3
7/26/2019 950120 http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/950120 1/3  Reports from the Provinces and from Abroad Source: The Musical Times , Vol. 103, No. 1428 (Feb., 1962), pp. 106-107 Published by: Musical Times Publications Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/950120 Accessed: 06-04-2016 15:17 UTC  Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms  JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Musical Times Publications Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Musical Times This content downloaded from 161.53.226.35 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:17:53 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

950120

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 950120

7/26/2019 950120

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/950120 1/3

 

Reports from the Provinces and from Abroad

Source: The Musical Times , Vol. 103, No. 1428 (Feb., 1962), pp. 106-107

Published by: Musical Times Publications Ltd.

Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/950120

Accessed: 06-04-2016 15:17 UTC

 

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at

http://about.jstor.org/terms

 

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted

digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about

JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

Musical Times Publications Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The 

Musical Times 

This content downloaded from 161.53.226.35 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:17:53 UTCAll use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

Page 2: 950120

7/26/2019 950120

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/950120 2/3

 BOURNEMOUTH

 Silvestri's first concert as principal conductor was a

 civic occasion; there was, however, little that was

 civic about the programme, which had been cunning-

 ly chosen to display the virtuosity of orchestra and

 conductor. Stupendous playing justified the choice:

 of Rawsthorne's Street Corner Overture, Shostako-

 vich's First Symphony, a Prelude and Fugue by

 Silvestri, Till and the second Daphnis and Chloe suite.

 Two virtues were immediately apparent: a precision

 in attack which has been lacking for too long, and

 excellent balance. Particularly memorable were the

 Shostakovich, and Silvestri s own Prelude and

 Fugue: a work which bears the stamp of a genuine

 creative mind, is brilliantly scored, and generous in

 rhythmic and melodic excitement.

 Silvestri's next concert was more of a 'pop', and it

 was easier to make a critical evaluation. The same

 virtues were apparent, but the Pathetic Symphony

 seemed to reveal a tendency to overphrase and to

 hammer home the obvious; it was wilful and way-

 ward. On the other hand the Tristan preludes and

 Liebestod showed the utmost sensitivity-what

 unpredictable creatures conductors are.

 Edgar Cosma, a Silvestri pupil, is to conduct a

 number of concerts, but there was little to rouse

 enthusiasm on Nov 30. His Coriolan and Eighth

 Symphony were badly balanced and ponderous;

 Don Juan was little better; there was a distinct

 improvement in a splendidly controlled Pictures

 from an Exhibition.

 Charles Groves gave an interesting programme on

 Dec 7, including Webern's Six Pieces, op 6. But

 AUSTRALIA

 Stravinsky's visit in November made a considerable

 impact, even though he conducted only one concert

 in Sydney and one in Melbourne. In Sydney his

 programme, shared with Robert Craft, included

 Pulcinella, the Symphony in Three Movements, the

 Firebird Suite, and the ravishing Apollo Musagetes.

 A capacity audience gave Stravinsky a tremendous

 reception, and though the Sydney Symphony

 showed signs of nervousness, the concert was a

 memorable success.

 So was the Melbourne concert-though there the

 hall was far from full. Craft conducted two rarities

 in this programme-the sombre Ode and the

 Symphonies of Wind Instruments with its eerie

 sonorities, also The Card Game. The poetic languor

 and beauty of The Fairy's Kiss, complete, was in

 no way diminished by the economy of the com-

 poser's own conducting technique. The Victorian

 Symphony was piloted securely through the

 rhythmic kaleidoscopes.

 The Sydney Symphony seems to be no nearer

 finding a resident conductor. Part of the 1962

 season will be under Horenstein, and visiting con-

 ductors include Van Otterloo and Dean Dixon. In

 the final months of 1961 the SSO was conducted by

 Alberto Bolet, formerly in charge of the pre-Castro

 Havana Philharmonic. Initially the critics found him

 106

 despite John Russell's lucid and persuasive exposi-

 tion at a public lecture a few days before, the

 audience did not take the work to their hearts. The

 performance itself was quite good, though it was

 obvious that many of the players regarded the

 event more as a prank than as music to be played

 and experienced. Vaughan Williams's Job was

 magnificently done.

