Upload
crikk
View
349
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
LANDSCAPE
Citation preview
APR2014
Suggestion for the development of the 2nd UMEKITA district
414Designing environment and scenery for public.
95
95
2
145A5
29TOKYO NPO
1,6001,524+ISBN978-4-944091-49-2
COREDO
ECOM
G
JA
espressamente illy
9
NN
2
MT
70
24
UDX
55HIROBA
Q-COURT
o
JR
-fl ower & cafebar
03
23
21
4F
SC
SC
SC
TEL.03-3496-7046
87_-.indd 1 2012/10/12 14:01:20
145A5
29TOKYO NPO
1,6001,524+ISBN978-4-944091-49-2
COREDO
ECOM
G
JA
espressamente illy
9
NN
2
MT
70
24
UDX
55HIROBA
Q-COURT
o
JR
-fl ower & cafebar
03
23
21
4F
SC
SC
SC
TEL.03-3496-7046
87_-.indd 1 2012/10/12 14:01:20
Create a space like Central Park in OsakaSuggestion for the development of the 2nd UMEKITA district
JR24ha 7ha 4
4ha 2
2008 9 2
2
2
2011 112
42012 1
9
42013 10
140
2
(
To greening Umekita
Yukiko ShinozakiManaging Director of the Kansai Association of Corporate Executives, President of City Life Institute
2
1979
006
1
2 3 2008 9 2 17ha2010 12 5 2 10.5ha 3 2 21ha 2
24p
2
2
23 p10
007LD95 APRIL 2014
2 2 2
7ha 21ha 1 2-1.1-5.
No.78p112 117
2 2
2011 11
NY ( ) 1. 2012 3 2
11 1 2
1-1. 1-2. GREEN PARKOsaka Central Park-
008
2
2011 4 11 82HA9 1 2 2
23 32 2. 3. 4. 3.1ha2 11.5ha .
20 3.2ha2
1-3. Media Forest 1-4. LY History, Mind, and Green River
009LD95 APRIL 2014
3 2 4
32 1
40 13 3 5.1
2 20114 2 1 2
2 6.1 22 10 1ha 2 1 7. 2
2 22 2
12345
21
3 2 3 13245
1-5. ria
010
4 100
2 1
4
A B22014 6.
NY 1
2.2 2 P9 No.8
3.2 2 P12 No.11
4. 2 2 P13 No.12
2. 2 2 P10 No.9
5. 4 P5 No.5
7. 2 4 P4 No.4
3. 4 P7 No.7
1.
6. 4 P11 No.11
011LD95 APRIL 2014
5.
2001 5
12
10
1 2
9
14
24ha
=
500
Mario Roberto ALVAREZ
NPO
2 NY
2002
3
2003 10
3
2004 3
12
10 ha
2
212
Metropolitan Compost
012
200821
2 2 1 1 3. 23 17 100
24ha
2008 10
2
3
2
2
2
2
210
20
221
2
2
2009 7
N.Y. (
ha )
2
2
2009
2020
28
FIFA
2
(JUDI )
35
2 3 5
5
12 ( )
2
201423
Green innovation: Osaka Central ParkFrom "Umekita" the state-of-the-art city in the world
Mikiko IshikawaProf. Chuo University, Faculty of Science and Engineering Department of Intergraded Science and EngineeringProf. Emeritus, University of Tokyo
1
19180 1853 1870
2008200820082008EU20032001
1851 1853 32
20
2 19 42 5 26
Recommendations of Landscape Architects
014
6 36 6 3 2 1212 1 3 46 7 12
16 132ha162ha132ha126ha 37
31960 1 20
1928 1927
1943 1941
1927-1943
1
2001
015LD95 APRIL 2014
Vision of environment for global societybe proposed to the greening city rather than greening in the city
Isoya ShinjiProf. emeritus, Dr. Tokyo Univ. of Agriculture
25 9 12
1 150 60 90 60
60 320ha 60 15060
100 150 80
016
7,000 3 1m50cm
30
1964
2020
21
4
2013 3 3
017LD95 APRIL 2014
3
3 1010
21
3
018
Interurban competitionInternational strategy of greening and water management in Singapore
Junichi InadaFormer Director of Planning & Development National Parks Board SINGAPORE,Beijing Tsinghua University visiting Professor, President WIN Landscape Planning & Design
25 10 2
2 3738 592013 8 14 14 14 38.1 61.361.3
56.53 57.3 38 34.5 2 52.6Sp1 42.7 0Sp3 32.2 38 6
2
150 , 2012Gardens By e Bay54ha 2 17ha 336ha 1858
61.3 56.6 42.7
35.7%1986
1976 198952ha2010
019LD95 APRIL 2014
10 2 156 Garden City City in a Garden Gardens By e Bay 150 200 24 Greensward100 1 9
716 697 592 270 880 500
1965 50 30 One Nation One People One Singa-pore
400 20 35 20 1983 Dr.Tan
Na-tional Parks Board 1859 Dr.Tan WOCWorld Orchid ConferenceDirector Planning and Development NATIONAL PARKS BOARD 3 Dr. Tan 1965 201550
200735.7%46.7% Marina Bay Sans Hotel Gardens By The BaySans Hotel
Pasir Ris Park
020
1986 35.7 1983 4 Bukit Timah Nature Reserve1987
, Green and Blue 1986 35.7 20 2007 46.7 50 1 23
4 5 6 6
Public Utility Boarde Active, Beautiful, Clean Waters Programme
a City of Gardens and Water
2 150
021LD95 APRIL 2014
New vision of public space creationand greening city planning in the metropolis
Yoji SasakiProfessor at Kyoto university of Art and Design
25 11 12
19 1 2
391ha 51ha
ASLA
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
022
UR
19 4
51859 341ha19
9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16
6 7
8
9 18 19 2021
1016 171919
023LD95 APRIL 2014
11
NPO NPO
KEEP IT WILD 12 132000
17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24
14 100ha 15 300 100 ha 6m 220 151 1617
18 19 66 20
2122
024
25 26 27
28 29 30
23
24
25
1970 812 2013 263 19m 27
2010 28 2 3 20ha 2919 21 30
025LD95 APRIL 2014
Theory of civilization about the beautiesFlower and greening raise the charm of the city
Nobuo ShirasunaProfessor Faculty of Economics, KOBE INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY, Landscape Architect
25 12 11
21EconomyEcology 0ikos
195310
2
1
2
1 3
4 6
2
5
026
10 3 110 4
5EXPO90 1990
21 2300 83 6
7 8 12,000 1,000
85 50/4 910
1
11
7 8 9
10 11 12
027LD95 APRIL 2014
60 3 4 IT 1213
2
141516
HIS2011
18
13
16
14 15
1817
028
Greening and city management
Masayuki WakuiTokyo City University Professor, Department of Environment, President of Gifu Prefectural Forest Academy
26 1 9
70 6 30
280PPM2005 379PPM113,30010
2013 COP19 19 IPCC 6 100 0.68 6 0.8 2 6,400km
30km 1km 46138 4 7 8 12 28 12 31 11 59 2
1945 2005
13 1992
1
029LD95 APRIL 2014
2 38 1970 19921 1 CO2 2RIO+201992 13 3
1,200
3
5 5 37% 2 3 2.8
030
10 40 0.25 6 2 10 5 SATOYAMASATOYAMA SATOYAMASATOYAMA
19802050
RIO+20
031LD95 APRIL 2014
1
19
12 5 4EXPO90 2050
( )
2050
032
Portlands Pearl DistrictUrban Renaissance through Public Private Partnerships
Mitsuhiro YamazakiBuisiness & Industry Manager, Portland Development Commissintranslation by Maiko Shibuta
10 mixed-use245
1980 20
20 1988e Central City Plan1990
Hoyt Street Properties Portland Devel-opment Commission 34 1992 e Central City Plan Hoyt Street Properties Port-land Development Commissione River District Vision Plan 1994 e River District Development Planmixed-use neighbor-hoodthe River District Urban Renewal Plan 90
1975952012 3
1994
033LD95 APRIL 2014
Tax Increment Financingincrement Tax Increment Financing - - - - -2030 2 2500 1997 PDC 300 1 87 6000 100 1 109 1 131 25
Portland Development Commission 1 20 2001 7
Jamison Square 1 e first River District park 2002 10 3 Hoyt Street Properties 2002 mixed-used 10
Hoyt Street Properties
6000 25 5 Brewery Blocks Ziba Design Keen Footwear and Vestas8000
034
The City of Portlands unique model for placemaking has made it one of the most de-
sirable cities in the United States. The city
uses public-private partnerships to leverage
each sectors respective expertise and share development responsibilities, ensuring that
projects provide public benefits and remain
financially solvent. The Citys proficiency in deploying such policy and planning tools as
land use and public financing, coupled with
the private sectors know-how in building development and construction, have created
a more sustainable and livable city.
