Upload
vannga
View
219
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Flag Report #29
Mission 31: Breaking new ground in ocean science and exploration from 20,000 mm under the sea
Fabien Cousteau, Brian Helmuth (FN ’07) and Mark Patterson
On July 2, 2014 a team of aquanauts emerged from the waters of Conch Reef, Florida. For expedition leader Fabien Cousteau, the event marked the first time that he had seen direct sunlight or felt the sea breeze on his face for more than a month. It also signaled the successful conclusion of Mission 31 and the return of Explorers Club Flag #209. The idea for Mission 31 came to Cousteau two years earlier when he visited scientist Mark Patterson and ocean explorer Sylvia Earle in the school-‐bus sized Aquarius underwater habitat, the world’s only saturation diving facility devoted to scientific research. Located at a depth of 20 m off the Florida Keys and managed by Florida International University (FIU), Aquarius has served as a training ground for scientists and explorers for more than 20 years, but Mission 31 was by far the most ambitious expedition to date. Fabien and two of his fellow aquanauts, Mark Hulsbeck and Ryan LaPete, completed the longest Aquarius mission on record having spent 31 days living and working on the bottom of the sea. A team of scientists from FIU (Andy Shantz and Adam Zenone) traded places at the midpoint with Liz Magee (Northeastern University) and MIT graduate Grace Young, as did two documentary filmmakers (Kip Evans and Matt Ferraro), so that six aquanauts lived in “the can” at all times throughout the entire month-‐long mission.
The selection of 31 days was by no means arbitrary. Half a century earlier, Fabien’s grandfather and famed ocean explorer Jacques Cousteau built Conshelf II, a “village under the sea” where his team lived for 30 days at a depth of 10 m. The underwater
experiment resulted in the film Academy Award winning documentary, World without Sun, captivated a worldwide audience, and launched discussions of how humankind would inhabit the sea floor in coming decades. It also highlighted just how little we know of the ocean floor. One of the main objectives of Mission 31 was to rekindle that same excitement for ocean exploration, as well as to explore how our ocean environment has changed over the last 50 years. Indeed, there are many parallels between underwater exploration and the space race that was underway in the early 1960s, just as there are parallels to be made for where both space and ocean exploration stand today. To date, approximately 500 astronauts have flown in space and comparably an estimated 700 aquanauts have lived underwater in saturation research facilities. Incidentally, NASA now regularly uses Aquarius to train astronauts for life on the International Space Station.
The science of saturation diving As the name implies, aquanauts undergoing “saturation” allow the gases in their bodies (and specifically nitrogen) to come to equilibrium with those in the pressurized air that they breathe. This sounds anathema to surface-‐based scuba divers accustomed to careful monitoring of their blood gases in order to prevent “the bends” upon surfacing (when nitrogen bubbles can form, causing severe pain and even death). Under saturation, divers instead have nitrogen levels so high that their blood would rapidly fizz like a shaken bottle of champagne if they returned to the surface and would die unless immediately placed back under pressure. The trade-‐off is the “gift of time”; where a surface diver can spend at most a few hours underwater in a day, with long surface intervals between each dive, an aquanaut can spend virtually unlimited time at saturation depth. As a result, each saturated diver can spend 8 hours or more per day working on the reef, returning to the habitat only for food and rest. At the end of the mission, the aquanauts are slowly returned to surface pressure over a period of 16 hours so that the accumulated nitrogen can be safely released through the diver’s exhalations. In this way, the combined surface and saturation team conducted the equivalent of many months, perhaps even years, of research in just 31 days.
The science of Mission 31 Cousteau assembled a large team of scientists, engineers, documentary filmmakers, educators, diving specialists and communications experts to study and document the Conch Reef environment (the site of Aquarius in the heart of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary), and to share the findings with the world. In addition to the nine aquanauts who lived on the seafloor, a team of scientists led by Brian Helmuth (FN ’07) and Mark Patterson from Northeastern University conducted surface-‐based diving research studying the reef health and specifically the impacts of global climate change on reef organisms. Helmuth and Patterson are both veterans of multiple previous Aquarius missions and thus could anticipate more easily the challenges that would arise during Cousteau’s record-‐breaking saturation. A team of graduate students and technicians (affectionately dubbed “surfnauts”) worked collaboratively with the aquanauts to conduct research related to Northeastern’s Urban Coastal Sustainability Initiative and were instrumental to the ultimate success of Mission 31, in a manner reminiscent of Jacque Cousteau’s topside support team during Conshelf II.
