46
DAFTAR PUSTAKA Ackman RG. 1982. Fatty Acid Composition of Fish Oils. Di dalam: Barlow SM and Stasty ME, Editor. Nutritional Evaluation of Long Chain Fatty Acids in Fish Oil. London: Academic Pr. hlm. 25-88. Alexander DW, Mc Guire SO, Cassity NA, Fritsche KL. 1995. Fish oil lower rat plasma and hepatic, but not immune cell α-tocopherol concentration. J Nutr 125:2640-2649. Anggorodi. 1985. Kemajuan Mutakhir dalam Ilmu Makanan Unggas. Jakarta: UI Pr. Bandie MJ. 1982. Status perikanan lemuru di Jawa Timur. Di dalam: Prosiding Seminar Perikanan Lemuru. Banyuwangi, 18 – 21 Januari 1982. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perikanan. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Departemen Pertanian. hlm. 37-45. Baumann H, Gauldie J. 1994. The acute phase response. Immunol Today 15: 74-80. Beaur J. 1993. The potential for dietary polyunsaturated fatty acid in domestic animals. Aus Vet J 71:342-345. Bellanti AJ. 1993. Imunologi III. Yogyakarta: UGM Pr. [BNF] British Nutrition Foundation’s. 1994. Unsaturated Fatty Acid, Nutritional and Physiological Significance. London : The Report of The British Nutrition Foundation’s, Task Force. Billiar TR et al. 1988. Fatty acid intake and Kufper cell function: fish oil alters eicosanoid and monokine production to endotoxin stimulation. Surgery 104: 343-349. Boudreau MD, Chanmugan PS, Hart SB, Lee SH, Hwang DH. 1991. Lack of dose response by dietary n-3 fatty acids at a constant ratio of n-3 to n-6 fatty acids in suppressing eicosanoid biosynthesis from arachidonic acid. Am J Clin Nutr 54:111-117. Bremner I , Beattle JH. 1990. Metallothionein and the trace minerals. Am Rev Nutr 10:63-83. Broughton KS, Whelan J, Hardardottir I, Kinsella JE. 1991. Effect of increasing the dietary (n-3) to (n-6) polyunsaturated fatty acid ration on murine liver and peritoneal cell fatty acids and eicosanoid formation. J Nutr 121:155-164. Cahyanto MN, Santoso U, Zuprizal, Irianto HE, Sastrodihardjo S. 1997. Ekstraksi Minyak Mengandung Asam Lemak Omega-3 dari Limbah Industri Minyak Ikan Lemuru dan Penggunaannya dalam Peningkatan Kandungan Asam Lemak Omega-3. [laporan penelitian]. Yogyakarta: Kerjasama Lembaga Penelitian UGM dengan Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian.

Dapus 2008dru-8.pdf

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ghghg

Citation preview

Page 1: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Ackman RG. 1982. Fatty Acid Composition of Fish Oils. Di dalam: Barlow SM and Stasty ME, Editor. Nutritional Evaluation of Long Chain Fatty Acids in Fish Oil. London: Academic Pr. hlm. 25-88.

Alexander DW, Mc Guire SO, Cassity NA, Fritsche KL. 1995. Fish oil lower rat

plasma and hepatic, but not immune cell α-tocopherol concentration. J Nutr 125:2640-2649.

Anggorodi. 1985. Kemajuan Mutakhir dalam Ilmu Makanan Unggas. Jakarta: UI

Pr. Bandie MJ. 1982. Status perikanan lemuru di Jawa Timur. Di dalam: Prosiding

Seminar Perikanan Lemuru. Banyuwangi, 18 – 21 Januari 1982. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perikanan. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Departemen Pertanian. hlm. 37-45.

Baumann H, Gauldie J. 1994. The acute phase response. Immunol Today 15:

74-80. Beaur J. 1993. The potential for dietary polyunsaturated fatty acid in domestic

animals. Aus Vet J 71:342-345. Bellanti AJ. 1993. Imunologi III. Yogyakarta: UGM Pr. [BNF] British Nutrition Foundation’s. 1994. Unsaturated Fatty Acid, Nutritional

and Physiological Significance. London : The Report of The British Nutrition Foundation’s, Task Force.

Billiar TR et al. 1988. Fatty acid intake and Kufper cell function: fish oil alters

eicosanoid and monokine production to endotoxin stimulation. Surgery 104: 343-349.

Boudreau MD, Chanmugan PS, Hart SB, Lee SH, Hwang DH. 1991. Lack of

dose response by dietary n-3 fatty acids at a constant ratio of n-3 to n-6 fatty acids in suppressing eicosanoid biosynthesis from arachidonic acid. Am J Clin Nutr 54:111-117.

Bremner I , Beattle JH. 1990. Metallothionein and the trace minerals. Am Rev

Nutr 10:63-83. Broughton KS, Whelan J, Hardardottir I, Kinsella JE. 1991. Effect of increasing

the dietary (n-3) to (n-6) polyunsaturated fatty acid ration on murine liver and peritoneal cell fatty acids and eicosanoid formation. J Nutr 121:155-164.

Cahyanto MN, Santoso U, Zuprizal, Irianto HE, Sastrodihardjo S. 1997.

Ekstraksi Minyak Mengandung Asam Lemak Omega-3 dari Limbah Industri Minyak Ikan Lemuru dan Penggunaannya dalam Peningkatan Kandungan Asam Lemak Omega-3. [laporan penelitian]. Yogyakarta: Kerjasama Lembaga Penelitian UGM dengan Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian.

Page 2: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

84

Chanmugan P et al. 1992. Incorporation of different types of n-3 fatty acids into

tissue lipids of poultry. Poult Sci 71:516-521. Decker JM. 2000. Introduction to Immunology. Massachusetts; Blackwell

Science Inc. Denbow DM. 2000. Gastrointestinal Anatomy and Physiology. Di dalam:

Whittow GC, editor. Sturkie’s Avian Physiology. San Diego: Academy Pr. Dewi EN. 1996. Isolasi Asam Lemak Omega-3 dari Minyak Hasil Limbah

Penepungan dan Pengalengan Ikan Lemuru (Sardinella Longiceps) [skripsi]. Bogor: Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Dinarello CA. 1988. Biology of interleukin 1. FASEB J 2:108-115. Dwiponggo A. 1982. Beberapa aspek biologi ikan lemuru, Sardinella longiceps.

spp. Di dalam: Prosiding Seminar Perikanan Lemuru. Banyuwangi, 18 – 21 Januari 1982. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perikanan. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Departemen Pertanian. hlm. 205-216.

Endres S et al. 1989. The effect of dietary supplementation with n-3

polyunsaturated fatty acids on synthesis of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor by mononuclear cells. N Engl J Med 320:265-271.

Erf GF, Bottje WG, Bersi TK, Headrick MD, Fritts CA. 1998. Effect of dietary

vitamin E on the immune system in broilers: altered proportions of CD4 T cells in the thymus and spleen. Poult Sci 77:529-537.

Friedman A, Sklan D. 1995. Effect of dietary fatty acids on antibody production

and fatty acid composition of lymphoid organs in broiler chicks. Poult Sci 74: 1463-1469.

Friedman A, Sklan D. 1997. Effect of dietary fatty acids on humoral immune

response of turkeys. Br Poult Sci 38:342-348. Fritsche KL, Cassity NA, Huang SC. 1991a. Effect of dietary fat source on

antibody production and lymphocyte proliferation in chickens. Poult Sci 70: 611-617.

Fritsche KL, Cassity NA, Huang SC. 1991b. Effect of dietary fats on the fatty

acid compositions of serum and immune tissues in chickens. Poult Sci 70: 1213-1222.

Fritsche KL, Cassity NA. 1992. Dietary (n-3) fatty acids reduce antibody

dependent cell cytotoxicity and alter eicosanoid release by chicken immune cells. Poult Sci 71:1646-1657.

Fritsche KL, Cassity NA, Huang SC. 1992. Dietary (n-3) fatty acid and vitamin

E interactions in rats: effects on vitamin E status, immune cell prostaglandin E production and primary antibody response. J Nutr 122:1009-1018.

Page 3: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

85

Fritsche KL, Johnston PV. 1990. Effect of dietary omega-3 fatty acids on cell-mediated cytotoxic activity in BALB/c mice. Nutr Res 10:577-588.

German JB, Lokesh B, Kinsella JE. 1987. Modulation of zymosan stimulated

leukotriene release by dietary unsaturated fatty acids. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Med 30:69-76.

Glick B, Olah J. 1993. Bursal secretory dendritic-like cell: a microenvironment

issue. Poult Sci 72:1262-1266. Grenfell S, Smither N, Withan S, Sham A. 1991. Analysis of mutation in the

putative nuclear localization sequenzes of interleukin-1 B. Biochem J 280: 111-116.

Guyton AC. 1983. Fisiologi Kedokteran. Dharma A dan Lukito P, Penerjemah;

Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kedokteran. Terjemahan dari : Medical Fisiology. Hardoko. 1998. Pengaruh Jenis Minyak yang Dikonsumsi terhadap Komposisi

Asam Lemak Otak dan Kemampuan Belajar Tikus Percobaan. [disertasi]. Bogor: Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Hamid H, Campbell RS, Parede L. 1991. Studies of pathology of velogenic

newcastle disease virus infection in non immune and immune birds. Avian Pathol 20:561-575

Hasmawati, 2005. Studi Histopatologi Organ Paru-paru, Hati, Limpa, dan Ginjal

Ayam yang Diinfeksi Eimeria tennela setelah Pemberian Infusa Meniran (Phylanthus niruri L) melalui Air Minum [skripsi]. Bogor : Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Hinds A, Sanders TAB. 1993. The effect of increasing levels of dietary fish oil

rich in eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids on lymphocyte phospholipid fat acid composition and cell-mediated immunity in the mouse. Br J Nutr 69:423-429.

Huang CC, Misfeldt ML, Fritshe KL. 1992. Dietary fat influences la antigen

expression and immune cell populations in the murine peritoneum and spleen. J Nutr 122:1219-1231.

Husband AJ. 1995. The immune system and intergrated homeostasis. Immunol

and Cell Biol 73:377-382. Hwang DH, Beaudreau M, Chanmugan P. 1988. Dietary linolenic acid and

longer-chain n-3 fatty acid: comparasion of effect on arachidonic acid metabolism in rats. J Nutr 118:427-437.

Kinsella JE, Lokesh B, Broughton S, Whelan J. 1990. Dietary polyunsaturated

fatty acids and eicosanoids: Potential effects on the modulation of inflammatory and immune cells. An overview Nutrition 6:24-40.

Kizaki H, Suzuki K, Tadakuma T, Ishimura Y, 1990. Adenosin recept-mediated

accumulation of cyclic AMP-induced T-lymphocyte death through internucloeosomal DNA cleavage. The J Biol and Biochem 9:5280-5284.

Page 4: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

86

Klasing KC. 1984. Effect of inflammatory agents and interleukin-1 on iron and zinc metabolism. Am J Phisiol 247:R901-R904.

Klasing KC. 1994. Avian leukocytic cytokines. Poult Sci 73:1035-1043. Klasing KC, Korver DR. 1997. Leukocyte cytokines regulate growth rate and

composition following activation of the immune system. J Animal Sci 75 Supl 2: 58 –67.

