(CM)
() , ,
() () 2
: A Request for the Compensation(by a construction
contractor)
( ) (Claims) (Disputes)
Unresolved Claims become Disputes( ) , , , (51 )(Claim) 3
Definition of ClaimsA Claim is a demand or assertion by one of
the parties seeking as a matter of right, adjustment
or interpretation of contract terms, Payment ofmoney, Extension
of time or Other relief with respect to the terms of the
Contract.(AIA-A201, Clause 4.3.1, 1987)AIA-A201 , 1987 4
() 51( )
: 30
(Claim)
(Dispute) 51( ) 5
() ()
(, , , , ) = ( ) , , ,
(, )6
() (agreement) () 2
() () . ( )
, , ( 535)7
(), () (), () . : , , , : ,
() ( 536)
( 537) ().8
() , ,
( 5 4) . .9
ICE
GSA(Standard Form 23A) AIA(AIA A101& A201) AGC
FIDIC Red(87), Yellow(87), and Orange Books(95) White
Book(99)10
1985~1995 ( )FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Electrical and
Mechanical Works(The Yellow Book) Conditions of Contract for
Design-Build and Turnkey (The Orange Book)
(2) (1
)
(3) (, 2001) 12
FIDIC (5.2)(1) The Contract Agreement() (2) The Letter of
Acceptance() (3) The Tender() (4) Part II of these Conditions() (5)
Part I of these Conditions() (6) Any other document() The
Specification() The Drawings() The priced Bill of Quantities()FIDIC
4th Edition, 1987 13
(II)(2002.2)(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (II) 3
14
() () ,
() 15
( ) ( ) , ( )
( / ) 16
(I) 2 2 48 6 ( 3,200) (36.4%), (63.6%) (0.5%) (17%) ; (30%) ; (
)(0.2%) (1.5%) (21%) ; , (10%) ; (12.5%) (2.5%), (2.8%)
(1.5%)17
(I-1) () 52.86% 98.47% 45.87% 0.00% 45.99% SH 8.22% SS 69.60%
98.07% 70.00% 73.88% 70.00% 0.00% 71.91% (%)
18
(II) 6 5 --> 100~650 ( ) ( )
2~3 20~30% 100~15019
(III) 6 A(97.6) 92 ( )
5 B(96.12) 3 320 ()
5 C(96.12) 3 38 ()
7 D(99.5) 30 13.7 ( )
6 E 2 6 ( )20
(IV) P F 4 7 6 3 6 ( )
S 3 6 3 3 3 ( )
I 1 G 1 3 ()
I H ( )21
(V) 2 2 #11, 12 (241 ) #13, 14 (178 )
100mm
23
(V-1) () #11,12 H 2
#13,14 S 2
+ 20% (%)
97.10-01.6 2,020 241 76 32%
98.1-02.7 2,083 178 114 64%
24
, , 15.4%
15-20% 1.5
25-35% (1999.3) 25
() (Delay Claims) (Scope of Work Claims) (Acceleration Claims)
(Changing-SiteCondition Claims) Type I Condition Indicated and/or
Implied in the Contract
Type II Condition Show that Unusual Condition, Differ
MateriallyAdrian, 1988 26
( ) (Contractual Claims)
(Claims for Breach of Contract)
(Mercy Claims)
27
() [ ] (22) (19) (23) (21) (25) , , ,
( 26)28
(I) ( 64) 60 100 5 100
( 74) = ( / ) ( ) ( 74 5) ( 4)29
(II) ( 100) (16) (10) < 622 16%> (9) (6) (6) (6) (5)
(5)< 622>30
(1998) (1997)
(III) , ( 45107-2319)
( 5% ) ( 45107-345) - ( ) - ( 98.3.31) - (, )
31
(I) ( 65, 20)
< 622 10%>
: : .
