Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    1/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Biodiversity is life

    Biodiversity is our life

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    2/75

    Fishing Technology Interventions for

    Conservation of Biodiversity

    Dr. M.R. BoopendranathDr. M.R. Boopendranath

    Central Institute of Fisheries TechnologyCentral Institute of Fisheries TechnologyP.O. Matsyapuri, CIFT Junction, CochinP.O. Matsyapuri, CIFT Junction, Cochin--682 029682 029

    EE--mail:mail: [email protected]@hotmail.com

    National Seminar on

    Aquatic Biodiversity and its Conservation31 December 2010, CIFT, Cochin

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    3/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Estimates of the total number of species in theworld vary from 5 million to over 50 million (May,1998).

    Number of accepted published species in theworld are close to 1,900,000 (Chapman, 2009).

    The World Register of Marine Species(WoRMS) listed 2,07,286 valid marine species,as on December 2010.

    Fish species listed in FishBase are 31,900 intotal and 2,473 species in India, as on

    December 2010

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    4/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    The most serious threats to aquatic biodiversityare:

    Overexploitation

    Pollution

    Habitat destruction and fragmentation

    Invasive alien speciesGlobal climate change

    (Jackson et al., 2001; Dulvy et al., 2003; Pandolfi et al., 2003; Adger etal., 2005; Danielsen et al., 2005; Worm et al., 2005; Lotze et al., 2006).

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    5/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Overfishing and irresponsible fishing practices

    have long been recognized as leading causesthat have reduced biodiversity and modifiedecosystem functioning (FAO, 1995; Jackson et al.,2001; Lotze et al., 2006; Worm et al., 2006).

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    6/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Status of world fish stocks (Data source: FAO, 2009)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    7/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Global loss of species from LMEs: Trajectories of collapsed fishand invertebrate taxa over the past 50 years (Source: Worm et al., 2006)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    8/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Fishing down effect is pervasive in worldfisheries, including Indian fisheries (Pauly et al.,2003; Vivekanandan et al., 2005; Bhathal, 2005; Bhathal andPauly, 2008).

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    9/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Fishing down marine food webs (Source: Pauly et al., 2003)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    10/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Trends in mean trophic level of landings in India from 1950 to 2000(Bhathal and Pauly, 2008)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    11/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Analysis of data from five ocean basinsrevealed 90% decline in numbers of largepredatory fishes (tuna, blue marlins, swordfishand others) since the advent of industrializedfishing (Myers and Worm, 2003).

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    12/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Depleton of predatory fishes (Source: Myers and Worm, 2003)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    13/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Marine biodiversity loss is increasingly

    impairing the ocean's capacity to providefood, maintain water quality, and recoverfrom perturbations.

    Yet available data suggest that at this point,these trends are still reversible.

    (Worm et al., 2006; 2009)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    14/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Major commercial harvesting systems

    Trawl nets

    Surrounding nets

    Gillnets and entangling nets

    Hooks and lines

    Traps

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    15/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Overcapacity in fisheries

    There is a critical overcapacity in the worldfishing fleet. Over-fishing can have seriousconsequences for the entire marineenvironment.

    Global fishing fleets are estimated to have acapacity 2.5 times greater than the

    optimum (Schorr, 2004).

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    16/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Overcapacity in Marine Fisheries-India

    10998

    784

    3694

    2014

    1558

    19048

    14862

    29241

    983

    14183

    8862

    5642

    58911

    75591

    0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000

    Mechanised trawlers

    Mechanised purse seiners

    Mechanised gill netters

    Mechanised bag netters

    Other mechanised boats

    Total mechanised boats

    Total motorised boats

    Optimum fleet size (Kurup and

    Devaraj, 2000)

    Present fleet size (CMFRI, 2005)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    17/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    CCRF and Biodiversity Conservation

    The CCRF (FAO, 2005) sets out principles and

    international standards of behaviour forresponsible practices with a view to ensuring theeffective conservation, management anddevelopment of living aquatic resources that

    give due respect for the ecosystem andbiodiversity.