Knudsen PJ, Dinarello CA, Strom TB. 1986. Prostaglandins posttranscrptionally

inhibit monocyte expression of interleukin-1 activity by increasing intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate. J Immunol 137:3189-3194.

Korver DR, Klasing KC. 1997. Dietary fish oil alters specific and inflammatory

immune response in chicks. J Nutr 127:2039-2046. Kreutler PA. 1980. Nutrition in Prespective. USA: Prentice-hall, Inc Englewood, Lands WEM. 1986. Fish and Human Health. Chicago: Departement of

Biological Chemistry, University of Illionis , Academic Pr, Inc. Leece AA, Allman MA. 1996. The relationships between dietary α-linolenic :

linoleic acid and rat platelet eicosapentaenoic and arachidonic acids. British J of Nutr 76:447-452.

Lefkowith JB. 1990. Essential fatty acid deficiency: probing the role of

arachidonate in biology, Di dalam: Samuelsson B, Dahlen SE, Fritsche SE, Hedqvist P, editor. Advances in Prostaglandin Thromboxane and Leukotriene research. New York : Raven Pr. hlm. 224-231.

Lehninger A. 1991. Dasar-Dasar Biokimia. Thenawidjaja M, Penerjemah;

Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga. Terjemahan dari : Principles of Biochemistry. Lowenthal JW, Conaick TE, McWateres PG, York JJ. 1994. Development of T

cells immune responsivenes in chicken. Immunol And Cell Biol 72:1294- 1300.

Marsh JA. 1993. The humoral activity of the avian thymic microenveroment.

Poult Sci 72:1294-1296. Mason JR, Clark L. 2000. The Chemical Senses in Birds. Di dalam: Whittow

GC, editor. Sturkie”s Avian Physiology. San Diego: Academic Pr. Meydani M et al. 1991. Effect of longterm fish oil suplementation on vitamin E

status and lipid peroxidation in women. J Nutr 121:484-491. Meydani SN et al. 1993. Immunologic effect of national cholesterol education

panel step-2 diets with and without fish derived n-3 fatty acid enrichment. J Clin Invest 92:105-113.

Meydani SN. 1995. Vitamin E enhancement T cell-mediated function in healthy

elderly: mechanisms of action. Nutr Rev Supl 53:52-58.

Page 5: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

87

[MFI] Mikrobiologi Farmasi Indonesia. 2007. Sistem Kekebalan Tubuh. http://mikrobia.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/sistem-kekebalan-tubuh-068114009068114048068114055/.

Navarra P et al. 1992. Interleukin-1β and interleukin-6 specifically increase the

release of prostaglandin E2 from rat hypothalamic explants in vitro. Nueroendocrinol 56:61-68.

[NRC] National Research Council. 1987. Predicting Feed Intake of Food-

Producing Animals. Washington: National Academy Pr. [NRC] National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirement of Poultry.

Washington: National Academy Pr. Parakkasi A. 1988. Ilmu Nutrisi dan Makanan Ternak. Volume ke-IB. Jakarta:

UI Pr. Pendino KJ, Chepenik KP, Schmidt RR. 1992. Defferential eicosanoid

synthesis by murine fetal thymic non-lymphoid cells. Immunol And Cell Biol 70:237-252.

Piliang WG. 2002. Nutrisi Vitamin. Volume ke-1. Bogor: Pusat Antar Universitas

Ilmu Hayati, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Piliang WG, Djojosoebagio Al Haj S. 2006. Fisiologi Nutrisi. Volume ke-1.

Bogor: Pusat Antar Universitas Ilmu Hayati, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Prescott SM. 1984. The effect of eicosapentaenoic acid on leukotriene B

production by human neutrophils. J Biol Chem 259:7615-7621. Rodenamm HP, Goldberg. 1982. Arachidonic acid, prostaglandin E2 and F2ά,

influence rate of protein turnover in skeletal and cardiac muscle. The J Biol and Biochem 25:1632-1638.

Rompannen, T. 1982. Post embryonic development of chicken bursa Fabricius:

a light microcopic histoquantitative study. Poult Sci 60:2261-2270. Rusmana D. 2000. Pengaruh Suplementasi Minyak Ikan, Minyak Jagung dan

ZnCO3 dalam Ransum terhadap Kandungan “ω-3, ω-6 PUFA” dan Kolesterol Telur dan Karkas Ayam Kampung [tesis]. Bogor: Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Scales WE, Chensue SW, Otterness I, Kunkel SL. 1989. Regulation of

monokine expresion: Prostaglandin E2 suppresses tumor necrosis factor but not interleukin-1α or β-mRNA and cell-associated bioactivity. J Leukocyte Biol 45:416-421.

Schmidt EB et al. 1991. n-3 fatty acids and leukocyte chemotaxis. Effects in

hyperlipidemia and dose-response studies in healthy men. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis 11:429-435.

Page 6: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

88

Schmidt A, Thierauch KH, Schleuning WD, Dinter H. 1995. Slice variant of human EP3 receptor for prostaglandin E2. Eur J Biochem 228:23-30.

Setiabudi E. 1990. Pengaruh Waktu Penyimpanan dan Jenis Filter pada Jumlah

Asam Lemak Omega-3 dalam Minyak Limbah Hasil Pengalengan dan Penepungan Ikan Lemuru [tesis]. Bogor: Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Sijben JW, Schrama JW, Niuewland MG, Parmentier HK. 2000.

Immunomodulatory effects of Indomethacin and Prostaglandin E2 on primary and secondary antibody response in growing layer hens. Poult Sci 79:949-955.

Sijben JW, Niuewland MG, Kemp B, Parmentier HK, Schrama JW. 2001.

Interaction and antigen dependence of dietary n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids on antibody responsiveness in growing layer hens. Poult Sci 80 : 885-893.

Smith WL, Borgeat P. 1985. The eicosanoid as prostaglandin, thromboxanes,

leukotrins and hydroxyeicosanoid-acid. Di dalam: Vance DE , Vance JE, editor. Biochemistry of Lipid and Membranes. California: The Benyamin Cumming Pub. Co. Inc.

Soeharsono. 1997. Pengaruh Pemberian Minyak Ikan Lemuru (Sardinella

longiceps) terhadap Penampilan Tubuh dan Aktivitas Beberapa Organ Limfoid Ayam Pedaging yang Divaksin Tetelo [tesis]. Bogor: Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Steel GD, Torrie JH. 1991. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika. Sumantri B,

Penerjemah; Jakarta: Penerbit PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Terjemahan dari : Principles and Procedures of Statistics.

Suprijana O. 1995. Pengaruh minyak ikan dalam diet terhadap lipoprotein

plasma pada tikus. J of Padjadjaran University. 13: 29. Tizard I. 1982. Pengantar Imunologi Veteriner. Partodiredjo M dan Hardjosworo

S Penerjemah; Surabaya: Penerbit Airlangga University Pr. Terjemahan dari : An Introduction to Veterinary Immunology.

Wahju J. 1997. Ilmu Nutrisi Unggas. Yogyakarta : UGM Pr. Wander RC, Hall JA, Gradin JL, Du S -H, Jewe DE. 1997. The Ratio of Dietary

(n-6) to (n-3) Fatty Acids Influence Immune System Function, Eicosanoid Metabolism, Lipid Peroxidation and Vitamin E Status in Aged Dogs. J Nutr 127:1198-1205.

Wander RC, Du S-H, Ketchum S0, Rowe KE. 1996a. Effect of interaction of

RRR α-tocopheryl acetate and fish oil on low-density-lipoprotein oxidation in postmenopausal women with and without hormon replacement therapy. Am J Clin Nutr 63:184-193.

Page 7: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

89

Wander RC, Du S-H, Ketchum S0, Rowe KE. 1996b. α-tocopherol influences in vivo indices of lipid peroxidation in postmenopausal women given fish oil. J Nutr 126:643-652.

Whelan J, Broughton KS, Kinsella JE. 1991. The comparative effects of dietary

α-linolenic acid and fish oil on 4- and 5-series leukotriene formation in vivo. Lipids 26:119-126.

Virella G, Kilpatrick JM, Rugeles MT, Hyman B, Rusell R. 1989. Depression of

humoral respons and phagocytic function in vivo and in vitro by fish oil and eicosapentanoic acid. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 52:257-270.

Zoschke DC, Messner. 1984. Suppresion of human lymphocyte mitogenesis

mediated by phagocyte – released reaction oxygen species: comparative activities in normal and in chronic granulomatous disease. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 32:29-40.

Page 8: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

90

Lampiran 1. Analisis konsentrasi asam lemak (AOCS official method Ce 1-62 1990) Sebanyak ± 25 mg sampel ditimbang secara tepat, kemudian ditambahkan

standar internal (C17 : 0) sebanyak 0.5 mg. Ke dalam campuran ditambahkan 1.5

ml NaOH metanolik 0.5 N, kemudian tabung diisi dengan gas N2, ditutup rapat,

dikocok dan dipanaskan dalam penangas air suhu 100 0C selama 5 menit. Setelah

tabung didinginkan, ke dalam campuran ditambahkan 2 ml BF3-metanol (14% b/v),

tabung diisi dengan gas N2 ditutup dan tabung divorteks selama 30 detik. Ke dalam

tabung segera ditambahkan larutan NaCl jenuh sebanyak 5 ml, diisi dengan gas N2

ditutup dan dikocok. Lapisan heksana dipisahkan dan dipindahkan ke dalam vial.

Fase metanol/air diekstrak kembali dengan 1 ml heksana dan hasil ekstraksi

digabung serta dilakukan penyaringan dengan Na2SO4 anhidrid. Sampel methil

ester asam lemak dikonsentratkan dengan hembusan gas N2 hingga volume ± 1 ml.

Sampel siap diinjeksikanke alat kromatografi gas. Kondisi pemisahan asam lemak

adalah suhu injektor 250 0C, suhu detektor 260 0C, suhu kolom awal 140 0C yang

dipertahankan selama 6menit, peningkatan suhu kolom kemudian adalah 3 0C per

menit sehingga suhu akhir 230 0C dan dipertahankan selama 20 menit. Gas

pembawa digunakan helium dengan tekanan 1 kg/cm2, sedangkan tekanan gas

Hidrogen dan udara masing-masing adalah 0.5 kg/cm2. Identifikasi dilakukan

dengan menggunakan standar methil ester asam lemak dan kuantitasi dilakukan

dengan perbandingan standar internal.