 JOHN EMERY

 BIRMNGHAM

 The last weeks of 1961 brought a crop of novelties.

 Orchestra da Camera, enterprising as ever, included

 in their alternating chamber and orchestral series

 works by Skalkottas and Wishart, and an effective

 Piano Trio in serial technique commissioned from

 James Walker. The Chamber Music Society are

 also presenting a contemporary work in each

 concert: after Wordsworth and Hindemith came

 the Schoenberg Third Quartet, played by the

 Drolc Quartet. The Birmingham Symphony have

 been playing well on the whole, under Rignold,

 though Kodaly's first Symphony, which received

 its 'first British performance' simultaneously in

 Birmingham and London, lacked something of verve

 and rhythmic drive which might have made it more

 memorable. The first of the year's Feeney Trust

 commissions was John Gardner s Herrick Cantata

 (see page 115), an attractive work, offering no

 challenges to the listener, but inventive and

 finely-wrought.E. DOHERT

 E E DOHERTY

 unsubtle and heavy in his approach, but increasing

 familiarity with the orchestra refined his results.

 The Victorian Symphony had Georges Tzipine

 and Sir Bernard Heinze at the helm during the last

 part of the year. Both introduced new symphonies

 to Melbourne Roussel s Fourth under Tzipine,

 and Walton s Second under Heinze. Another

 novelty was the Violin Concerto of Margaret

 Sutherland, a work of more charm than originality,

 finely played by Thomas Matthews.

 Moura Lympany appeared as successful soloist

 and recitalist in both Sydney and Melbourne.

 Segovia's guitar playing was rapturously received.

 On a visit to his home city of Melbourne, Sir

 William McKie gave a recital to a capacity audience

 in St Paul s Cathedral.

 FRED BLANKS

 MUNCH

 With five concert orchestras, three opera houses (the

 fourth and biggest is being rebuilt) and the usual

 concerts by visiting international artists, Munich

 musical life is one of feverish activity. The hardest

 concerts to get into are the six annual, fully-sub-

 scribed MUSICA VIVAS. At the first, in November,

 Kubelik, making his second appearance as perma-

 nent conductor of the Bavarian Radio Orchestra,

This content downloaded from 161.53.226.35 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:17:53 UTCAll use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

Page 3: 950120

7/26/2019 950120

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/950120 3/3

 gave an excellent concert performance of Janacek's

 House of the Dead, distinguished by Josef Traxel's

 Filka Morosov.

 At the December concert Luigi Nono s Ha

 Venido made the most compelling impression.

 Dedicated by the composer to his daughter Silvia

 for her first birthday (1960), this beautiful setting of

 three short poems by Antonio Machado for seven

 unaccompanied sopranos-a soloist and chorus of

 six-breaks new ground in its intimate expression

 of joy at the start of a new life. The arresting

 combination of silvery tones set up vibrations in the

 ears which had a direct physical working on this

 listener.

 gave an excellent concert performance of Janacek's

 House of the Dead, distinguished by Josef Traxel's

 Filka Morosov.

 At the December concert Luigi Nono s Ha

 Venido made the most compelling impression.

 Dedicated by the composer to his daughter Silvia

 for her first birthday (1960), this beautiful setting of

 three short poems by Antonio Machado for seven

 unaccompanied sopranos-a soloist and chorus of

 six-breaks new ground in its intimate expression

 of joy at the start of a new life. The arresting

 combination of silvery tones set up vibrations in the

 ears which had a direct physical working on this

 listener.

 gave an excellent concert performance of Janacek's

 House of the Dead, distinguished by Josef Traxel's

 Filka Morosov.

 At the December concert Luigi Nono s Ha

 Venido made the most compelling impression.