In downtown Portland, nothing is more em-
blematic of that model than the Pearl District,
development on a district scale that has suc-
ceeded beyond expectation.
Lauded as one of the 10 best new neighbor-
hoods in the United States, the 245 acre
mixed-use neighborhood is strategically lo-
cated immediately north of the central busi-
ness district of Portland.
In 1980 the area was a dilapidated rail yard
ringed with rundown brick warehouses built
during the railroads heyday at the turn of the 20th century. Pedestrians were non-existent
and drivers locked their car doors at traffic
stops to discourage the approach of vagrants
near the train station.
How did Portland transform this decaying
rail yard to what has been called an oasis of new urbanism in 20 years? What created this urban renaissance?
True to the Portland model, the evolution
required tightly knit teamwork between the
city, private industry, and the community. The
Central City Plan of 1988 emphasized Port-
lands Central City as the economic and cul-tural center of the region, called out the need
for new market-rate housing downtown and
specifically identified the rail yards as a prime
area for change. Supported by that plan, a
visionary private developer Hoyt Street
Properties and the Portland Development
Commission, the citys urban redevelopment agency, purchased the 34-acre rail yard in
1990. With the land under control and the
Central City Plan as context, Hoyt Street
Properties and the City jointly prepared the
River District Vision Plan in 1992 and the Riv-
er District Development Plan in 1994. These
plans established the vision for the future
mixed-use neighborhood and created the
framework for the future development
agreement. Key themes of the plan were to:
recreate the street grid; link to the central
business district through transit; encourage
new housing; create a network of three new
parks as essential residential amenities; and
require active retail and other uses on the
ground level.
The integration of transportation, housing,
retail and parks is essential to the Portland
model of placemaking and creating good
neighborhoods, as is implementation based
on public-private partnership with each sec-
tor contributing its respective tools and per-
spectives. Working with a stakeholder group
of public and private representatives, the City
created the River District Urban Renewal Plan
which combined the previous two plans com-
pleted in the early 90s and provided tax in-crement financing for the districts improve-ments. The City used the financing tool to
construct the basic bones of the area transit
and infrastructure - and required the private
developer to incorporate public benefits such
as density, open space and affordable hous-
ing in the redevelopment plans.
Tax increment financing is a tool widely uti-
lized in the U.S to stimulate redevelopment.
In essence the financing program consists of
the following steps:
-Create the plan for the district
-Freeze existing property taxes to continue to
flow to the city, county and schools
-Sell bonds to be repaid by the increment of
new taxes in the district
-Invest the bond proceeds in projects to lev-
erage private investment and maximize new
tax generation
-Pay off the bonds after 20-30 years
-After the bonds are paid off all of the tax
revenue, both the original base and the sub-
sequent increment go to the traditional tax-
funded entities.
In this case the River District Urban Renewal
Plan created a capacity to borrow up to $225
million.
A key aspect of the public-private partner-
ship was a complex, 300-page Master Devel-
opment Agreement entered into by the de-
veloper, the City and PDC in 1997. It outlined
a series of reciprocal obligations of the devel-
oper and City that called for private sector
concessions with each public contribution.
For instance, the city demolished an old via-
duct and rebuilt streets while the developer
agreed to dedicate the right of way for all
streets and build to a minimum density of 87
units per acre. The city constructed the $60
million streetcar while the developer contrib-
uted $1 million and built to a minimum of
109 units per acre. The city built the districts
three new parks and the developer donated
the land and increased density to 131 units
per acre. Finally, the city subsidized afforda-
ble housing and the developer agreed to
build 25% of the units as affordable.
To date, the Portland Development Commis-
sion has invested more than $100 million in
urban renewal resources in the district, lever-
aging more than $2 billion in private invest-
ment. The streetcar began passenger service
in July 2001. Jamison Square, the first River
District park, was dedicated in 2002, and ten
years later, the City had completed all three
parks. Hoyt Street Properties completed the
first mixed use condominium building in
2002, and has subsequently built 10 more
mid- and high rise residential projects in the
Pearl.
Hoyt Street Properties successful develop-ment inspired other developers to renovate
the historic old buildings on the blocks sur-
rounding the rail yards, a mix of old brick
warehouses and former manufacturing
plants. These renovated turn of the century
warehouse buildings have become desirable
offices for the burgeoning high-tech sector,
further stimulating more than 6000 residen-
tial units in the larger Pearl neighborhood,
25% of which are for low-income residents.
The rest command some of the highest val-
ues in the region.
The success of Pearl District renovation relied
on the elements that have characterized ef-
fective placemaking in Portland new, green
construction combined with adaptive reuse
within the context of public-private partner-
ship which are illustrated notably by the
Brewery Blocks, a five-block parcel within the
district.
Today the Pearl neighborhood is home to
8000 new jobs at firms such as Ziba Design,
Keen Footwear and Vestas, and is known as
one of the citys most dynamic boutique retail districts, with two full service supermarkets,
several drug stores and a plethora of neigh-
borhood-serving amenities. It is truly a jewel
in Portlands urban planning crown, the pre-mier demonstration of the citys expertise in building a green city.
www.pearldistrict.org
035LD95 APRIL 2014
The creation of nature in the city."Ecology-Horticulture-Design"
PLAN
Text & Photos by Nigel Dunnet [Professor of Planting Design &Vegetation Technology, University of Sheffield, UK] . Edit cooperatin by Ayako Nagase [Assistant Professor, Division of Design Science, Graduate School of Engineering , Chiba University].