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    18/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    CCRF and Biodiversity Conservation

    Section 6.6 under Article 6 (General principles)Section 6.6 under Article 6 (General principles)

    prescribes that selective and environmentally safeprescribes that selective and environmentally safefishing gear and practices should be further developedfishing gear and practices should be further developedand applied, to the extent practicable, in order toand applied, to the extent practicable, in order tomaintain biodiversity and to conserve the populationmaintain biodiversity and to conserve the populationstructure and aquatic ecosystems and protect fishstructure and aquatic ecosystems and protect fish

    quality. Where proper selective and environmentally safequality. Where proper selective and environmentally safefishing gear and practices exist, they should befishing gear and practices exist, they should berecognized and accorded a priority in establishingrecognized and accorded a priority in establishingconservation and management measures for fisheries.conservation and management measures for fisheries.States and users of aquatic ecosystems should minimizeStates and users of aquatic ecosystems should minimizewaste, catch of nonwaste, catch of non--target species, both fish and nontarget species, both fish and non--fish species, and impacts on associated or dependentfish species, and impacts on associated or dependentspecies.species.

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    19/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    CCRF and Biodiversity Conservation

    SubSub--section 7.2.2 under Section 7.2section 7.2.2 under Section 7.2(Management objectives) of Article 7 (Fisheries(Management objectives) of Article 7 (Fisheries

    Management) prescribes that biodiversity ofManagement) prescribes that biodiversity of

    aquatic habitats and ecosystems is conservedaquatic habitats and ecosystems is conservedand endangered species are protected.and endangered species are protected.

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    20/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    CCRF and Biodiversity Conservation

    SubSub--section 8.4.8 under Article 8 (Fishingsection 8.4.8 under Article 8 (Fishing

    operations) prescribes that research on theoperations) prescribes that research on theenvironmental and social impacts of fishing gearenvironmental and social impacts of fishing gear

    and, in particular, on the impact of such gear onand, in particular, on the impact of such gear on

    biodiversity and coastal fishing communitiesbiodiversity and coastal fishing communitiesshould be promoted.should be promoted.

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    21/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    CCRF and Biodiversity Conservation

    Section 12.10 under Article 12 (FisheriesSection 12.10 under Article 12 (Fisheriesresearch) prescribes that States should carry outresearch) prescribes that States should carry outstudies on the selectivity of fishing gear, thestudies on the selectivity of fishing gear, theenvironmental impact of fishing gear on targetenvironmental impact of fishing gear on target

    species and on the behaviour of target and nonspecies and on the behaviour of target and non--target species in relation to such fishing gear astarget species in relation to such fishing gear asan aid for management decisions and with aan aid for management decisions and with aview to minimizing nonview to minimizing non--utilized catches as wellutilized catches as wellas safeguarding the biodiversity of ecosystemsas safeguarding the biodiversity of ecosystemsand the aquatic habitat.and the aquatic habitat.

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    22/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible Fishing Technologies

    to Minimise Biodiversity Loss

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    23/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Reducing incidental catch of

    non-target species, protected species andjuveniles in trawling

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    24/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Generation of bycatch in fish harvesting systems

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    25/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Size selectivity of fishing systems

    Size selectivityFishing system

    HighTrapsHighHooks and Lines

    HighGill nets

    Average to lowEntangling nets

    Average to lowTrawls

    LowPurse seines

    (Hameed and Boopendranath, 2000)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    26/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    The shrimp trawl is a non-selective gear thatcommonly has an associated catch of non-targetedorganisms such as finfish and miscellaneousinvertebrates.

    Kelleher (2004) has estimated total bycatch discardsin Indian fisheries at 58,000 t, which formed 2% ofthe total landings.

    Pramod (2010) recently estimated the bycatch of

    Indian trawlers as 1.2 million tBycatch of Indian shrimp trawlers: 70-90%, of whichabout 40% are juveniles (Pillai, 1998)

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Trawl bycatch

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    27/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Discards - World Fisheries

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    28/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    0.7

    4.4

    13.2

    90.0

    99.2

    161.0

    207.2

    213.0

    429.1

    1217.9

    0 100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1000

    1100

    1200

    1300

    1400

    1500

    Gujarat

    West Bengal

    Andaman & Nicobar Islands

    Maharashtra

    Orissa

    Karnataka

    Andhra Pradesh

    Tamil Nadu

    Kerala

    Total

    Bycatch discards from trawlers, x103

    t(Data source: Pramod, 2010)

    Discards from Indian trawlers

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    29/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Typical landings of shrimp trawlersTypical landings of shrimp trawlers

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    30/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Trawl design improvementsTrawl design improvements

    Mesh size optimizationMesh size optimization

    Bycatch reduction devices andBycatch reduction devices andturtle excluder devicesturtle excluder devices

    Juvenile and trash fish excluder devicesJuvenile and trash fish excluder devices

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Trawl bycatch reduction

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    31/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Mesh size optimization

    Typical selection curve for trawl codend

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    32/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Mesh size optimization