Page 9: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

91

Lampiran 2. Koefisien variasi bobot awal ayam broiler umur 1 hari (DOC) penelitian tahap I

Perlakuan Ulangan 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 47 44 41 40 46 45

R1 2 40 42 45 47 46 40 3 46 41 43 44 45 48 4 42 45 46 41 45 45 1 41 42 43 40 44 45

R2 2 41 42 39 47 40 46 3 46 39 40 49 45 48 4 39 44 42 44 45 46 1 42 40 41 39 47 48

R3 2 48 45 40 47 46 48 3 42 43 39 45 50 46 4 42 41 49 46 51 46 1 44 42 44 49 49 50

R4 2 41 50 43 39 44 48 3 50 42 44 42 45 44 4 47 44 43 42 44 39 1 41 42 44 47 48 48

R5 2 43 46 38 46 42 40 3 45 52 47 46 42 43 4 43 41 43 46 46 45 1 42 41 46 40 44 40

R6 2 51 43 42 47 46 45 3 46 43 39 48 42 52 4 45 40 43 51 50 46 1 43 45 43 41 45 45

R7 2 44 45 40 39 47 46 3 46 47 48 45 42 43 4 38 43 45 45 46 49 1 42 42 47 42 46 46

R8 2 46 42 42 42 46 46 3 40 46 44 41 45 44 4 50 41 40 47 47 40 1 45 42 43 43 49 44

R9 2 45 42 43 43 49 44 3 39 42 42 42 44 46 4 48 48 48 45 37 40 Jumlah total 9534

Rataan 44.13889 STDEV 3.089241 KV 6.99891 %

Page 10: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

92

Lampiran 3. Analisis statistika pengaruh tingkat penggunaan minyak ikan dan suplementasi vitamin E dalam ransum terhadap pertambahan bobot badan ayam broiler

Ulangan R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 2118 2007 1947 1848 1805 1741 1998 1687 1990 1764 1947 1606 1708 1746 1773 1642 1800 1959 1806 1741 1923 1888 1810 1944 1899 1930 1685 1875 1880 1867 1857 1624 1745 2144 1879 1713 Rataan 1891 1894 1836 1825 1746 1801 1921 1824 1837 Total 7563 7576 7343 7301 6985 7202 7682 7296 7347 Faktor M. Ikan 0 3 6 Total 0 7562.70 7575.58 7342.83 22481.12 505400607Vit. E 100 7301.00 6985.23 7202.27 21488.50 461755632 200 7682.23 7296.23 7346.95 22325.42 498424229 Total 22545.93 21857.05 21892.05 66295.03 Total 2 508319110 477730635 479261853

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05 Perlakuan 8 91100.83 11387.6034 0.6122597 2.31 M. Ikan 2 25093.0183 12546.5092 0.6745688 3.35 Vit. E 2 47498.8846 23749.4423 1.27689961 3.35 M X E 4 18508.92 4627.23113 0.2487852 2.73 Galat 27 502181.17 18599.3026 Total 35 593282.00

Page 11: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

93

Lampiran 4. Analisis statistika pengaruh tingkat penggunaan minyak ikan dan suplementasi vitamin E dalam ransum terhadap konsumsi ransum ayam broiler

Ulangan R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 4176 4048 3564 4169 3959 3941 3818 3929 3836 3472 3606 3319 4062 3928 3720 3552 3783 3307 3724 4252 3181 4101 3776 3652 3428 3675 3336 3777 4234 3372 3814 3424 3748 3555 3663 3541 Rataan 3787 4035 3359 4036 3772 3765 3588 3763 3505 Total 15149 16141 13436 16146 15087 15061 14353 15050 14019 Faktor M. Ikan 0 3 6 Total 0 15148.90 16140.53 13435.92 44725.34 2000356436Vit. E 100 16145.89 15086.78 15060.67 46293.33 2143072711 200 14352.75 15050.00 14019.21 43421.96 1885466224 Total 45647.54 46277.31 42515.79 134440.63 Total 2 2083697807 2141589009 1807592305

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05 Perlakuan 8 1610557.07 201319.6343 4.510892403 2.31 M. Ikan 2 676485.3264 338242.6632 7.578874583 3.35 Vit. E 2 344506.1693 172253.0846 3.85960929 3.35 M X E 4 589565.58 147391.3948 3.302542869 2.73 Galat 27 1205001.06 44629.66889 Total 35 2815558.13 Perlakuan

Konsumsi (g)

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

R4 4036 R2 4035 1 2.91 306.85R1 3787 249 248 3.05 322.17R5 3772 265 263 16 3.14 331.15R6 3765 271 270 22 7 3.21 338.54R8 3763 274 273 25 9 3 3.27 344.88R7 3588 448 447 199 184 177 174 3.30 348.57R9 3505 532 530 282 267 260 258 83 3.34 352.27R3 3359 677 676 428 413 406 404 229 146 3.36 354.38

Perbedaan antar perlakuan

Page 12: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

94

Lampiran 5. Analisis statistika pengaruh tingkat penggunaan minyak ikan dan suplementasi vitamin E dalam ransum terhadap konversi ransum ayam broiler

Ulangan R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9

1 1.97 2.02 1.83 2.26 2.19 2.26 1.91 2.33 1.93 2 1.97 1.85 2.07 2.38 2.25 2.10 2.16 2.10 1.69 3 2.06 2.44 1.65 2.17 2.09 1.88 1.80 1.90 1.98 4 2.01 2.25 1.81 2.05 2.11 2.15 1.66 1.95 2.07

Rataan 2.00 2.14 1.84 2.22 2.16 2.10 1.88 2.07 1.92 Total 8.02 8.56 7.36 8.86 8.64 8.39 7.54 8.28 7.66

Faktor M. Ikan 0 3 6 Total 0 8.02 8.56 7.36 23.94 572.991 Vit. E 100 8.86 8.64 8.39 25.89 670.0912 200 7.54 8.28 7.66 23.48 551.515 Total 24.41 25.48 23.41 73.31 Total 2 596.0845 649.4374 547.9721

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 8 0.56 0.070151 2.455567 2.31 M 2 0.179501 0.089751 3.141612 3.35 E 2 0.271437 0.135718 4.750662 3.35 ME 4 0.11 0.027568 0.964998 2.73 Galat 27 0.77 0.028568 Total 35 1.33

Signifikansi

M. Ikan

FC

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

a 3% 2.12 ab 0% 2.03 0.09 2.905 0.141742 b 6% 1.95 0.17 0.08 3.05 0.148817

Signifikansi

Vit. E

FC

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

a 100 ppm 2.16 b 0 ppm 1.99 0.16 2.905 0.141742b 200 ppm 1.96 0.20 0.04 3.05 0.148817

Page 13: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

95

Lampiran 6. Analisis statistika pengaruh tingkat penggunaan minyak ikan dan suplementasi vitamin E dalam ransum terhadap titer antibodi setelah vaksin ND pertama

R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 6 6 6 5 7 5 6 6 5 4 7 5 7 5 6 6 4 5 6 6 8 6 7 4 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 5 6 7 6 5 5 5 5 7 9 5 6 5 6 5 6 6 6 4 6 5 5 7 7 5 6 5 5 5 4 6 6 6 5 6 5 6 7 7 7 6 4 6 6 4 6 5 9 4 5 4 6 5 5 6 6 6 8 6 6 6 5 4 5 5 5 3 6 6 5 5 7 7 6 7

5.5 6 5.58 5.67 5.75 5.33 5.92 5.58 6 66 72 67 68 69 64 71 67 72

Faktor M. Ikan 0 3 6 Total 0 66 72 67 205 42025

Vit. E 100 68 69 64 201 40401 200 71 67 72 210 44100 Total 205 208 203 616 379456 Total 2 42025 43264 41209

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05 Perlakuan 8 5.185185 0.648148 0.597826 2.056 M 2 0.351852 0.175926 0.162267 3.106 E 2 1.12963 0.564815 0.520963 3.106 ME 4 3.703704 0.925926 0.854037 2.486 Galat 99 107.33 1.084175 Total 107 112.52

Page 14: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

96

Lampiran 7. Analisis statistika pengaruh tingkat penggunaan minyak ikan dan suplementasi vitamin E dalam ransum terhadap titer antibodi setelah vaksin ND kedua

R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 7 5 8 8 7 7 8 8 8 5 7 8 9 7 8 6 8 8 6 6 8 5 7 7 6 7 8 7 7 6 10 7 9 9 8 10 7 8 7 9 7 8 7 8 7 7 7 8 8 6 9 7 7 10 6 5 7 8 8 6 7 7 11 4 6 6 8 8 8 7 8 11 7 4 8 8 8 6 6 8 11 5 7 6 9 10 7 7 8 9 6 8 7 10 8 10 8 8 8 6 7 7 9 8 10 6 7 8

6.08 6.42 7.17 8.42 7.58 7.92 7.00 7.67 9.08 73 77 86 101 91 95 84 92 109

Faktor M. Ikan 0 3 6 Total 0 73 77 86 236 55696 Vit. E 100 101 91 95 287 82369 200 84 92 109 285 81225 Total 258 260 290 808 652864 Total 2 66564 67600 84100

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05 Perlakuan 8 85.12963 10.6412 8.646888 2.056 M 2 17.85185 8.925926 7.253078 3.106 E 2 46.35185 23.17593 18.83242 3.106 ME 4 20.92593 5.231481 4.251026 2.486 Galat 99 121.83 1.23064 Total 107 206.96

Page 15: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

97

Perlakuan

Perbedaan Rataan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signi fikansi

R9 9.08 a R4 8.42 0.67 2.80 0.90 ab R6 7.92 1.17 0.50 2.95 0.94 bc R8 7.67 1.42 0.75 0.25 3.05 0.98 bc R5 7.58 1.50 0.83 0.33 0.08 3.12 1.00 bc R3 7.17 1.92 1.25 0.75 0.50 0.42 3.18 1.02 cd R7 7.00 2.08 1.42 0.92 0.67 0.58 0.17 3.22 1.03 cde R2 6.42 2.67 2.00 1.50 1.25 1.17 0.75 0.58 3.26 1.04 de R1 6.08 3.00 2.33 1.83 1.58 1.50 1.08 0.92 0.33 3.29 1.05 e

Page 16: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

98

Lampiran 8. Analisis statistika pengaruh tingkat penggunaan minyak ikan dan suplementasi vitamin E dalam ransum terhadap titer antibodi setelah vaksin IBD

R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 4 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 4 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 4 2 2 3 2

2.11 2.13 2.22 2.44 2.63 2.88 2.89 2.56 2.67 19 17 20 22 21 23 26 23 24

Faktor M. Ikan 0 3 6 Total 0 19 17 20 56 3136 Vit. E 100 22 21 23 66 4356 200 26 23 24 73 5329 Total 67 61 67 Total 2 4489 3721 4489

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05 Perlakuan 8 6.097222 0.762152778 1.270169 2.088 M 2 0.253105 0.126552707 0.210907 3.138 E* 2 4.725755 2.362877493 3.937865 3.138 ME 4 1.118362 0.279590456 0.465953 2.518 Galat 69 41.40 0.600040258 Total 77 47.50

Vitamin

E Perbedaan Rataan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signifikansi

200 2.703704 a 100 2.648148 0.055556 2.82325 0.428897 ab

0 2.225694 0.478009 0.422453704 2.971 0.451342 b

Page 17: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

99

Lampiran 9. Analisis statistika pengaruh tingkat penggunaan minyak ikan dan suplementasi vitamin E dalam ransum terhadap eosinofil

R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 2 3 1 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 1 1 3 3 1 0 2 1 4 2 1 3 1 1 0 1 4 8 5 0 1 0 0 2 3 1 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 1 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0

2.88 2.25 1.00 0.88 1.13 0.50 0.38 1.88 1.00

R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 8.13 9.97 5.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.74 9.97 8.13 0.00 5.74 5.74 9.97 9.97 5.74 0.00 8.13 5.74

11.54 8.13 5.74 9.97 5.74 5.74 0.00 5.74 11.54 16.43 12.92 0.00 5.74 0.00 0.00 8.13 9.97 5.74

0.00 9.97 0.00 0.00 12.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.13 8.13 8.13 0.00 0.00 5.74 0.00 9.97 0.00

