Ref Description Quantity Unit Rate Cost - … Foxton Level... · Enhancements Estimating Standard Template for Stage 1 and 2 Estimates Ref Description Quantity Unit Rate Cost £ -

Enhancements Estimating

Standard Template for Stage 1 and 2 Estimates

Ref Description Quantity Unit Rate Cost

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -

Rev 1, Date: 7 May 2010



Oracle Project

No.

Project

Description Foxton Level Xing Closure - Footbridge, Wrap Stairs & Lifts TOTAL -£


40 Telecoms

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -

135112





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -




Oracle Project

No.

Project



50 Operational Property

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -

135112





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -




Oracle Project

No.

Project

Description Foxton Level Xing Closure - Footbridge, Wrap Stairs & Lifts TOTAL 1,189,692.90£


60 Structures

£ - £ -

Footbridge, Lifts & Wrap Around Stairs £ - £ -

£ - £ -

Footbridge Deck 66.3 m2 £ 3,575.00 £ 237,022.50

Lift Shaft 2 nr £ 165,000.00 £ 330,000.00

Lifts 2 nr £ 165,000.00 £ 330,000.00

Stairs 90 m2 £ 1,375.00 £ 123,750.00

Access Path 96 m2 £ 82.50 £ 7,920.00

E/ O - mobilisation/ demobilisation of Piling Rig 1 nr £ 18,000.40 £ 18,000.40

£ - £ -

Switch Room 2 nr £ 71,500.00 £ 143,000.00

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ 1,189,692.90

135112





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -




Oracle Project

No.

Project



70 General Civils

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -

135112





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -




Oracle Project

No.

Project



80 Utilities

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -

135112





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -




Oracle Project

No.

Project

Description Foxton Level Xing Closure - Footbridge, Wrap Stairs & Lifts -£


Other Contractors Indirect Costs

Spares

Signalling £ - £ -

Electrification and Power £ - £ -

Track £ - £ -

Telecoms £ - £ -

To Estimate Summary Report £ £ -

Other Costs

(The Consultant shall enter details)

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -


135112




Oracle Project

No.

Project

Description Foxton Level Xing Closure - Footbridge, Wrap Stairs & Lifts TOTAL 23,793.86£


Network Rail Direct Costs

NDS Materials & Fleet (Tampers, etc.) costs generally within rates at

GRIP 0-2

£ - £ -

NDS - Possession / Isolation management

£ - £ -

Possession Management 0.02 % £ 1,189,692.90 £ 23,793.86

Midweek Day nr £ - £ -

Midweek Night nr £ - £ -

Weekend nr £ - £ -

Bank Holiday nr £ - £ -

£ - £ -

OLE Isolations £ - £ -





£ - £ -

DC Isolations £ - £ -





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -


Other Costs

TWA Charges sum £ - £ -

Land / Property Costs & compensation sum £ - £ -

Other ( State ) sum £ - £ -

sum £ - £ -

sum £ - £ -

sum £ - £ -


Page Total £ -

135112



Oracle Project No.:

Project Description:

Estimate Stage:

Rev. Date Consultant Prepared by Checked

Rev 1 8-May-13 F & A Steve Jackson

Description

Network Rail Validation

Foxton Level Xing Closure - Pedestrian Subway

Level of Confidence - +/- 40% (Stage 1), +/- 30% (Stage 2)

Issue and Revision Record:

