10
Fukushima Floating Offshore Wind Farm Fukushima F loating O ffshor e W ind Far m D emonstration Project (Fukushima FORWARD) (Fukushima FORWARD) Takeshi ISHIHARA Takeshi ISHIHARA The University of Tokyo 0

Fukushima Floating Offshore WindFind Farm …windeng.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ishihara/posters/2012_digest.pdfFukushima FORWARD project Ideal area for floating offshore wind Large wind energy

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Fukushima Floating Offshore Wind FarmFukushima Floating Offshore Wind Farm Demonstration Project

(Fukushima FORWARD)(Fukushima FORWARD)

Takeshi ISHIHARATakeshi ISHIHARAThe University of Tokyo

0

Contents

Background and objective

Technical challenges and solutions

Social acceptance and collaboration Social acceptance and collaboration

C l i d ti Conclusion and perspectives

1

Background

BenefitsOffshore wind energy potential 400

500

0-20ml (G

W)

Water depth

Offshore wind energy potential in Japan

along Japan is 1.2TW, while thetotal capacity of the conventionalsources is 0.2TW.

200

300

400 20-50m50-200m

gy p

oten

tia

More than 80% of the offshore windenergy potential in Japan arelocated at deep water. 0

100

200

Win

d en

er

ChallengesFl t t

00-10km 10-20km 20-30km

Distance from coastline

Floater conceptsMeasurement and PredictiontechnologyFloating substationCost efficiencyAdvanced Material

2

Advanced Material

Compact semi-sub

V-shape semi-sub

Advanced spar

Fukushima FORWARD project

Ideal area for floating offshore windLarge wind energy potential at 20km 50km fromLarge wind energy potential at 20km-50km fromcoast, where water depth is 100m–200m

Strong power grid for nuclear and thermal power g p g pplants

Port facilities available

設備利用率

25.0 - 30.0%

30.0 - 35.0%

35.0 - 40.0%

40.0 - 45.0%

BenefitsThe accumulation of wind energy industry will help

0 20 40 60 8010km

the restoration of this region.

7.4m/s (offshore) 4.3m/s (onshore)

3

Facility specifications of FORWARD projectFacility Name Scale Wind Turbine type Floater type Project Term

Floating Wind Turbine I 2MW Downwind Type Compact Semi-Sub First

Floating Wind Turbine II 7MW Upwind Type V-shape Semi-Sub Secondg p yp p

Floating Wind Turbine III 7MW Upwind Type Advanced Spar Second

Floating Substation 25MVA/66kV Substation Advanced Spar First

Substation 4 Colum Semi-Sub Advanced Spar 3 Colum Semi-Sub

4

Work packages1 Preliminary study Phase I

• site assessment• preliminary design

5 Operation & Maintenance• floater / mooring• wind turbine

2 Measurement / prediction 6 Environment issue

• preliminary design • substation / power cable

• environmental assessment• marine navigation safety• collaboration with fishery

• metocean• floater motion• substation / power cable

3 Floating wind turbines 7 DocumentationPhase II

• wind turbine• floater / mooring

• technical review• manual

4 Grid integration 8 Public relation

floater / mooring• advanced material • project report

• communication centre• floating substation• dynamic cables

• communication centre• seminar and symposium

5

Presentation of consortium membersConsortium Member Main Rule

Marubeni Corporation 【Project Integrator】Pre-Studies, Approval and Licensing, Operation andMaintenance, Collaboration with Fishery Industry

The University of Tokyo 【Technical Advisor】Measurement and Prediction Technology, NavigationSafety, Public relationSafety, Public relation

Mitsubishi Corporation Pre-Studies, Approval and Licensing, EnvironmentalAssessment

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. V-Shape Semi-Sub Type Floater

IHI Marine United Inc. Advanced Spar Type Floater and Floating Substation

Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. Compact Semi-Sub Type Floater

Nippon Steel Corporation Advanced Steelpp p

Hitachi, Ltd. Floating Electric Power Substation

Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. Undersea and Dynamic Cables

Shimizu Corporation Pre-Studies Construction and Installation TechnologyShimizu Corporation Pre-Studies, Construction and Installation Technology

Mizuho Information & Research Institute, Inc. Documentation, Committee Operations

6

FORWARD vision and challengesGreen growth in Fukushima• Industry accumulation• Employment• Employment• Restoration

Fukushima FORWARD

Technical challenge Social acceptance• Floater concepts• Measurement and prediction

• Navigation safety• Environmental assessmentMeasurement and prediction

• Floating substation• Cost efficiency• Advanced material

• Environmental assessment• Collaboration with fishery• Public relation

• Advanced material

7

Development phases and key success factors

Phase I (2011~2013) Phase II (2014~2015)

2 Phases:

( ) ( )

Floating substationCompact semi-sub (2MW)

V-shape semi-sub (7MW)Advanced spar (7MW)

Phase I

1,850mV-shapesemi-sub

Floating substationPhase II

Compact semi-sub V-shape semi-subAdvanced spar

1,480m

1 480

Floatingsubstation

Compactsemi-sub

Transmissioncable

1,480m

Advancedspar

D i / T t / I t C t ffi i / i d t i li ti

3 key success factors:

18Technology maturity / Social acceptance

Design / Test / Improvement Cost efficiency / industrialization

Thank you for your attention

20