OpenStack User Committee - Havana Summit

Openstack User Commi1ee

Havana Summit Tim Bell, Ryan Lane, JC Mar?n

user-‐[email protected]

Initial committee scope

•  Define bylaws [1] •  Define users •  Present user needs •  Present aggregate stats •  Expand user group structures

Committee Structure

Users

Consumer

Operator

Ecosystem Partner

Distribution Provider or Application Vendor

Current status

•  Ini?al members selected (with NDA signed) • Mailing list created [2] •  Structure being defined [1] •  Collec?ng data with founda?on •  Conducted an ini?al user survey

Strategic priorities for 2013

•  Complete forma?on •  Expand membership •  Form comprehensive view of community •  Set up communica?on pathways •  Provide metrics

References 1.  h1ps://docs.google.com/document/d/

1yD8TfqUik2dt5xo_jMVHMl7tw9oIJnEndLK8YqEToyo/edit 2.  user-‐[email protected]

414 survey responses

16%

7%

8%

4%

11% 17%

37%

More than 10,000 employees 5,001 to 10,000 employees 1,001 to 5,000 employees 501 to 1,000 employees 101 to 500 employees 21-‐100 employees 1-‐20 employees

Company Size

Information Technology 60%

Academic / Research 15%

Telecommunication 10%

Industries

Government / Defense 3%

CC Icons http://vathanx.deviantart.com/

175 29 28 23 18

56 countries

Country

124 100

77

151

Service Provider

Ecosystem Vendor

Cloud Consumer

Cloud Operator

Type of Involvement

Common Further Enhancements •  Simplify installa?on and configura?on process •  Rolling migra?ons with N-‐1 compa?bility •  Documenta?on–archive old content, end-‐user guide,

problem guide, … •  Security such as SSL op?ons everywhere •  Horizon lacks latest feature support, admin func?onality

and more a1rac?ve theme •  High availability out-‐of-‐the-‐box for OpenStack components

and VM restart •  Ac?ve Directory integra?on

Foundation Priorities

•  Ensure compa?bility across different implementa?ons

•  Stability/Hardening of exis?ng func?onality •  Establish cer?fica?on program •  Encourage training for different skill sets •  Support user groups, especially outside U.S.

197 Deployments Type

35 Hosted Private 15

Hybrid 37

Public

106 On Premise Private

Trunk 8%

Grizzly 15%

Folsom 47%

Essex 25%

Diablo 5%

Version 84

92 94

Production Proof of Concept

Dev/QA

Stage

134

94

94

89

66

46

Dashboard

Object Storage

Snapshotting to new images

Live Migration

EC2 Compatibility API

S3 Compatibility API

Features

181

171

169

153

147

121

103

20

16

Nova

Glance

Keystone

Horizon

Quantum

Cinder

Swift

Ceilometer

Heat

Components

KVM 71%

ESX 8% Xen 8%

Xenserver 5%

Lxc 5% Hyperv 3%

Other 29%

Hypervisors

LVM 36%

NFS 19%

Ceph RBD 13% Netapp

10% GlusterFS

8% SAN/HP 5%

Windows 4% EMC 3%

Solidfire 2%

Other 32%

Open Vswitch 39%

Linux Bridge 31%

Cisco 11% Hyper-‐v

5%

Nicira 5%

Brocade 3% Ryu 2%

big switch 2% NEC 2%

Other 19%

Storage Drivers

Network Drivers

SQL 55%

LDAP 34% PAM

8%

KVS 3%

Other 11%

Identity Drivers

150

62

33

JSON XML Both

API Format

Detailed Features

Nova Scale of 98 Non POC Deployments

1-‐100 52%

101-‐500 18% 501-‐1,000

8%

1,001-‐5,000 8%

5,000-‐10,000 3%

> 10,000 6%

Unspecified 5%

Other 30%

Instances

1-‐50 71%

51-‐100 8%

101-‐500 9%

501-‐1,000 2% >1,000 4% unspecified

6%

Other 29%

nodes

1-‐100 51%

101-‐500 21% 501-‐1,000

4% 1,001-‐5,000

12%

5,001-‐10,000 3%

>10,000 4%

unspecified 5%

Other 16%

cores

0-‐10 49%

11-‐100 19%

100-‐500 5%

More than 500 5%

unspecified 22%

Other 10%

Cinder Scale of 59 Non POC Deployments

TeraBytes of block storage

SwiQ Scale of 47 Non POC Deployments

0-‐10 43%

11-‐100 15%

100-‐500 8%

> 500 11%

unspecified 23%

TeraBytes of object storage

1-‐10,000 40%

10,001 To 100,000

13%

100,001 to 1 million

9%

1 M to 100 M 4%

100M to 500 M 4%

unspecified 30%

Other 17%

Number of objects

Survey is still opened: https://www.openstack.org/user-survey

Survey discussions on:

[email protected]

Documents

OpenStack User Committee - Havana Summit