Translation by Mitsuyo Saito [PLAN Architects]
20
20 21
036
1 2
037LD95 APRIL 2014
Ecology: Horticulture: Design
TEXT by Professor Nigel Dunnett
For the past 20 years Professors Nigel Dun-nett and James Hitchmough of the Department of Landscape, University of Sheffield, have been developing innovative and sustainable approach-es to the design and management of urban parks and gardens, with a focus on planting design and vegetation. The objectives of this programme have been to develop vegetation types that have very high aesthetic value and public appeal, but which require low inputs of resources such as water and carbon for their management. One of our main priorities is to support a large amount of native biodiversity, and to promote the deliv-ery of many other ecosystem services by urban landscapes. This program has become known as The Sheffield School of Planting Design. One of the main elements of our work has been the development of the Urban Meadows concept as a very important method for achieving our objectives: meadows and the meadow aesthetic form a constant theme. As a result of this work and its application, we have been involved in many high-profile European landscape projects, including the London Olympic Park, where our methods and principles formed the basis of the vegetation design for the whole park, generating an overwhelmingly positive public response.We have developed these approaches for many reasons. Partly it has been in response to the public funding context in the UK and many other Western countries, in which the funding for high quality horticulture has been reduced, and we need to find ways of achieving very high standards in a very cost-effective way. Partly it is because of the great need to reduce the amount of irrigation, chemical fertilisers and pesticides, and intensive maintenance for public landscapes. But increasingly, it is also because of the urgent urban environmental agenda. A key element of our work is to move landscape architecture and landscape planting design away from a predominantly decorative, functional and amenity role, to one in which it becomes an essential element in the delivery of healthy cities and liveable places.The nature in cities and ecological landscape design movement in the 20th and 21st Centuries has been dominated by ideas related to a restora-tion ecology philosophy that have at their basis the assumption that native species and ecosystems are fully and best adapted to a local and regional climate, geology and soils, and are therefore the best candidates for an ecological approach. But the highly modified nature of the urban climate, and the disrupted nature of urban soils, means that comparison with the environmental condi-tions in undisturbed natural areas of the local region is not meaningful. Native plant commu-
nities may not be the best match. And even if they are able to establish, they may not function to their optimum.But perhaps the greatest consideration is that much ecological design thinking has concentrated most on the ecology, and relatively little on the design. There has been a low focus on aesthet-ics, or a real consideration of what the public will be at ease with in terms of an ecological landscape. This has perhaps been of relatively little importance to date, when many of the ap-plications of an ecological approach have been in easy to achieve or obvious locations. But if we want to embed ecological approaches into the mainstream, as the default position, and for this approach to be applicable in as many contexts and locations as possible, then we also need to change what is seen as the basic elements and compo-nents of ecological design.In our work we have emphasised the visual drama of colourful and dynamic herbaceous vegetation, and we use the meadow as the basis of our work. We learn from beautiful and visu-ally attractive natural herbaceous vegetation and grasslands from around the world, and adapt the principles gained from these observations into our designed landscapes. Our approach is to create designed plant communities that will be self-sustaining as much as possible, with low maintenance inputs. We undertake very careful plant selection so that the competition between the different species can be kept in balance. It is very important that we understand the long-term behaviour of the species we are working with, so that we are not introducing potentially invasive species into new environments. Typically, we will identify the species that we want to work with in a particular plant community, and investigate their landscape potential as individuals and their culture and propagation. But the core of our research is to monitor how the species interact with each other in an ecological sense. All of this is based upon very intensive research at a range of scales, from small-scale research plots through to large-scale real landscapes with a whole range of project partners.A unique aspect of our work is that we create large and small-scale landscapes not just through traditional planting, but also by seeding, or a mix-ture of seeding and planting. Seeding allows very large areas to be created at low cost, it gives a very spontaneous and natural effect, and it also pro-duces a very ecological outcome, in that different species will be successful across a site according to their precise ecological needs. We have developed reliable techniques that allow high control over the numbers of each species that will appear in the created vegetation; and in reliable methods for weed control and vegetation establishment. There are several fundamental principles that lie underneath our design approach.
1.Ecological fitness. Our designed plant commu-
nities must be suited to the exact environmental
conditions within a site, rather than needing to
significantly modify the site to meet the require-
ment of the vegetation.
2.We work with the idea of plant succession,
so that there is a very long period of visual inter-
est from the same area of land. This is achieved
through different layers of vegetation rising
through lower layers to continue the visual inter-
est.
3.We develop a clear vegetation structure, of a
matrix of lower growing plants, through which
taller vertical emergent species provide visual
drama. This is done on a large scale, and part of
the excitement of this type of the planting is the
visual impression created by repetition of these
simple elements over large scales.
4.Although our plantings might be diverse in
terms of the total numbers of species that they
contain, at any one time the main visual display
might be generated by just one or two species
flowering across a whole area.
This last point, which relates to the visual flowering display can be the most important consideration. In our experience, people respond most to the flowering and colourful displays that we produce, and this appears to be a universal response, regardless of background or culture.We work in a very wide range of contexts, from small-scale domestic gardens and courtyards, urban parks and housing areas, through to urban highways and large-scale green infrastructure. A very important application of our techniques is in urban design locations: green roofs and roof gardens, rain gardens and water-sensitive design applications, and commercial and business loca-tions. Depending on the context, we vary our approach. In contexts that are highly people-focused in the public or private realm, the balance between ecological purity and the use of native species, and aesthetic quality in terms of what excites and satisfies people, needs to be tuned in favour of people. We tend to use native species in situations where rural character is dominant, or in landscape that have strong physical or perceptual relationships with natural landscapes. We work across the whole range of plant types: using annuals, perennials, bulbs, shrubs and trees. Our approach is to create naturalistic vegeta-tion structures of forest, woodland, meadow and wetland, but to not be constrained by the use of native species within these vegetation types. The meadows are the most visible element of our work within this wider vegetation framework. Annual meadows create very colourful areas that create an incredible positive public response, and we use them extensively in public places or temporary sites. Perennial meadows have long-term pres-ence, and mixed with bulbs and geophytes can have a long display season.
038
Olympic Gold Meadows
50
50 hectares of native wildflower meadows.The largest areas of urban meadows made in one place.
2012250ha 150 2008 2014 4
2012 7
600
4
3
039LD95 APRIL 2014
The London Olympic Park
TEXT by Professor Nigel DunnettThe London 2012 Olympic Park represents the most coherent and large-scale application of our techniques and approaches. As well as being a showcase for the best in world sport, the London 2012mOlympic Park was also designed as a showcase for the innovation in in British landscape design and horticulture. At 250 hect-ares, The London Olympic Park is the largest new urban park to be developed in Europe for 150 years and contains extensive garden areas, wildflower meadows, woodlands and wetlands, as well as the sporting venues and recreation facilities. We (Nigel Dunnett and James Hitch-mough) were appointed as lead horticultural and planting design consultants for the project in 2008, and we retain an ongoing role in vegeta-tion development from 2014 onwards.We have introduced a whole new style of planting in the park that is highly designed but has a very naturalistic appearance. The wider park areas are unique for a major new park in that they are composed entirely of wildf lower meadows, woodlands (including the largest area of wet woodland ever to have been created in the UK) and wetlands. Even the lawned areas are species-rich lawns with creeping and low-grow-ing wildflowers. Throughout we have thought hard about the visual appearance. In terms of meadows and the meadow aes-thetic, we used four basic approaches, which represent a nature-culture gradient from pure restoration ecology through to stylized and ab-stracted design.