12.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.97 0.00 8.13 8.13 9.97 0.00 0.00 5.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.16 7.87 4.42 3.21 3.58 2.87 1.73 6.72 3.89

65.28 63.00 35.32 25.69 28.63 22.96 13.87 53.77 31.15 Faktor M. Ikan 0 3 6 Total 0 65.2781727 62.9988875 35.3218356 163.598896 26764.5987Vit. E 100 25.6876141 28.6343587 22.9566819 77.2786546 5971.99046 200 13.8692728 53.76616 31.1454023 98.7808352 9757.6534 Total 104.83506 145.399406 89.4239198 10990.3897 21140.9873 7996.63744

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 8 339.883402 42.4854252 2.20884657 2.096 M. Ikan 2 69.6697849 34.8348925 1.81109009 3.146

Vit. E 2 168.262622 84.1313109 4.3740449 3.146 M X E 4 101.950995 25.4877487 1.32512564 2.526 Galat 63 1211.75541 19.2342129 Total 71 1551.63882

Signifikansi Vit. E Eisonofil Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan SSR 0.05 LSR 0.05

a 0 6.82 b 200 4.12 2.70 2.83 2.53 b 100 3.22 3.60 0.90 2.98 2.67

Page 18: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

100

Lampiran 10. Analisis statistika pengaruh tingkat penggunaan minyak ikan dan suplementasi vitamin E dalam ransum terhadap heterofil

R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 9 25 18 19 16 15 27 7 1 21 18 16 17 10 15 21 12 5 51 14 23 14 46 4 19 28 14 36 56 17 10 58 14 17 25 21 13 8 23 12 7 18 29 10 10 18 41 12 52 10 20 16 36 28 13 10 14 18 15 17 14 2 13 29 54 43 13 42 5 38 30 22

23.75 28.25 20.75 19.38 25.50 13.50 22.63 18.75 14.25

R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 17.46 30.00 25.10 25.84 23.58 22.79 31.31 15.34 5.74 27.27 25.10 23.58 24.35 18.43 22.79 27.27 20.27 12.92 45.57 21.97 28.66 21.97 42.71 11.54 25.84 31.95 21.97 36.87 48.45 24.35 18.43 49.60 21.97 24.35 30.00 27.27 21.13 16.43 28.66 20.27 15.34 25.10 32.58 18.43 18.43 25.10 39.82 20.27 46.15 18.43 26.57 23.58 36.87 31.95 21.13 18.43 21.97 25.10 22.79 24.35 21.97 8.13 21.13 32.58 47.29 40.98 21.13 40.40 12.92 38.06 33.21 27.97 28.39 30.94 26.70 25.41 28.91 21.00 28.12 24.28 20.92

227.13 247.50 213.57 203.25 231.28 168.02 224.96 194.20 167.40 Faktor M. Ikan 0 3 6 Total 0 227.1306 247.4972 213.5654 688.1932 473609.9 Vit. E 100 203.2522 231.282 168.0229 602.5571 363075.1 200 224.9635 194.2035 167.397 586.5641 344057.4 Total 655.3464 672.9827 548.9853 429478.9 452905.7 301384.9

Page 19: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

101

Lampiran 11. Analisis statistika pengaruh tingkat penggunaan minyak ikan dan suplementasi vitamin E dalam ransum terhadap limfosit

R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 89 72 81 81 84 85 72 90 97 79 81 83 80 87 84 79 86 94 45 84 76 83 53 95 81 71 82 56 39 83 89 42 86 81 72 78 87 89 77 88 88 82 71 90 90 80 57 86 48 90 79 84 61 72 82 90 86 82 85 83 86 95 87 69 44 54 87 58 94 62 70 78

73.375 69.5 78.25 79.75 73.375 86 77 79.375 84.75

R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 70.63 58.05 64.16 64.16 66.42 67.21 58.05 71.57 80.03 62.73 64.16 65.65 63.43 68.87 66.42 62.73 68.03 75.82 42.13 66.42 60.67 65.65 46.72 77.08 64.16 57.42 64.90 48.45 38.65 65.65 70.63 40.40 68.03 64.16 58.05 62.03 68.87 70.63 61.34 69.73 69.73 64.90 57.42 71.57 71.57 63.43 49.02 68.03 43.85 71.57 62.73 66.42 51.35 58.05 64.90 71.57 68.03 64.90 67.21 65.65 68.03 77.08 68.87 56.17 41.55 47.29 68.87 49.60 75.82 51.94 56.79 62.03 59.66 57.51 62.60 63.90 60.06 68.48 61.61 63.98 67.91 477.30 460.05 500.81 511.22 480.52 547.83 492.90 511.85 543.28

Faktor M. Ikan 0 3 6 Total 0 477.29543 460.05052 500.81465 1438.1606 2068305.9Vit. E 100 511.22074 480.51809 547.8339 1539.5727 2370284.2 200 492.90297 511.84922 543.28137 1548.0336 2396407.9 Total 1481.4191 1452.4178 1591.9299 2194602.7 2109517.5 2534240.8

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 8 861.99142 107.74893 1.3161061 2.096 M. Ikan 2 451.62956 225.81478 2.7582289 3.146

Vit. E 2 311.50094 155.75047 1.9024239 3.146 M X E 4 98.860915 24.715229 0.3018857 2.526 Galat 63 5157.7777 81.869487 Total 71 6019.7691

M. Ikan Lymfosit Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan SSR 0.05 LSR 0.05 Signifikansi

6 66.33 a 0 61.73 4.60 2.83 5.22 ab 3 60.52 5.81 1.21 2.98 5.50 b

Page 20: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

102

Lampiran 12. Koefisien variasi bobot awal ayam broiler umur 1 hari (DOC) penelitian tahap II

Kode 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1.1. 47 50 50 50 52 50 53 49 42 53 1.2. 49 51 49 51 47 39 48 52 47 51 1.3 48 51 51 49 49 51 45 49 56 48 1.4 50 48 52 42 49 49 52 50 50 48 2.1 50 47 52 52 47 49 50 53 40 54 2.2 47 47 48 52 49 51 48 47 50 53 2.3 40 43 40 46 45 55 48 49 48 40 2.4 50 48 48 36 51 44 50 49 50 56 3.1 51 49 53 48 50 48 55 44 54 54 3.2 50 45 51 47 51 54 52 50 48 51 3.3 53 49 44 51 46 51 55 50 48 52 3.4 54 49 48 55 54 52 44 51 52 53 4.1 48 43 48 53 51 53 47 50 49 46 4.2 44 48 50 48 49 46 52 46 41 46 4.3 42 53 55 44 54 50 52 52 53 47 4.4 54 45 48 48 50 48 61 51 43 47 5.1 52 42 55 50 59 47 49 52 48 42 5.2 48 50 47 48 51 52 52 52 48 50 5.3 49 53 46 54 51 48 45 45 53 50

6.1 51 52 50 55 51 48 50 49 48 50 6.2 47 53 52 48 45 50 52 51 48 50 6.3 48 48 53 54 56 43 43 48 51 49 6.4 46 53 54 53 57 43 53 52 56 48 7.1 55 47 51 50 55 48 56 51 54 46 7.2 49 55 51 52 45 45 50 50 54 57 7.3 53 49 56 45 56 50 52 46 48 52 7.4 50 53 46 58 49 51 54 52 57 50 8.1 51 55 51 49 48 52 49 44 53 44 8.2 50 55 47 52 49 50 51 55 51 46 8.3 50 56 51 50 56 45 51 52 47 45

Jumlah Total 14909 Rataan 49.7 STDEV 3.72 KV 7.485 %

Page 21: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

103

Lampiran 13. Analisis statistika pengaruh perlakuan terhadap konsumsi ransum sebelum dan sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1187.90 1260.87 1180.45 1063.93 1135.61 1253.74 1147.62 1036.94 1119.20 1190.76 1119.04 1116.91 1268.08 1133.48 1183.31 1132.52 1192.08 1168.96 1140.23 1028.96 1112.31 1183.07 1109.68 1086.76 1169.97 1130.42 1085.26 1195.83 1181.01 1153.48 1167.29 1187.75 1131.24 1069.93 1177.96 1187.83 1148.52 1085.41Total 4669.14 4751.00 4524.97 3209.80 4711.84 4751.31 4594.09 3256.22

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 48877.18993 6982.455705 3.055808578 2.46 Galat 22 50269.52 2284.978109 Total 29 99146.71 Perla kuan

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signi fikansi

6 1187.83 a 2 1187.75 0.08 2.93 70.03 a 4 1177.96 9.87 9.79 3.08 73.61 a 1 1167.29 20.54 20.46 10.67 3.17 75.77 a 7 1148.52 39.30 39.23 29.44 18.76 3.24 77.44 a 3 1131.24 56.58 56.51 46.72 36.04 17.28 3.29 78.63 ab 8 1085.41 102.42 102.34 92.55 81.88 63.11 45.84 3.32 79.35 b 5 1069.93 117.89 117.82 108.03 97.35 78.59 61.31 15.47 3.35 80.07 b

Umur 3 – 4 minggu (Sesudah ditantang virus IBD) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 827.89 856.00 913.38 853.78 907.33 852.56 798.22 747.672 795.56 757.89 670.29 826.44 778.89 609.44 785.00 704.133 767.78 769.00 854.89 833.22 871.67 785.00 788.56 806.444 769.22 738.56 701.89 874.33 779.78 825.25

790.11 780.36 785.11 837.81 858.06 756.69 799.26 752.75Total 3160.44 3121.44 3140.44 2513.44 3432.22 3026.78 3197.03 2258.24

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 34045.51867 4863.645524 1.070524676 2.46 Galat 22 99951.18 4543.235326 Total 29 133996.70

Page 22: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

104

Umur 4 – 5 minggu (Sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atan ND) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 857.66 875.46 888.47 899.52 755.76 738.20 927.39 840.222 891.17 903.45 1102.58 873.00 836.29 1037.88 901.24 795.413 895.35 878.53 866.37 921.86 891.79 903.20 844.27 915.854 915.60 917.32 757.85 744.71 921.99 865.39

889.94 893.69 903.82 898.13 807.14 900.32 884.57 850.49Total 3559.78 3574.75 3615.27 2694.39 3228.55 3601.27 3538.29 2551.48

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 29938.81077 4276.972967 0.680143817 2.46 Galat 22 138343.40 6288.336176 Total 29 168282.21

Umur 5 – 6 minggu (Sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1050.68 1153.86 1065.02 999.46 1014.02 1048.86 1050.68 1114.322 978.19 992.75 989.89 1126.08 756.10 1144.26 1040.05 987.153 969.80 986.59 979.17 939.85 1015.84 1033.89 1049.28 1156.304 984.91 985.19 909.32 954.40 1053.48 1000.58

995.90 1029.60 985.85 1021.80 935.09 1070.12 1035.15 1085.92Total 3983.58 4118.38 3943.40 3065.39 3740.36 4280.49 4140.59 3257.77

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 60046.44679 8578.063828 1.511145154 2.46 Galat 22 124883.70 5676.532004 Total 29 184930.15

Umur 3 – 6 minggu (Sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 2736.23 3007.78 2991.16 2752.76 2677.11 2639.62 2776.29 2702.212 2664.92 2654.08 3126.46 2947.65 2371.29 2791.58 2726.29 2597.963 2632.92 2634.12 2700.43 2694.93 2779.29 2722.09 2682.11 3006.714 2669.73 2641.07 2369.06 2573.45 2755.25 2691.22