    Mesh configuration under stressDiamond mesh netting stretched in normal direction (left), diamond mesh

    netting turned through 90(middle) and square mesh netting (right

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    33/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    BRDsBRDs are devices used to minimize the catchare devices used to minimize the catch

    nonnon--targeted organisms during trawlingtargeted organisms during trawling

    Principles of operationPrinciples of operation Size selectivitySize selectivity

    Differential fish behaviourDifferential fish behaviour

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity lossBycatch Reduction Devices (BRDs)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    34/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Reduction in impact of trawling onReduction in impact of trawling onnonnon--targeted marine resourcestargeted marine resources

    Reduction in damage to shrimps due toReduction in damage to shrimps due to

    absence of large animals in codendabsence of large animals in codendShorter sorting timesShorter sorting times

    Longer tow timesLonger tow times

    Lower fuel costs due to reduced net dragLower fuel costs due to reduced net drag

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Advantages of BRDs

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    35/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Brewer et al.(1998)

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Soft BRDs Diamond mesh codend /window

    Diamond mesh codend (top), square meshcodend (middle) and square mesh window on

    diamond mesh codend (bottom)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    36/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity lossSoft BRDs : Big eye BRD

    Bycatch reduction: 11-33%

    Shrimp loss: 2-4%(Boopendranath et al., 2008)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    37/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity lossSoft BRDs : Sieve net

    Bycatch reduction: 5-50%Shrimp loss: 5-15%

    (Polet et al., 2004; Revill and Holst, 2004;Catchpole, 2008; Boopendranath et al., 2008)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    38/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Brewer et al.(1998)

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity lossHard BRDs : Rigid grid sorting devices

    Bycatch reduction: up to 43%

    Shrimp loss: 6-8%(Boopendranath et al., 2008)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    39/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Brewer et al.(1998)

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Hard BRDs : Fish Eye BRD

    Bycatch reduction: 35-63%

    Shrimp loss: 2-4%(Boopendranath, 2008)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    40/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Juvenile and Trash Excluder Device (JTED)

    Juvenile fish exclusion: 73%

    Shrimp loss: 8%

    (Eayrs et al., 2007 , 2008)

    (adapted from Chokesanguan et al., 2004)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    41/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    JFE-SSD is an innovative BRD design to reducebycatch of juveniles with an integrated system forin situshrimp sorting.

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity lossJuvenile Fish Excluder- cum-Shrimp SortingDevice (JFE SSD)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    42/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Bycatch reduction: 29-43%

    Shrimp loss: 3-5%

    (Boopendranath, 2008)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    43/75

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    44/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Turtle Excluder Device for protection of sea turtles

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    45/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    CIFTCIFT--TED is a Turtle Excluder Device,TED is a Turtle Excluder Device,

    appropriate for Indian fisheries, developed byappropriate for Indian fisheries, developed byCentral Institute of Fisheries Technology.Central Institute of Fisheries Technology.

    CIFTCIFT--TED is being popularized in areasTED is being popularized in areasaffected by trawling induced turtle mortality, inaffected by trawling induced turtle mortality, in

    collaboration with the respective Statecollaboration with the respective StateFisheries and Forest Departments, MPEDA,Fisheries and Forest Departments, MPEDA,WII and NGOs.WII and NGOs.

    In addition to shrimp, it permits retention ofIn addition to shrimp, it permits retention ofmuch of nonmuch of non--shrimp demersal catch exceptshrimp demersal catch exceptlargelarge elasmobranchselasmobranchs and finfishesand finfishes

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Turtle Excluder Device (TED)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    46/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Perspective view of TED extension

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Turtle Excluder Device (TED)

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    47/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    CIFT-TED

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    48/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    CIFT-TED: A view of the catch from TED-installed trawl net

    (February 2001; Orissa)

    A view of the Olive

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    49/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    A view of the Olive

    Ridley turtles whichescaped from the TED-installed trawl net;turtles are seenretained in the exit hole

    codend(February 2001; Orissa)

    Catch lossCatch loss

    Total catchTotal catch : 2.4: 2.4--3.3 %3.3 %

    Shrimps: 0.5Shrimps: 0.5--1.0 %1.0 %

    Sea turtle exclusionSea turtle exclusion: 100%: 100%

    (CIFT, 2003; Boopendranath et al., 2003;(CIFT, 2003; Boopendranath et al., 2003;

    2010)2010)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    50/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Reducing bycatchReducing bycatch Operational selectionOperational selection

    Optimization of mesh size for the targetOptimization of mesh size for the target

    species.species.