 Dedicated by the composer to his daughter Silvia

 for her first birthday (1960), this beautiful setting of

 three short poems by Antonio Machado for seven

 unaccompanied sopranos-a soloist and chorus of

 six-breaks new ground in its intimate expression

 of joy at the start of a new life. The arresting

 combination of silvery tones set up vibrations in the

 ears which had a direct physical working on this

 listener.

 gave an excellent concert performance of Janacek's

 House of the Dead, distinguished by Josef Traxel's

 Filka Morosov.

 At the December concert Luigi Nono s Ha

 Venido made the most compelling impression.

 Dedicated by the composer to his daughter Silvia

 for her first birthday (1960), this beautiful setting of

 three short poems by Antonio Machado for seven

 unaccompanied sopranos-a soloist and chorus of

 six-breaks new ground in its intimate expression

 of joy at the start of a new life. The arresting

 combination of silvery tones set up vibrations in the

 ears which had a direct physical working on this

 listener.

 Stefania Woytowicz (who has a lovely lyric voice

 which reminded me of Los Angeles), Michel

 Senechal and Keith Engen were the soloists in a

 performance of Debussy's L'Enfant Prodigue, at

 times too vaguely directed by Bruno Maderna.

 Maderna's time-beating account of Karl Amadeus

 Hartmann's monstrous Seventh Symphony did little

 to elucidate its long-winded complexities. The

 composer deserves immense praise for all he has

 done for this city s musical life, especially by

 organizing MUSICA VIVA; but the enforced hearing

 of this horrid work struck me as a form of musical

 blackmail. Gratitude should be unbinding.

 GREVILLE ROTHON

 Stefania Woytowicz (who has a lovely lyric voice

 which reminded me of Los Angeles), Michel

 Senechal and Keith Engen were the soloists in a

 performance of Debussy's L'Enfant Prodigue, at

 times too vaguely directed by Bruno Maderna.

 Maderna's time-beating account of Karl Amadeus

 Hartmann's monstrous Seventh Symphony did little

 to elucidate its long-winded complexities. The

 composer deserves immense praise for all he has

 done for this city s musical life, especially by

 organizing MUSICA VIVA; but the enforced hearing

 of this horrid work struck me as a form of musical

 blackmail. Gratitude should be unbinding.

 GREVILLE ROTHON

 Stefania Woytowicz (who has a lovely lyric voice

 which reminded me of Los Angeles), Michel

 Senechal and Keith Engen were the soloists in a

 performance of Debussy's L'Enfant Prodigue, at

 times too vaguely directed by Bruno Maderna.

 Maderna's time-beating account of Karl Amadeus

 Hartmann's monstrous Seventh Symphony did little

 to elucidate its long-winded complexities. The

 composer deserves immense praise for all he has

 done for this city s musical life, especially by

 organizing MUSICA VIVA; but the enforced hearing

 of this horrid work struck me as a form of musical

 blackmail. Gratitude should be unbinding.

 GREVILLE ROTHON

 Stefania Woytowicz (who has a lovely lyric voice

 which reminded me of Los Angeles), Michel

 Senechal and Keith Engen were the soloists in a

 performance of Debussy's L'Enfant Prodigue, at

 times too vaguely directed by Bruno Maderna.

 Maderna's time-beating account of Karl Amadeus

 Hartmann's monstrous Seventh Symphony did little

 to elucidate its long-winded complexities. The

 composer deserves immense praise for all he has

 done for this city s musical life, especially by

 organizing MUSICA VIVA; but the enforced hearing

 of this horrid work struck me as a form of musical

 blackmail. Gratitude should be unbinding.

 GREVILLE ROTHON

 LETTERS TO THE EDITORLETTERS TO THE EDITORLETTERS TO THE EDITORLETTERS TO THE EDITOR

 Spurious Chopin Letters

 I am authorized by the President of the conference

 of Polish musicologists and scholars which met in

 October 1961 at Niebor6w, Poland, to make public

 certain facts. The conference was called by the

 Chopin Institute, Warsaw, to investigate thoroughly

 the so-called 'Letters of Chopin to Delfina Potocka'

 produced by one Paulina Czericka in 1941 and

 again in 1945. These letters were given wide

 publicity (notably in the book The Life and Death of

 Chopin by K. Wierzyfiski) and have been the subject

 of controversy chiefly in the Polish, French and

 American press.