2675.95 2734.26 2796.78 2798.45 2600.28 2727.14 2718.98 2768.96Total 10703.80 10937.05 11187.10 8395.35 10401.13 10908.54 10875.91 8306.87

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 114896.0808 16413.72583 0.531982505 2.46 Galat 22 678785.42 30853.88277 Total 29 793681.50

Page 23: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

105

Lampiran 14. Analisis statistika pengaruh perlakuan terhadap pertambahan bobot badan sebelum dan sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND

Umur 1 – 3 minggu (Sebelum uji tantang virus IBD atau ND) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 634.62 565.10 475.65 510.42 441.62 562.49 475.03 367.73 457.82 581.80 359.81 551.88 505.87 450.03 477.53 542.40 454.86 548.71 546.32 550.24 450.82 496.26 403.30 579.59 491.33 475.36 449.47 541.06 474.83 387.22 509.66 542.74 457.81 538.40 466.10 495.90 435.77 496.57Total 2038.63 2170.97 1831.25 2153.60 1398.31 1983.60 1743.09 1489.72

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 39533.7669 5647.680992 1.398159934 2.46 Galat 22 88866.07 4039.366925 Total 29 128399.84

Umur 3 – 4 minggu (Sesudah uji tantang virus IBD)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 434.53 407.13 462.13 424.56 452.74 434.11 324.78 327.33 336.90 397.22 286.43 414.67 439.77 320.38 371.89 285.75 403.11 386.56 463.56 433.89 478.32 356.33 336.78 402.33 353.11 372.67 281.44 420.37 340.44 344.90 381.91 390.89 373.39 423.37 456.94 362.82 344.59 338.47Total 1527.65 1563.57 1493.55 1693.49 1370.83 1451.26 1378.35 1015.42

Sumber db JK KT F F0.05

Perlakuan 7 40812.4854 5830.355051 2.314158935 2.46 Galat 22 55427.40 2519.427237 Total 29 96239.88

Umur 4 – 5 minggu (Sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 515.13 560.66 500.77 425.72 350.52 470.88 476.64 358.46 522.00 448.65 427.02 524.95 469.36 474.29 480.40 481.82 488.08 429.58 308.72 515.26 487.12 671.74 456.35 435.63 441.06 490.90 326.39 484.65 508.97 467.88 491.57 482.45 390.73 487.65 435.67 531.47 470.32 425.30Total 1966.26 1929.80 1562.90 1950.58 819.88 2125.87 1881.26 1275.91

Page 24: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

106

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05 Perlakuan 7 53599.3226 7657.046079 1.859235685 2.46 Galat 22 90604.44 4118.383775 Total 29 144203.77

Umur 5 – 6 minggu (Sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 476.41 634.55 367.46 524.75 264.74 470.70 447.39 386.21 409.30 468.98 372.83 293.51 331.78 529.21 420.66 457.60 397.54 489.75 305.79 269.20 332.45 302.95 460.73 482.31 439.21 504.45 160.50 358.49 429.08 443.86 430.62 524.43 301.64 361.49 309.66 432.99 443.16 442.04Total 1722.46 2097.73 1206.58 1445.95 928.97 1731.94 1772.64 1326.11

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 157493.907 22499.12957 3.908582139 2.46 Galat 22 126639.49 5756.340476 Total 29 284133.40

Perla kuan

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signi fikansi

2 524.43 a 7 443.16 81.27 2.93 111.15 ab 8 442.04 82.39 1.12 3.08 116.84 ab 6 432.99 91.45 10.18 9.05 3.17 120.25 abc 1 430.62 93.82 12.54 11.42 2.37 3.24 122.91 abc 4 361.49 162.94 81.67 80.55 71.50 69.13 3.29 124.81 bcd 5 309.66 214.78 133.50 132.38 123.33 120.96 51.83 3.32 125.95 cd 3 301.64 222.79 141.52 140.39 131.34 128.97 59.84 8.01 3.35 127.08 d

Umur 3 – 6 minggu (Sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atan ND)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1426.06 1602.33 1330.35 1374.03 1173.52 1375.68 1248.81 1072.00 1268.21 1314.86 1086.29 1229.13 1174.72 1323.88 1272.95 1225.17 1288.73 1305.89 1078.06 1217.35 1258.53 1331.02 1253.86 1320.28 1233.38 1368.02 768.33 1269.50 1278.50 1256.63 1304.10 1397.77 1065.76 1272.50 1202.26 1327.27 1258.06 1205.81Total 5216.38 5591.10 4263.03 5090.01 2348.24 5309.07 5032.25 3617.44

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 274658.105 39236.87211 2.889613322 2.46 Galat 22 298728.96 13578.58915 Total 29 573387.07

Page 25: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

107

Perla kuan Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signifi kansi

2 1397.77 a 6 1327.27 70.51 2.93 170.71 ab 1 1304.10 93.68 23.17 3.08 179.45 ab 4 1272.50 125.27 54.76 31.59 3.17 184.70 ab 7 1258.06 139.71 69.20 46.03 14.44 3.24 188.77 abc 8 1205.81 191.96 121.45 98.28 66.69 52.25 3.29 191.69 bc 5 1202.26 195.51 125.01 101.83 70.24 55.80 3.55 3.32 193.44 bc 3 1065.76 332.02 261.51 238.34 206.75 192.31 140.06 136.50 3.35 195.18 c

Page 26: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

108

Lampiran 15. Analisis statistika pengaruh perlakuan terhadap konversi ransum sebelum dan sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND

Umur 1 – 3 minggu (Sebelum uji tantang virus IBD atau ND) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1.74 2.05 2.24 2.17 2.03 2.05 2.18 2.48 2 2.21 1.89 2.73 2.01 2.12 2.27 2.24 1.91 3 2.36 1.97 1.91 2.06 1.85 2.17 2.44 1.73 4 2.17 2.16 2.17 2.02 2.24 2.63

2.12 2.02 2.26 2.08 2.01 2.18 2.37 2.04 Total 8.47 8.07 9.05 6.23 8.03 8.73 9.49 6.12

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 0.460546527 0.065792361 1.284862997 2.46 Galat 22 1.13 0.05120574 Total 29 1.59

Umur 3 – 4 minggu (Sesudah uji tantang virus IBD) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1.91 2.10 1.98 2.01 2.01 1.96 2.46 2.28 2 2.36 1.91 2.34 2.01 1.69 1.90 2.11 2.46 3 1.90 1.99 1.84 1.92 1.99 2.20 2.34 2.00 4 2.18 1.98 2.49 1.83 2.29 2.39

2.09 1.995 2.16 1.98 1.88 2.089915 2.326 2.25 Total 8.35 7.98 8.65 5.94 7.52 8.36 9.30 6.75

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 0.568957232 0.081279605 2.239277886 2.46 Galat 22 0.80 0.036297239 Total 29 1.37

Umur 4 – 5 minggu (Sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1.66 1.78 2.02 2.12 1.71 1.57 1.95 2.34 2 1.71 2.01 3.43 1.90 2.39 2.19 2.11 1.88 3 1.83 2.05 2.81 1.79 1.91 1.34 2.34 2.40 4 2.08 1.87 2.32 1.53 1.81 2.39

1.82 1.93 2.65 1.94 1.89 1.73 2.20 2.21 Total 7.28 7.71 10.58 5.81 7.55 6.91 8.79 6.62

Page 27: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

109

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05 Perlakuan 7 2.410359715 0.344337102 3.107058981 2.46 Galat 22 2.44 0.110824128 Total 29 4.85

Perla kuan

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signifi kansi

3 2.65 a 8 2.21 0.44 2.93 0.49 ab 7 2.20 0.45 0.01 3.08 0.51 ab 4 1.94 0.71 0.27 0.26 3.17 0.53 b 2 1.93 0.72 0.28 0.27 0.01 3.24 0.54 b 5 1.89 0.76 0.32 0.31 0.05 0.04 3.29 0.55 b 1 1.82 0.83 0.39 0.38 0.12 0.11 0.07 3.32 0.55 b 6 1.73 0.92 0.48 0.47 0.21 0.20 0.16 0.09 3.35 0.56 b

Umur 5 – 6 minggu (Sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 2.21 1.82 2.90 1.91 3.00 2.23 2.35 2.89 2 2.39 2.12 2.66 3.85 2.99 2.16 2.47 2.16 3 2.44 2.01 3.20 3.50 3.04 3.41 2.28 2.40 4 2.24 1.95 5.67 3.24 2.46 2.25

2.32 1.98 3.61 3.09 3.07 2.56 2.338 2.48 Total 9.28 7.90 14.42 9.26 12.27 10.26 9.35 7.44

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 7.670209117 1.09574416 2.566497217 2.46 Galat 22 9.39 0.426941495 Total 29 17.06

Perla kuan

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signifi kansi

3 3.61 a 4 3.09 0.52 2.93 0.96 ab 5 3.07 0.54 0.02 3.08 1.01 ab 6 2.56 1.04 0.52 0.50 3.17 1.04 bc 8 2.48 1.13 0.61 0.59 0.08 3.24 1.06 bc 7 2.34 1.27 0.75 0.73 0.23 0.14 3.29 1.07 bc 1 2.32 1.29 0.77 0.75 0.25 0.16 0.02 3.32 1.08 bc 2 1.98 1.63 1.11 1.09 0.59 0.50 0.36 0.34 3.35 1.09 c

Page 28: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

110

Umur 3 – 6 minggu (Sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1.92 1.88 2.25 2.00 2.31 1.92 2.22 2.52 2 2.10 2.02 2.88 2.40 2.06 2.11 2.14 2.12 3 2.04 2.02 2.50 2.22 2.25 2.05 2.14 2.28 4 2.16 1.93 3.08 2.05 2.16 2.14

2.06 1.96 2.68 2.21 2.16 2.06 2.161 2.31 Total 8.23 7.84 10.71 6.62 8.65 8.23 8.65 6.92

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 1.353673305 0.193381901 5.958499721 2.46 Galat 22 0.71 0.032454797 Total 29 2.07

Perla kuan

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signifi kansi

3 2.68 a 8 2.31 0.37 2.93 0.26 b 5 2.21 0.47 0.10 3.08 0.28 bc 4 2.16 0.52 0.14 0.04 3.17 0.29 bc 7 2.16 0.52 0.14 0.05 0.00 3.24 0.29 bc 1 2.06 0.62 0.25 0.15 0.11 0.10 3.29 0.30 bc 6 2.06 0.62 0.25 0.15 0.11 0.10 0.00 3.32 0.30 bc 2 1.96 0.72 0.35 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 3.35 0.30 c

Page 29: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

111

Lampiran 16. Analisis statistika pengaruh perlakuan terhadap berat relatif bursa Fabricius sebelum dan sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND

Umur 2 minggu 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 0.0024 0.0027 0.0040 0.0035 0.0019 0.0014 0.0023 0.0011 2 0.0029 0.0024 0.0099 0.0035 0.0027 0.0038 0.0024 0.0026 3 0.0044 0.0029 0.0059 0.0013 0.0023 0.0017 0.0026 0.0013 4 0.0021 0.0029 0.0018 0.0033 0.0037 0.0032

0.0030 0.0027 0.0054 0.0029 0.0023 0.0026 0.0026 0.0017 Total 0.0118 0.0109 0.0216 0.0117 0.0068 0.0105 0.0106 0.0051

