karthi (1)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    1/23

    CHAPTER 4

    ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

    The purpose of the data analysis and interpretation phase is to transform the datacollected into credible evidence about the development of the intervention and its

    performance. Data analysis includes the systematic organizing of the data and its

    presentation in a form that readers of the project can understand. It also includes the

    interpretation of the data to identify the importance ideas or new bits of knowledge that

    they reveal.

    Reviewing the data analysis, interpretation clarifies how relationships between

    variables might work. The researcher will need to choose the methods best suited to thedata you have collected, and will need to be able to justify your choice of methods.

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    2/23

    Table 4.1 showing the type of Eureka Forbs product used by customers

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.1 showing the type of Eureka Forbs product used by customers.

    Interpretation

    58% of the respondents suggest that they are using the water purifier and around

    42% of them are users of vacuum cleaner.

    58

    42

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Water purifier Vacuum cleaner

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Water purifier 58 58

    Vacuum cleaner 42 42

    Total 100 100

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    3/23

    Table 4.2 showing the suggestion of respondents regarding how they come to know

    about Eureka Forbs

    Factors X Y D (X-Y) D

    Internet 1 2 -1 1

    Advertisement 2 1 1 1

    News paper 3 3 0 0

    Monthly publicity 4 5 -1 1

    Television 5 4 1 1

    Source: Primary Data

    R = 1- 6D2

    = 1- 64

    N3-N

    = 1-24 = 0.8

    Chart 4.2 showing the suggestion of respondents regarding how they come to know

    about Eureka Forbs

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been analyzed that the respondents has rank

    advertisement at the top position as the factor which help them to know about the

    company. Followed by internet, News Paper, Television, Monthly publicity respectively.

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.54

    4.5

    Internet Advertisment News paper Monthly publicity

    Rank

    120

    120

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    4/23

    Table 4.3 showing the number of years for which they are the customers of Eureka

    forbs

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Less than 1 month 8 8%

    2-6 months 15 15%

    6-12months 14 14%

    More than 1 year 63 63%

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.3 showing the number of years for which they are the customers of Eureka

    forbs

    Interpretation

    About 15% of the respondents were the customers of this company for 2-6 month

    and 63% of respondents were customers for more than 1 year. Thereby majority of the

    respondents are the customers of the company from the period of more than 1 year.

    8%15% 14%

    63%

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    Less than 1

    month

    2-6 months 6-12months More than 1 year

    Percentage

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    5/23

    Table 4.4 showing the satisfaction level of respondents regarding the order delivery

    & services provided by the Eureka Forbs

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Highly satisfied 21 21%

    Satisfied 65 65%

    Dissatisfied 10 10%

    Highly dissatisfied 4 4%

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.4 showing the satisfaction level of respondents regarding the order delivery

    & services provided by the Eureka Forbs

    Interpretation

    Majority of the respondents [65%] are satisfied with the delivery services

    provided by the Eureka forbs. Around 21% of them are highly satisfied but still an

    average of 14% of them is dissatisfied.

    21

    65

    10

    4

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Highly

    satisfied

    Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly

    dissatisfied

    Percentage

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    6/23

    Table 4.5 showing the satisfaction level of customers with the price of Eureka Forbs

    products

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Highly Satisfied 28 28%

    Satisfied 67 67%

    Dissatisfied 5 5%

    Highly Dissatisfied - -

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.5 showing the satisfaction level of customers with the price of Eureka Forbs

    products

    Interpretation

    Almost all the respondents [around 95%] are satisfied with the pricing system of

    the Eureka forbs only 5% of them are dissatisfied with the pricing system of the

    company.

    28

    67

    5

    00

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    Highly satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly

    dissatisfied

    Percentage

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    7/23

    Table 4.6 showing the extent to which respondents agree that the company exchange

    information with them frequently

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Strongly Agree 15 15

    Agree 60 60

    Neutral 10 10

    Disagree 10 10

    Strongly Disagree 5 5

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.6 showing the extent to which respondents agree that the company

    exchange information with them frequently

    Interpretation

    75% of respondents agree that the company used to exchange information with

    them but around 15% of the respondents disagree with the same and around 10% of them

    give neutral suggestions.

