E. Wisnioski , E. Wuyts, S. Wuyts, R. Genzel, L.J. Tacconi, P. Lang, D. Lutz, M. Fossati, D. Wilman, A. Renzini, S. Tacchella, M. Carollo

K. Bandara, A. Beifiori, R. Bender, N. Bouché, G. Brammer, A. Burkert, J. Chan, A. Cimatti, G. Cresci, E. Daddi, R. Davies, D. Erb,

A. Galametz, S. Kulkarni, S. Lilly, C. Mancini, J.T. Mendel, I. Momcheva, T. Naab, E.J. Nelson, S. Newman, Y. Peng, D. Rosario,

R. Saglia, S. Seitz, A. Shapley, C. Steidel, A. Sternberg, E. Strobl-Hicks, K. Tadaki, H. Übler, P. van Dokkum, D. Vergani, G. Zamorani

N.M. Förster Schreiber and the KMOS3D, SINS/zC-SINF, 3D-HST, PHIBSS/2 Teams

Galaxy Evolution

Insights from Spatially & Spectrally Resolved Studies

E.g., NMFS+06,09,16; Mancini+11; Wisnioski+15,16; Genzel+06,08,11,14; E.Wuyts+14,16; S. Wuyts+16

KMOS 24 IFUs

SINFONI & AO

Physics of Galaxy Evolution from In Situ IFU Studies

KMOS3D

600+ M

-selected z~0.7-2.7 SFGs Deep+wide coverage in M

-SFR-UVJ

SINS/zC-SINF

110 SFGs at z ~ 1–3 35 w/ deep AO follow-up

Mass assembly Star formation Structural buildup Chemical enrichment Feedback Quenching

IJH HST/CANDELS

KMOS3D – Wisnioski+15

E.g., Labbé+03;Lotz+06,08,10; Elmegreen+07-09;Kriek+09;NMFS+11a,b;Guo+12,15;Szomoru+13;Nelson+13;Tacchella+15a,b;Tadaki+14a;Cibinel+15

Rich Morphologies of z~1–3 SFGs

M

HST/CANDELS

And e.g. Kauffmann+03,06;Schiminovich+07;Bell+08,12;Cheung+12;Bruce+12,14;Fang+13;Bluck+14 ; Hunter+98;Martig+09,13;Saintonge+12;Crocker+12

(M*)

Smoother Stellar Structure of z~1–3 SFGs

Wuyts+12; Lang+14 Wuyts+13; Nelson+13,15; Genzel+14a; Tacchella+15a.b

H VFs VLT/KMOS3D

Also, e.g., Law+09,12;Epinat+09-12;Jones+10;Green+10; Wisnioski+11,12; Yuan+11,12;Kassin+12; Sobral+13;Stott+14; Livermore+15; Leethochawalit+15

Wisnioski+15; Genzel+06,08,11; NMFS+06,09,15; Shapiro+08; Cresci+09; Tacconi+13; Newman+13

Majority of Disk Kinematics of z~1–3 SFGs

Wisnioski+15

Burkert+15; Lang+16 in prep. / Also S.Wuyts+16 in prep.

Also, e.g., NFW+97; Mo+98; Bullock+01; Sofue&Rubin01; Hetznecker+06; Courteau+07; Burkert+10; van der Kruit&Freeman11; Barnabè+12; Bovy&Rix13; Moster+13; Dutton+13; Cappellari+13; Dekel&Burkert14; Übler+14; Genel+14; Courteau&Dutton15; and many more

Outer Rotation Curves & Angular Momenta

(baryons) ~ (DM)

NMFS/Genzel+06–11; Wisnioski+15. Also, e.g., Kassin+07,12; Epinat+09,12; Law+09,12; Wright+09; Swinbank+12a,b; Jones+10; Sobral+13; Stott+14

2 2 2

02      rot circ

d

Rv v

R

Stack of ~100 log(M

) > 9.7, 0.8 z 2.6 SFGs

baryons ~ 0.037 ~ DM

360 log(M

) > 9.3, 0.8 z 2.6 SFGs

Specific angular momentum of disks reflects that of their DM halos

Falling outer rotation curves – pressure-driven disk truncation?