 The President of the Niebor6w conference writes:

 'The letters are spurious. To the arguments already

 formulated have been added new ones, which are

 quite simply a revelation. In the papers left behind

 by Mme Czernicka were found further exercises

made by her in the form of 104 fragments of Chopin

 letters . Of these only a certain number are covered

 by the letters hitherto revealed. It was evidently

 the lady's plan to proceed with a far more extensive

 publication; she had already picked out those

 fragments which she considered most successful .

 It was further shown that she had engaged in

 musicological studies in France; that at her residence

 near Wilno she had something of a Chopin Chapel ;

 that she had at her disposal a considerable library;

 and that some of her letters are simply taken from

 Kleczynski, Hoesick and others; also that her

 suicide [in 1949] was connected with the 100th

 anniversary of Chopin s death. There was some

 psychopathic identification of herself with Chopin

 which led her to write letters, and to put into those

 letters her own thoughts and imaginings.

 'Further: philological analysis showed that the

 characteristic linguistic features of Chopin's letters

 are repeated in the spurious ones, but 100 per cent

 more frequently. Evidently Mme Czernicka added

 plenty of salt , wishing to give a flavour of authen-

 ticity. Again: expressions are found which were not

 used in the Polish language in 1830-40. In the

 spurious texts are found certain vulgar expressions

 which appeared in Polish only after the First World

 War. Philological evidence places the date of the

 fabrication between 1926 and 1945.

Within the next few months a complete report of

 the conference will appear.

 London NW3 ARTHUR HEDLEY

 Spurious Chopin Letters

 I am authorized by the President of the conference

 of Polish musicologists and scholars which met in

 October 1961 at Niebor6w, Poland, to make public

 certain facts. The conference was called by the

 Chopin Institute, Warsaw, to investigate thoroughly

 the so-called 'Letters of Chopin to Delfina Potocka'

 produced by one Paulina Czericka in 1941 and

 again in 1945. These letters were given wide

 publicity (notably in the book The Life and Death of

 Chopin by K. Wierzyfiski) and have been the subject

 of controversy chiefly in the Polish, French and

 American press.

 The President of the Niebor6w conference writes:

 'The letters are spurious. To the arguments already

 formulated have been added new ones, which are

 quite simply a revelation. In the papers left behind

 by Mme Czernicka were found further exercises

made by her in the form of 104 fragments of Chopin

 letters . Of these only a certain number are covered

 by the letters hitherto revealed. It was evidently

 the lady's plan to proceed with a far more extensive

 publication; she had already picked out those

 fragments which she considered most successful .

 It was further shown that she had engaged in

 musicological studies in France; that at her residence

 near Wilno she had something of a Chopin Chapel ;

 that she had at her disposal a considerable library;

 and that some of her letters are simply taken from

 Kleczynski, Hoesick and others; also that her

 suicide [in 1949] was connected with the 100th

 anniversary of Chopin s death. There was some

 psychopathic identification of herself with Chopin

 which led her to write letters, and to put into those

 letters her own thoughts and imaginings.

 'Further: philological analysis showed that the

 characteristic linguistic features of Chopin's letters

 are repeated in the spurious ones, but 100 per cent

 more frequently. Evidently Mme Czernicka added

 plenty of salt , wishing to give a flavour of authen-

 ticity. Again: expressions are found which were not

 used in the Polish language in 1830-40. In the

 spurious texts are found certain vulgar expressions

 which appeared in Polish only after the First World

 War. Philological evidence places the date of the

 fabrication between 1926 and 1945.

Within the next few months a complete report of

 the conference will appear.

 London NW3 ARTHUR HEDLEY

 Spurious Chopin Letters

 I am authorized by the President of the conference

 of Polish musicologists and scholars which met in

 October 1961 at Niebor6w, Poland, to make public

 certain facts. The conference was called by the

 Chopin Institute, Warsaw, to investigate thoroughly

 the so-called 'Letters of Chopin to Delfina Potocka'

 produced by one Paulina Czericka in 1941 and

 again in 1945. These letters were given wide

 publicity (notably in the book The Life and Death of

 Chopin by K. Wierzyfiski) and have been the subject

 of controversy chiefly in the Polish, French and

 American press.