20 32
(II) ( 125-881) ( 2210-180)
( 45107-2128) , ( 45107-522) ( 45107-2063)33
(I) (23) ,
,
( ) 23 34
(II) (25)
(26) 25&26 35
( 21) [ , ] , ( ) (), 1998.2.20 36
( 125-1808) ()
, , ( 45107-1125) Change Orders v. Cardinal Changes(25% )
, 37
(Liability) - (Causation) - (Quantum) -
( ) ( ) ( )O'Hearn, 1986 38
(I) 28 (FIDIC 44) ( 26)
FIDIC 44, Extension of Time 39
(II)
(Summary) / (Explanation) (Issue Analysis) (Schedule Analysis)
(Damages Analysis) ( )R.S. Means, 1990 40
5
1. (Documentation) (Contemporary Records)
2. 3. (DOCUMENTATION) 4. 5. --(D-O-C-U-M-E-N-T-A-T-I-O-N)
41
(I) , , /,
(Excusable) (Compensable) : (Non-compensable) :
(Non-excusable) (Concurrent) Pepescu and Charoenngam, 1995
42
(II) (Claims) (Delay) < > (Excusable) < >
(Compensable) < > (Nonexcusable) < > (Concurrent)
< > (Noncompensable)
Excusable(meaning time may be extended) Compensable(meaning
money may also be recovered)Hill International, Inc. 1995 43
(Disruption) ,
(Interference)
(Inefficiencies) ()
19 5( ) , , 44
CPM Time truly is money
CPM (Legal Basis) (Reconstruction of Projects History) Float is
a shared Time Impact Evaluation(TIE)commodityAsselin, 1980 &
O'Brien, 1993 45
(Extension Entitlement)
(As-Planned)
(Net Delay)
(Acceleration)
(As-Built)
(As-Planned Impacted)
R.S. Means, 1990
46
(I) (Actual Cost Method) = ( + )
(Total Cost Method) = - ( )
(Modified Total CostMethod) = - 47
(II) (Quantum Meruit) = (Proving the reasonable value of its
goods and services to the defendant)
(Equitable Adjustment) = -
(99.7) (99.8)
48
( ) (, ) + () 5 - 20%
(Percent Overhead) ,
(Extended Overhead)() ()49
() (Percent Overhead) v. (Extended Overhead)
(4)
(3) (2)
(1) () ()
50
() :
, , : : : : ( + ) : ( + + ) ( 2200.04-148-1, 98.2.20)51
(I)
()
(Hudson) (w/100) x (CS)/ (CP)x pd w = (fixed) pd = (Compensable
delay)
(Emden) h x (CS)/ (CP)x pd h = /Murdoch and Hughes 1992 52
(II)(Eichleay) i x { (OP)/ (CP)}x pd i = Contract Billings/Total
Billings during Contract Period
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
i x OP = Overhead Allocable to Contract Allocable
Overhead/Actual Days of Contract Performance = Daily Overhead Rate
Allocable to Contract Daily Contract Overhead x Compensable Delay
Days = Unabsorbed OverheadR.S. Means, 1990 53
(III)
(Lost Profit) , , 54
? , , , (, , ) , , , , 3 ,
, , ( ) ( 10) , 100 PQ 55
(I) 3
20001-328, 2002.1.1
37 3, 39 5, 54 10 56
(II)
,
57
51 36
( ) (-)
, ()58
51( )98 : 19 99 : 31 00 : 45 01 : 57
: 30
98 : 39 99 : 30 00 : 15 01 : 12
(Claim)
(Dispute) 51( ) 59
()
(1958 , 1973 , 120 )
.
60
All disputes, controversies, or differences which may arise
between the parties, out of or in relation to or in connection with
this contract, or for the breach thereof, shall be finally settled
by arbitration in Seoul, Korea in accordance with the Commercial
Arbitration Rules of the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board and
under the Laws of Korea. The award rendered by the arbitrator(s)
shall be final and binding upon both parties concerned.61
Dispute Resolution Continuum
(Negotiation)
(Neutral)
(Mediation)
(Mini -trial)
DRB
3
Hill Internatinal, Inc.,1997
62
() (69, ) , ,
,
()
, ( )63
() (28~31, )
50 15 ()
() 15 64
() () 90 - 98.12 131 108 ( 15 ) 18 5 , 5
98 39 10 (5 )
(, http:\\www.kcab.or.kr) ( 26%) 1998 1999 2000 2001 : (19) :
(31) : (45) : (57)
65
( )
( ) ,
(DRB) ( )
( )
66
.
67