Standard Template for Stage 1-2 Estimates

135112

2


Standard Template for Stage 1 and 2 Estimates Rev 3, Date: 28 October 2011



Estimate Document Contents

1 Assumptions

2 Estimating Risk Register

3 Estimate Summary Report

4 Summary by GRIP

5 Indirect Costs (Auto generated)

6 10. Signalling, measured works

7 20. Electrification and Power, measured works

8 30. Track, measured works

9 40. Telecommunications, measured works

10 50. Operational Property, measured works

11 60. Structures, measured works

12 70. General Civils, measured

works

13 80. Utilities, measured works

14 Other Contractors Indirect Costs

15 Network Rail Direct Costs




Estimate Stage: 2

Oracle Project No.: 135112

Project Description: Foxton Level Xing Closure - Pedestrian Subway

Assumptions

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

G6

G7

G8

D1

D2

D3

D4

E1

E2

E3

E4

E5

E6

E7

E8

E9

Escalation has not been included within the Project AFC as the AFC is below £50m in value

and/or the construction phase will be under two years in duration

General / Drawings & Documents / Exclusions

General

TOC/ FOC Uplift has been allocated at 10%

The estimate base date is 1Q2013

Land take temporary or permanent

MMD-318484-C-DR-BR-101 to 104

Any allowance for Network Rail Fee Fun & Industry risk

VAT

Excludes any allowance for Optimism Bias

MMD-318484-C-DR-BR-01 to 09

MMD-318484-C-DR-HW-ALL.PDF

An uplift factor of 30% has been applied for cost and scope uncertainty

Drawings & Documents

Service Diversions

Power Upgrades

3rd Party Compensation costs

Planning & approval charges

The following documents have been used in the preparation of this estimate:

Exclusions



Estimate Stage: 2

Oracle Project No.: 135112

Project Description: Foxton Level Xing Closure - Pedestrian Subway

Estimating Risk Register

Ref Risk Type Description Probability Potential Cost Impact

Scope confidence Price confidence Risk confidence

Remarks

Notes:

The estimator is required to identify any risks to the project and/or estimate identified in preparing the

estimate; this is to inform the QCRA process only and any potential cost impacts will not impact on the

estimate total. The estimator should indicate his assessment of the level of cost impact (by

percentage/ H/M/L assessment / cost value or range), it is recognised that this will be a subjective

assessment only

CONFIDENCE LEVEL MATRIX

Utilities

General Civils

Structures

OP Property

Telecoms

Track

E&P

Signalling

Asset

Risk Confidence: Good = low risk scheme / works; Poor = high risk scheme /works

Price confidence: Good = we have good cost knowledge; Poor = poor cost knowledge and/or price certainty

Scope Confidence: High = good confidence scope will not change significantly; Medium = Limited scope growth

predicted; Low = scope may grow significantly#

Stage 3 4 Estimate: Standard Template (Network Rail) Issue 2, Date : 6 April 2010

1302MA0163 Revision Rev 1 Estimate Stage 2

8-May-13 1Q2013

TBA TBA

WBS Estimate Breakdown ValueEscalation

(Y/N)

%age of

Point

Estimate

Remarks

Contractor's direct costs -

10 Signalling - Y

20 Electrification & Plant 38,500 Y

30 Track - Y

40 Telecoms - Y

50 Operational Property - Y

60 Structures 1,438,774 Y

70 General Civils - Y

80 Utilities - Y

Contractor's Base Construction Cost inc OH&P: Sub-Total A 1,477,274

Network Rail's "direct costs"

tbc NDS - Materials Y Generally within the rates (direct costs) at Stages 1 - 2

tbc NDS - Fleet Y Generally within the rates (direct costs) at Stages 1 - 2

tbc - Engineering trains Y Generally within the rates (direct costs) at Stages 1 - 2

tbc - Tampers Y Generally within the rates (direct costs) at Stages 1 - 2

tbc NDS - Possession / Isolation Management 28,775

Sub - Total B 28,775

1,506,050 0.00%

Contractor's indirect costs

tbc 301,230 Y

tbc 149,652 Y

tbc 2,888 Y

tbc Y Generally within the rates (direct costs) at Stages 1 - 2

tbc Y Generally within the rates (direct costs) at Stages 1 - 2

tbc - Y

Sub - Total D 453,770

Total Construction Cost E (C+D) 1,959,820

Network Rail's indirect & other costs

tbc Network Rail Project Management, (COWD) N To be advised by project manager if applicable

