44

Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 1/44

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 2/44

What are ecological footprints?

• Ecological footprints measure the extent towhich humans are using the Earth

 

sbioproductive capacity

• Units are global hectares

 – A hectare of land with average bio-productivecapacity (for agriculture, forest, nutrient cycling,

energy production, etc.)

 – A hectare = 2.5 acres(1 acre is about a football field between the 5 yard lines)(1 hectare is 2 complete football fields with endzones) 

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 3/44

Ecological Footprint

From Living Planet Report 2008, World Wildlife Fund, 2008.

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 4/44

Ecological footprints measure Earth 

scarrying capacity for humans

• In 2010, the biosphere had about 11.5 billion hectaresof biologically productive surface (about 1/4 of thetotal planet)

 – 2 billion ha of ocean (the continental shelves) – 9.5 billion ha of land

• Current estimates indicate that humans are over-shooting the Earth s carrying capacity by 25-50%

 – To sustain the current carrying capacity, we could need11 /2 Earths!

 – But, population growth and increasing developmentmeans that we are inc reasing  our use of Earth’s

carrying-capacity (bio-capacity)

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 5/44

From Living Planet Report 2008, World Wildlife Fund, 2008.

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 6/44

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 7/44

With respect to sustainability of the human endeavor,population growth rate and population size are onlypart of the picture: per capita consumption is the other

Developed countrieshave very largeecological footprints

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 8/44

Ecological Footprints (Hectares per person)

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 9/44

Ecological Footprint by Region

From Living Planet Report 2008, World Wildlife Fund, 2008.

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 10/44

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 11/44

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 12/44

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 13/44

United States Ecological Footprint ByComponent

Biocapacity varies somewhat over time because oftechnology, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use

and irrigation), ecosystem degradation 

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 14/44

Mexico 

s Footprint by Component

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 15/44

Mexico

• Mexico has moved from using only 1/3 of its biocapacity

in 1961 to nearly 1 ½ times its own biocapacity in 2002

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 16/44

Calculate your own ecological footprint(Can you realistically reduce your footprint to 1 planet?)

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 17/44

So, where do we stand?

• There are 11.5 billion hectares of bio-productiveland, and it is declining

• There are about 7 billion people, and increasing at

about 1% per year

• There are currently 1 2 /3 hectares per person, andmost ecologists believe this is insufficient to supporta significant quality of life for the average person on

Earth

• If we continue down the path we are on, there will beless than 1 hectare per person by 2050

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 18/44

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 19/44

Sustainability ?

From Living Planet Report 2008, World Wildlife Fund, 2008.

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 20/44

Envisioning Solutions

• Former president Bill Clinton has argued that

combating climate change doesn’t have to mean

economic hardship (Clinton Initiative Topic)

• It could be the biggest development stimulus since

World War II, creating millions of jobs and saving

trillions of dollars in foreign fuel imports

• What are some of the strategies we have available?

9-20

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 21/44

Controlling Emissions is Cheap

Compared to Climate Change

• A 2010 study by the Pew Trust estimates the cost of lost

ecological services by 2100

• Costs included factors such as lost agricultural

productivity from drought, damage to infrastructure fromflooding and storms, lost biological productivity, health

costs from heat stress, and lost water supplies

•The Pew report found that climate change is likely to cost

between $5 trillion and $90 trillion by 2100

• The Stern Review (2006) estimates a cost of only about 1%

of global GDP to avoid the worst impacts of climate change

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 22/44

There Are Many Ways We Can Control

Greenhouse Emissions

• We can reduce dependence on coal, which produces

more CO2 per energy unit than any other fuel

• We could institute fees for selling fossil fuels – these wouldhelp fossil fuel prices represent their many hidden costs

• We can invest in new technologies and energy efficiency

• We can institute emissions trading, by instituting a legalcap on emissions, then allowing companies to buy and

sell shares of that total cap (California 

s AB-32 does

this)

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 23/44

A Wedge Approach Involves Dissecting

the Problem into Stepwise Solutions

• To avoid a doubling of atmospheric CO2 we need to

reduce our annual carbon emissions by about 7

billion tons (=7 gigatons or GT) by 2060• Scientists have divided these emissions into 14

wedges”

, each of which represents 1 GT of

carbon emissions avoided in the year 2060

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 24/44

Local Initiatives Are Effective

• California has greatly reduced Carbon emisions by

switching all coal burning power plants to natural gas

(decreased CO2 by 30%) & switching to green energy

production• New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark pledged that

her country will be the first to be carbon neutral”

 