    15%

    60%

    10% 10%

    5%

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

    disagree

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    8/23

    Table 4.7 showing the method by which the customers interact with the firm

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Direct Interaction 20 20%

    Phone calls 75 75%

    Internet/ e-mail 5 5

    Others - -

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.7 showing the method by which the customers interact with the firm

    Interpretation

    In the above table 75% of the respondents prefer the interaction through telephone

    and 20% prefer direct interaction and only 5% interact through e-mail. Hence majority of

    the customers prefer through telephones.

    20.00

    75.00

    5.000%

    0.00

    10.00

    20.00

    30.00

    40.00

    50.00

    60.00

    70.00

    80.00

    Direct Interaction Phone calls Internet/ e-mail Others

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    9/23

    Table 4.8 showing the extent to which company inform about the new service or

    facilities to the customers

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Always 75 75

    Never 17 17

    Sometime 8 8

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.8 showing the extent to which company inform about the new service or

    facilities to the customers

    Interpretation

    75% of the respondents suggest that company used to provide information

    regarding new services and facilities but around 17% of them oppose this statement.

    75%

    17%

    8%

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    Always Never Sometime

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    10/23

    Table 4.9 showing the suggestion of respondents on, weather the company provides

    price reduction or offers during festival seasons

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Yes 69 69

    No 31 31

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.9 showing the suggestion of respondents on, weather the company provides

    price reduction or offers during festival seasons

    Interpretation

    Around 69% of the respondents suggest that the company provides price

    reduction and offers during the festival season but about 31% of them disagree with the

    same.

    69%

    31%

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    Yes No

    Percentage

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    11/23

    Table 4.10 showing the suggestion of respondents regarding whether the company

    used to forward Festival wishes

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Yes 69 69

    No 31 31

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Interpretation

    In the above table, it has been inferred that around 83% of the respondents agree

    that company used to give festival wishes. 17% of the respondents disagree with the

    above statement.

    83%

    17%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    Yes No

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    12/23

    Table 4.11 showing the method selected by the company to make festival wishes

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Direct 6 6%

    Phone calls 55 55%

    E-mail 20 20%

    Greeting cards 19 19%

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.11 showing the method selected by the company to make festival wishes

    Interpretation

    In the above table 55% of the respondents suggest that the company uses phone

    call method to give festival wishes and 20% suggest it as E-mail and 19% as greeting

    cards. Hence most effective method is considered as Phone calls method.

    6%

    55%

    20%

    19%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    Direct Phone calls E-mail Greeting cards

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    13/23

    Table 4.12 showing the extent to which respondents agree that the company respond

    on their complaints

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Always 100 100

    Never - -

    Sometime - -

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.12 showing the extent to which respondents agree that the company

    respond on their complaints

    Interpretation

    From the above table, we can find that all the respondents agree that the company

    used to respond on their complaints.

    100%

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    Always Never Sometime

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    14/23

    Table 4.13 the method through which customers place complaints to the company

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Direct 24 24%

    Phone calls 64 64%

    E-mail 12 12%

    Postal - -

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.13 showing the method through which customers place complaints to the

    company

    Interpretation

    64% of the respondents place their complaints through phone calls and 24% of the

    respondents place their complaints directly and only 8% place through E-mails. Majority

    of the respondents place complaints through phone call.

    24%

    64%

    12%

    00

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    Direct Phone calls E-mail Postal

    Percentage

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    15/23

    Table 4.14 showing the time required by the company to clear customer complaints

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Within one day 22 22

    One week 60 60

    One month 18 18

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.14 showing the time required by the company to clear customer complaints

    Interpretation

    60% of respondents says that the company takes one week to clear complaints and

    22% says that the company takes only one day to clear complaints and 18% says that

    company take one month to clear complaints. So majority of the respondents says that the

    company clears all complaints in one week.

    22%

    60%

    18%

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    Within one day One week One month

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    16/23

    Table 4.15 showing the extent to which firm shows a sincere interest in solving

    customers problems

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Always 100 100%

    Never - -

    Sometime - -

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.15 showing the extent to which firm shows a sincere interest in solving

    customers problems

    Interpretation

    From the above table 100% of respondents say that the company shows sincere

    interest in solving customer problems.

