30
Increasing quantum limited sensitivity of interferometers using electromagnetically induced transparency Hunter Rew Advised by Dr. Eugeniy Mikhailov

Defense (1)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Defense (1)

Increasing quantum limited sensitivity of interferometers using electromagnetically

induced transparency

Hunter RewAdvised by Dr. Eugeniy Mikhailov

Page 2: Defense (1)

What to expect

● Introduction○ Gravitational wave detection○ Increasing sensitivity○ Electromagnetically induced transparency

● Simulation methods and results● Experimental methods and results● Conclusions

2

Page 3: Defense (1)

Gravitational Waves

Gravitational waves (GWs) are a prediction of general relativity.

GWs contract space in one direction while expanding it in transverse directions

Copyright: [NASA]

3

Page 4: Defense (1)

Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detectors

GW changes lengths of arms relative to each other, creating a phase shift in the light

GW interferometers such as Advanced LIGO are approaching the standard quantum limit

4

Page 5: Defense (1)

Uncertainty and Squeezing

5

Page 6: Defense (1)

Noise in LIGO

Noise sources within LIGO are frequency dependent

6[Nature Photonics 7, 613–619 (2013) doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.177]

Page 7: Defense (1)

Electromagnetically Induced Transparency

Opaque media become transparent when optical fields are applied at the transitions of hyperfine ground states. A dark state is produced from the superposition of these states.

● Produce narrow linewidths● Near 100% transmission● Tunable

7

Page 8: Defense (1)

The Lambda Model [4]

8

Page 9: Defense (1)

Simulation Methods

● eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator (XMDS)● SciClone

9

[XMDS]

Page 10: Defense (1)

Simulated EIT (Results)

10

Page 11: Defense (1)

Methods (cont.)

Simulations varied the following parameters:

● Drive Rabi frequency (Ωd) from 17 to 25 KHz● 2 photon detuning ( ) with a range based on the given drive● Time from 0 to 0.1 s● Media length from 0 to 2 cm

11

Page 12: Defense (1)

Methods (cont.)

Constants:

● Probe Rabi frequency (Ωp) of 0.1 Hz● Excited state decay (γ) of 6 MHz● Ground state decay (γbc) of 1 Hz● Particle density of 1015 particles per m3

● Transitions at 794.7 nm

12

Page 13: Defense (1)

Simulated EIT (Definitions)

13

Data is fit to a generalized Lorentzian

A is the contrast

γ is the linewidth / 2

Page 14: Defense (1)

14

Page 15: Defense (1)

15

Page 16: Defense (1)

16

Page 17: Defense (1)

Region of interest

17

Page 18: Defense (1)

Experimental setup

18

Page 19: Defense (1)

Experimental parameters

● Rubidium cell is roughly 1.5 cm in diameter and 1 cm in length○ Anti-relaxation coating

● Drive and probe intensities are roughly equal○ Rabi frequencies from 5 to 30 MHz

● Cell temperatures from 35 to 75 Celsius○ Particle concentrations from 3 x 1010 to 9 x 1011

● Beam waists from full to 0.8ω0

19

Page 20: Defense (1)

Analysis of experimental data

Data is fit to a generalized Lorentzian

A is the contrast

γ is the linewidth / 2

20

Page 21: Defense (1)

Experiment vs simulation: contrast vs drive

21

Page 22: Defense (1)

Experiment vs simulation: width vs drive

22

Page 23: Defense (1)

Experiment vs simulation: transmission vs concentration

23

Page 24: Defense (1)

Experiment vs simulation: width vs concentration

24

Page 25: Defense (1)

Experiment vs simulation: contrast vs concentration

25

Page 26: Defense (1)

Varying concentration

26

Page 27: Defense (1)

Reminder of experimental setup

27

Page 28: Defense (1)

Varying beam size

28

Page 29: Defense (1)

Conclusions and future work

● Best contrast: 3.9%● Best linewidth: 202 Hz● Experiment and simulation

agree (mostly)● Low temperatures show

promise● Low drive intensities show

promise

29

Page 30: Defense (1)

Acknowledgements

● Dr. Eugeniy Mikhailov● Dr. Irina Novikova● SciClone

30