Sponge Biology: Graduate student Allison (Alli) Matzelle led a study of how giant barrel sponges (Xestospongia muta) respond to changing temperatures on the reef. These slow-‐growing “redwoods of the reef” are potentially centuries old, and serve a vital function in their role as filters; every 24-‐48 hours all of the water on a coral reef goes through sponges like these, and so the health of reef sponges may have direct implications for overall reef health. We instrumented the sponges with sensors to measure the water chemistry entering and leaving these filtering organisms, and also took samples of water to understand their diet of bacteria and tiny photosynthetic algae. The combined aquanaut/surfnaut team also deployed a sophisticated acoustic instrument to measure the pumping activity of the sponges over a two-‐week period. These measurements are providing us an unprecedented view into “days in the lives of a sponge”.
Zooplankton: Aquanauts and surface divers (led by graduate student Amanda Dwyer) conducted daily samples of plankton to document, for the first time at Aquarius, how this vital food source changes over a lunar cycle. Corals that have access to abundant zooplankton may weather the stress of global change better than those that don’t so understanding how zooplankton may be changing on coral reefs is a vital project. Zooplankton were also sampled during Conshelf II. We continued this tradition: every day, for a month, the aquanaut team set up traps late in the afternoon to catch the night-‐time plankton that abound on a coral reef. This was a time-‐consuming activity that looked like a slow-‐motion underwater ballet as aquanauts assembled the traps painstakingly. If the trap bottles were incorrectly installed, or the nets improperly installed on its weighted frame, all would be for naught. Every morning the aquanauts returned to harvest the catch and prepare it for transfer and subsequent analysis by the surface team. During the second half of the mission, the aquanaut team got a daily aerobic workout by swimming a plankton net at set heights above the bottom to look at the plankton distribution and abundance during the day. (For an excellent video, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItsQfeQACkY).
The aquanaut team members were mesmerized by the nightly plankton show that gathered under the bright lights of the habitat. It was a delight to fall asleep in the bunkroom as innumerable plankton swirled like tiny stars in a sea of larger organisms that came to gorge themselves. During one of these spectacles, the expedition was privy to a nocturnal territorial encounter between a great barracuda and goliath grouper that was captured on video from the bunkroom (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfqCxWY2ho0).
Coral Ecophysiology: With the help of Cousteau’s team, Patterson-‐ whose coral research is supported by the US National Science Foundation -‐ and technician Sara Williams, used a unique microelectrode amplifier and ultra fine oxygen sensors to examine how corals share resources between the polyps of a coral colony. The data are used to test a mathematical model that predicts how different species of coral contend with environmental change. The unprecedented data show that some corals don’t share resources with neighbors within the colony, compared to other
species. Also, the Mission 31 team made the first-‐ever measurements of how a type of underwater storm, called an internal wave, affects the metabolic rate in our target species, the large star coral (Montastraea cavernosa). These internal waves, first discovered by prior researchers at Aquarius, caused a rapid drop in photosynthesis during the day and respiration at night, because of how sensitive corals are to temperature changes. These data will be useful in predicting how corals will respond to global warming.
All of us were outside the habitat several times during the mission when these internal waves passed up onto the reef. Within a matter of minutes, the temperature dropped precipitously by many degrees, the currents picked up to where the divers had to struggle to move around the reef (on some days flapping like a flag on the descent line), and the water shimmered, as cold nutrient-‐rich water was carried by these powerful waves from deeper water. The Northeastern science team is now unraveling how these waves affect corals and sponges.
Reef Life in Slow Motion: Grace Young worked with fellow aquanauts to deploy a unique high speed camera, an Edgertronic imager in a Sexton Underwater Housing, to document phenomena that will help scientists to understand the biomechanics of reef creatures. Compelling footage was obtained of polychaete tentacle retraction and pistol shrimp feeding strikes, both processes occurring at the scale of milliseconds. Cousteau noted that in many cases this required several hours of preparation just to capture the footage, something that never could have been accomplished by “the unsaturated.”