tbc Network Rail Project Management, (forecasted remaining costs) 221,591 Y Calculated as Percentage on "Indirects" tab

tbc 178,139 Y Calculated as Percentage or preliminary estimate on "Indirects" tab

tbc DCO Charges - Y Refer "NR Indirects" tab

tbc Land / Property Costs & compensation - Y Refer "NR Indirects" tab

tbc Escalation (see Note 1) % - NA See Note 1

tbc Other ( State ) - Refer "NR Indirects" tab

Sub - Total F 399,730

Point Estimate - Sub - Total G (E+F) 2,359,550

Uplift for Risk and Contingency

tbc To Mean (see Note 3) £ See Note 3

Project Budget (Point Estimate + Uplift to Mean) 2,359,550 for Project Manager's reference

tbc QRA Value - at P50 (see Note 3) £

tbc QRA Value - at P80 - incremental on P50 value (see Note 3) £

tbc Adjustment for residual factors (see Note 2) % 30% 707,865

Project Anticipated Final Cost (AFC) 3,067,415 Authorised AFC

Other Costs to the Customer

tbc Allowance for Escalation (see Note 1) See Note 1

tbc Allowance for Network Rail Fee Fund -

tbc Allowance for Industry Risk Fund -

tbc Allowance for Insurance Top-up

01/05/2002

Cost to Customer 3,067,415

Name :- Steve Jackson

Network Rail

Position :- Estimator - Anglia Route

Signed :-

Date :- 08/05/2013

ESTIMATE SUMMARY REPORT

Estimate No.

Estimate Date Price 'Base date'

Project Title / Location Foxton Level Xing Closure - Pedestrian Subway

Total Base Construction Cost inc OH&P: Sub-Total C (A+B)

Preliminaries

Anticipated Start Date Anticipated Finish Date

Project No. 135112

Other

Compensation charges (TOC & FOC), (costs from NDS)

Sponsor to advise if P50 or P80 value shall apply See Note 3

Design

Testing & Commissioning

Training

Spares

provided by Sponsor

APPROVAL & ENDORSEMENT

Estimate Produced by :- Estimate Approved by :- Estimate Endorsed by :-

Sponsor to advise if P50 or P80 value shall apply See Note 3

Uplift on Point Estimate Value (excluding the Cost of Work Done) See Note 2

provided by Sponsor

provided by Sponsor

21/03/2013

F & A

Notes:-

1. Where the project AFC is below £50m or the construction phase will be shorter than two years, escalation shall not be included .

2. An 'Adjustment for residual factors' has been applied in accordance with the Guidance Notes on Estimating.

3. The project team or Risk & Value Manager should provide the values for uplifts to Mean, P50 and P80. The uplifts to Mean and P50 should be entered in the spaces provided; the incremental value to P80 (beyond P50) should be

shown in the box provided (i.e. P80 value - P50 value)




Estimate Stage:

Oracle Project No.:

Project Name:

Calculation of Contractors and Network Rail's Indirect Costs

Asset Total Direct

Costs

% Preliminaries % Design % Test &

Commission

% Network Rail

Management

% Sponsor

Signalling 0 35% 0 20% 0 15% 0 12% 0 3% 0

Electrification & Plant 38,500 35% 13,475 15% 5,775 7.5% 2,888 12% 4,620 3% 1,155

Track 0 25% 0 10% 0 0% 0 12% 0 3% 0

Telecoms 0 25% 0 20% 0 15% 0 12% 0 3% 0

Operational Property 0 25% 0 10% 0 0% 0 12% 0 3% 0

Structures 1,438,774 20% 287,755 10% 143,877 0% 0 12% 172,653 3% 43,163

General Civils 0 20% 0 10% 0 0% 0 12% 0 3% 0

Utilities 0 25% 0 10% 0 0% 0 12% 0 3% 0

301,230 149,652 2,888 177,273 44,318

Allowance for TOC / FOC Compensation - calculator

1,477,274 301,230 2,888

TOTAL 1,781,392

Allowance for TOC / FOC compensation (%) 10% 178,139

2

135,112

Foxton Level Xing Closure - Pedestrian Subway




Oracle Project

No.