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 3.122E-05 4.46E-06 1.975772 2.46 Galat 22 0.00 2.257E-06 Total 29 0.00

Umur 4 minggu (sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.002 0.001 0.0034 0.0028 0.0034 0.002 0.0022 0.002 0.001 0.0007 0.0016 0.0009 0.0012 0.002 0.0024 0.002 5E-04 0.0019 0.0032 0.001 0.0019 0.003 0.0024 0.003 7E-04 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.001 0.0028 1E-03 0.001 0.0022 0.0016 0.0022 0.002 0.0025 0.002 Total 0.004 0.0041 0.0088 0.0062 0.0065 0.009 0.0098 0.007

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 1.0191E-05 1.4559E-06 2.274082 2.46 Galat 22 1.4085E-05 6.4022E-07 Total 29 2.4276E-05

Perla- kuan

Rataan

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signi fikan

7 0.0025 a 8 0.0025 1E-05 2.93 0.001 a 6 0.0023 0.0002 0.0002 3.08 0.001 ab 3 0.0022 0.0003 0.0003 5E-05 3.17 0.001 ab 5 0.0022 0.0003 0.0003 9E-05 4E-05 3.24 0.001 ab 4 0.0016 0.0009 0.0009 0.0007 0.0006 0.0006 3.29 0.001 ab 2 0.001 0.0014 0.0014 0.0012 0.0012 0.0011 0.00054 3.32 0.001 b 1 0.001 0.0015 0.0015 0.0013 0.0012 0.0012 0.00058 4E-05 3.35 0.001 b

Page 30: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

112

Umur 5 minggu (sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6E-04 0.0007 0.003 0.0016 0.002 0.0005 0.0008 0.0008 5E-04 0.0008 0.002 0.0019 0.003 0.0007 0.0005 0.0005 7E-04 0.0006 0.001 0.004 0.003 0.0007 0.0009 0.0019 7E-04 0.0009 0.001 0.0035 0.0004 0.0005 6E-04 0.0008 0.002 0.0028 0.002 0.0005 0.0007 0.0011 Total 0.002 0.003 0.008 0.011 0.007 0.0022 0.0027 0.0032

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 2.0602E-05 2.9431E-06 8.926284 2.46 Galat 22 7.2536E-06 3.2971E-07 Total 29 2.7855E-05

Per-laku- an

Perbedaan antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signi fikan si

4 0.003 a 5 0.002 4E-04 2.93 0.0008 a 3 0.002 8E-04 4E-04 3.08 0.0009 ab 8 0.001 0.002 0.001 9E-04 3.17 0.0009 bc 2 8E-04 0.002 0.002 0.001 3E-04 3.24 0.0009 c 7 7E-04 0.002 0.002 0.001 4E-04 8E-05 3.29 0.0009 c 1 6E-04 0.002 0.002 0.001 5E-04 2E-04 8E-05 3.32 0.0010 c 6 5E-04 0.002 0.002 0.001 5E-04 2E-04 1E-04 6E-05 3.35 0.0010 c

Umur 6 minggu (sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.0005 0.0005 0.0008 0.0005 0.0004 0.0004 0.00038 0.0003 0.0003 0.0008 0.0007 0.0011 0.0009 0.0005 0.00038 0.0005 0.0008 0.0006 0.0015 0.0009 0.0003 0.0006 0.00059 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006 0.0007 0.0006 0.0007 0.00074 0.0006 0.0006 0.0009 0.0008 0.0005 0.0005 0.00052 0.0005 Total 0.0022 0.0025 0.0036 0.0031 0.0016 0.0021 0.00209 0.0015

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 5.9022E-07 8.4317E-08 1.635795 2.46 Galat 22 1.1340E-06 5.1545E-08 Total 29 1.7242E-06

Page 31: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

113

Lampiran 17. Analisis statistika pengaruh perlakuan terhadap berat relatif limpa sebelum dan sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND

Umur 2 minggu

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.0009 0.0006 0.0009 0.001 0.0011 0.0003 0.00116 0.0015 0.0011 0.0009 0.0018 0.0006 0.0007 0.0019 0.00091 0.0007 0.0012 0.0015 0.0018 0.001 0.0011 0.0014 0.00113 0.0013 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0003 0.0007 0.00079 0.0009 0.0008 0.0012 0.0007 0.001 0.0011 0.001 0.0012 Total 0.0035 0.0033 0.0048 0.0029 0.0029 0.0043 0.00399 0.0035

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 7.2196E-07 1.0314E-07 0.45679 2.46 Galat 22 4.9673E-06 2.2579E-07 Total 29 5.6893E-06

Umur 4 minggu (sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.0015 0.0012 0.0011 0.0013 0.0014 0.0011 0.00147 0.0015 0.0014 0.0011 0.0011 0.0011 0.001 0.0021 0.00165 0.002 0.0013 0.0013 0.0009 0.0008 0.0014 0.0018 0.00135 0.0012 0.002 0.0018 0.0011 0.0014 0.0013 0.0025 0.0016 0.0013 0.001 0.0012 0.0013 0.0015 0.00174 0.0015 Total 0.0062 0.0054 0.0042 0.0046 0.0039 0.0062 0.00697 0.0046

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 1.5115E-06 2.1593E-07 1.726383 2.46 Galat 22 2.7516E-06 1.2507E-07 Total 29 4.2631E-06

Umur 5 minggu (sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.0014 0.0011 0.0028 0.0019 0.0011 0.0013 0.00124 0.0018 0.0007 0.001 0.0012 0.002 0.0018 0.0005 0.00133 0.0011 0.001 0.0008 0.0008 0.0019 0.0019 0.0009 0.00129 0.002 0.0009 0.0012 0.0011 0.0024 0.0014 0.00099 0.001 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0016 0.001 0.00121 0.0016 Total 0.004 0.0041 0.0059 0.0082 0.0048 0.0041 0.00486 0.0049

Page 32: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

114

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05 Perlakuan 7 3.8218E-06 5.4597E-07 2.841351 2.46Galat 22 4.2273E-06 1.9215E-07 Total 29 8.0491E-06

Per laku- an

Rata- an

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

4 0.002 a 8 0.0016 0.0004 2.93 6E-04 ab 5 0.0016 0.0005 3E-05 3.08 7E-04 ab 3 0.0015 0.0006 0.0001 0.0001 3.17 7E-04 ab 7 0.0012 0.0008 0.0004 0.0004 0.0003 3.24 7E-04 b 6 0.001 0.001 0.0006 0.0006 0.0004 0.0002 3.29 7E-04 b 2 0.001 0.001 0.0006 0.0006 0.0005 0.0002 1.5E-05 3.32 7E-04 b 1 0.001 0.0011 0.0006 0.0006 0.0005 0.0002 4E-05 3E-05 3.35 7E-04 b

Umur 6 minggu (sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.0015 0.0011 0.0008 0.0019 0.0007 0.0022 0.00306 0.0011 0.0007 0.0009 0.0019 0.0025 0.0012 0.0009 0.00383 0.0009 0.0013 0.0009 0.0013 0.0023 0.0015 0.0009 0.00118 0.0013 0.0007 0.0009 0.0017 0.0028 0.0024 0.00125 0.001 0.0009 0.0015 0.0024 0.0011 0.0016 0.00233 0.0011 Total 0.0042 0.0037 0.0058 0.0095 0.0034 0.0063 0.00932 0.0034

Sumber db JK KT F F0.05

Perlakuan 7 8.8471E-06 1.2639E-06 2.997873 Galat 22 9.2749E-06 4.2159E-07 Total 29 1.8122E-05

Per laku an

Rata-an

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signi- fikansi

4 0.0024 a 7 0.0023 5E-05 2.93 1E-03 a 6 0.0016 0.0008 0.0007 3.08 1E-03 a 3 0.0015 0.0009 0.0009 0.0001 3.17 0.001 ab 8 0.0011 0.0013 0.0012 0.0005 0.0003 3.24 0.001 b 5 0.0011 0.0013 0.0012 0.0005 0.0003 2E-06 3.29 0.001 b 1 0.001 0.0013 0.0013 0.0005 0.0004 8E-05 7.5E-05 3.32 0.001 b 2 0.0009 0.0015 0.0014 0.0007 0.0005 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 3.35 0.001 b

Page 33: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

115

Lampiran 18. Analisis statistika pengaruh perlakuan terhadap berat relatif timus sebelum dan sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND

Umur 2 minggu

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.0067 0.0038 0.0044 0.0067 0.0004 0.0003 0.0027 0.0023 0.0032 0.0024 0.0018 0.001 0.0013 0.0057 0.00121 0.0013 0.006 0.0035 0.0011 0.0027 0.0011 0.0003 0.00528 0.0039 0.0068 0.0043 0.0028 0.003 0.0037 0.00238 0.0057 0.0035 0.0025 0.0033 0.0009 0.0025 0.00289 0.0025 Total 0.0227 0.0141 0.0101 0.0133 0.0028 0.01 0.01158 0.0075

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 4.5052E-05 6.4360E-06 2.090761 2.46 Galat 22 6.7722E-05 3.0783E-06 Total 29 1.1277E-04

Umur 4 minggu (sesudah uji tantang virus IBD) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.0028 0.0018 0.0049 0.0078 0.006 0.0057 0.00543 0.0055 0.0023 0.0056 0.0023 0.006 0.0048 0.004 0.00236 0.0021 0.0031 0.0032 0.0027 0.0045 0.007 0.0039 0.00515 0.0034 0.0047 0.0038 0.0031 0.0048 0.005 0.00125 0.0032 0.0036 0.0033 0.0058 0.0059 0.0047 0.00355 0.0037 Total 0.0129 0.0145 0.013 0.0231 0.0178 0.0186 0.01419 0.011

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 3.0893E-05 4.4134E-06 2.174462 2.46 Galat 22 4.4652E-05 2.0296E-06 Total 29 7.5545E-05

Umur 5 minggu (sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.0045 0.0064 0.0054 0.0019 0.0041 0.002 0.00186 0.0046 0.0026 0.0056 0.0034 0.0046 0.0042 0.0038 0.00357 0.0032 0.0064 0.0009 0.0012 0.0045 0.0049 0.0038 0.00576 0.0038 0.0063 0.0018 0.0028 0.0055 0.0054 0.00323 0.005 0.0037 0.0032 0.0041 0.0044 0.0037 0.00361 0.0039 Total 0.0199 0.0146 0.0129 0.0165 0.0132 0.015 0.01443 0.0116

Page 34: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

116

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05 Perlakuan 7 8.0435E-06 1.1491E-06 0.400703 2.46 Galat 22 6.3088E-05 2.8676E-06

Umur 6 minggu (sesudah uji tantang virus IBD atau ND)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.0034 0.0074 0.0023 0.0032 0.0038 0.0026 0.00344 0.0045 0.0015 0.0047 0.0049 0.0041 0.0023 0.0037 0.00274 0.0032 0.0031 0.0038 0.0022 0.0026 0.003 0.005 0.00561 0.0053 0.0033 0.0057 0.0037 0.0013 0.0053 0.00453 0.0028 0.0054 0.0033 0.0028 0.003 0.0042 0.00408 0.0044 Total 0.0112 0.0216 0.0131 0.0112 0.0091 0.0167 0.01632 0.0131

Sumber db JK KT Fhit F0.05

Perlakuan 7 2.2958E-05 3.2797E-06 2.309567 2.46Galat 22 3.1241E-05 1.4201E-06 Total 29 5.4200E-05

Page 35: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

117

Lampiran 19. Tehnik pembuatan preparat histopatologi.

