9.1. ЭКОНОМИКО-МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКИЕ МЕТОДЫ ОЦЕНКИ ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТИ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ОРГАНОВ ВНУТРЕННИХ ДЕЛ

  • View
    215

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Transcript

  • ..

    9. , ,

    , ( 12.00.11)

    9.1. -

    , ..., . : . : , . E-mail: peschanskih_gv@fskn.gov.ru :

    . - . - - . , - - , - . : ,

    , -, - , - . ECONOMIC AND MATHEMATICAL ESTIMATION METHODS OF EFFECTIVE WORK OF LAW-ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES

    Peschanskikh Georgy Vladimirovich, Dr of Economics, asso-ciate professor. Position: professor. Place of employment: Economic security academy of MIA Russia, mathematics and information technologies chair. E-mail: peschan-skih_gv@fskn.gov.ru

    Annotation: The factors of effective counteractions of law-enforcement agencies economic and tax crimes are worked out. They interconnect the results of law-enforcement agencies activity with the running costs. These factors allow to compare different law-enforcement agencies and their departments in relation to the effective use of financial and other resources. This helps to define which areas need supplementary financing to increase ef-ficiency of law-enforcement agencies activity. Keywords: economic safety, economic crimes, tax crimes, effective work of law-enforcement agencies, efficient expenditure of budget funds.

    1.

    () -

    1. - - - - , , . - , , - , . - , - , - 2. -- - - , . - - - - , , , - . -

    , - , , , - . , , - -, , - . - ( ). - .

    , - , - . - - , - ,

    1 24.12.2009 .

    1468

    2 12.05.2009 . 537 - 2020 .

    271

  • 2'2010

    , , - - , -- .. - - - - , - 3. ,

    , , . .., : ( ) - ( - )4. -

    , , - ():

    = / (1)

    , - , -. -

    , .., - -, - (, , ) - 4.

    - (1), , , - () ()5:

    1 = / (2) -

    , , - . - ( 1) ( 2) 2003 2009 (. 1). - (1) (2) 1 (. 2).

    3 ..

    (- ) // - 2009. 12 .5-9

    4 .. . - ., 2000.

    5 .., .. -- - // - 2009. 8 .89-95

    1. -

    () - () (). -

    , - (. 2) , , 2006 2009 , - . , -, - . , 1 , 2003

    2006 . , 2006 , - . , - , - (1), , - 2003 2009 (. 2).

    2. (-

    ) (1) - () - (1) (2) , - - ( ). 1 2

    . 2003 2009 - . - -. , 2006 , - . , .

    272

  • ..

    - . ., , , , - . , -, , -, -, - .

    . - -, , , - . , - - . , -

    , 2006 2009 - , () - ( - ). -

    , - , , , -, .. , - -, , - , - , . , - () , - . , , , , , , . - , - - . 6

    , , -, , - . - - .

    6 -

    ( 19 2004 . 927).

    , . , - - , - . -

    , , . - -.

    2. -

    , (2) -

    (1) . , -, , - -, - (), , (). (2) , , - , . -

    () - . - , , -. , , - . , -

    -, , . , - - , - () - ( ) (). - -, , (3). 2 = (1/ ) * (1/ ) (3) (3)

    - (. 3). 2 (3)

    (. 3) , - - . - - (2) , -, .

    273

  • 2'2010

    3. -

    - (2) (3) (1/./.). - ,

    , , - .

    = / (4)

    :

    .

    -, , , .

    , . (4)

    (1). , - (4) (1) - , - . - , , , -, -- , - , , -- . , -

    (1), - . -, -

    , . , - . - () (). , - , , - . , - . -, -

    , - , -, , , , , (- , (,

    ) ) . .., - ( ), , . -,

    . - , , , . - . , , - - , - - . , -

    , (1). - (), - - . . -, , , - . , - -, , (1) . .. - , , . , - . , ,

    , - , , , , , . , -, - - , - .