    Medina panel and back down manoeuver toMedina panel and back down manoeuver to

    prevent capture of cetaceans.prevent capture of cetaceans.

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Purse seining

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    51/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Medina panel and back down procedure

    Carangids caught by large mesh purse seine, off Cochin

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    52/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Reducing bycatchReducing bycatch Optimization of mesh size for the target species.Optimization of mesh size for the target species.

    Optimization of Hanging Coefficient for theOptimization of Hanging Coefficient for the

    target species.target species.

    AcousticAcoustic pingerspingers as deterrents for cetaceansas deterrents for cetaceans..

    Ghost fishing due to lost or abandoned gearGhost fishing due to lost or abandoned gear

    Incorporating biodegradable or timeIncorporating biodegradable or time--releaserelease

    elements in rigging.elements in rigging. Location and retrieval of lost gears.Location and retrieval of lost gears.

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Gill netting

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    53/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Reducing bycatchReducing bycatch

    Optimization of bait,Optimization of bait,hook size and shape forhook size and shape for

    the target species.the target species.

    Magnetic field to deterMagnetic field to deterelasmobranchselasmobranchs..

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Long lining

    Source: WWF

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    54/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Reducing bycatchReducing bycatch

    Deep setting ofDeep setting oftunatuna longlineslonglines toto

    prevent captureprevent capture

    of sea turtlesof sea turtles

    Streamer linesStreamer lines

    and settingand setting

    tubes to preventtubes to prevent

    capture of seacapture of seabirds.birds.

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Long lining

    Source: WWF

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    55/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Optimization ofOptimization ofbait, trap mouthbait, trap mouth

    size and shapesize and shape

    for the targetfor the targetspecies.species.

    Escape windowsEscape windows

    for juveniles andfor juveniles andnonnon--targettarget

    species.species.

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Reducing bycatch in traps

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    56/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Choice of fishing areaChoice of fishing area

    Choice of fishing depthChoice of fishing depth

    Choice of fishing time and seasonChoice of fishing time and season

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Operation related approaches for bycatchreduction

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    57/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Reducing bottom impact of towed gears

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    58/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Bottom trawling caused direct and indirectBottom trawling caused direct and indirectimpacts on marine environment and benthicimpacts on marine environment and benthiccommunitiescommunities (Hall, 1999; Kaiser and de(Hall, 1999; Kaiser and de GrootGroot, 2000;, 2000;Barnes and Thomas, 2005;Barnes and Thomas, 2005; MeenakumariMeenakumari et alet al., 2009).., 2009).

    Approaches to minimise impacts include:Approaches to minimise impacts include:SemiSemi--pelagic trawl systemspelagic trawl systems

    Benthic release panelsBenthic release panels

    Ground gear modificationsGround gear modificationsOtter board designsOtter board designs

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Reducing bottom impact of towed gears

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    59/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    SemiSemi--pelagic trawling minimizes the bottompelagic trawling minimizes the bottom

    impact as it operates a little distance aboveimpact as it operates a little distance abovethe sea bottom.the sea bottom.

    CIFT SPTSCIFT SPTS--I is a semiI is a semi--pelagic trawl systempelagic trawl systemdeveloped by CIFT for smalldeveloped by CIFT for small--scalescalemechanised trawlers of India.mechanised trawlers of India.

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Reducing bottom impact of towed gears

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    60/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Reducing bottom impact of towed gears

    Artists perspective of CIFT SPTS-I

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    61/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    A view of the catch of CIFT SPTS-I

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    62/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible fishing technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Pollution from fishing operations

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    63/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    GHG emissions of Indian and World fishing fleet

    1.7

    1.13

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

    Global

    Indian

    CO2 released per tonne of live -weight of marine fish landed (tonnes)

    (Source: Tyedmers et al., 2005; Boopendranath, 2008)

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    64/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    GHG emissions of fishing systems in Indian waters

    0.17

    0.30

    0.82

    0.87

    0.99

    1.02

    3.52

    0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

    Mechanised purse seining

    Motorised ring seining

    Mechanised gillnetting-cum-long lining

    Large scale aimed midwater trawling

    Mechanised bottom trawling

    Motorised mini-trawling

    Large scale bottom trawling

    CO2 emission per tonne of fish landed (tonnes)Source: Boopendranath, 2000

    Responsible Fishing Technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    65/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Low energy fishing techniquesLow energy fishing techniques

    Low drag trawlsLow drag trawls

    Pair trawlingPair trawlingEconomic vessel speedEconomic vessel speed

    Hull design and displacement optimisationHull design and displacement optimisation