Sampel organ diambil dan diawetkan

Sampel dipotong dengan ketebalan ± 3mm Dan difiksasi BNF 10%

Organ kembali dipotong dengan ukuran panjang ± 4mm,lebar 3mm dan tebal 3mm

Pengambilan air dari jaringan (dehidrasi): Organ-organ didehidrasi dengan alkohol konsentrasi bertingkat mulai dar 70%, 80%,

90%, 95% absolut 1 dan absolut 2. Masing-masing konsentrasi membutuhkan waktu ± 2 menit

Tahap penjernihan : Organ dimasukan ke dalam xylol selama 30 menit

Penanaman dalam parafin (embedding dan blok) : Organ-organ tersebut ditanam ke dalam parafin cair dalam lemari pemanas selama

2 jam dan kemudian organ-organ dimasukan ke dalam blok pencetak

Blok parafin dibekukan kemudian disimpan dalam lemari es

Blok dipotong dengan menggunakan mikrotom dengan ketebalan 5 µm (agar hasil potongan tidak mengkerut maka potongan diletakan diatas permukaan air bersuhu

45 oC), hasil potongan kemudian diangkat dengan gelas objek.

Gelas objek tersebut disimpan dan dikeringkan ke dalam inkubator dengan suhu 60 oC selama satu malam

Pewarnaan

Page 36: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

118

Lampiran 20. Pewarnaan preparat histologi

Gelas objek yang telah diinkubator dimasukkan ke dalam alkohol konsentrasi bertingkat mulai dari absolut 1, absolut 2, 95%, 90%, 80%, 70% masing-masing

selama 2 menit

Lalu bilas dengan air mengalir

Pewarnaan hematoksilin, dilakukan dengan memasukan sediaan ke dalam zat

warna hematoksilin selama 2 – 3 menit

Sebelum dimasukkan ke dalam pewarnaan eosin harus dibilas terlebih dahulu dengan air mengalir, demikian pula setelah pewarnaan eosin sediaan kembali

dibilas dengan air

Sediaan dimasukkan ke dalam alkohol konsentrasi bertingkat

dan alkohol absolut 1 dan 2

Penjernihan : proses ini dilakukan dengan memasukan sediaan ke dalam xylol 1 dan

xylol 2 selama beberapa menit

Lalu dikeringkan di udara terbuka agar sediaan terhindar dari pengaruh lingkungan

Kemudian ditutup dengan cover glass yang direkatkan dengan zat perekat entelen

Sediaan kemudian dikeringkan di udara terbuka dan diberi label

agar mudah diidentifikasi

Pemeriksaan mikroskopik dilakukan dengan pembesaran 400 x

Perubahan organ pada masing-masing unit perlakuan diamati dengan pengamatan lima lapang pandang

Page 37: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

119

Lampiran 21. Skor lesio histopatologi bursa fabricius Umur (minggu) 2 4 5 6 1 0 1 1 1 R9. Non Vaksin 2 0 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 4 0 1 1 1 Rataan 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 3 2 R9. Vaksin 2 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 4 0 0 1 Rataan 0 1 1 1 1 0 2 3 3 R9. Non Vaksin ND + infeksi ND 2 0 1 3 2 3 0 1 2 1 4 0 0 1 2 Rataan 0 1 2.25 2 1 0 0 2 3 R9. Vaksin + infeksi ND 2 0 0 3 2 3 0 1 1 1 4 0 1 1 2 Rataan 0 0.5 1.75 2 1 0 1 2 2 R0. Vaksin + infeksi ND 2 0 1 3 3 3 0 2 1 3 4 0 Rataan 0 1.33 2.0 2.67 1 0 2 3 3 R9. Non Vaksin IBD + infeksi IBD 2 0 2 2 2 3 0 2 2 2 4 0 2 3 1 Rataan 0 2 2.5 2 1 0 1 1 1 R9. Vaksin + infeksi IBD 2 0 0 1 1 3 0 1 2 1 4 0 1 2 1 Rataan 0 0.75 1.5 1 1 0 2 1 2 R0. Vaksin + infeksi IBD 2 0 2 1 2 3 0 1 1 1 4 0 Rataan 0 1.67 1 1.67

Keterangan : 0 = 0 – 0.25; 1 = 0.26 – 1.25; 2 = 1.26 – 2.25; 3 = 2.26 – 3.00

Page 38: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

120

Lampiran 21. Skor lesio histopatologi bursa Fabricius Umur (minggu) 2 4 5 6 R9. Non Vaksin 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 R9. Vaksin 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 R9. Non Vaksin ND + infeksi ND 0 1.00 2.25 2.00 R9. Vaksin + infeksi ND 0 0.50 1.75 2.00 R0. Vaksin + infeksi ND 0 1.33 2.00 2.67 R9. Non Vaksin IBD + infeksi IBD 0 2.00 2.50 2.00 R9. Vaksin + infeksi IBD 0 0.75 1.50 1.00 R0. Vaksin + infeksi IBD 0 1.67 1.00 1.67 Uji Kruskal-Walis skor lesio histipatologi bursa Fabricius umur 4 minggu 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 13 25.5 2.5 13 25.5 13 25.5 13 13 13 2.5 13 25.5 2.5 25.5 13 13 13 13 25.5 25.5 13 13 13 2.5 13 25.5 13 Ri 52 39 54 31 51.5 102 41.5 64 Ri

2 2704 1521 2916 961 2652.25 10404 1722.25 4096 Ri

2/ni 676 507 729 240.25 884.0833 2601 430.5625 1365.333 H = [12/(29 x 30)] x Σi Ri

2/ni – 3 x 30 H = [12/(29 x 30)] x 7433.229– 3 x 30 H = 12.5273 Hterkoreksi = H/ {(1 – [Σ T/(n-1)n(n+1)]} Hterkoreksi = 12.5273/0.797553 Hterkoreksi = 15.70717; χ2

0.05; db 7 = 14.1; Hterkoreksi > χ20.05; db 7

Uji jarak berganda Duncan skor lesio histipatologi bursa Fabricius umur 4 minggu Perlakuan

Perbedaan Antar perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signifi-kansi

6 2 a 8 1.67 0.33 2.93 0.75 ab 5 1.33 0.67 0.33 3.08 0.79 abc 2 1 1.00 0.67 0.33 3.17 0.82 bc 1 1 1.00 0.67 0.33 0.00 3.24 0.83 bc 3 1 1.00 0.67 0.33 0.00 0.00 3.29 0.85 bc 7 0.75 1.25 0.92 0.58 0.25 0.25 0.25 3.32 0.85 c 4 0.50 1.50 1.17 0.83 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.25 3.35 0.86 c

Page 39: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

121

Uji Kruskal-Walis skor lesio histipatologi bursa Fabricius umur 5 minggu 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9.5 27 27 20 20 27 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 27 27 27 20 9.5 9.5 9.5 1.5 20 9.5 9.5 20 20 9.5 9.5 1.5 9.5 9.5 27 20

Ri 38 39.5 83.5 66 56.5 94 59 28.5 Ri

2 1444 1560.25 6972.25 4356 3192.25 8836 3481 812.25 Ri

2/ni 361 390.0625 1743.063 1089 1064.083 2209 870.25 270.75 H = [12/(30 x 31)] x Σi Ri

2/ni – 3 x 31 H = [12/(30 x 31)] x 7997.208 – 3 x 31 H = 10.18978 Hterkoreksi = H/ {(1 – [Σ T/(n-1)n(n+1)]} Hterkoreksi = 10.18978/0.873637 Hterkoreksi = 11.66363; χ2

0.05; db 7 = 14.1; Hterkoreksi < χ20.05; db 7

Uji Kruskal-Walis skor lesio histipatologi bursa Fabricius umur 6 minggu

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 20 28 28 20 28 8 20 8 1 20 20 28 20 8 20 8 8 8 8 28 20 8 20 8 8 20 20 8 8

Ri 32 37 76 76 76 76 32 60 Ri

2 1024 1369 5776 5776 5776 5776 1024 3600 Ri

2/ni 256 342.25 1444 1444 1925.333 1444 256 1200 H = [12/(30 x 31)] x Σi Ri

2/ni – 3 x 31 H = [12/(30 x 31)] x 8311.583 – 3 x 31 H = 14.24624 Hterkoreksi = H/ {1 – [Σ T/(n-1)n(n+1)]} Hterkoreksi = 14.24624/0.865628 Hterkoreksi = 16.45768; χ2

0.05; db 7 = 14.1; Hterkoreksi > χ20.05; db 7

Uji jarak berganda Duncan skor lesio histipatologi bursa Fabricius umur 6 minggu Perlaku- an Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signifi-kansi

5 2.67 a 3 2 0.67 2.93 0.9 a 4 2 0.67 0 3.08 1.0 a 6 2 0.67 0 0 3.17 1.0 a 8 2 0.67 0 0 0 3.24 1.0 a 7 1 1.67 1 1 1 1 3.29 1.0 b 1 1 1.67 1 1 1 1 0 3.32 1.0 b 2 1 1.67 1 1 1 1 0 0 3.35 1.1 b

Page 40: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

122

Lampiran 22. Skor lesio histopatologi limpa Umur(minggu) 2 4 5 6 1 0 0 0 2 R9. Non Vaksin 2 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 0 1 4 1 1 1 1 Rataan 0.75 0.75 0.50 1.75 1 0 0 1 1 R9. Vaksin 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 1 Rataan 0.25 0 0.25 1 1 0 0 2 2 R9. Non Vaksin ND + infeksi ND 2 0 1 2 3 3 0 1 2 2 4 0 0 2 2 Rataan 0 0.5 2 2.25 1 0 0 2 1 R9. Vaksin + infeksi ND 2 1 0 2 1 3 0 0 2 1 4 0 0 2 1 Rataan 0.25 0 2 1 1 0 0 3 3 R0. Vaksin + infeksi ND 2 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 3 3 4 0 Rataan 0 0 3.0 3.0 1 0 1 2 2 R9. Non Vaksin IBD + infeksi IBD 2 0 1 2 2 3 1 1 2 1 4 1 0 1 1 Rataan 0.5 0.75 1.75 1.50 1 0 0 2 2 R9. Vaksin + infeksi IBD 2 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 1 Rataan 0 0 1.50 1.25 1 0 1 1 2 R0. Vaksin + infeksi IBD 2 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 2 1 4 0 Rataan 0 0.33 1.33 1.33 Keterangan : 0 = 0 – 0.25; 1 = 0.26 – 1.25; 2 = 1.26 – 2.25; 3 = 2.26 – 3.00

Page 41: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

123

Lampiran 22. Skor lesio histopatologi limpa

Umur

(minggu) 2 4 5 6 R9 non vaksin 0 0.50 0.50 0.45 R9 vaksin 0 0.87 0.83 0.38 R9 non vaksin ND+tantang ND 0 0.38 2.00 1.85 R9 vaksin + tantang ND 0 0.63 0.75 0.85 R0 vaksin + tantang ND 0 0.63 2.10 1.97 R9 non vaksin IBD+tantang IBD 0 0.70 0.75 1.60 R9 vaksin+tantang IBD 0 0.68 0.53 0.80 R9 vaksin+tantang IBD 0 0.67 1.03 1.73