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    Always Never Sometime

    Percentage

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    17/23

    Table 4.16 the satisfaction level of respondents with the firms services

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Highly Satisfied 32 32

    Satisfied 52 52

    Dissatisfied 16 16

    Highly Dissatisfied - -

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.16 the satisfaction level of respondents with the firms services

    Interpretation

    In the above table, about 32%of the respondents are highly satisfied and 52% of

    them were satisfied and 16% of respondents are dissatisfied with the service provided by

    the company. So majority of the respondents are satisfied with the service provided by

    the firm.

    32

    52

    16

    00

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Highly satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly

    dissatisfied

    Percentage

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    18/23

    Table 4.17 showing the suggestion of respondents regarding, whether they are

    satisfied with the existing Communication system

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Yes 88 88%

    No 12 12%

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.17 showing the suggestion of respondents regarding, whether they are

    satisfied with the existing Communication system

    Interpretation

    From the above table, we can say that 88% of the respondents are satisfied and

    12% of the respondents are dissatisfied so majority of the respondents are satisfied with

    the existing system of the company.

    Yes, 88%

    No, 12%

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    Yes No

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    19/23

    Table 4.18 showing votes given by the respondents for the different methods adopted

    by the Company which is suitable for maintaining relation with the firm

    Opinion X Y D D

    Direct 1 1 0 0

    Phone calls 2 2 0 0

    E-mail 3 3 0 0

    Postal 4 5 1 1

    Others 5 4 1 1

    Source: Primary Data

    R = 1- 6D2

    = 1- 62

    N3-N

    = 1- 12 = 0.9

    Chart 4.18 showing votes given by the respondents for the different methods adopted

    by the Company which is suitable for maintaining relation with the firm

    Interpretation

    From the table it has been analyzed that the respondents give 1st

    rank to the direct

    interaction factor, second rank to the phone calls followed by e- mail and postal

    respectively.

    1

    2

    3

    5

    4

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Direct Phone calls e-mail Postal Others

    Y

    120

    120

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    20/23

    Table 4.19 showing the factors which motivate that respondents while purchasing

    Eureka forbs Products

    Factors X Y D

    D

    Quality 1 1 0 0

    Advertisement 2 4 -2 4

    Price 3 2 1 1

    Health & safety 4 3 1 1

    Personal Touch 5 5 0 0

    Source: Primary Data

    R = 1- 6D2

    = 1- 66

    N3-N

    = 1 - 36 = 0.7

    120

    Chart 4.19 showing the factors which motivate that respondents while purchasing

    Eureka forbs Products

    Interpretation

    From the table it has been inferred that the respondents give the 1st

    priority to the

    quality factor followed by price, health& safety, advertisement, personal touch

    respectively.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Quality Adverisment Price Health & safety Personel Touch

    120

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    21/23

    Table 4.20 showing the customers opinion bout after sale services given by the

    company

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Excellent 12 12%

    Very good 40 40%

    Good 48 48%

    Poor - -

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.20 showing the customers opinion bout after sale services given by the

    company

    Interpretation

    In the above table, about 48% of the customers suggest that the after sale service

    provided by the company is good, also around 40% of them suggest it as very good and

    12 % of the respondents suggest it as excellent. From this, we can assume that after sale

    services are beneficial to the customers.

    12

    40

    48

    00

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Excellent Very good Good Poor

    Percentage

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    22/23

    Table 4.21 showing the performance level of Eureka Forbs products

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Excellent 82 82%

    Very good 18 18%

    Good - -

    Poor - -

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.21 showing the performance level of eureka forbs products

    Interpretation

    82% of the customers says that performance level of eureka forbs products is

    excellent and 18% of respondents are says that very good so all customers are satisfied

    with performance of eureka forbs products.

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    Excellent Very good Good Poor

    Percentage

  • 7/28/2019 karthi (1)

    23/23

    Table 4.22 showing the satisfaction level of customers with the products of Eureka

    Forbes

    Opinion of Respondents No of Respondents Percentage

    Yes 100 100%

    No - -

    Total 100 100

    Source: Primary Data

    Chart 4.22 showing the satisfaction level of customers with the products of eureka

    Forbes

    Interpretation

    All the respondents suggest that they are satisfied with the products of Eureka

    Forbes.

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    Yes No

    Percentage