Project

Description Foxton Level Xing Closure - Pedestrian Subway TOTAL -£


10 Signalling

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -

135112





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -




Oracle Project

No.

Project

Description Foxton Level Xing Closure - Pedestrian Subway TOTAL 38,500.00£


20 Electrification and Plant

£ - £ -

M & E Allowance 1 nr £ 38,500.00 £ 38,500.00

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ 38,500.00

135112





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -




Oracle Project

No.

Project



30 Track

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -

135112





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -




Oracle Project

No.

Project



40 Telecoms

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -

135112





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -




Oracle Project

No.

Project



50 Operational Property

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -

135112





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -




Oracle Project

No.

Project

Description Foxton Level Xing Closure - Pedestrian Subway TOTAL 1,438,774.26£


60 Structures

£ - £ -

Subway/ Bridleway Option £ - £ -

£ - £ -

Subway Box Section 107.3 m2 £ 5,500.00 £ 590,150.00

Ramps (per m of cross sectional area) 160 m2 £ 5,261.48 £ 841,836.16

Access Footpath 82.5 m2 £ 82.28 £ 6,788.10

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ 1,438,774.26

135112





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -




Oracle Project

No.

Project



70 General Civils

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -

135112





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -




Oracle Project

No.

Project



80 Utilities

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -

135112





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

Page Total £ -




Oracle Project

No.

Project

Description Foxton Level Xing Closure - Pedestrian Subway -£


Other Contractors Indirect Costs

Spares

Signalling £ - £ -

Electrification and Power £ - £ -

Track £ - £ -

Telecoms £ - £ -


Other Costs

(The Consultant shall enter details)

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -


135112




Oracle Project

No.

Project

Description Foxton Level Xing Closure - Pedestrian Subway TOTAL 28,775.49£


Network Rail Direct Costs

NDS Materials & Fleet (Tampers, etc.) costs generally within rates at

GRIP 0-2

£ - £ -

NDS - Possession / Isolation management

£ - £ -

Possession Management 0.02 % £ 1,438,774.26 £ 28,775.49





£ - £ -

OLE Isolations £ - £ -





£ - £ -

DC Isolations £ - £ -





£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -

£ - £ -


Other Costs

TWA Charges sum £ - £ -

Land / Property Costs & compensation sum £ - £ -

Other ( State ) sum £ - £ -

sum £ - £ -

sum £ - £ -

sum £ - £ -


Page Total £ -

135112


NR Foxton Level Crossing Closure GRIP 2 Feasibility Study Report

318484/WTD/MID/001/C May2013 P:\Birmingham\BNI\318484 Foxton Level Crossing Elimination\Reports\Foxton Level Crossing Elimination GRIP 2 Report Rev C.docx

79

Appendix F. Risk and Opportunity Register

Ref Identified Risk Likelihood Impact Potential Mitigating Measures Target Stage

1.1 Land acquisition Medium High Start early negotiations with land owners. If it is not possible to reach agreement then purchase land through DCO process.

Grip 3

1.2 Contaminated ground Medium High Desktop study highlights presence of contaminated land at some locations. GI and SI are required to confirm. Procedure of dealing with contaminated land to be agreed with EA at early stages.

Grip 3

1.3 Flooding during excavation

High High Detail ground investigation required to determine existing water table level.

Grip 3

1.4 Buried Services High High Inappropriate data would cause significant amount of damage to the scheme. Liaise with stats authority and acquire updated data.

Grip 3

1.5 Archaeological Finds Medium Medium Effects would be dependent upon the direct effects on these historic assets. This will need to be reviewed as the scheme progresses.