 The President of the Niebor6w conference writes:

 'The letters are spurious. To the arguments already

 formulated have been added new ones, which are

 quite simply a revelation. In the papers left behind

 by Mme Czernicka were found further exercises

made by her in the form of 104 fragments of Chopin

 letters . Of these only a certain number are covered

 by the letters hitherto revealed. It was evidently

 the lady's plan to proceed with a far more extensive

 publication; she had already picked out those

 fragments which she considered most successful .

 It was further shown that she had engaged in

 musicological studies in France; that at her residence

 near Wilno she had something of a Chopin Chapel ;

 that she had at her disposal a considerable library;

 and that some of her letters are simply taken from

 Kleczynski, Hoesick and others; also that her

 suicide [in 1949] was connected with the 100th

 anniversary of Chopin s death. There was some

 psychopathic identification of herself with Chopin

 which led her to write letters, and to put into those

 letters her own thoughts and imaginings.

 'Further: philological analysis showed that the

 characteristic linguistic features of Chopin's letters

 are repeated in the spurious ones, but 100 per cent

 more frequently. Evidently Mme Czernicka added

 plenty of salt , wishing to give a flavour of authen-

 ticity. Again: expressions are found which were not

 used in the Polish language in 1830-40. In the

 spurious texts are found certain vulgar expressions

 which appeared in Polish only after the First World

 War. Philological evidence places the date of the

 fabrication between 1926 and 1945.

Within the next few months a complete report of

 the conference will appear.

 London NW3 ARTHUR HEDLEY

 Spurious Chopin Letters

 I am authorized by the President of the conference

 of Polish musicologists and scholars which met in

 October 1961 at Niebor6w, Poland, to make public

 certain facts. The conference was called by the

 Chopin Institute, Warsaw, to investigate thoroughly

 the so-called 'Letters of Chopin to Delfina Potocka'

 produced by one Paulina Czericka in 1941 and

 again in 1945. These letters were given wide

 publicity (notably in the book The Life and Death of

 Chopin by K. Wierzyfiski) and have been the subject

 of controversy chiefly in the Polish, French and

 American press.

 The President of the Niebor6w conference writes:

 'The letters are spurious. To the arguments already

 formulated have been added new ones, which are

 quite simply a revelation. In the papers left behind

 by Mme Czernicka were found further exercises

made by her in the form of 104 fragments of Chopin

 letters . Of these only a certain number are covered

 by the letters hitherto revealed. It was evidently

 the lady's plan to proceed with a far more extensive

 publication; she had already picked out those

 fragments which she considered most successful .

 It was further shown that she had engaged in

 musicological studies in France; that at her residence

 near Wilno she had something of a Chopin Chapel ;

 that she had at her disposal a considerable library;

 and that some of her letters are simply taken from

 Kleczynski, Hoesick and others; also that her

 suicide [in 1949] was connected with the 100th

 anniversary of Chopin s death. There was some

 psychopathic identification of herself with Chopin

 which led her to write letters, and to put into those

 letters her own thoughts and imaginings.

 'Further: philological analysis showed that the

 characteristic linguistic features of Chopin's letters

 are repeated in the spurious ones, but 100 per cent

 more frequently. Evidently Mme Czernicka added

 plenty of salt , wishing to give a flavour of authen-

 ticity. Again: expressions are found which were not

 used in the Polish language in 1830-40. In the

 spurious texts are found certain vulgar expressions

 which appeared in Polish only after the First World

 War. Philological evidence places the date of the

 fabrication between 1926 and 1945.

Within the next few months a complete report of

 the conference will appear.

 London NW3 ARTHUR HEDLEY

 The Prince Consort

 The piano duet by the Prince Consort, described by

 Mr Howes in his letter last month, sounds most

 entertaining, but I have been unable to find a copy

 of it. It is certainly not in the British Museum. The

 'German melodies' in it are evidently some of the

 Prince's own songs.

