101
OM-375 GROUP LINGO QUIZ #1: CHAPTERS 7, 8, & 9 AND STOCK DATA.

OM-375 GROUP LINGO

  • Upload
    gabby

  • View
    43

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

OM-375 GROUP LINGO . QUIZ #1: CHAPTERS 7, 8, & 9 AND STOCK DATA. ASSIGNED PROBLEMS. CHAPTER 7: 24 27 30 38 41 50 53 CHAPTER 8: 21 24 27 30 CHAPTER 9: 2 5 8 11 14 17 20 23 . ASSIGNMENTS . GROUP MEMBERS: CHAPTER(S) & PROBLEM(S): - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: OM-375 GROUP LINGO

OM-375 GROUP LINGO QUIZ #1: CHAPTERS 7, 8, & 9

AND STOCK DATA.

Page 2: OM-375 GROUP LINGO

ASSIGNED PROBLEMS

• CHAPTER 7: 24 27 30 38 41 50 53

• CHAPTER 8: 21 24 27 30

• CHAPTER 9: 2 5 8 11 14 17 20 23

Page 3: OM-375 GROUP LINGO

ASSIGNMENTS

GROUP MEMBERS: CHAPTER(S) & PROBLEM(S):Fatema Choukeir                           7-24 & 9-11Lina Idelbti                                    7-27 & 8-24James Kim                                    7-38 & 9-5Anthony Cangialosi                          7-41Bruno Silva                                    8-27 & 9-8Akintundo Oyauwusi                      9-17Christopher Raines                        7-53Anisha Patel                                 9-2 & 9-17Nisorg Patel                                  8-30Paula Dunn                                           7-50 & 8-21             Adetola Poppoola 9-23                     Justin A Conyers 7-30 & 9-14

Page 4: OM-375 GROUP LINGO

Justin A. Conyers Chapter 7-30 A:

• !Justin A. Conyers;• !OM 375 Dr. Lawrence;• !Problem 7-30 Data entered into Lingo:• !MAXIMIZE TOTAL RETURN (ASSUMING INCREASE IN STOCK PRICE);• MAX = E*15 + C*18;• !CONSTRAINT ON MAXIMUM INVESTMENT;• 40*E + 25*C <= 50000;• !CONSTRAINT ON MINIMUM INVESTMENT IN EASTERN CABLE (E);• 40*E >= 15000;• !CONSTRAINT ON MINIMUM INVESTMENT IN COM SWITCH (C);• 25*C >= 10000;• !CONSTRAINT PREDICATED ON RISK IN INVESTING IN COM SWITCH (C);• 25*C <= 25000;• !NON-NEGATIVITY CONSTRAINT;• E >= 0;• C >= 0;• END

Page 5: OM-375 GROUP LINGO

Justin A. Conyers Chapter 7-30 A contd:

Page 6: OM-375 GROUP LINGO

Justin A. Conyers Chapter 7-30 c:

• The coordinates of each extreme point are as follows:

• (375, 1000)• (375, 400)• (1000, 400)• (625, 1000)• Excluding the extreme points where either

value would be set to zero considering that the constraints in this problem allots for a minimum of 10000 dollars in Comstock and 15000 in Eastern stock.

Page 7: OM-375 GROUP LINGO

Justin A. Conyers Chapter 7-30 d:

• The optimal solution in this problem is to invest in 625 shares of Eastern Cable stock as well as to invest in 1000 shares of ComSwitch stocks to meet the constraints and investment maximization of the client.

• The return on the total investment shall be $27375.00

Page 8: OM-375 GROUP LINGO

Justin A. Conyers Chapter 9-14 A:

• The linear programming model was formed in Lingo:• !OM 375 Dr. Lawrence;• !Problem 9-14;• !MINIMIZE TOTAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURING STORING AND

MAINTAINING INVENTORY;• ! A B C D REPRESENT NUMBER OF BOATS PRODUCED PER QUARTER E F G H

REPRESENT ENDING INVENTORY OF BOATS PER QUARTER;• MIN = A*10000 + B*11000 + C*12100 + D*13310 + E*250 + F*250 + G*300

+ H*300;• !DEMAND CONSTRAINT FOR 1ST QUARTER;• A - E = 1900;• !DEMAND CONSTRAINT FOR 2ND QUARTER;• E + B - F = 4000;• !DEMAND CONSTRAINT FOR 3RD QUARTER;• F + C - G = 3000;• !DEMAND CONSTRAINT FOR 4TH QUARTER;• G + D - H = 1500;

Page 9: OM-375 GROUP LINGO

Justin A. Conyers Chapter 9-14 A: cont’d

• !DEMAND CONSTRAINT FOR YEAR ENDING INVENTORY;• H >= 500;• !MAXIMUM PRODUCTION CAPACITY CONSTRAINT FOR QUARTER 1;• A <= 4000;• !MAXIMUM PRODUCTION CAPACITY CONSTRAINT FOR QUARTER 2;• B <= 3000;• !MAXIMUM PRODUCTION CAPACITY CONSTRAINT FOR QUARTER 3;• C <= 2000;• !MAXIMUM PRODUCTION CAPACITY CONSTRAINT FOR QUARTER 4;• D <= 4000;• !NON-NEGATIVITY CONSTRAINS;• A >= 0;• B >= 0;• C >= 0;• D >= 0;• END

Page 10: OM-375 GROUP LINGO

Justin A. Conyers Chapter 9-14 B:

QUARTER NUMBER OF BOATS PRODUCED

INVENTORY CLOSE OF QUARTER

ASSOCIATED COSTS

1 4000 2100 $40,525,000.00

2 3000 1100 $33,275,000.00

3 2000 100 $24,230,000.00

4 1900 5000 $25,439,000.00

TOTAL: $123,469,000.0

Page 11: OM-375 GROUP LINGO

Justin A. Conyers Chapter 9-14 C:

C: The dual price as learned in Chapter 8, refers to the improvement in the value of the optimal solution when we increase the right hand side of a constraint by one unit. As a manager this is important to quantify the potential risk and/or loss associated with an increase in production. My advice would be to only increase production in any quarter if the dual price is below the next quarter’s associated costs considering a 10% increase quarterly.

Page 12: OM-375 GROUP LINGO

Justin A. Conyers Chapter 9-14 D:

D: In the 4th quarter there is a zero dual cost meaning that there is room to produce more in the 4th quarter. Quarters 1 through 3 have positive dual prices, in consideration of this fact we can improve upon the objective function by increasing production. For each additional unit produced the cost associated with producing the boat(s) will decrease the total costs by the same amount.

Page 13: OM-375 GROUP LINGO

Justin A. Conyers Chapter 9-14

Lingo screen shot:

Page 14: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 15: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 16: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 17: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 18: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 19: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 20: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 21: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 22: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 23: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 24: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 25: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 26: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 27: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 28: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 29: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 30: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 31: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 32: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 33: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 34: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 35: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 36: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 37: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 38: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 39: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 40: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 41: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 42: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 43: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 44: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 45: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 46: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 47: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 48: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 49: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 50: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 51: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 52: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 53: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 54: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 55: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 56: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 57: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 58: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 59: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 60: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 61: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 62: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 63: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 64: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 65: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 66: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 67: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 68: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 69: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 70: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 71: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 72: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 73: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 74: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 75: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 76: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 77: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 78: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 79: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 80: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 81: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 82: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 83: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 84: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 85: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 86: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 87: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 88: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 89: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 90: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 91: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 92: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 93: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 94: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 95: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 96: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 97: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 98: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 99: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 100: OM-375 GROUP LINGO
Page 101: OM-375 GROUP LINGO