    AntiAnti--fouling measuresfouling measures

    Choice of enginesChoice of enginesRight sizing of enginesRight sizing of engines

    Preventive maintenance of enginesPreventive maintenance of engines

    Reduction gear, propeller size and propeller nozzleReduction gear, propeller size and propeller nozzle

    SailSail--assisted propulsionassisted propulsionUse of advanced technology (Use of advanced technology (EchosounderEchosounder, GPS,, GPS,PFZ information, GIS)PFZ information, GIS)

    Fleet managementFleet management

    Responsible Fishing Technologies to minimise biodiversity loss

    Approaches to energy conservation in fishing

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    66/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible Fishing practices to minimise biodiversity loss

    Lost and abandoned fishing gear and relatedmarine debris

    Responsible Fishing practices to minimise biodiversity loss

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    67/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible Fishing practices to minimise biodiversity loss

    Lost and abandoned fishing gear and relatedmarine debris

    Derelict fishing gear and related marine debris of plasticorigin is recognized as a critical problem in the marine

    environment and for living marine resources in terms ofthe long-term sustainability of fish stocks and biodiversityconservation, due to ghost fishing and habitat loss andimpact on endangered species such as marine mammals

    and turtles (Laist, 1987; Jones, 1995; Ayyappan et al. 2005; Derraik, 2002)

    Responsible Fishing practices to minimise biodiversity loss

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    68/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    espo s b e s g p act ces to se b od e s ty oss

    Approaches to minimize plastic debris due toabandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear

    Use twines, ropes, netting, connectors and shackles of

    correct specifications and breaking strength, in fishinggear fabrication.

    Introduce a system of marking fishing gears and

    procedures for reporting of lost fishing gears and theirretrieval.

    Compliance of MARPOL regulations which prohibits at

    sea disposal of plastics and other synthetic materials.

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    69/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Responsible Fishing practices to minimise biodiversity loss

    Approaches to minimize ghost fishing

    Use biodegradable twines to connect the netting to floatsin gillnets. When floats are separated due to disintegrationof the link, the gill nets loose the fishing attitude andhence the ability to fish

    Use biodegradable netting panels in trapsSalvaging lost fishing gear

    Responsible Fishing practices to minimise biodiversity loss

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    70/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Garbage, waste oil and oily mixtures andemissions from the vessel operations

    Pollution of the marine environment by ships of all types,Pollution of the marine environment by ships of all types,

    including fishing vessels, is strictly controlled by theincluding fishing vessels, is strictly controlled by theInternational Convention for the Prevention of PollutionInternational Convention for the Prevention of Pollution

    from Ships (MARPOL).from Ships (MARPOL).

    The discharge of oily mixtures into the sea is prohibited.The discharge of oily mixtures into the sea is prohibited.The only allowable discharge of an oily mixture is whereThe only allowable discharge of an oily mixture is where

    a discharge level of 15ppm is achieved through oila discharge level of 15ppm is achieved through oil

    filtering/separating equipment. All vessels over 400 tonsfiltering/separating equipment. All vessels over 400 tons

    are required to be fitted with this type of equipment.are required to be fitted with this type of equipment.

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    71/75

    Responsible Fishing practices to minimise biodiversity loss

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    72/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    BRDs and TEDs need to be adopted and enforcedlegally, under a participatory management regime, in

    order protect the biodiversity and prevent trawlinginduced sea turtle mortality.

    Semi-pelagic trawling can be promoted as an alternativeto shrimp trawling in small mechanised trawl sector in

    India, to minimize environmental impacts.

    Conclusion and Recommendations

    Responsible Fishing practices to minimise biodiversity loss

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    73/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Ecofriendly practices are to be promoted in purseseining, gillnetting, lining and trap operations, to minimizethe impact on non-target species and environment.

    Technologies and procedures for minimization of GHGemissions from the fishing fleet need to be promotedthrough legislation, stakeholder education and training

    Conclusion and Recommendations

    Responsible Fishing practices to minimise biodiversity loss

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    74/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Procedures for minimization of plastic waste originating

    from abandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear, need tobe adopted.

    Strict compliance of MARPOL regulations for safedisposal of garbage, oil, oily mixtures and other residues

    originating from fishing vessels operations, need to bepromoted and implemented.

    Web-based National Registers of Aquatic Biodiversitymay be developed and maintained.

    Conclusion and Recommendations

  • 8/8/2019 Boopendranath Biodiversity 31.12

    75/75

    Central Institute of Fisheries Technology

    Thank you

    Happy New Year !

    (Photo credit: David Balata)