1.Native Wildflower Meadows. Native species only, in typical plant community mixes representative of those communities that would be native to the site. Created by seeding.
2.Enhanced Native Wildflower Meadows. Use of native species only, created by seeding. The wildf lower meadows were made as plant communities that had maximum floral display particularly for visitors during the Games week in late July 2012. We saw this as an opportunity to create a real sense of festival, and to excite the millions of visitors into the idea of how beauti-ful the native wildflower meadows were, and to then go on to argue for more native wildflowers in public parks across Britain and beyond. The meadows were created as flower-rich meadows without grasses to maximize the flowering dis-play.3.Non-native urban meadows and Pictorial Meadows These are new, designed plant communities with the meadow aesthetic and function, but not composed of native species. The largest applica-tion of this approach concerned the annual wild-flower meadows wrapping around the stadium, interspersed with close-planted clumps of birch trees to provide highly colourful and very experi-ences during the Games period. The meadows contain a mix of European species and North American Prairie Annuals. The colour impres-sion from these meadows was so great that many people had very strong emotional responses to the beauty of these landscapes.4.Stylised and Abstrated Naturalistic Perennial Plantings. These are planted areas, not seeded, and are highly designed. But they have the meadow aesthetic in a very abstract sense. The 2012 gardens in the London Olympic Park are a spec-tacular celebration of contemporary horticulture and planting design, comprising of half a mile of naturalistic perennial plantings. While the main focus in the Olympic Park as a whole is on native biodiversity, the 2012 gardens explore
the horticultural diversity of British gardens and take visitors on a tour of the biodiversity hotspots of the world that have been the major source of plants for UK gardeners over the past 600 years. There are four zones or separate areas within the gardens: Western Europe, North America, The South Africa, and Temperate Asia. These gardens, which have been co-designed by Nigel Dunnett, James Hitchmough and Sarah Price, consist of three main elements: formal clipped hedges which provide permanent struc-ture within the gardens; strips which are long-running single species plantings of tall upright grasses or perennials which give a strong vertical aspect to the gardens; and the field plantings which are the main element in the gardens and consist of mixed naturalistic perennials. These field plantings have been carefully designed for visual drama and each one is a representation of a particularly beautiful plant community found in that region. In the South Hemisphere garden, for example, it is a high altitude Drakensberg Grassland, in the North America garden it is a mesic-dry prairie. For the Asian garden it is the edges and glades of temperate forests, while for the European garden, it is lowland species-rich hay meadows and wildf lower grasslands. The meadow-like effect is achieved in all the gardens by the technique of random planting. The composition of the perennial mixes in each area is carefully worked out according to heights and colours and flowering times, but the plants are placed randomly within the planting areas, at regular spacing or density (as opposed to be being planting in groups or drifts of one type of plant next to another), with no planting plan. This technique gives a truly spontaneous effect. The interaction between the two field plantings and the more formal strips and hedge elements is both thought provoking and extremely beauti-ful.
040
North Park
South Park
[North Park Concept]Ecological park Dramatic landforms emphasise the valley settingRiver banks re-profiled to open up views to the River LeaConcourse trees provide shelter and shade
[South Park Concept]Natural AppearanceBut mix of native and non-native speciesVery dramaticAnnual species1.1 kilometre continuous length
1.1km
North Park
The perennial wildflower meadows were created using native UK species, but with an emphasis on creating flower-rich meadows with very high visual impact.
View from the Northern end of the North Park, with the Olympic Stadium 3 kilometres away in the South Park. The complete naturalistic landscape was created from a cleared bare site in a period of five years. 3 5
041LD95 APRIL 2014
South Park
The 2012 gardens were a designed representation of biodiversity hotspots around the world. Created through planting, they were based on a complex 'meadow aes-thetic'.2012
The annual Olympic Meadows covered a continuous length of 1 kilometre and are composed of both native and non-native species to create a spectacular aesthetic impression, and also an important resource for pollinating insects.1
Visitors to the park entered the site through the colourful meadow areas. The public response has been hugely positive and enthusiastic.
Planting work
The main areas of the Olym-pic Park were created through seeding. Here, Nigel Dunnett is training the contractors in wildflower meadow sowing techniques.
Landscape contractors sowing seed by hand on steep slopes. The seed is mixed with saw-dust to ensure even coverage.
The seed is raked to incorpo-rate into the soil surface.
Nigel DunnettProfessor of Planting Design and Vegetation Technology. Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Shef-field, UK.
[http://www.nigeldunnett.info]
042
Possibility of grassland in urban greening
2
043LD95 APRIL 2014
20 1 2 3 100 =
50 1 1
234
1
1 2007 4
2
3 2012 4
4 2012 8
044
2012 2013 5cm 10cm
045LD95 APRIL 2014
: A4 / : 266P: 3,500
:
L A N D S C A P E W O R K S048
056
062 E-DESIGN
photo by OHTORI CONSULTANTS
047LD95 APRIL 2014
1.
2.
75 75
75
3.
1
2
3
I.
II.
III.
4.
75
5.
1.5m
6
SS
New School building in the woodsReitaku University "ASUNARO"Hikarigaoka, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba
Landscape by KEIKAN SEKKEI TOKYO Co., Ltd.Photos by Tooru Miyakoda, Naomichi SodeSS Tokyo Co.,Ltd.*
048
049LD95 APRIL 2014
6F
2F
050
2F
60
051LD95 APRIL 2014
2F
6.
7.
8.
P52
study
1
9.
2
052
2F
1F
053LD95 APRIL 2014
Environmental Sensitivity and Sustainability In considering how a structure becomes truly
integrated within a forest, one will realize that the
proximity of a building to large mature trees cre-
ates a unique opportunity for people to see and
experience the grandeur of the trees. We rarely
are able to get up close from various vantage
points and elevations to have such an intimate
association with a verdant green environment.
The experience is almost as if becoming a bird.
By carefully orienting indoor and outdoor spaces,
students become part of the forest ecosystem,
ranging from ground level outdoor spaces to
exterior terraces and classrooms carefully placed
directly into the tree canopy. Because the building
is not occupied during the extreme summer and
winter seasons the landscape and structure are
designed to maximize opportunities for passive
heating, cooling, and lighting. These techniques
provide a quality educational environment, im-
proving student health and learning, as well as
conserving resources during construction, and
continuing to reduce the resources required to
maintain and operate the building. Each floor
contains a Community Circle, or interior common,
which functions as a space for social interaction.
Each Community Circle features floor to ceiling
windows oriented around the south facing Relief
Courtyard, providing natural lighting and a strong
visual as well as sensual connection between in-
terior and exterior spaces. Deciduous trees in the
Relief Courtyard block direct summer sunlight,
creating a more comfortable summer microcli-
mate while allowing warm winter sun to permeate
the interior. Wood from trees that were removed
from the site was used to construct tables, bench-
es, and window frames to reduce waste and pre-
serve the history of the site for future generations.