Environmental Contamination: At the start of the mission, the aquanauts deployed a low-‐tech but novel passive sampling system using treated polyethylene film to see whether toxic compounds, including the dispersant released in large quantities in the BP oil spill in the nearby waters of the Gulf of Mexico, are present in significant amounts at the Aquarius site. Because these compounds are resistant to breakdown by microbes, they are of concern to both human and ecosystem health as toxins that can bioaccumulate in a variety of organisms. At set times during Mission 31, we harvested subsets of these samplers, and preserved them for sophisticated processing back at Northeastern by Professor Loretta Fernandez, one of our colleagues who developed this technique. We are hoping that we find nothing, but Cousteau’s work with other researchers who looked at human contamination among remote peoples found, there is nowhere on Earth or Ocean that these compounds are not found.
Living and working underwater Perhaps the biggest experiment of all, however, was what would happen to Cousteau, Hulsbeck and LaPete after living 31 days underwater? The challenges were many. Nitrogen narcosis (“rapture of the deep”) made living in close quarters easier, but also made checklists and daily planning paramount to keeping everyone focused. Practical jokes, often quite elaborate, were played with increasing frequency on fellow aquanauts or visitors, such as filling scuba booties with foot-‐staining Gatorade. Skin ailments developed from the long periods of immersion so the team was vigilant for infection. Visitors were frequent
and welcome, but psychologically the team did feel they were in a remote outpost despite the able supervision 24/7 by the watch desk ashore miles away in Islamorada. Cousteau found the cacophony of constant communications from topside, the snapping shrimp audible through the hull, and the in-‐water communications during dives both on scuba and helmet anything but the Silent World! Because each hour in the water burns hundreds of extra calories, aquanauts were constantly hungry and consumed many high-‐energy foods to keep body weight up. The team became tired of the freeze-‐dried camping food that serves as normal fare and looked forward to the occasional treats such as homemade lasagna sent down from the surface by support divers using pressurized pots.
Bringing Exploration to the Public: A key part of this exploration mission was bringing the excitement of expeditionary science to the public. We employed many conduits for this. Cousteau connected via Skype during the first week of the mission with members at The Explorers Club as part of Outdoor Fest, offering a virtual tour of his home for the next month (for those who missed the event, a tour is here: http://www.northeastern.edu/helmuthlab/Research/gigapan/USFL/USFL.html).
Four major live outreach events were held in collaboration with the Boston Museum of Science. During one of these events, the Museum devoted half a day to special exhibits and talks by marine scientists from Northeastern, with the highlight a live broadcast on the subject of sustainable use of the oceans that featured a roundtable discussion with Cousteau, Helmuth, and Northeastern University Provost, Stephen Director. Other outreach sessions featured a live connection to the habitat with subject matter experts from our surface team visiting. These sessions focused on sponge biology, coral biology, and a mission wrap-‐up report on the science.
We also conducted a Google Hangout from the Aquarius with the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and ocean experts across the planet, on the future of the oceans. Another Google Hangout focused on the status of reefs in the Caribbean and involved experts on Marine Protected Areas from Barbados and Grenada, moderated by reef conservation expert Stephen Price, an Aquarius veteran from Canada.
A series of blogs by aquanauts Magee and Young and the surface team proved wildly popular based on Internet traffic. We were fortunate to have a nationally known correspondent from National Public Radio embedded with the surface team, Heather Goldstone. She was able to visit the wet porch inside the habitat and report on her experiences both with aquanauts and the topside team. Because the second half of the mission involved so many women in science, we invited teen blogger Morgan Helmuth to the field site to offer her impressions of what makes (or should make) science exciting to young women. Social media were used heavily to inform the public about the unique value of saturation diving for science, and some of the unique challenges facing the global ocean. Mission 31 received an unprecedented amount of publicity and interest on the global stage, with more than 500 million persons aware of the mission before it concluded.
Beyond Mission 31: This mission will live on in a variety of formats, including a documentary, a traveling global exhibit, lessons plans, blogs, and the numerous scientific publications planned by Mission 31 team members. Our team is exploring how best to advance the science of undersea exploration using humans in the loop, a unique aspect of saturation diving. Although Aquarius remains the only habitat currently available for use by diving scientists, we envision a future where more than one habitat exists. A state-‐of-‐the-‐art future facility would go beyond the older technology that began with Jacques Cousteau’s Conshelf habitat, still embodied today in the design of Aquarius, with its metal hull, toggle switches, and hydrocarbon fuel source. A future habitat could be lightweight and mobile for use in different habitats, and extract the energy needed for life support directly from the ocean and sun in a sustainable manner. We hope to return to Aquarius to test some of these concepts in a future expedition where we can continue our research on coastal sustainability and the impacts of climate change on our world’s oceans.