 I am grateful to Mr Howes for mentioning the

 Royal College of Music in connection with the

 Prince Consort. He may, indeed, have provided

 the first stimulus which ultimately led to the founda-

 tion of the College, though the evidence for this

 seems a little thin. On the whole I feel that my

 assessment of the Prince s influence on musical

 education still stands. He expressed advanced views

 on the subject but did not get them put into practice.

 Mr Robert Sterndale Bennett has kindly pointed

 out a serious error in my article. I said that

 the performance of the St Matthew Passion at

 Windsor Castle was the first in England. My

 impression that this was so had come from Martin's

 Life of the Prince Consort. With the help of Mr

 Hyatt King and of the Queen s Librarian, Mr

 Mackworth-Young, it has been possible to establish

 the date of the Windsor performance as 23 April

 1859. It was thus over a year later than the per-

 formance by the Bach Society under Sterndale

 Bennett, which took place on 23 March 1858. So it

 is to Sterndale Bennett, and not to the Prince

 Consort, that we owe the introduction of Bach s

 masterpiece to this country. The Windsor per-

 formance seems, indeed, to have been a direct

 product of the Bach Society performance of 1858;

 the same English translation, newly made by Helen

 Johnston, was used, and the chorus was drawn from

 the Bach Society. The conductor was G. F. Ander-

 son, Master of the Queen's Private Band.

 Faculty of Music, NICHOLAS TEMPERLEY

 Cambridge University

 Joao Domingos Itomtempo

 I am anxious to obtain information about the work

 of the Portuguese composer Joao Domingos

 Bomtempo, who lived in London between 1810 and

 1820; and should be grateful if anyone possessing

 any of his works, in printed or manuscript form,

 would communicate with me.

 London W1 J P SARRAUTE

 107

 The Prince Consort

 The piano duet by the Prince Consort, described by

 Mr Howes in his letter last month, sounds most

 entertaining, but I have been unable to find a copy

 of it. It is certainly not in the British Museum. The

 'German melodies' in it are evidently some of the

 Prince's own songs.

 I am grateful to Mr Howes for mentioning the

 Royal College of Music in connection with the

 Prince Consort. He may, indeed, have provided

 the first stimulus which ultimately led to the founda-

 tion of the College, though the evidence for this

 seems a little thin. On the whole I feel that my

 assessment of the Prince s influence on musical

 education still stands. He expressed advanced views

 on the subject but did not get them put into practice.

 Mr Robert Sterndale Bennett has kindly pointed

 out a serious error in my article. I said that

 the performance of the St Matthew Passion at

 Windsor Castle was the first in England. My

 impression that this was so had come from Martin's

 Life of the Prince Consort. With the help of Mr

 Hyatt King and of the Queen s Librarian, Mr

 Mackworth-Young, it has been possible to establish

 the date of the Windsor performance as 23 April

 1859. It was thus over a year later than the per-

 formance by the Bach Society under Sterndale

 Bennett, which took place on 23 March 1858. So it

 is to Sterndale Bennett, and not to the Prince

 Consort, that we owe the introduction of Bach s

 masterpiece to this country. The Windsor per-

 formance seems, indeed, to have been a direct

 product of the Bach Society performance of 1858;

 the same English translation, newly made by Helen

 Johnston, was used, and the chorus was drawn from

 the Bach Society. The conductor was G. F. Ander-

 son, Master of the Queen's Private Band.

 Faculty of Music, NICHOLAS TEMPERLEY

 Cambridge University

 Joao Domingos Itomtempo

 I am anxious to obtain information about the work

 of the Portuguese composer Joao Domingos

 Bomtempo, who lived in London between 1810 and

 1820; and should be grateful if anyone possessing

 any of his works, in printed or manuscript form,

 would communicate with me.

 London W1 J P SARRAUTE

 107

 The Prince Consort

 The piano duet by the Prince Consort, described by

 Mr Howes in his letter last month, sounds most

 entertaining, but I have been unable to find a copy

 of it. It is certainly not in the British Museum. The

 'German melodies' in it are evidently some of the

 Prince's own songs.