Grip 3

1.6 Noise, dust & Vibration restrictions

Medium Medium Control measures should be adopted. Appropriate contract language to mitigate inconveniences.

Grip 3

1.7 Estimate Variance Low Medium Review cost against the budget as the scheme progressed.

Grip 3

1.8 Exceptional inclement weather during construction

Medium Medium Clarity in contract regarding weather risk. Plan site setup to avoid severe weather conditions.

Grip 3

1.9 Prolonged TWA Process

Low Medium The process of applying for planning permission may lead to programme delays. Liaise with planning department at early stages.

Grip 3

1.10 Detrimental impact on operability of existing network

Medium Medium Competency and accuracy during design, check and construction phase.

Grip 3

1.11 Ecology-Roosting bats High Low Further survey required, if presence of bat roost is confirmed a licence may be required from Natural England for works to proceed. A mitigation plan would need to be devised; seasonal constraints associated with both surveys and mitigation.

Grip 3

1.12 Ecology-great crested newts

High Low Further survey required, if presence of newts is identified, a licence may be required from Natural England for works to proceed. A mitigation plan would need to be devised; seasonal constraints associated with both surveys and mitigation.

Grip 3

Ref Identified Risk Likelihood Impact Potential Mitigating Measures Target Stage

1.13 Unforeseen circumstances

Medium High Identify possible extraordinary scenarios and ensure procedures to be followed and documented.

Grip 3

1.14 Undermining of adjacent structures

Low High Adopt appropriate construction methodology to protect existing assets.

Grip 3

1.15 Japanese knotweed Low Low Survey to identify it early and mitigate plans in place for eventuality.

Grip 3

1.16 Lack of Possession Medium Medium Possessions available for the year 2014 have been assessed. The study should continue as the project progress.

Grip 3

1.17 Ground Investigation Medium High Undertake geotechnical investigation prior to design.

Grip 3

1.18 Demolishing of NR depot.

High Low Agree methodology at early stage Grip 3



80

Appendix G. Designers Hazard Elimination and Management Record

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)

1 Excavation during construction (All Options)

Damage to existing services Construction Design Route has been developed to avoid presence of existing services to mitigate the risk during construction. The information avialable about stats is a guide indicating approximate location of existing services. It is therefore necessary to follow this up in the next GRIP stage with Stats Enquiries to determine the exact location and what other Statutory Undertaker’s apparatus is present and how this affects the implementation of proposed options.

Yes D/P Active

2 Excavations during construction (All options)

Contaminated land Construction Ground sampling to be undertaken in the next GRIP stage to enable an assessment of risks to human health during construction works. Underpass options are eliminated to mitigate the risk.

Yes P Active

3 Instability of embankment/cutting slope Risk to the community and work force Construction To mitigate the risk, shallow slopes i.e. 1:3 are considered while developing the Road alignment. It is recommended to investigate existing ground conditions in the next GRIP stages. Reinforced earth overbridge option is preferred to minimise excavation during construction.

Yes P Active

4

Encountering ground water during excavation (All options)

Flooding during construction Construction Desk study indicates shallow shallow ground water approximately 2m below EGL. Overbridge has been preffered to minimise the risk of De-watering during the construction.

Yes P Active

5 Disturbance of track support zone during excavation (All options)

Risk of De-railment from track. Construction

Excavations to be stone filled and concreted in same shift. Track monitoring to be carried out. Tamping facilities to be available as necessary. Form C is required if excavation is within the track influence zone.

Yes P Active

6 Construction-General (Options 1-9)

Working adjacent to the live Rail Construction The bridge supports are set 4.5m from the access rail to carryout the work in green working zone.Road bridge beams and superstructure of the footbridge will be constructed during the possession.

No P Closed

7

General site activities (All options)

Noise, Vibration, dust emissions Construction Shortest route i.e. C4 is preferred to reduce the site work. Sub-Route C4 leads to a minimum structural span which minimises the possession time and nuisance for the local community.

