Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MS414 Materials Characterization (소재분석)
Lecture Note 2: UPS
Byungha ShinDept. of MSE, KAIST
1
2017 Fall Semester
CourseInformationSyllabus1. Overview of various characterization techniques (1 lecture)2. Chemical analysis techniques (8 lectures)
2.1. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)2.2. Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy (UPS)2.3. Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)2.4. X-ray Fluorescence (XRF)
3. Ion beam based techniques (4 lectures)3.1. Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS)3.2. Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS)
4. Diffraction and imaging techniques (7 lectures)4.1. Basic diffraction theory4.2. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) & X-ray Reflectometry (XRR)4.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) &
Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS)4.4. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
5. Scanning probe techniques (1 lecture)5.1. Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM)5.2. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
6. Summary: Examples of real materials characterization (1 lecture)
* Characterization techniques in blue are available at KARA (KAIST analysis center located in W8-1)
Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy (UPS)
• UV radiation (10 – 45 eV) àemission of photoelectrons from valence orbitals (bands); energy too small for core level photoelectrons
• Also called Molecular Photoelectron Spectroscopy
XPS: core-level as well as valance level
hn: 1486.6 eV (Al Ka) or 1253.6 eV (Mg Ka)hn: 10 – 50 eV
UPS: valance level
XRF AES
UPS vs. XPS• UV is more efficient in emitting photoelectrons from valence bands.
Emission of photoelectrons from valence bands also occurs in XPS. However, kinetic energy of such photoelectrons too large àcross-section of valence band photoelectrons small compared to UV light.
• Much better energy resolution with UPS (~10 meV) than with XPS (~0.5 eV). Why?- Broader excitation source of XPS: FWHM of AlKa ~0.9 eV (~0.25 eV after the crystal monochromator)- Core-hole lifetime broadening: EB is only determined within the natural lifetime width of the core hole (Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle: ∆𝐸 # ∆𝑡 ≥ ℏ) and it is very short for the empty core hole state.
• UPS often more surface-sensitive than XPS
UV Light Source• Most commonly used UV light source: resonance lines of rare gases
produced by discharge or microwave lamp
UV Light Source
(strongest emission)(strongest emission)
Relative intensity under normal He I operating conditions
(100)(2)(0.5) (<1)
emissionfromneutralHe
emissionfromsinglyionizedHe
• Most commonly used UV light source: He I at 21.22 eV and He II at 40.81 eV• Higher discharge voltages and currents and lower He gas pressures produce
a higher intensity of He II radiation
Herbert Kroemer (Recipient of Nobel Prize in Physics in 2000 for developing semiconductor heterostructures)
Photoemission Process (metallic sample)
core levels
valence band
0 eV
(hn – FS) eV(hn – Fa) eV
(FS – Fa) eV (FS – Fa + Eacc) eV
(hn – Fa + Eacc) eV
• Calibrated KE from a metallic sample: Low KE cutoff at FS and high KE cutoff at ~hn
• Normally plotted in BE = hn – KE, Low BE cutoff at ~0 (from EF) and high BE cutoff at hn – FS
• Even uncalibrated KE (or BE): high KE – low KE = hn – FS
Determination of Work Function
Park et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, p. 2699 (1996)
• Work function of ITO determined by UPS: 21.22 eV (He I) – FITO = 21.77 – 5.03 àFITO = 4.48 eV
• Spectrometer not well calibrated
(3.000 V: to distinguish inelastic cutoff from that due to the spectrometer)
Photoemission Process (semiconductor sample)• High KE – Low KE =
hn – FS – (EF – VBM)• Unlike a metallic sample,
work function of a semiconductor sample cannot be determined from UPS spectrum alone àanalyzer needs to be calibrated with a metal.
• Calibrated KE: high KE at hn – (EF – VBM)low KE cutoff at FS
• Calibrated BE (EF at 0 eV): high BE at hn – FSlow BE cutoff at EF – VBM
• Once calibrated, absolute values of work function and surface VBM determined.
0 eV
hn – Eion = hn – [ FS + (EF – VBM) ]hn – (EF – VBM)
Example: UPS from Au (standard) and p-SiAuraw data with He I (21.22eV) Vacc = 15V
photoelectrons from the spectrometer
KE – qVacc (15 eV)
Low KE cutoff at FS
high KE cutoff must be at ~hn
UPS data taken by Dr. Kyoung Soon Choi at KBSI
4.94 eV (0.42 eV smaller than FSof Au, 5.36 eV)
20.8 eV (~0.42 eV smaller than hn, 21.22 eV)
21.5 eV (~0.28 eV larger than hn ??)
low KE cutoff must be at FS
Au
KE’ = KE + 0.42 eV (calibration)BE = hn – KE’
High BE (secondary) cutoff,hn – FS = 21.22 eV – 5.36 eV = 15.86 eV
EF
Example: UPS from Au (standard) and p-Si
Example: UPS from Au (standard) and p-Sip-Si
KE’’ = KE – 15 eV (Eacc) + 0.42 eV (calibration)BE = hn – KE’’
EF
raw data
High BE cutoff hn – FS = 16.52 eV à FS,p-Si = 4.7 eV
Low BE cutoff EF – VBM = 0.23 eV
Vacuum level
CBM
VBMEF
4.7 eV
0.23 eV
Example: Cu(In,Ga)Se2/CdS
12 9 6 3 0 -30
2
4
6
8
10
Inte
nsity
x 1
03 (arb
. uni
ts)
Binding energy (eV)
Valence band offset=1.02eV
0.28eV1.3eV
CIGS_pCIGS/CdS_p
12 9 6 3 0 -30
2
4
6
8
10In
tens
ity x
103 (a
rb. u
nits
)
Binding energy (eV)
1.3eV1.57eV
Band bending=0.27eV
CIGS/CdSCIGS/CdS_pump
EF
CIGS
CdS
1.02eV
EF
CIGS
CdS
1.3eV1.57eV
Excitationbyfs-laser:CarriergenerationinCIGSflatteningtheband
(EF– EV)
0.28eV
Eg,CIGS1.12eV
Eg,CdS2.4eV
0.27eV
1.02eVunpumped pumped
UPSperformedbyDr.RichardHaightatIBMT.J.WatsonResearchCenter
Example: Organic/organic heterojunction
Mg sub.
Alq3 (100A)CuPc
3.2 eV (bulk Alq3, EF – VBM)
1.5 eV(“bulk” CuPc)
XPS BE shift
Alq3, hn – FS
CuPc,hn – FS
CuPc: a larger FS
Tang et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, p. 232103 (2006)
UPS
With increasing thickness of CuPc,• Alq3: neg. BE shift à upward band
bending (as approaching the interface)• CuPc: neg. BE shift à upward band
bending (as moving away from the interface) or downward band bending (as approaching the interface)
“bulk” CuPc
bulk Alq3
Example: Organic/organic heterojunction
Tang et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, p. 232103 (2006)
from other measurements
UPS low BE cutoff 1.0UPS high BE cutoff (FS)
XPS BE shift
determined automatically
Mg sub.
Alq3 (100A)CuPc