Design Value The siting and design of the Asunaro building
with its embrace of the adjacent forest provides
a place for students to not only learn from their
teachers but also from nature. This environment
clearly reflects the educational philosophy of
Chikuro Hiroike. The project is one that he would
be proud of for achieving the ecological steward-
ship he established many years ago and continues
today. The Asunaro Building in the Woods serves
as the centerpiece of Reitaku Universitys philoso-phy of coexistence between man and nature. It
achieves this by successfully preserving and pro-
tecting the woods and creating new woods with
material transplanted from the site. The result is
a forest ecosystem in harmony with a dynamic
new educational facility linking the old and new
campuses and students with nature. In assessing
the project an administrator commented that the
design team successfully created a facility in the forest rather than a forest around the facility. Another noted the humble approach to site plan-
ning, observing that the forest shapes the facilities
and circulation rather than the other way around.
The same university official stated that he is look-ing forward to watching the campus grow into the
forest.
2-1-1
0.8ha2008 32010 122009 42010 12
1Fetc.90etc.
054
RLA
KUMAMOTO SHINTOSHINKumamoto-shi, Kumamoto
Landscape Design by OHTORI CONSULTANTSArchitecture by RIA + ICHIURA HOUSING & PLANNINGText by Kenichiro Noguchi [OHTORI CONSULTANTS, RLA]Photos by OHTORI CONSULTANTS
056
24
LED
057LD95 APRIL 2014
ASO
ASO
LED
058
059LD95 APRIL 2014
060
ABILITY11
2007 12 20092008 12 2012 7,304.72 5,033.68G343G350G614G633
ASO LIXIL
50m25100
S=1:2000
061LD95 APRIL 2014
062
E-DESIGN E-DESIGN
Brillia Residence ROKKO ISLANDKobe-city,Hyogo-pref.
Landscape design by E-DESIGNPhotograph by E-DESIGN
063LD95 APRIL 2014
3
1988
15 455
064
5,500
2012
3
studio-L
E-DESIGN
065LD95 APRIL 2014
3
1/100
5500
066
067LD95 APRIL 2014
D
A
0
20 40 60 80
5 6 2 E-DESIGN studio-L /2012 22012 820,00010,000
WORKS MOVEMENT
9,953 1,953 400 2013131 50-1
14.92ha 4.48ha 30 5002,000 5,00020143667
SEGES
068
WORKS MOVEMENT
WORKS MOVEMENT1LANDSCAPE WORKS
962014315
1 5 230 250 350dpi doc txt
150-0042 2-1 1405TEL.03-3496-7046E-mail:[email protected]
100 FCV 201442 2 3
2 2642 LIXIL ITS 15,5003-11105http://toyota-ecofultown.com/
Ecoful Town
Ecoful Town2
069LD95 APRIL 2014
184-0014 4-11-20TEL 042-384-2251FAX [email protected]://www.koganeien.co.jp
designed by Keikan Sekkei Tokyo Co.,Ltd.
koganeien_syusei.indd 1 2014/02/07 19:06:42
830-0063 823TEL0942-27-3231FAX0942-27-3234
821-0012 1161-17TEL0948-52-1175FAX0948-52-1183
114-0022 1-22-10 101TEL03-5963-5075FAX03-5963-5076
90
http://www.ay-renga.co.jp/
070
071LD95 APRIL 2014
Water Basin at Hotel New Otanidesigned by Keikan Sekkei Tokyo Co.,Ltd.
131-0033 3-39-1403-5637-9211FAX03-5637-9213
[email protected] -20 120139
311-4402 718-2
TEL 0296-70-6061FAX 0296-88-2063
[email protected]://www.sanyo-zouen-doboku.com
121
12
2
2
11
12
21
2
3
140205sanyo_zoen.indd 1 2014/02/05 21:02:36
3526-4 194-0202TEL.042-797-7131 FAX.042-797-0139 5808-3 391-0012TEL.0266-79-6161 FAX.0266-79-6161 GSB CO.,Ltd. 74 6th st. Alberttown Georgetown, GUYANA
17
150-0042 2-1 1405Tel03-3496-7046Fax03-3496-7387Maildesign@marumo-p.co.jpURLhttp://www.marumo-p.co.jp
/
CSR
/
072
105-0004 6-9-2 Tel 03-3431-8070 540-0026 2-1-19 Tel 06-7222-3222 818-0056 4-27-49Tel 092-285-1270 981-3133 3-27-3 Tel 022-218-4415 http://www.waterdesign.co.jp
50
LD34A4150 2,993
LANDSCAPE DESIGN
LANDSCAPE GARDEN SKETCH WORKS
200A4120 2,835
A4144 2,835
p069-AD.indd 69 2014/02/10 21:39:51
4
3000
2500
2
2 2
2
4 4
1 1
[column] Ease, Thoughts, and Inspiration Recommendation Design by ALL- Image & Idea drawing by Elliptic motion for everybody
Yoshihiro Amimoto (Idea Engineering Laboratory Leader, Honorary Professor at Kyushu Sangyo University)
1944
074
UFJ 5294495
2-1 1405 TEL 03-3496-7046FAX03-3496-7387Web http://www.marumo-p.co.jp/
TEL.
FAX. E-mail
ISBN978-4-944091-48-5C3052 1762E
1,850 380 B5 136 8
chapter 1
chapter 2
21 for for
chapter 3
2740
1983
Landscape Lighting
076
Landscape Lighting
Designing of visual performance and methods for the visual performance
The Lighiting design world of Yukio ONODA
Only a few lighting designers are specializing in lighting design for landscapes.
But there are a few who have considerable experience in lighting design for landscape lighting.
Yukio Onoda is one of them.
With a landscape lighting project for a resort in Shimukappu village in Hokkaido as a start in 1983,
he has been involved in many landscape lighting projects since.
Light that is natural like the moon light, light that is spilling out from buildings, light that is reflected
on the ground and light that appears out of nowhere, landscape lighting counts every matter in
the surroundings as an essential factor for the landscape design.
This special issue explores the world of landscape lighting through the works of and an interview
with Yukio Onoda who have rich experience in collaborating with many landscape architects.
Special Issue-
077LD95 APRIL 2014
078
Landscape Lighting
079LD95 APRIL 2014
2003
080
Landscape Lighting
1981 TL 1999 IALD( ) IESNA F
081LD95 APRIL 2014
3.11
1983 TL 8m 1983
082
3 TOKYO SHOMEICONSULTANT
Landscape Lighting
083LD95 APRIL 2014
LED PR
NTT-DATA
084
LED 2020 TOKYO
2014
&
&VIALA
Landscape Lighting
Iris-Associates Inc. Iris 1999
085LD95 APRIL 2014
2013 10
SNOW&BLUERedUmberCandle400
Nightscape
LED
Nightscape illuminated by lighting design
Nightscape in downtown releases us from the din of the daytime. Twinkling illuminations ornament the long night of winter.
Roadside trees without leaves become the greatest feature by the illuminations. The downtown is filled with the colorful light and the atmo-
sphere is visionary. The world illumination used to be associated with the image of social events or theme parks.But it is nowadays a common feature that brings a gorgeous atmosphere to downtowns by night and enriches our lives in winter.
The more people come to the downtown, the more vitalized it gets and the more it generates economic activities.
Lighting design will continue evolving by the spread of LED.
Let us enjoy the nightscapes ornamented by lighting design.
Special Issue-
Landscape Lighting
086
Landscape Lighting
2013 142013 11 22 2014 2 14
14 6 LED140 2013 1226 2014 3 16
087LD95 APRIL 2014
TAKINOYU Forest ILLUMINATION
088
Landscape Lighting
1
2
3
1. 32. 5.5m LED 3.