Yes P Active

8 Bridge deck construction Heavy Lifting of beams Construction Sub-Route C3 has not been brought forward to next GRIP stage due to larger bridge span.

Yes D/P Active

9 Bridge deck construction Stability of Beams Construction The option of steel composite structure has been eliminated due to its instability and requirement of bracing members during erection. Thefixing/bolting of bracing members would require longer possession time compared to precast concrete beams.

Yes D/P Active

10 Bridge deck construction High voltage (25KV) overhead lines Construction The bridge headroom is set to clear existing OLE height. It is proposed to lower the OLE below the footbridge soffit i.e.5.1m once the existing level crossing is closed. To avoid touch potential, it is proposed that steel structure is electrically bonded to track with aluminium wire.

Yes P Active

11 Demolition-General Instability of structure Demolition Bypass Route on the North side is selected as it requires minimum demolition work of existing dwellings. The design minimises the overall construction time required therefore reducing the effect of noise, vibration etc. on residential dwellings. Appropriate method of demolition to be adopted.

Yes P Active

12 Demolition-General Dust emissions and flying of debris. Demolition See Hazard Ref 3. Yes P Active

13 Ramp Construction Inconvenient for wheel chair users and people with walking difficulties.

Use (as workplace)

Footbridge with Equality Act 2010 lift shafts are taken forward as a preferred options to mitigate the risk.

No P Closed

14 Subway construction (option 9) Under mining of existing platforms foundation. Construction Construction of subway option is not taken forward as it will undermine the foundation of existing structures. The temporary supports would be required during construction to mitigate the risk oof structure collapse.

No D/P Closed

15 Inspection and Maintenance Working adjacent to the live Rail Maintenance Integral or semi integral bridge is preferred as it eliminate the need for inspection of bearings, thus minimising maintenance and inspection costs. Steel bridge option is eliminated due to its high maintenance require over the track.

Yes F Active

16 Gauging to structures and passing clearances (All options)

Struck by trains Use (as workplace)

Structures are designed to compliance with Network Rail standard gauging requirements. Available data of platform gauging indicates that existing platforms of Foxton station are non-compliance. It is recommended to brought the clearances to current standard when improvement works are planned.

Yes P Active

17 Construction of new bypass Route and closure of existing crossing.

Vehicle Incursion/Accidents Construction Appropriate vehicle incursion measures are taken in the design development i.e.1. Once existing level crossing is closed,1.8m high steel palaside fence is proposed at the crossing.2.Wider footways are proposed on the bridge.3. High containment parapet (1.8m high) is proposed over the structure and e.t.c.

Yes P Active

18

Working in the vicinity of existing known cable routes (power, telecomms, signalling etc.)

Risk of injury to personnel and damage to infrastructure.

Construction Temporary support and protection of existing cable routes will be required during and excavation and construction of foundations.The options that have taken forward to next GRIP stage does not effect the signal sighting.

Yes P Active

Name: Freddy Yeung Date:

Notes 123

4

5

6 This Form should be reviewed and revised as design changes are made and as the stages of design progress.

Information codes: D = Information detailed on drawings (add drawing nos); P = Information for Pre-Construction Health and Safety Plan; F = information for the health and safety file. Please note that this information may also be relevant to specifications and/or reports.

Signature:

Project Safety AdvisorDivision or Sub-DivisionMark Alton

Foxton Level Crossing Closure 318484 Freddy Yeung

Project Manager (or Design Team Leader, as appropriate) to check and approve Record unless the design work has been carried out directly by the Project Manager (or Design Team Leader) in which case the Record is to be checked and approved by the Project Director (or Sub-Project Director, as appropriate).

