Upload
bandiyah-sri-aprillia
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
1/14
Epitaxial growth and study of 2DSe-based ultrathin films: Bi2Se3,
MoSe2, fSe2 , !rSe2
"retouli E# $leopatra
2%&2&'( NCSR DEMOKRITOS, Athens, Greece
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
2/14
Outline
• )opologi*al insulators: Bi2Se3MBE growth and stru*tural *hara*teri+ation• Semi*ondu*ting )ransition metal di*hal*ogenides
)MDsMoSe2fSe2
!rSe2• .on*lusions& /uture wor0
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
3/14
3D Topological InsulatorsBi2Se3 , Bi2Te3, Bi1-xSbx
Y. Xia et al., Nat. Phys. 5 , 3! "#$$%
Topologically protected
Spin locked to orbital momentum
Backscattering is suppressed o!el s"itc#ing mec#anisms$%unctionalities
k -k k
-k
spin
e-Non-magneticimpurity
“insulating” bulk
&apless metallic sur%ace states
-k
relati!istic mo!ement o% e- ' light-like particles
Spin polari(ed )#elical* Dirac cones
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
4/14
+ltra #ig# !acuum c#ampers %or gro"t# and structuralc#aracteri(ation
ST
./0S
B0
/S.00D
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
5/14
.T0 and /S
1 4 5 1 nm
T#ick 5 26 uintuple 4ayers )4*
1 QL
High epitaxial quality and “clean” crystalline interfaces
711-268
Bi2Se3$l
o reaction 9s#arpcrystalline inter%aces
31 epitaxial Bi2Se3
* P. Tsi&as et al., ACS Nan', ! "(%, ))*+ "#$*+%
Substrates ' 266 nm l)6661* $266 mm Si )111*
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
6/14
k//,y (Å-1) k //,y (Å
-1) k //,y (Å-1) k //,y (Å
-1)
Γ ΜΜ
0.4 e!
"n# #eri$ati$e "n# #eri$ati$eΓ ΜΜ
%&
!&
Gaplesssurfacestates
3 4 Bi2Se3$l)6661* : 4 Bi2Se3$l)6661*
'(
E B
( e V )
E B
( e V )
'(
&apless sur%ace states in ultrat#in Bi2Se3
3QL: Thinnest Bi !e3 "ith gapless surface states #$irac c%ne& e'er rep%rted
experi(entally )
*educe surface t% '%lu(e rati% - applicati%ns in nan%electr%nics
Insit- "4ES
Gaplesssurfacestates
ltrathin /il0s1 2yri4i5ati'n6a& '&enin6 Thic7 /il0s "8)9: e;&.%1 N'ninteractin6
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
7/14
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
8/14
Semiconducting 2D Transition etals Dic#alcogenides )TDs*
anisotropic mec#anical optical and electrical propertiesSi(able band gap in t#e !isible and I. region o% t#e solar spectrum
x y
+).+
x
y
+
o
Se
4ayered TDs crystals o% t#e composition 2 '
' transition metal )IB' o, C and IB' r,% *' ;#alcogen species )S, Se, Te*
+pplicati%ns in ,pt%electr%nic de'ices#energy c%n'ersi%n syste(s&
and ield .ffect Transist%rs/ l%" p%"er l%gic de'ices
2 structure 1T structure
Indirect to direct band gapcrosso!er "#en t#ickness reduces to
a single layer
Indirect band gap!ery close to Si
H%neyc%(0 like structures superi%r pr%perties t% th%se %f graphene 111
M'Se# 1 E. Xen'6iann'&'-l'- et al. s-0itte4 #$*+ 2/Se# 1 K.E. Aret'-li et al. s-0itte4 #$*<
Se
%
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
9/14
#
b
,
MoSe2
350°C
MoSe2
690°C
AlN
Bi2Se3
300°C
MoSe2
300°C
.00D, T0, ST o% 34 oSe2$l)6661*
ST image' #oneycomb structure
#
e
l
oSe2
3:6E;
oSe2
F@6E;
estimated distance o% 3>3 ? bet"een Se-Se atoms 5 aoSe22@@ ?
!dC gap
"
1
Line 1
.+
eeSe
o"+
Line "
e/o
T"o step gro"t# processl
oSe2
3:6E;
oSe2
F@6E;
oSe2
3:6E;
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
10/14
e 9
e 99
1st Brillouin(one
oSe2
K
A
ΓL
M
H
alence Band Imaging
.T measurements
S#i%t o% B at G-point
to #ig#er binding energy
Indirect to direct bandgap transition in t#e14 limit
GH oSe2 2= ?-1
'(
k //,y +-1
E. Xen'6iann'&'-l'- et al. s-0itte4 #$*+
-4
-"
0
"
4
ΓMKΓ
& i n # i n g ' n e r g y 0 e ! 1
14 oSe2 3 4
'(
F4Γ 2 Γ3 235 Γ3 235
(a) (b) (c)
6e 7
00k // 8y+-1
6e 77
(d) (e) (f)
k //,y +-1
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
11/14
.aman and /4 c#aracteri(ation o% oSe2 %ilms at
4-limit on l)6661*
"00 400 )00 900 1000 1"00
/oe"
i peak
i *"1cm-1
:1g
"40.9 cm-1
7 n t e n s i t y 0 a . u . 1
;aman
A L 7 n t e n s i t y
0 a . u
1
'nergy e!
)he dire*t band gap in single layers results inintense room temperature photolumines*en*e 4
pplications %rom optoelectronics to energycon!ersion
cti!e modes o% oSe2'
1g at 2=6>J cm-1
02g at 2JJ>: cm-1
Bg at 35 c(-2 in fe" layer
(aterial
1"# meV
Γ $%
& B
"00 "0 00 0 400
LoB!2"
#!2"
l o g 0 7 n t e n s i t y 1 0 a
. u .
1
;aman s
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
12/14
" l 5
' M f S e 2
: M f S e 2
3 M M o S e
2
6''-2%7 a+imuth
K G L
0%
2
-'
'
%
-2
-3
-;
-(
E n e r g y , e
< -
$&=&>&? >M
B i n d
i n g E n e r g y E B , e
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
13/14
;onclusions• )hinnest Bi2Se3 31 with gapless surfa*e states
Dira* *one e@er reported experimentally• igh stru*tural Auality MoSe2 and fSe2 on "l5&Si
substrates• MoSe2&Bi2Se3 and MoSe2&fSe2 multilayers *an be
produ*edMuture "ork • Exploring the semi*ondu*tors fSe2, !rSe2
• Ele*tri*al *hara*teri+ation of Bi2Se3, MoSe2 fSe2 ,!rSe2 and their heterostru*tures
• Magnetoresistan*e measurements& all effe*t
measurements
8/17/2019 Hfse vs. MoSe
14/14