con Ram ppt.ppt

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 con Ram ppt.ppt

    1/12

    PRESENTED BY

    K.RAMACHANDRAN

    1168009

    M.E- COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

    GUIDED BY

    MRS.P.CHITRA.,M.E.,

    ASSOSIATE PROFESSOR

    DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND

    COMMUNICATION

    CIT

    Energy-Efficient Localized Routing in

    Random Multihop Wireless Networks

  • 7/28/2019 con Ram ppt.ppt

    2/12

    Publication of International Journal on

    Modeling & Simulation

    2

    Introduction

    Ad hoc networks are infrastructureless networks.

    There is no central base station and thus they aredecentralized networks.

    Since all the nodes in the network are under mobility, the

    network topology is dynamic in nature.

    Ad hoc networks:

    ROUTING:

    It is the process of selecting paths in a network along which

    to send network traffic.

  • 7/28/2019 con Ram ppt.ppt

    3/12

    Publication of International Journal on

    Modeling & Simulation

    3

    Introduction

    Rapidly deployable, self configuring.

    No need for existing infrastructure.

    Wireless links.

    Nodes are mobile, topology can be very dynamic.

    Nodes must be able to relay traffic since communicating nodes

    might be out of range.

    A MANET can be a standalone network or it can be connected

    to external networks (Internet).

    MANET

  • 7/28/2019 con Ram ppt.ppt

    4/12

    Available Protocols

    Table driven

    Frequent updates

    Global information

    Transmission delay to mobility matching.

    No scalability

    10-15% overheads

  • 7/28/2019 con Ram ppt.ppt

    5/12

    Publication of

    International

    Journal on

    Modeling &Simulation

    Alternates

    Uses only local information to make routing decisions.

    No complete topology information is needed.

    Any low power GPS system is use to locate the nodes.

    Overheads are reduced considerably.

    5

    Localized Routing

  • 7/28/2019 con Ram ppt.ppt

    6/12

    Publication of

    International

    Journal on

    Modeling &Simulation

    Greedy Routing

    Geographic location of a mobile destination may not be known

    Message gets stuck in a local minimum.

    If nodes are not equipped with a GPS, it cant find its location.

    6

    In Greedy routing messages are always forwarded to the neighbor that is

    closest to the destination.

    Disadvantages

  • 7/28/2019 con Ram ppt.ppt

    7/12

    Publication of

    International

    Journal on

    Modeling &Simulation

    Face Routing

    The path found may not be neither shortest nor energy efficient.

    Number of hops may be increased.

    7

    The idea of face routing is to walk along the faces which are intersected

    by the line segment between the source and the destination.

    Disadvantages

  • 7/28/2019 con Ram ppt.ppt

    8/12

    Publication of

    International

    Journal on

    Modeling &Simulation

    LEARNRouting

    8

    LEARN selects the neighbor inside a restricted neighborhood (defined bya parameter) that has the largest energy mileage (i.e., the distance traveled

    Per unit energy consumed) as the next hop node.

    Energy mileage is the ratio between the transmission distance and the

    energy consumption of such transmission, i.e (x /c(x)).

    For destination node t, an intermediate node u will only select a neighbor

    v such that vut for a parameter < /3 in our LEARN method.

    For >/3 our LEARN method will not be able to find an energy efficient

    neighbor.

    When no node v satisfy that vut , then greedy routing is applied

    afterward, then the routing protocol is called LEARN-G. If the Face routing

    is used, then the routing protocol is called LEARN-GF.

  • 7/28/2019 con Ram ppt.ppt

    9/12

    Publication of

    International

    Journal on

    Modeling &Simulation

    LEARNRouting

    9

    r0 is the value such that r0/c(r0) = maxx (x /c(x)). i.e maximum energy

    mileage.

    To extend the LEARN routing completely instead of Greedy and Face

    routing is the goal.

  • 7/28/2019 con Ram ppt.ppt

    10/12

    Future work

    The proposed routing is extended into three-dimensional (3D) networks

    (such as underwater sensor networks).

    The classical greedy routing, LEARN routing protocol can be applied in

    3D networks not directly but with some modifications.

    But the restricted region now is a 3D cone with volume D.

  • 7/28/2019 con Ram ppt.ppt

    11/12

    Publication of International Journal on

    Modeling & Simulation

    11

    REFFERENCE

    [1] Yu Wang, Xiang-Yang Li, Wen-Zhan Song, Energy-Efficient LocalizedRouting in Random Multihop WirelessNetworks, IEEE TRANSACTIONS

    ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, VOL. 22, NO. 8,

    AUGUST 2011

    [2] T. Melodia, D. Pompili, and I. F. Akyildiz, Optimal local topology

    knowledge for energy efficient geographical routing in sensornetworks, in

    IEEE INFOCOM, 2004.

    [3] Xiaoyang Guan, Face Routing in Wireless Ad-hoc Networks,

    University of Toronto,2009.

    [4] Yu Wang, Wen-Zhan Song, Weizhao Wang, Xiang-Yang Li, Teresa A.

    Dahlberg. Localized Energy Aware Restricted Neighborhood Routing for

    Ad HocNetworks, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago[5] Roland Flury, Sriram V. Pemmaraju, Roger Wattenhofer, Greedy

    Routing with Bounded Stretch, ETH Zurich, Switzerland The University of

    Iowa, USA

  • 7/28/2019 con Ram ppt.ppt

    12/12

    Publication of

    International

    Journal on

    Modeling &Simulation

    12

    THANK YOU