Is there a 'significant'residual risk

to be

passed on?3

(Y/N)

If answer to (6)is Yes,

informationflow:

D/P/F4

Status Within MM

(Active / Closed)

Designer Risk Control Measures2: Design actiontaken, record of decision processincluding option considered, designconstraints and justification foroptions/actions not having been taken

Form No/ Revision318484-DH/01

Scope ofDesign

Foxton Level Crossing Closure

BNI

UK CDM ACOP defines 'significant' 'Significant risks are not necessarily those that involve the greatest risks, but those, including health risks that are: (a) not likely to be obvious to a competent contractor or other designers; (b) unusual; or (c) likely to be difficult to manage effectively.' Extract from ACOP clause 133.

Designer Risk Control Measures are to be based upon the Principles of Prevention - 'Eliminate, Reduce, Inform & Control'.

Haz

Ref Activity/Process/

Material/Element - what is being undertaken?

A hazard is something with the potential to cause harm, such as: working near live traffic, working at height, falling object etc.

Checked and approved by (see notes 5 & 6):

Stage of WorkHazard1

MMF110 Aug 08 - PM/106/02 Page 1 of 1 © Mott MacDonald 2008



81

Appendix H. Register of Technical Queries (TQ)



82

Appendix I. Indicative Construction Programme

Foxton Level Crossing Closure ‐ Options Report Appendix B ‐ Outline Programme for Options

Sheet 1 of 1

Foxton Level Crossing Month

Options Report Week

1 Site Mobilization

2 Service Diversions

3 Access Road Construction

4 Earthworks (Approach Embankments)

5 Drainage

6 Paving

7 Safety Barriers

8 Lighting/Ancillary work & site cleaning

Overbridge Construction9 Foundations

10 Substructure

11 Superstructure

12 Parapets

13 Approach Wingwalls

Month

Options Report Week

1 Site Mobilization

2 Service Diversions

3 Excavation

4 Access Road Construction

5 Earthworks (Approach Cutting)

6 Drainage

7 Paving

8 Safety Barriers

9 Lighting/Ancillary work & site cleaning

Underpass Construction10 Box Construction

11 Box Installation

12 Headwalls

13 Approach Wingwalls

10

37 40

10

37 40

38

38

39

39

34

34

9

35 36

9

35 36

Und

erbridge Option

26 27 28 29 30 3331 32 3322 23 24 2516 17 181513 21201914

8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

3 4 5 6 7

29 30 3223 3324 25 26 27

8

31

9 10

28189 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 21 2217

11 12

1

3 4Overbrid

ge Option

2

87

1 2 3 4 6 7 8

651 2



83

Appendix J. Combined Certificate of Interdisciplinary Review and Interdisciplinary Check

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Typewritten Text

yeu17200

Text Box

To be undertaken in Grip 3



84

Appendix K. DRN Comments

yeu17200

Text Box

No specific DRN comments, but all comments by main stakeholders have be incorporated into this submission



85

Appendix L. Designers Compliance Certificate



86

Appendix M. Level Crossing Use Census

1

Yeung, Freddy W

From: Wright Matthew <[email protected]>Sent: 01 February 2013 12:59To: Yeung, Freddy WCc: Alton, Mark ASubject: FW: 135112 - FLC Records

Freddy/Mark, PSB for the latest census details for Foxton Level Crossing. Did you manage to get the records I uploaded onto the system yesterday?

Kind regards,

Matt Wright

Scheme Project Manager (Development)│Infrastructure Projects, Network Rail, 4th Floor, East Anglia House, 12-34 Gt Eastern St, London, Greater London, EC2A 3EH│Tel: 0207 904 4060│07711600248│Fax: 0207 904 4420│email: [email protected]

From: Bolton Robert Sent: 01 February 2013 11:07 To: Wright Matthew Subject: Fw: 135112 - FLC Records Hi Matt, Census details below (is meant to read 2012 rather than 2013!) If you need any more detailed information in this regard, do let me know. Regards Rob

From: Rosse Mo Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 11:03 AM To: Bolton Robert Cc: Turner Lorna