Also, Pettini+00; Heckman+03,15; Shapley+03;Weiner+09; Steidel+10; Coil+11; Kulas+11; Law+12b; Kornei+12; Chen+12; Martin+05;

Rupke+02–13; Sharp,Bland-Hawthorn10; Sturm+11; Westmoquette+12,13; Bouché+12,14; RodríguezZaurín+13; Cicone+14; and many others

Genzel+11; Newman+12a,b; Shapiro+09

FWHM ~ 450 km/s, across disks, at/near SF clumps

Hα broad – Outflow

1” (8kpc)

Hα narrow – Star formation

B

Vigorous Outflows Driven by Star Formation

SINFONI+AO

ZC406690 clump B

velocity offset (km/s)

-2000 -1000 0 1000 2000

0.0

0.5

1.0

Outflow

Star

formation

Stacked pixels

dMout/dt (ionized gas) ~ 1 – 5 SFRs

Breakout at (SFR) ≳ 1 M

/yr/kpc2

D3a-6004 (z=2.38)

Hα broad (outflow) Hα narrow (star formation) Rest-V continuum (stars,HST)

SINFONI+AO

NMFS+14;

Genzel+14b;

+ in prep.

Ubiquitous Nuclear Outflows Driven by AGN

.Also, e.g., Rupke+02-13; Sturm+11; Nesvadba+11; Westmoquette+12,13; Harrison+12,14; Maiolino+12; Cano Diaz+12; Fabian12; Diamond-Stanic+12; Mullaney+13; Rodriguez-Zaurin+13; Cicone+12,14,15; Juneau+12,14; Brusa+15; Cresci+15; Perna+15

Centers of log(M*) ≳ 10.9 galaxies, FWHM ~ 500–2000 km/s, in H+[NII]+[SII], 2 – 3 kpc extent

High duty cycle among typical massive galaxies, dMout/dt (ionized gas) ~ SFR, vout > vesc

320 M

-selected 0.8 z 2.6 galaxies; 80 at log(M

) > 10.8

(KMOS3D, SINS/zC-SINF, LUCI, GNIRS)

D3a-6004 (z=2.38)

Hα broad (outflow) Hα narrow (star formation) Rest-V continuum (stars,HST)

SINFONI+AO

NMFS+14;

Genzel+14b;

+ in prep.

Ubiquitous Nuclear Outflows Driven by AGN

.Also, e.g., Rupke+02-13; Sturm+11; Nesvadba+11; Westmoquette+12,13; Harrison+12,14; Maiolino+12; Cano Diaz+12; Fabian12; Diamond-Stanic+12; Mullaney+13; Rodriguez-Zaurin+13; Cicone+12,14,15; Juneau+12,14; Brusa+15; Cresci+15; Perna+15

Centers of log(M*) ≳ 10.9 galaxies, FWHM ~ 500–2000 km/s, in H+[NII]+[SII], 2 – 3 kpc extent

High duty cycle among typical massive galaxies, dMout/dt (ionized gas) ~ SFR, vout > vesc

320 M

-selected 0.8 z 2.6 galaxies; 80 at log(M

) > 10.8

(KMOS3D, SINS/zC-SINF, LUCI, GNIRS)

7 h 1 h IJH HST

The Need for Sensitive Spatially-Resolved Data

K20-ID7 z = 2.2

NMFS+09,15; Tacchella+15a; Lang+14

F(Ha) = 2 10–16 cgs

Re (H, M) 8 kpc M = 4.0 1010 M

SFR = 210 M

/ yr n (H, M) 0.2

SINFONI+AO

2 h 3 h 4 h 5 h 6 h 7 h

KMOS (noAO)

H

SINFONI+AO

V (H)

SINFONI+AO

M

HST/WFC3

The Need for Sensitive Spatially-Resolved Data

D3a15504 z = 2.4

Genzel+06,14; NMFS+14

Not corrected for VF Corrected for VF

F(Ha) = 2 10–16 cgs

FWFMbroad (nucl.) = 1000 km/s

M = 1.1 1011 M

SFR = 150 M

/ yr

Fbroad/Ftotal (nucl.) = 0.7

Mass Accretion

Star

formation

Outflows

Structural buildup

Quenching

Physics of lifecycle of massive galaxies

from resolved in-situ studies

NOEMA ALMA

Outlook

Cold molecular gas

PHIBSS/2 @ PdBI/NOEMA Tacconi+10,13

Cold gas/dust on par with Opt/NIR

D = 4.5 Mpc

Larsen+99 1.5 ~ 35 pc resolution HST/WFC3 – VLT+AO 1.5 kpc resolution JWST/NIRCAM 700 pc resolution E-ELT/MICADO 100 pc resolution

5 kpc

z = 2.0

(20 L)

Deep near-IR

imaging

M83 log(M*) ~ 10.6

SFR ~ 4 M

/yr

fgas ~ 10-15%

Towards Resolving Distant Galaxies on 100pc Scales

Mock z=2.3 galaxy, EELT resolution ~100 pc

Compact clusters detected to KAB ~ 28.5

(MR,AB ~ –16) Sims details:

Trippe et al. (2010)