Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Thomas Jensen, Eckart Witzel, Alexandre Paduch,Patrick Ziegler, E.U. Wagemann, and Oliver Funke
Agilent Technologies GmbH, Herrenberger Straße 130, 71034 Böblingen,Germany
NFOEC, Dallas 2002
A new method to determine Loss, PDL, GD,and DGD of passive optical components
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 2
Outline
• Optical Network Evolution• Experimental Setup• Measurement Principles for Loss, PD, GD, and DGD• Accuracy Verification• Measurement Examples• Summary
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 3
Optical Network Evolution
DeMUX
OADM
VOAGain eq.
∆τ∆τ∆τ∆τ
CD / PMDcompensator
MUX λλλλ
OA
Next Generation optical network facts:• 40 Gb/s and beyond• ultra dense WDM (≤≤≤≤10 Gb/s)• transparent
Network performance strongly depends on both: • amplitude (loss) and • phase (dispersion) characteristics of optical components
����
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 4
Complex component designs require an adequateall-parameter test method
Advanced components require high resolution andhigh accuracy for both loss and dispersion test
Example: TFF-Design
(G.Lenz et.al., IEEE J. Quant. Electr., 1390 (1998)
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 5
Experimental Setup
Swept homodyne interferometry
SignalLocal oscillator
Pol.contr.8169A
TLS81640B
DUTE D F
G
H
I
J
Wavelength Reference Unit
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 6
Loss & PDL Determination• Application of four well-known
polarization states to the DUT
• Transmission data are used to calculate the1st row - Mueller matrix coefficients
• PDL is obtained from the Mueller matrix coefficients
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
1533 1533.2 1533.4 1533.6 1533.8 1534 1534.2 1534.4 1534.6 1534.8 1535Wavelength
PDL
Scanning 10msScanning 1msMueller Method
accuracy comparablewith polarization scanning method
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 7
GD & DGD Determination
Interferometric principle
Polarizationresolvingdetector
Tunable laser &polarization controller
DUT
Interferometer
)(cos)()(2)()()( ,22
, ωϕωωωωω jidutLOdutLOji EEEEP ⋅++=
Polarization resolved measurement based on two orthogonalsweeps i and detections j .
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 8
Calculation from Jones matrixTransformation of the eigenvectors 2/1x� of the DUT Jones matrix
)()()()()( 2/12/1)(
2/12/12/1 ωωωωσω ωφ xUxey i ���
⋅=⋅=
2/1)(
2/12/1 )(
)(1
2/1 xUex i �� ⋅���
����
�= − ω
ωσωφ
Eigenvectors do not depend on the wavelength
2/12/1
2/12/1
22/1
2/12/1 '11'0 2/12/12/1 xUeUeiUedxd iii �
�
⋅���
����
�+−−== −−− φφφ
στ
σσσ
ω .
Simplification to an eigenvalue relation( ) 2/12/12/12/1
',0' τσσγγ iwithxUU +==⋅−
�
Calculation of GD and DGD from the eigenvalues
( ))Im()Im(21)(
)Im()Im()(
21
21
γγω
γγω
+=
−=
GD
DGD
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 9
Comparison of measured and theoretical GDcurve of HCN gas cell peak
1547 1547.2 1547.4 1547.6 1547.8 1548
5
10
15
20HCN gas cell
wavelength [nm]
grou
p de
lay
[ps]
red: measurementblue: theory
Theoretical curve reconstructed with Kramers-Kronig relationfrom amplitude response .
deviationbelow 1%
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 10
Comparison of DGD measurement with NIST
Averaged DGD results on NIST SRM 2518 / 029
0.32
0.34
0.36
0.38
0.4
0.42
0.44
1520.5-1568.5nm 1531.5-1568.5nm
DG
D [p
s]NISTinstrument a
instrument b
NIST device consist of coupled waveplates.DGD value is averaged over wavelength interval (PMD 1st order).
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 11
Measured DGD repeatability (i.e. TFF)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
1555.3 1555.4 1555.5 1555.6 1555.7 1555.8 1555.9 1556 1556.1 1556.2
DG
D p
s
0
5
10
15
20
25
loss
dB
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 12
Noise contribution of setup
0 20 40 60 80 1000.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
2σdg
d [p
s]
averages
sliding window 10 pm 30 pm 50 pm
0 20 40 60 80 1000.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
2σgd
[ps
]
averages
sliding window 10 pm 20 pm 30 pm 50 pm
• GD • DGD
Number of averages and width of sliding window have to be set properlyfor required SNR and spectral resolution.
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 13
Measurement of Dispersion Compensator (FBG)
• Reflection • Transmission
1574.0 1574.4 1574.8 1575.20
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
GD
IL
GD
[ps
]
wavelength [nm]
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
1573.0 1573.5 1574.0 1574.5 1575.0 1575.5 1576.00
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
GD
IL
wavelength [nm]
-15
-10
-5
0
IL [dB]
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 14
Measurement of Thin-Film-Filter
1572.6 1572.8 1573.0 1573.2012345
DGD
DG
D [
ps]
wavelength [nm]
0102030405060
GD
GD
[ps
]
-50-40-30-20-10
0IL
IL [
dB]
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 15
Measurement of AWG
1552.8 1553.2 1553.6 1554.0 1554.40
10
20
30
40
DGD
DG
D [
ps]
wavelength [nm]
50
100
150 GD
GD
[ps
]
-60-50-40-30-20-10
0PDLIL
IL [
dB]
024681012 PD
L [dB]
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 16
Measurement of EDFA
1530 1540 1550 1560 15700.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8DGD
DG
D [
ps]
wavelength [nm]
0
2
4
6
8
GD
GD
[ps
]
-25-20-15-10
-5 ILIL
[dB
]
NFOEC Dallas 2002 Page 17
Summary
• In this presentation we reported on a new measurement method fortesting passive components for spectral loss, PDL, GD, and DGD.
• When moving to advanced networks (beyond 10G or ultra-dense)requirements to test all-parameters can be expected for manycomponents.
• All-parameter test combines the state-of-the-art technique for Lossand PDL with a new high potential interferometric GD and DGDmeasurement.
• The new measurement method demonstrates its potentialparticularly when characterizing advanced network components