    (1) 1 (2), -, 5.

    3=1*= =(/)*(/)= (5)

    =/

    ( - ), (6): 3= / ( + ) (6)

    274

  • ..

    : , -

    - . -

    (1) (2) , - (-) - (7).

    4=/, (7)

    = /(*) (4)

    - () - (). () . , . -

    - (7) - , - ( = 1 + 2 + 3 +) ( = 1 + 2 + 3 +) :

    4=(1+2+3+)/(*(1+2+3+)) (8) : i, i

    (, - ). (8) (9,

    10):

    i , -

    i- - . ,

    (4) , - , (i) - . , (10)

    . - (, - ). , - , - . (10, 11) . i. , . i , i

    , i- . (10) ,

    (, ). - (10) Fi , - , - .

    , (10)

    :

    ,

    , - (, ) (4(_i)), - (i) - , - (Fi).

    (15) (16) - , - .. , 4. - .

    3. , -

    - , - 4: - ( 21 ), - ( 22 ), , ( 198, 199, 199.1, 199.2 ), - ( 23 ) . ,

    , - () - () - . , (10 .). , -

    275

  • 2'2010

    . - - (), (). , - (10 .) , - . . ,

    ( -) - () ()? -

    - - - 7:

    5= / (17)

    : , -, . -

    (5) , - . , :

    : , -

    - -, . (17)

    - (). -, , , - . , (), , - ( ) () (, ) () (20).

    7 .., .. - - // 2009. 12 .72-77

    - , - , - 8. , -, . - . -

    , -, . , - -, . , -

    , -, -, 2004 23 , 1 720 , - 9. -.

    () , - . , 10. , 11. -

    , , - , , 400 12. - (20) - () , , - (5) (17).

    8 .. -

    . - // . - 2005. 2 .4-49.

    9 , 22.06.2005 .; , 24.06.2005 . 10 , .2 :

    , 1998. 244 . 11 ,

    , 22-24.05.2002. / : -- , 2002. 184. , .2 :

    , 1998. 244 . 12 , 30.11.2005 .;

    http://minfin.ru

    276

  • ..

    - - . - - - , - .

    (), - (-) :

    1 = / (21) -

    , - - ( - ). ( ) . , (21) - :

    (22) (21) -

    , , - , , , . -

    , , ( - ) 3:

    -

    4 (7), -, - 4:

    ,

    - ( -) -

    () , - . , - -, - , -.

    4. ,

    . - 1 2. , 1 , - -, .

    1 3 (. 4). 1 (2) - - . 3 (5) , - - .

    4. -

    : 1 (2) 3 (5) - . 1 3 4 -

    , - , , . - 4 , - (1) - . , - 4, , - - , -. -. - - , , -, , - - . -

    4 (7), - () -

    277

  • 2'2010

    (). -, (10) , - . -, , - , . , , - - - . 4

    , , - . 5

    4 - . - - - - , -.

    5. 4 (7) -

    ( ) , - (- / . .).

    - ( ) - , (. 5). , , 22 , , , , - -, . - -, , 198 () - (. 6). , (10)

    (11) , .

    6. 4 (7) -

    ( ) , - (- / ..). ,

    - , -. (10) i - -. 7 - 1%. , - .

    7. - ( ) -, 2009 . - : i = 14%. , - 4(i) (10)

    4 (7) 20%. 6%. -

    , - . - - . -, -. ,

    . 198 () . -, , - . -

    , -

    278

  • ..

    . - - . - . -

    , , , , 400 12: = 400 (25) . 2005

    , , 2004 . (20) (25) , 2004 - 584 - (), .. 1,45 , . -, -, , :

    -

    - . , , 25% 40% , . 2002 . - , 30% 50% 13. 2004 - - -, - - - 30% 40%14. - 1,42 1,67. , , - : =1,45. -. ,

    , , - . , - , , , -. , -, -, 1,1 4,015, - . -