• Germany has reduced its CO2 emissions at least 10percent by switching from coal to gas and by

encouraging energy efficiency throughout society

• Denmark now gets 20% of its electricity from windmills 

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 25/44

California: A long history of investing inclean power and energy efficiency

1974 2008

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 26/44

California is a model for efficiency

∆(2005) 

= 4,000kWh/yr

= $400/capita

   k   W   h   /  p  e  r  s  o  n

United States

California

Per Capita Electricity Sales (not including self-generation)

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 27/44

Energy Efficiency Strategies

• Flattening out the curve – yesterday – Decouple sales from revenues – eliminate disincentive

 – Set and strengthen building and appliance standards

 – Invest in utility energy efficiency programs

• Bending the curve downward –  tomorrow

 – Strengthen incentives –  Decoupling Plus”

 

 – Set long term goals to achieve durable, broad-based

reductions

 – Enhance strategic planning: work backwards from goals

 – Improve branding, messaging and marketing

 – Invest in workforce and research and development

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 28/44

• Accomplishing just half of these wedges could level off our

emissions. Accomplishing all of them could return to levels well

below those envisioned in the Kyoto protocol

Wedge Analysis

McKinse December 2007

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 29/44

McKinsey, December 2007U.S. GHG Abatement Mapping Initiative

22 S C C

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 30/44

22 States Committed to Regional CarbonMarkets (w/ an additional 8 observing

)

Source:

Pew Center

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 31/44

Products and the Environment

• At first glance,the relationshipbetween products& our environment

may seem clear,

BUT…. 

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 32/44

Let 

s consider the simple French fry

• What are itsconnects to the

environment?

• What impact does ithave?

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 33/44

How did the fry get to the restaurant?

Producer

Distribution Center  

Processing Plant

Suppliers 

Bob’s Burger Shop 

Truck 

Truck 

Truck 

Truck 

http://www.rprogress.org/

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 34/44

What impact did its journey have?

Producer  

Distribution Center

Processing Plant

Suppliers 

Bob’s Burger Shop

Truck 

Truck 

Truck 

Truck 

Fossil Fuels

Fossil Fuels 

Freezer  

Fertilizers 

Pesticides 

Machinery 

Hydropower

Fossil Fuels 

Machinery 

Fossil Fuels 

Packaging 

Hydroflourocarbons 

Irrigation 

Hydropower  

Freezer  

Food waste

Machinery 

Fossil Fuels 

Fossil Fuels 

Fossil Fuels 

Hydroelectric dam 

Fossil Fuels 

 Animal Feed

Irrigation 

Seeds 

http://www.rprogress.org/

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 35/44

What impact did these impacts have?

Runoff

Air

Pollution

Solid

Waste

Air

Pollution Fossil Fuels

Fossil Fuels

Freezer

Fertilizers

Pesticides

Truck

Truck

Machinery

Hydropower

Truck

Fossil Fuels

Machinery

Fossil Fuels

Damage

To Ozone

Packaging

Hydroflourocarbons

Irrigation

Hydropower

Freezer

Food waste

Machinery Producer

Distribution Center

Processing Plant

Suppliers

Fossil Fuels

Fossil Fuels

Fossil Fuels

Truck

Hydroelectric dam

Loss of

Biodiversity

Fossil Fuels

Animal Feed

Loss of

BiodiversityIrrigation

Seeds

Fossil Fuels

Bob’s Burger Shop

Air

Pollution

http://www.rprogress.org/ 

How might all of this affect the

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 36/44

How might all of this affect theEarth

 

s systems?

Runoff

Air

Pollution

Solid

Waste

Air

Pollution Fossil Fuels

Fossil Fuels

Freezer

Fertilizers

Pesticides

Truck

Truck

Machinery

Hydropower

Truck

Fossil Fuels

Machinery

Fossil Fuels

Damage

To Ozone

Packaging

Hydroflourocarbons

Forests

Irrigation

Forests Built-up Land

Grazing Land

Forests

River

Cropland

Hydropower

Freezer

Food waste

Machinery Producer

Distribution Center

Processing Plant

Suppliers

Bob’s Burger Shop

Fossil Fuels

Fossil Fuels

Fossil Fuels

Truck

Hydroelectric dam

Loss ofBiodiversity

Fossil Fuels

Built-up Land

Animal Feed

Loss of

BiodiversityIrrigation

Seeds

Air

Pollution

Forests

http://www.rprogress.org/

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 37/44

We’ve considered only the potato 

• Consider all the otherparts of your meal

 – the other foods

 – the utensils

 – the napkins

 – the condiments

 – the drinks… • There are multiple

environmental impactsinvolved in these as well

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 38/44

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 39/44

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 40/44

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 41/44

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 42/44

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 43/44

8/10/2019 Bio112-EcologicalFootprint

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio112-ecologicalfootprint 44/44