3
089LD95 APRIL 2014
MK PROFESSIONAL LINE MK Illumination 100 PROFESSIONAL LINE
QuickFix
MK Illuminaition
LED LED
1996 23 100 MK Illumination
Construction
M K
Quality
M KM K
300
http://mk-illumination.jp/
Premium LED
Lighting
092
Landscape Lighting Products of the Topic
DC24V 50W 2210 170,000
LED 1,670
LED2
TEL. 03-5159-1290 FAX. 03-5159-1291www.colorkinetics.co.jp
ColorBlast 1212
130H575 350mm LED22W13000K 58,590
X-series BOLLARD
80mm
850
575
2
TEL. 03-6741-2300 FAX.03-6741-2371www.yamagiwa.co.jp
X-series BOLLARD
57246111mm AC100V 6WLED15WLED
HK
LED
ZXL16i15WLED
TEL. 03-5379-6009 FAX.03-5379-60043/17 TEL. 03-6261-3740 FAX.03-6261-3741
www.hklighting.jp
HK ZXL16i
W70D135H169mm LED7.7W 39,0005m40,00010m
De-SPOT 100
TM
TM
TEL. 073-484-3618 FAX.073-484-3619http://takasho-digitec.jp
De-SPOT 100
Landscape Lighting Products of the Topic
LED
150H900 2W LED 16 14 4 216,000
150H900 + 2W LED 12 14 4 123,000
Consolapo
2
200H400 or 2W LED9 8 4 127,000
200H400 2W LED9 8 4 263,000
101-00442-3-29TEL03-5209-8231FAX03-5209-8232http://www.fukei-s.com
CPLPDPAP4
093LD95 APRIL 2014
-
[Series] The town planning of Tokyu Green System Town planning Linking People, Environment, Enterprises:Town planning of Tokyu Group with Tokyu Green System
= =
Coverage and Composition by Editorial DeskCorporate by Tokyu Green System Co.,LTD.
3
1955
1971
3
1
094
2005
2010
30
17F
2
3 &
095LD95 APRIL 2014
1960 4 18
2010 50
250
2002
5 2
2013
096
489-1 TEL:045-910-0117http://www.tokyu-greensystem.com/
100
097LD95 APRIL 2014
Waterscapes
5 SW12th Avenue
10
2WSUD:
, 3
5
(Visible Water)
Invisible Water
1
58
930
155
(Urban
Growth Boundary)
(Livable City)
Bureau of Environmental Services, City of Portland Kevin Robert Perry (City of Portland)
098
New 'Green Street' integrates sustainable stormwater management. Photo by Kevin Robert Perry, City of Potland)
'Juncus patens ' performs essential role for quick infiltration and reduc-ing runoff speed as well as capturing sediment.Photo by Kevin Robert Perry, City of Potland)
099LD95 APRIL 2014
SW12th Avenue SW12th Avenue
SW12th Avenue
138,850
30cm
1 5cm
18cm
2
34
1.5m5.5m35cm
17cm
60cm
20cm 3
Juncus patens
Juncus patens
Nyssa sylvatica
SW12th Avenue SW12th Avenue 2006
SW12thAvenue
680KL4
15cm
70%
1
47
2008
5 5
2013
174,000 5 920
2002 5 EPA2
25
Typical cross section for stormwater planters.
Image courtesy of Sustainable Stormwater Management Program
100
Project site plan showing the stormwater planter at SW 12th Avenue. Stormwater is collected from road and sidewalk, and treated as water flows in and out of planters.
Image courtesy of Sustainable Stormwater Management Program
Existing conditions of SW 12th Av-enue (above) and after renovation to 'Green Street' through addition of stormwater planters.Photo by Kevin Robert Perry, City of Potland)
Map indicating location of 'Green Streets' (green) and future implementation location (red).
Green Street Map provided by Bureau of Environmental Services, City of Portland
101LD95 APRIL 2014
SW12th Avenue 1.5m5.5m35cm438,850 40002005 5 62006
10
100
1) http://www.asla.org/awards/2006/06winners/341.html2) Hoyer, Jacqueline.,Wolfgang,Dickhaut.,Kronawitter,Lukas.,Weber, Bjoern,Water Sensitive Urban Design, Jovis, 20113) http://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/345984) http://urbanraindesign.com/
Sectional diagramme showing relationship between road level and stormwater planter.
Image courtesy of Sustainable Stormwater Management Program
Runoff from road enters stormwater planter during an intense autumn
storm event. Photo by Kevin Robert Perry, City of Potland)
102
[Series] Waterscapes
[5] From Grey to Green: City of Portlands innovative Green Infrastructure SW12th Avenue Green Street Project and Sustainable Stormwater Management Text by Takanori Fukuoka(Research Associate Professor, Kobe University)Photography Copyright: City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services, Kevin Robert Perry (City of Portland former employee)Coordinator: Jeremy Anterola
Introduction As the fifth issue in a series of articles entitled
Waterscapes, innovative Green Street projects and Sustainable stormwater mangement in Port-
land, USA is featured. In this article, both city scale
green street projects vision and specific project, SW12th Avenue Green Street introduced. As a
Landscape Architect, we often discuss where we can find water on site. Although it is very at-tractive to use water in design, there is no promise
whether you can have water on site or not. There
are two types of water, one is always visible such
as water feature, pool fountain and the other is
invisible one. To think of invisible water requires
broader vision for healthy water cycle in urban
condition, and knowledge to integrate storm-
water management system into real project. In
simple description, Green Street is GreenWay inte-
grated with sustainable stormwater management.
At city scale, this Green Street can act significant
role as part of Green (or Blue) Infrastructure. In
this article, I would like to introduce how invisible
water performs essential role in a small Green
Street.
City of Portland and Green Street Projects City of Portland has been started implementing
Green Infrastructure and sustainable stormwater
management for over 10 years. Citys big vision is From Grey to Green, and they promoted city scale green Open Space planning and sustainable
stormwater management integrated as Green
Infrastructure vision, and implemented many
pilot projects as part of this framework. Green
Street has been very successful and recognized as
excellent example piece to make part of Green In-
frastructure. Main purposes of Green Street are to
reduce amount of stormwater runoff, slow runoff,
and improve quality of water. By promoting Green
Street projects, City can save money to build new
sewer lines. Listed below are recognized as posi-
tive effect of Green Street. 1) Restore healthy wa-
ter cycle in urban condition through sustainable
stormwater management 2)Reduce amount and
speed of runoff into the River, and prevent flood-
ing 3) Transform into Livable city, Environmental
Value to raise real estate price 4) Microclimatic
Benefits, Improve Air Quality 5) Promote healthy
lifestyles by renovating pedestrian and vehicular
spaces 6) Enhance biodiversity by renovating both
private and public green spaces
Green Street then can be classified into following
4 categories. 1) Extended planter: Residential area
or less traffic area is suitable to extend curb, and
convert road into Green Street. This also helps to
slower driving speed, and to increase safety of
road. 2)Stormwater Planter: Can be implemented
at limited space in between sidewalk and curb.