 I am grateful to Mr Howes for mentioning the

 Royal College of Music in connection with the

 Prince Consort. He may, indeed, have provided

 the first stimulus which ultimately led to the founda-

 tion of the College, though the evidence for this

 seems a little thin. On the whole I feel that my

 assessment of the Prince s influence on musical

 education still stands. He expressed advanced views

 on the subject but did not get them put into practice.

 Mr Robert Sterndale Bennett has kindly pointed

 out a serious error in my article. I said that

 the performance of the St Matthew Passion at

 Windsor Castle was the first in England. My

 impression that this was so had come from Martin's

 Life of the Prince Consort. With the help of Mr

 Hyatt King and of the Queen s Librarian, Mr

 Mackworth-Young, it has been possible to establish

 the date of the Windsor performance as 23 April

 1859. It was thus over a year later than the per-

 formance by the Bach Society under Sterndale

 Bennett, which took place on 23 March 1858. So it

 is to Sterndale Bennett, and not to the Prince

 Consort, that we owe the introduction of Bach s

 masterpiece to this country. The Windsor per-

 formance seems, indeed, to have been a direct

 product of the Bach Society performance of 1858;

 the same English translation, newly made by Helen

 Johnston, was used, and the chorus was drawn from

 the Bach Society. The conductor was G. F. Ander-

 son, Master of the Queen's Private Band.

 Faculty of Music, NICHOLAS TEMPERLEY

 Cambridge University

 Joao Domingos Itomtempo

 I am anxious to obtain information about the work

 of the Portuguese composer Joao Domingos

 Bomtempo, who lived in London between 1810 and

 1820; and should be grateful if anyone possessing

 any of his works, in printed or manuscript form,

 would communicate with me.

 London W1 J P SARRAUTE

 107

 The Prince Consort

 The piano duet by the Prince Consort, described by

 Mr Howes in his letter last month, sounds most

 entertaining, but I have been unable to find a copy

 of it. It is certainly not in the British Museum. The

 'German melodies' in it are evidently some of the

 Prince's own songs.

 I am grateful to Mr Howes for mentioning the

 Royal College of Music in connection with the

 Prince Consort. He may, indeed, have provided

 the first stimulus which ultimately led to the founda-

 tion of the College, though the evidence for this

 seems a little thin. On the whole I feel that my

 assessment of the Prince s influence on musical

 education still stands. He expressed advanced views

 on the subject but did not get them put into practice.

 Mr Robert Sterndale Bennett has kindly pointed

 out a serious error in my article. I said that

 the performance of the St Matthew Passion at

 Windsor Castle was the first in England. My

 impression that this was so had come from Martin's

 Life of the Prince Consort. With the help of Mr

 Hyatt King and of the Queen s Librarian, Mr

 Mackworth-Young, it has been possible to establish

 the date of the Windsor performance as 23 April

 1859. It was thus over a year later than the per-

 formance by the Bach Society under Sterndale

 Bennett, which took place on 23 March 1858. So it

 is to Sterndale Bennett, and not to the Prince

 Consort, that we owe the introduction of Bach s

 masterpiece to this country. The Windsor per-

 formance seems, indeed, to have been a direct

 product of the Bach Society performance of 1858;

 the same English translation, newly made by Helen

 Johnston, was used, and the chorus was drawn from

 the Bach Society. The conductor was G. F. Ander-

 son, Master of the Queen's Private Band.

 Faculty of Music, NICHOLAS TEMPERLEY

 Cambridge University

 Joao Domingos Itomtempo

 I am anxious to obtain information about the work

 of the Portuguese composer Joao Domingos

 Bomtempo, who lived in London between 1810 and

 1820; and should be grateful if anyone possessing

 any of his works, in printed or manuscript form,

 would communicate with me.

 London W1 J P SARRAUTE

 107

This content downloaded from 161.53.226.35 on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:17:53 UTCAll use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms