Upload
captbaba
View
11
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Congestion
Citation preview
Martin Williams Director, Bisham Consulting
Scope & definitionContainer movements onlyShort sea shipping in N EuropeSmall ports market place – Bulk
Cars Forestry Coal etc RoRo Intra-European containers Feeder operations
The Big QuestionsCan we persuade shippers to move from road
to sea?
Can we win business away from the main ports?
Times, they are a’changingBunker pricesWorld trade RecessionMega carriersPort congestion
You can’t buck the market, can you?
Supply & Demand1400 container vessels on order 6.9m teu 58% of the current fleetOf these 194 vessels > 10,000teuRecent trade forecasts halved
What will happen to the excess tonnage?
UK leading portsGrimsby & Immingham 66.3 Mt
London 52.7 Mt
Tees and Hartlepool 49.8 Mt
Southampton 43.8 Mt
Forth 36.7 Mt
Felixstowe, the leading container port,
handled 2.1 million containers (3.3 million
TEU), a 10 per cent increase on 2006.
Phase 1 of the London Gateway = 1.7m
Major N European ports Rotterdam – 10.8m teuHamburg – 9.9mAntwerp – 8.2mBremerhaven – 4.9m Felixstowe - 3.3m
compared to the world.......
Major world-wide portsSingapore – 27.9m teuShanghai – 26.2mHong Kong – 24.0mShenzen – 21.1mBusan – 13.3m
Felixstowe is not in the Top Twenty! 7 are in China
Move from road to seaFuel costsRoad tollsWTDCongestion EnvironmentalDriver shortagesGovernmental support
So short sea operators are well positioned, aren’t they?
Well.......Short sea operators are at the bottom of the
food chainNew sulphur limits agreed at the
International Maritime Organization Government support?Not necessarily cheaperPort hinterland/access – road/railCustomer reluctance
Winning business from the main portsDeepsea operators are reducing main line
ports – hub conceptDeepsea operators do their own feederingExisting networks are well established with
significant investment (terminals and road/rail connections)
Trend increasing for deepsea operators to own their own terminals
Most deepsea operators have no interest in setting up in ‘new’ ports
Some examples• Maersk – 7 Asia/N. Europe services
calling Rotterdam (6), Bremerhaven (4) F’stowe (3), Hamburg (3), Le Havre (2) Zeebrugge (2)
• Evergreen – 3 Asia/N. Europe services calling at Rotterdam (3), Hamburg (2),Le Havre(2)
Bremerhaven, Thamesport , F’stowe,
S’ton & Zeebrugge (1)
• Mediterranean Shipping – 2 Asia/N. Europe services calling at F’stowe/Rotterdam/Antwerp or Le Havre/Hamburg/Bremerhaven
Significant Investment Terminal Capacity pa
Cost
ECT Euromax 2.3m teu $550m
London Gateway 3.5m teu $2700m
Northern Gateway 1.5m teu $539m
ConclusionsShort sea trade volumes will increase – but
largely as a result of trade growthEU moves to develop Motorways of the Sea
will be limitedShort sea operators may loose out to the
deepsea operatorsGlobal recession may have a major impact on
the viability of some carriersUK particularly requires significant
investment in road/rail port access
ConclusionsDemand for port based logistics/distribution
centres will growSmall ports can only challenge the main ports
if the importers lead the charge, but who will cover the investment and will the deepsea carriers follow?
In the short term port congestion will disappear and this will help the status quo
Channel TunnelChannel Tunnel freight services have failed
to meet initial expectations. Rail freight on through services has declined by 45 per cent since 2000.
In 2006 1.6 million tonnes of rail freight were carried on the Channel Tunnel
The amount of road freight carried through the tunnel has risen by 16 per cent from 14.7 to 17 million tonnes over the last five years