This helps to function as reducing runoff, im-
proving water quality, and slower runoff. 3) Rain
Garden: Utilize spaces on pedestrian walkways or
intersection to collect stormwater and infiltrate
into ground. 4) Simple Green Street: Renovate ex-
isting street planter by cutting curb and bringing
stormwater into planter
SW12th Avenue Green Street Perfect case model is SW12th Avenue Green
Street, which renovated part of existing pedes-
trian walkways into stormwater planter. Four
stormwater planters (planer size is approximately
1.5m wideX5.5m longX35cm deep)implemented
at space in between sidewalk and road curb and
receive stormwater both from road, and sidewalk.
As shown in plan diagram, first planter take run-
off from road, infiltrate water into the ground
in speed of 5cm per 1hour and can store upto
18cm deep water. Once exceeding capacity, water
moves into second planter. Stormwater repeats
same process for third and fourth, and overflow
will run into existing sewer line. Soil in planter is
layered with 2 different types. Bottom layer is laid
out with similar material with existing soil, and
top 20cm is combined with sand, top soil, and
compost. For Planting, Juncus patens is planted
densely to reduce runoff speed, and helps infiltra-
tion. Selected tree is Nyssa sylvatica which is toler-
ant to water, and give beautiful color in Autumn.
Total construction cost of SW12th Avenue Green
Planter is $38,850.
SW12th Avenue project received ASLA honor
award in 2006. One of jurors comment is "This is very relevant and will be influential in the pro-
fession. The best executed example of this type
of work we've ever seen." Stormwater planter at
SW12th Avenue can treat 670KL of stormwater in
1year, which is almost equal to annual stormwater
runoff in this area. It was also proved that 4 plant-
ers can infiltrate water 5cm per hour into ground
in average, and can reduce runoff speed up to
70%. Measurable such fact helps to promote
Green Street projects. For maintenance, removal
of sediment requires 7times per year, and cutting
grasses require once or twice per year.
Urban Scale Strategies- Green Street into Green Infrastructure City of Portland started Green Street as part of
flooding problem which mostly happened in CSO
(combined sewer overflows) area. To solve this,
City of Portland started holistic green infrastruc-
ture and sustainable stormwater management
program such as Green Street program, Eco
Roof program, Downspout Disconnection pro-
gram, and Wet Weaher program. In 2008, City
of Portland started Grey to Green Initiative, and
5million US dollar spent for Green Open Space
and sustainable stormwater management within
city. By 2013, 174,000 Eco Roof, 50,000Street Trees, and 920 Green Streets implemented. As
a pre-phase experiment from 2002 to 2007,
City received 2million US dollar funding from
EPA(Environmental Protect Agency), and built 25
pilot projects to see how Green Street works and
to promote and make public experience this idea.
City of Portland is also successful in educating
public. They successfully created visually powerful
communication tools such as website, guidelines,
case study cut sheets, and diverse education pro-
gram to promote citys vision for Green Infrastructure. In summary, City of Portland started Green Street
program as part of problem solving strategies in
order to reduce flooding in CSO area. In 10 years,
diverse program which integrates green open
space and stormwater management provided
positive results; however, this is not enough and
city is projecting further implementation of Green
Streets as shown in City Green Street Map. Big-
gest problem for the city is maintenance. Green
Street is living infrastructure. Therefore city tries
to stay minimum level maintenance in order to
maintain Green Infrastructure, because this is not
a garden or park. However, level of maintenance
still varies in different districts, and clear frame-
work for maintenance needed. One key might
be inviting and engaging more public into Green
Street building and management process. By
getting everyones power for small green street, City may find further success in creating city with
functional Green Infrastructure filled with healthy
everyday lives in it.
Hargreaves Associates, Gustafson Guthrie Nichol LtdAtelier Dreiseitl GmbH PM2012 6
Takanori Fukuoka, RLA, is a Research Associate Professor at Kobe University Graduate School of Engineering, Department of Architecture, Sustainable Living Environmental Design Program. He is a landscape architect trained in the United States and Germany. He has worked at Hargreaves Associates in San Francisco, California, Gustafson Guthrie Nichol Ltd in Seattle, Washington, and Atelier Dreiseil in Ueberlingen, Germany. He holds a Masters of Landscape Architecture from the University of Pennsylvania, School of Design.
References:1)http://www.asla.org/awards/2006/06winners/341.html2)http://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/3)http://urbanraindesign.com/4)Hoyer, Jacqueline.,Wolfgang,Dickhaut.,Kronawitter,Lukas.,Weber, Bjoern,Water Sensitive Urban Design, Jovis, 2011
103LD95 APRIL 2014
No.1
180km 3 3
No.1 10
No.1 MLTW)Sea Ranch Condominium No.1Charles Moore (MLTW)( / Sonoma County, California)1965
No.1
No.1
104
10
24 7.2m)
( )
4
2
L
105LD95 APRIL 2014
5,000
14
1
35 10
No.1
20
46
2
106
51T O T O T O T O T O T O 51ADP
No.1
2,000
20
107LD95 APRIL 2014
108
109LD95 APRIL 2014
110
111LD95 APRIL 2014
2014 3429 20142239
2014
2013
7
1
2014 1-5 2014 3/4 293/43/17 3/153/9 50 2014TEL:03-5532-1347FAX:03-5532-1307
LIXIL 2013
LIXIL2013 7,129
LIXIL
+
2
LIXIL EXTERIOR C
ON
TEST 2013
22R
112
LIXIL EXTERIOR C
ON
TEST 2013
http://www.lixil-extcontest.com/
FX
2013202013 102013 12 LIXIL1.2.3.4.E&G E&G E&G
AR-A
JR
113LD95 APRIL 2014
114
7,600 A4 192
Inner Landscape
2-1 1405 TEL:03-3496-7046FAX:03-3496-7387Web:http://www.marumo-p.co.jp
