EquipmentCalibration Procedure#368
Quarantinematerial
since lastgood pulltest.Notifymaintenance.
Form 818-1 (Rev 12Apr02)
CONTROL PLAN Control Plan No:
Part Number/Latest Change Level Key Contact/Phone Date (Orig.) Date (Rev.)
Customer Part Number CoreTeam
Customer Engineering Approval/Date (If Req'd.)
Part Name/Description Supplier/Plant Approval/Date Customer Quality Approval/Date (If Req'd.)
Supplier/Plant Supplier Code Other Approval/Date (If Req'd.) Other Approval/Date (If Req'd.)
Prototype Pre-Launch Production
Process Control Plan Example
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 27/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 2 7
Process Control Plan Example
Initiate weld sequence / Confirm Wire feed rate
Initiate weld sequence / Confirm Weld voltage
Initiate weld sequence / Perform TIG weld offrame parts.
Initiate weld sequence / Confirm Inert Gas flowrate
Scrap part &Re-startwelder
Closed-loop machinecontrol.
Each weldcycle.
100%MachineControl
300 mm / minute+/- 10 mm / min.
yesWeld wirefeed rate
Scrap part
& Re-startwelder
Closed-loop machine
control.
Each weld
cycle.
100%Machine
Control
24 Volts AC
+/- 2.0 volts
yesWeld voltage
Notifymaintenance.
Operator cleans gascup twice per shiftPM-WI-2500. Processmonitoring form PMF-
20-10
Per shift.twiceVisual5 cubic feet / min.+/- 0.5 cfm
yesInert gas flowrate
Removepart andsend torepair.
Visual inspection OWI#20-010.
Eachpiece.
100%Operatorevaluation toVisual StdTB20-VS1.
Weld appearancemeets visualstandard.
yesGood welds, novisible defects.
Scrap currentpart.Shut down.Notifymaintenance.
Set-up OWI #20-020 &Form PM-20-020
Predictivemaintenancepinch roller replace @180 days.
Shift startor change-over ormaint.event
100%Operatorsetup checkandverification
300 mm / minute+/- 10 mm / min.
yesWeld wirefeed rate
Quarantinematerialsince lastgood pulltest.Notifymaintenance.
Set-up OWI #20-02 &Form PM-00-02.Equipment CalibrationProcedure #368
Shift startor change-over ormaint.event
Onceeach
Visualverification ofFlow Meter
5 cubic feet / min.+/- 0.5 cfm
yesInert gas flowrate
Scrapcurrentpart.Shut down.Notifymaintenance.
Set-up OWI #20-02 &Form PM-20-02Periodic maintenanceper PM-WI #20.
Shift startor change-over ormaint.event
Onceeach
Visual24 Volts AC+/- 2.0 volts
yesWeld voltage
Quarantinematerialsince lastgood pulltest.
Hydraulic pull testinstruction TI41-01
Process monitoringform PM-20-010
Per shift.1 pc.Pull testusing testfixture 20-1.
Tube welds meetpull test with failurein parent material.
Weld beads perdesignspecification.
Robotic ArmTIG weldersand controllers.
300.
.
Robotic ArmTIG welders
Initiate weld sequence / Close and latch curtain
300
FrequencySize
Reaction
PlanControl Method
SampleEvaluation
MeasurementTechnique
Product / Process
Specification / Tolerance
ProcessProductNo.
MethodsSpecialChar.
Class.
CharacteristicsMachine,
Device, Jig,Tools for Mfg.
Process Name /
Operation Description
Part/ ProcessNumber
C S di S li A
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 28/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 2 8
Case Studies – Supplier A
Not ISO Certified, Primarily Defense business base Sole Source - Unique Technology No Process Flow
Operator work instruction for 100 piece componento 20 process steps on a single piece of paper (included machining)
o Building the component relied on Tribal Knowledge
Diagramming the Process Flow 20 steps turned into 951 steps to produce the component
22 manufacturing related issues (from DFMEA) wereincorporated in the PFD/PFMEA
Supplier A used PFD - FMEA to Develop work instructions
Determine the requirement to developed training programsfor assemblers / machinists, QC personnel
Develop safety program / training
C St di S li B
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 29/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 2 9
Case Studies – Supplier B
ISO Certified, Primarily Defense business base
Sole Source - Unique Design
“Fair” Documented Process Flow
Relied on a combination of operator knowing what shouldbe done next with operator work instructions.
o However it did allow for repeatable assembly of component with
skilled employee Diagramming the Process Flow
270 step PFD became 1,170 steps
o
FMEA analysis determined: work instructions that neededimprovement and new work instructions were required
Supplier B used PFD- FMEA to
Update work instructions to error proof build process
C St di S li C
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 30/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 3 0
Case Studies – Supplier C
ISO Certified, Defense/Civil business base
Well Documented Process Flow
Operator work instructions allowed for repeatable assembly
Error Proofing allows for assembly with “average”employees
Diagramming the Process Flow
263 step PFD became 268 steps
32 manufacturing related issues (from DFMEA) wereincorporated in the PFD/PFMEA
o FMEA analysis determined: work instructions that neededimprovement and new work instructions were required
Supplier C used PFD- FMEA to
Update work instructions
C St di S li D
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 31/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 3 1
Case Studies – Supplier D
ISO Certified, Aerospace business base Very Small Company
2 Master Assemblers (1 of which was the Assembly & TestManager)
Unique Technology “Fair” Documented Process Flow
Relied on a combination of operator knowing what should be done nextwith broad operator work instructions.
o However it did allow for repeatable assembly of component with highly
skilled employee Diagramming the Process Flow
5 page PFD became 22 pages
FMEA analysis determined: work instructions needed improvementto allow for production of more than 1 component at a time
Supplier D used PFD - FMEA to Develop work instructions with boundary photos Recall non-compliant parts Determine the requirement to developed training programs for
assemblers, QC personnel Develop detailed ATP
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 32/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 3 232
Recapping
Process Flow Diagram“What does the process do?
Control Plan“What needs to be controlled/monitored?”
“How do we react to problems?”
PFMEA“What could go wrong?”
“Could we prevent or detect?”
Operator Instructions & Monitoring“What am I supposed to do?”
“How am I supposed to do it?”“Where am I supposed to record it?”
References
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 33/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 3 3
References
AIAG FMEA Fourth Edition June 2008
SAE J1739 March 2009
Vocabulary
8/2/2019 201002ASQ0511ProcessFailureModeEffectsAnalysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201002asq0511processfailuremodeeffectsanalysis 34/34
Jam es Dav is, GDLS Sl id e Nu m ber : 3 4
Vocabulary
AIAG FMEA Fourth Edition Published June 2008 SAE FMEA J1739 Published March 2009 PFD, Process Flow Diagram
PFMEA, Process Failure Modes and EffectsAnalysis PCP, Process Control Plan