Uji kruskal walis skor lesio limpa umur 4 mg 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9.5 28.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 26 4 4 9.5 26 1 22.5 22.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 4 19.5 9.5 9.5 15.5 15.5 26 28.5 15.5 4 4 19.5 22.5

Ri 38.5 74 24 58.5 47.5 76.5 68 48 Ri

2 1482.25 5476 576 3422.25 2256.25 5852.25 4624 2304 Ri

2/ni 370.5625 1825.333 144 855.5625 752.0833 1463.063 1156 768 H = [12/(30 x 31)] x Σi Ri

2/ni – 3 x 31 H = [12/(30 x 31)] x7334.604 – 3 x 31 H = 8.166954 χ2

0.05; db 7 = 14.1; H > χ20.05; db 7

Uji kruskal walis skor lesio limpa umur 5 mg 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3.50 12.50 24.00 26.00 28.00 12.50 19.00 21.00 6.00 25.00 28.00 1.50 21.00 16.50 6.00 23.00 9.50 6.00 21.00 9.50 28.00 12.50 3.50 16.50 12.50 16.50 30.00 1.50 16.50 8.00

Ri 31.5 60 103 38.5 77 58 36.5 60.5 Ri

2 992.25 3600 10609 1482.25 5929 3364 1332.25 3660.25 Ri

2/ni 248.0625 900 2652.25 370.5625 1976.333 841 333.0625 1220.083H = [12/(30 x 31)] x Σi Ri

2/ni – 3 x 31 H = [12/(30 x 31)] x 8541.354 – 3 x 31 H = 17.21102 χ2

0.05; db 7 = 14.1; H> χ20.05; db 7

Page 42: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

124

Uji jarak berganda Duncan skor lesio limpa umur 5 minggu Perlakuan

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR0.05

LSR0.05

Signifi- kansi

5 2.10 a 3 2.00 0.10 2.93 0.8 ab 8 1.03 1.07 0.97 3.08 0.9 bc 2 0.83 1.28 1.18 0.21 3.17 0.9 c 4 0.75 1.35 1.25 0.28 0.08 3.24 0.9 c 6 0.75 1.35 1.25 0.28 0.08 0.00 3.29 0.9 c 7 0.53 1.58 1.48 0.51 0.30 0.23 0.23 3.32 1 c 1 0.50 1.60 1.50 0.53 0.33 0.25 0.25 0.03 3.35 1 c

Uji kruskal walis skor lesio limpa umur 6 mg 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1.50 11.50 5.50 9.00 30.00 11.50 3.50 24.00 15.00 3.50 29.00 18.00 23.00 27.50 20.00 21.00 11.50 7.50 25.00 7.50 17.00 27.50 15.00 22.00 1.50 5.50 26.00 19.00 15.00 11.50

Ri 29.5 28 85.5 53.5 70 81.5 50 67 Ri

2 870.25 784 7310.25 2862.25 4900 6642.25 2500 4489 Ri

2/ni 217.5625 196 1827.563 715.5625 1633.333 1660.563 625 1496.333H = [12/(30 x 31)] x Σi Ri

2/ni – 3 x 31 H = [12/(30 x 31)] x 8371.917 – 3 x 31 H = 15.02473 χ2

0.05; db 7 = 14.1; H > χ20.05; db 7

Uji jarak berganda Duncan skor lesio limpa umur 6 minggu Perlalakuan

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR0.05

LSR0.05

Signifi- kansi

5 1.97 a 3 1.85 0.12 2.93 0.99 ab 8 1.73 0.24 0.12 3.08 1.04 ab 6 1.60 0.37 0.25 0.13 3.17 1.07 abc 4 0.85 1.12 1.00 0.88 0.75 3.24 1.09 bc 7 0.80 1.17 1.05 0.93 0.80 0.05 3.29 1.11 bc 1 0.45 1.52 1.40 1.28 1.15 0.40 0.35 3.32 1.12 c 2 0.38 1.60 1.48 1.36 1.23 0.48 0.43 0.08 3.35 1.13 c

Page 43: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

125

Lampiran 23. Skor lesio histopatologi timus Umur (minggu) 2 4 5 6 1 0 1 1 1 R9. Non Vaksin 2 1 0 1 1 3 1 2 1 3 4 0 2 0 2 Rataan 0.50 1.25 0.75 1.75 1 0 1 1 1 R9. Vaksin 2 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 4 0 1 Rataan 0.33 0.67 0.25 1.00 1 0 2 1 3 R9. Non Vaksin ND + infeksi ND 2 1 1 1 3 3 0 0 1 3 4 1 2 0 3 Rataan 0.50 1.25 0.75 3.00 1 1 1 1 1 R9. Vaksin + infeksi ND 2 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 1 2 Rataan 0.25 0.25 1.25 1.75 1 0 0 1 3 R0. Vaksin + infeksi ND 2 0 0 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 4 Rataan 0.33 0.33 1.00 2.00 1 0 1 2 2 R9. Non Vaksin IBD + infeksi IBD 2 0 1 2 2 3 1 0 1 3 4 1 0 1 2 Rataan 0.50 0.50 1.50 2.25 1 1 0 1 2 R9. Vaksin + infeksi IBD 2 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 2 2 4 0 2 1 Rataan 0.33 0.25 1.50 1.50 1 0 1 2 3 R0. Vaksin + infeksi IBD 2 0 2 2 2 3 1 1 2 2 4 Rataan 0.33 1.33 2.00 2.33

Page 44: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

126

Lampiran 23. Skor lesio histopatologi timus Umur (minggu) 2 4 5 6 R9. Non Vaksin 0.50 1.25 0.75 1.75 R9. Vaksin 0.33 0.67 0.25 1.00 R9. Non Vaksin ND + infeksi ND 0.50 1.25 0.75 3.00 R9. Vaksin + infeksi ND 0.25 0.25 1.25 1.75 R0. Vaksin + infeksi ND 0.33 0.33 1.00 2.00 R9. Non Vaksin IBD + infeksi IBD 0.5 0.50 1.50 2.25 R9. Vaksin + infeksi IBD 0.33 0.25 1.50 1.50 R0. Vaksin + infeksi IBD 0.33 1.33 2.00 2.33 Uji Kruskal-Walis skor lesio histipatologi timus umur 2 minggu 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 9 23 9 9 23 9 23 9 23 9 9 9 9 9 23 23 9 9 23 23 9 23 9 23 9 23

Ri 64 41 64 50 41 64 41 41Ri

2 4096 1681 4096 2500 1681 4096 1681 1681Ri

2/ni 1024 560.3333 1024 625 560.3333 1024 560.333 560.333H = [12/(28 x 29)] x Σi Ri

2/ni – 3 x 29 H = [12/(28 x 29)]x 5938.333 - 3 x 29 H = 0.758621 Hterkoreksi = H/ {1 – [Σ T/(n-1)n(n+1)]} Hterkoreksi = 0.758621/0.716475 Hterkoreksi =1.058824; χ2

0.05; db 7 = 14.1; Hterkoreksi < χ20.05; db 7

Uji Kruskal-Walis skor lesio histipatologi timus umur 4 minggu 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 19 19 27 19 7 19 7 19 7 19 19 7 7 19 19 27 27 7 7 7 19 7 7 19 27 27 7 7 7

Ri 80 45 80 40 33 52 40 65Ri

2 6400 2025 6400 1600 1089 2704 1600 4225Ri

2/ni 1600 675 1600 400 363 676 400 1408.333H = [12/(29 x 30)] x Σi Ri

2/ni – 3 x 30 H = [12/(29 x 30)] x7122.333 – 3 x 30 H = 8.23908 Hterkoreksi = H/ {1 – [Σ T/(n-1)n(n+1)]} Hterkoreksi = 8.23908/0.851232 Hterkoreksi =9.679012; χ2

0.05; db 7 = 14.1; Hterkoreksi < χ20.05; db 7

Page 45: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

127

Uji Kruskal-Walis skor lesio histipatologi timus umur 5 minggu 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 14 14 14 14 26.5 14 26.5 14 3 14 14 14 26.5 14 26.5 14 3 14 26.5 14 14 26.5 26.5 3 3 3 14 14 26.5

Ri 45 23 45 68.5 42 81 81 79.5Ri

2 2025 529 2025 4692.25 1764 6561 6561 6320.25Ri

2/ni 506.25 132.25 506.25 1173.06 588 1640.25 1640.25 2106.75H = [12/(30 x 31)] x Σi Ri

2/ni – 3 x 31 H = [12/(30 x 31)] x 8293.063 – 3 x 31 H = 14.00726 Hterkoreksi = H/ {1 – [Σ T/(n-1)n(n+1)]} Hterkoreksi = 14.00726/0.795328 Hterkoreksi =17.61192; χ2

0.05; db 7 = 14.1; Hterkoreksi > χ20.05; db 7

Uji jarak berganda Duncan skor lesio histipatologi timus umur 5 minggu Perla- kuan

Ra- taan

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05

Signifi- kansi

8 2 a 6 1.5 0.5 2.93 0.70 ab 7 1.5 0.5 0 3.08 0.73 ab 4 1.25 0.75 0.25 0.25 3.17 0.76 ab 5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.25 3.24 0.77 bc 1 0.75 1.25 0.75 0.75 0.5 0.25 3.29 0.78 bc 3 0.75 1.25 0.75 0.75 0.5 0.25 0 3.32 0.79 bc 2 0.25 1.75 1.25 1.25 1 0.75 0.5 0.5 3.35 0.80 c

Uji Kruskal-Walis skor lesio histipatologi timus umur 6 minggu 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 5.5 5.5 27 17 5.5 17 17 27 5.5 5.5 27 17 17 17 5.5 17 27 5.5 27 17 5.5 27 17 17 17 5.5 27 17 17 5.5

Ri 55 22 108 68 28 78 45 61Ri

2 3025 484 11664 4624 784 6084 2025 3721Ri

2/ni 756.25 121 2916 1156 261.333 1521 506.25 1240.33H = [12/(30 x 31)] x Σi Ri

2/ni – 3 x 31 H = [12/(30 x 31)] x 8478.167 – 3 x 31 H = 16.3957 Hterkoreksi = H/ {1 – [Σ T/(n-1)n(n+1)]} Hterkoreksi = 16.3957/0.869855 Hterkoreksi =18.84876; χ2

0.05; db 7 = 14.1; Hterkoreksi > χ20.05; db 7

Page 46: Dapus  2008dru-8.pdf

128

Uji jarak berganda Duncan skor lesio histipatologi timus umur 6 minggu Perla- kuan

Rata- an

Perbedaan Antar Perlakuan

SSR 0.05

LSR 0.05 Signifi-

3 3.00 a 8 2.33 0.67 2.93 0.8788 ab 6 2.25 0.75 0.08 3.08 0.9238 ab 5 2.00 1.00 0.33 0.25 3.17 0.9508 b 4 1.75 1.25 0.58 0.50 0.25 3.24 0.9718 bc 1 1.75 1.25 0.58 0.50 0.25 0.00 3.29 0.9868 bc 7 1.50 1.50 0.83 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.25 3.32 0.9958 bc 2 1.00 2.00 1.33 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.50 3.35 1.0048 c