ISBN978-4-944091-47-8C0052 7238E
UFJ 5294495 00170-4-70822
Ichi IkedaEARTH ART TOKYO GREEN 2012
5 GREENSCAPES SHINOBAZU
29 TOKYO
1,29 + 1 380
1911983 G-day RIVER PLN1987
1988 ERTH DROWING1989 ERTH-LINE1991 No.1199 199
199 rcing rk 1997 Okinawa Water Channel2001
2002-2003 10 1987 50 12 19957 2008
TEL
TEL.03-3496-7046 UFJ No.52995
ICHI IKED 100 WTERS 198-2012
004
FAX.03-3496-7387
LD95_Ichi-Ikeda.indd 4 2014/02/10 19:01:33
117LD95 APRIL 2014
2013
LANDSCAPE DESIGN No.75
2013
FM
URL http://www.jsce.or.jp/committee/lsd/prize/
2013/2013result.html
4 7
2014
3
24
2014347
10:0017:0016:30
2013
242,3531,2793,640
2,000Web
JAPAN SHOP 2014
2014LED Next Stage 2014 7
03-5777-8600
URLhttps://messe.nikkei.co.jp/
31 10
16410
102014
1031
2
321615 8001800
45615 9301700
2014
TEL053-458-7601FAX053-458-7634
URLhttp://hamanakohanahaku2014.jp/
2014EXE2014
EXE2014 9
&
201441112
10:0017:0016:00
12
20,000
70400
LIXILYKK AP
TEL:03-6826-4128FAX:03-5295-0802
URLhttp://www.ex-exhibition.jp/
3
30
7
26m
3110:003116:00
7
10:0023:00
10:0022:00
2-15-5
TELFAX042-748-3196
URLHP
http://www.ikedawater.org/
20143
2014
2014
AC5133
TEL:072-677-6722FAX:072-677-6644
URLhttp://www.minatoseiki.co.jp/
n f o rm a t i o nI
120
4
120
2014 4
DOGO ONSENART2014
9
HOTEL HORIZONTAL
1
20144101231
/
120
TEL:089-921-6464FAX:089-934-3415
Mail [email protected]
URL http://www.dogoonsenart.com/
2014
3 4
15m20m
21:00 2
201432046
21:0020:30
6-16-3
30065150
TEL:03-3941-2222
URLhttp://www.tokyo-park.or.jp/
event/2013/12/post-165.html
EXPO
4
2
HEMS
5
201422628
10:0018:0017:00
110
EXPO
JBN JBN
210
7 7
TEL03-5501-7816FAX03-5501-7819
URLhttp://www.ecohouseexpo.jp/ja/
E&G 2014 100%
E&G
17
4
1
2.5
3138322
45419
38319322
49412419
423426
TEL:03-5825-8782 9:0018:00
TEL:06-6390-5174 9:0018:00
URLhttp://www.eandg.co.jp/
MIMOCA
1
4
2014315 11:0017:30
4
2
80-1
170
TEL0877-24-7755FAX0877-24-7766
URLhttp://www.mimoca.org/ja/
2013 8
W1800D450t42GLH400mm
164RW-1
239,000 /
03-5444-7811
06-7173-2790
51 IFLA
51IFLAInternational
Federation of Landscape Architects
2014 6
URBAN
LANDSCAPES IN EMERGENCY
2014657
Thinking and Action on Landscape
URBAN LANDSCAPES IN
EMERGENCY Creating a landscape of places
5/5TOP25 5/19
6/26/56
1 US 3,500US 2,500
US 1,300US 1,000
URL http://www.ifla-japan.net/
121LD95 APRIL 2014
r o d u c t sP
Tel.03-5209-8231Fax.03-5209-8232http://www.fukei-s.com/
+
SPPT
Tel.03-3507-7480Fax.03-3507-7481http://www.abc-t.co.jp/
23mm 21
AR-SYSTEM
Tel.0256-33-0101Fax.0256-33-0096http://www.asano-metal.co.jp/
PAT.P
Tel.0776-22-3300Fax.0776-22-3200http://www.yagikuma.co.jp/
PP
122
o o k s
25.618.21.6cm191 2,940
17
2
1988
18.6133cm 272 2,520
18.613.22.4cm269 1,890
123LD95 APRIL 2014
No.1-4 No.6-8 No.23-25 No.41 No.48 No.61
No.5 No.9-22 No.26-40
No.432005 8
No.422005 6
No.412005 4
No.442005 10
No.452005 12
No.462006 2
No.472006 4
No.492006 8
No.502006 10
No.512006 12
No.522007 2
No.532007 4
No.542007 6
No.552007 8
No.482006 6 DNA
No.562007 10
No.572007 12
No.582008 2
No.592008 4
No.602008 6
OLIN
No.612008 8
No.622008 10
No.632008 12
No.642009 2
124
No.652009 4 1,995 : Works 2
No.662009 6 1,995 Works 5 More
No.672009 8 1,995 2 LED Works Granpark More
No.682009 10 1,995 Works
No.692009 12 1,995
ap bank fes'09 Works + More
No.702010 2 1,995
Works More 2009 ASLA AnnualMeeting & EXPO
No.712010 4 1,995 13
No.722010 6 1,995 biotope Works
No.732010 8 1,995 Works MLS
No.742010 10 1,995 INTERVIEW CASE STUDY Works
MFO Works
No.752010 12 1,995
No.762011 2 1,995 CASE STUDYThe High LineTOPICS Works 100 tips by EARTHSCAPEASLA2010
No.772011 4 1,995 1 INTERVIEW: SPECIAL INTERVIEW: TOPICS: Works KRP9 2 :
No.782011 6 1,995 39 City in a Garden Works vol.1
No.792011 8 1,995 1
QMCH 2 JR Works LD
No.802011 10 1,995 1 Works 2
No.812011 12 1,995 Works
No.822012 2 2011 1,995 R&D Park PAO
125LD95 APRIL 2014
No.912013 8 1,995
Works i 2013
UFJ 5294495 150-0042 2-1 1405 TEL.03-3496-7046FAX.03-3496-7387
LANDSCAPE DESIGN 61
3
617
11,00011,9951,570
2014331 1
No.832012 4
1,995 Works More IFLA REPORT
No.852012 8 1,995 Works More
No.842012 6 1,995 Works More REPORT
No.862012 10 1,995 Works More REPORT
No.872012 12 1,995 9/11 Works Honda More REPORT
No.882013 2 2012 1,995 JIA25
No.892013 4 29TOKYO REPORT 1,995 2 REPORT Works MORE
No.902013 6 1,995 LAS&RISM Works Waterscapes
No.922013 10 1,995 Works GORA art & landscapeMORI TRUST GARDEN TORA 4 2 More
No.932013 12 1,995 Green Neighborhood Works SMAECO TOWN
No.942014 2 2013 1,995 THE WEST MINSTER ROPPONGI
126
My GARDEN 1
1,200 880
03-3496-7046
4 1
1 ( ) 1 4 1
1 4 1 5
22013 12 16 2014 5 31
1 4,400
3
No.612011 12 1,200
No.622012 3 1,200
No.632012 6 1,200
1
11
No.642012 9 1,200
No.652012 12 1,200
3
No.662013 3 1,200
No.672013 6 1,200
No.682013 9 1,200
No.692013 12 1,200
127LD95 APRIL 2014
N E X T I S S U E 96
0166-26-1120 011-231-2131 011-223-1911 0172-34-3131 018-884-1370 019-601-6161 022-716-4511 024-927-0440 048-640-3111 047-470-8311 03-5956-6111 03-5949-2910 03-3233-3312 03-5288-8881 03-3291-1338 03-5339-7611 03-3354-0131 03-5361-3301 03-3342-1673 03-5456-2111 03-3770-2525 03-3281-1811 03-3427-5711 03-3483-2166 03-3472-4353 0422-28-5333 042-526-3131 045-903-2191 045-453-0811 045-450-5901 044-520-1869 025-374-4411 076-492-1192
MARUZEN& MARUZEN& PAPER WALL ecute BOOKS
AD MARUZEN& MARUZEN& GEN
052-566-8877 052-589-6321 052-249-5592 075-252-0101 075-253-6460 075-803-4819 075-381-5094 075-231-3036 075-711-9297 06-6252-5250 06-4799-1090 06-4796-7188 06-6372-5821 06-6292-7383 06-6443-0167 06-4396-4771 06-6635-5330 078-252-0777 078-392-1001 0798-68-6300 0797-31-7440 086-236-1877 082-504-6210 082-568-3000 082-254-5252 089-915-0075 092-738-3322 092-524-2535 092-413-5401 092-434-3100 097-536-8181 099-216-8838 098-860-7175
MARUZEN &
2P2P68P68P69P69P69P69P70P70P70 4
LIXIL
962014 423
MARUZEN &
7-20 1 7 TEL 06-6292-7383 10:00-22:00
128
2014
1,995
3/31
5%
2,052
4/18%
952014
4150-0042
2-1
1405
19135-04
001002003004005006007008009010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132