Research on the QMST/QCG Methodology

in the Submarine System Development Stage

Development Stage Quality Control

Introduction

Conclusion

Byeong Ho Kim*, Won Bum Seo*, Si On Yim*, Young Ho Choi*,#

*Defense Agency for Technology and Quality

What is the Submarine?Paradigm Shift in Development Stage

Impact Test

본 연구는 기품원에서제시한 QMST 운영 및 QCG 검토 제도를이용한 OOOO급잠수함에대한 체계개발 품질관리방법론에대해 논의하였다.

국 방 기 술 품 질 원D e f e n s e A g e n c y f o r Te c h n o l o g y a n d Q u a l i t y

Advanced Products Quality Planning

Result of QMST and QCG in Underwater System

What is the QMST and QCG ?

7.6(MON), 2020 Spring The Korea Society for Quality Management

잠수함 체계개발 특성에 맞게 QMST를 조직하여 각 단계별 산출물 및 검토사항을제시하였고, 안전통제활동에 대한 QCG 검토 점검시트를 작성하였다.

- 장보고-lll 전투체계 운영 개념도

출처(Defense & Technology (466), pp. 54-59, 2017)

- 장보고-lll 진수식(VIP 참석)

○ 국내 자체기술로 건조한 소형잠수함인 돌고래 1번함 진수(‘83)

○ 장보고-l(독일)과 장보고-II(기술도입 건조) 잠수함 운용중(‘92~)

○ 국내기술로 OOOO급 장보고-III 잠수함 체계개발 진행중(‘16~‘26)

○ APQP 단계별 활동 ○ APQP 다기능 팀 구성

○ APQP 활동(5단계), 미국

. 다기능팀 구성 : 팀편성 및 역할정립

. 실행계획 수립 : 고객의 제품개발일정에 따른 활동계획 수립

. 교육/훈련 : APQP 교육/훈련 Program 수립, 시행

. APQP 실행 : 제품개발일정과 계약업체 실행계획 연계추진

. 유효성 검증 : 기술적 설계/개발 검증(요소별)

형태적 설계/개발 검증(단계별)

System

Development StageReview Contents

Critical Design Review- Analysis of design contents of detailed component units of system / subsystem

- Check if the system function requirements are completely assigned to the shipbuilding technical specification, construction

specification, and shape identification for detailed design

Design Decision

Review

- Review and confirm the tentative shape to see if the final shape meets the military requirements as a result of detailed design

- Confirmation of the possibility of entering into the system integration stage by building the leading and subsequent boxes by

checking the integrity of the shape identification

Production Readiness

Review

- Review the production schedule and delivery schedule

- Check the preparation status of the leading ship and the adequacy of the production plan

Software Output

Review

- Review the implementation status of software requirements

- Review whether the integrated software has been tested to meet software requirements

Test Readiness Review-Verification and verification possibility analysis of user requirements through test evaluation results

-Confirmation of test evaluation readiness such as prototype integrity and facilities according to the test plan

-Examine the possibility of entering the test evaluation stage

Functional

Configuration Audit

- Review whether the test evaluation results meet the functional / performance requirements of the shape items

- Consistency and traceability between defense standard linkage table and shape output

Physical Configuration

Audit

- Analyze whether there is a match by comparing the actual shape and the design document

- Confirm that the type of product is correctly manufactured in accordance with the product standard of the defense standard.

- Check the consistency and traceability of the output

Examination evaluation

technology review

- Examination management / operation procedure review

- TEMP confirmation technology review

- Technical review of items that do not meet the current test evaluation requirements and requirements

- DT / OT result confirmation / analysis technical support

- DT / OT result follow-up Action item identification / direction setting

- Observe test evaluation and identify issues

Defense standardization

technical data review

- Technical support and review of defense standards (draft) using the TAP Defense Standards link

- Consistency and appropriateness review of system development data

- Whether the item is missing or added to the requirements such as the Basic Guidelines for Trap Drying and Technical Specification

for Trap Drying

- Appropriateness of technical requirements and verification methods

- Review of defense standards (draft)

- Whether to reflect the supplementary requirements of the test evaluation results

- Conformity of leading ship shape standards

- Compliance with production and quality assurance requirements

- QMST(Quality Management Support Team, 품질관리지원팀)

∙ 체계개발 품질관리 지원을 담당하기 위해 구성된 조직

∙ 품질관리/형상관리/신뢰성 분과 개발품질관리 담당자 또는 외부 전문가로 구성

* 복합무기체계인함정특성을 고려하여체계분야별개발품질관리자를품질관리/형상관리분과에통합 구성

- QCG(Quality Control Gate, 품질통제점)

∙ 체계개발 주요단계에서 개발 대상 무기체계의 종합적인 품질 성숙수준을

평가하여, 후속 개발과정에서 품질을 확보할 수 있도록 관리하는 프로세스

- 함정 무기체개개발 프로세스

- 일반무기체계개발 VS 함정 무기체계개발 프로세스

- 잠수함 체계개발을 위한 QMST 구성도

- 잠수함 체계개발 각 단계별 산출물 검토 절차

- 잠수함 체계개발을 위한 QCG 검토 수행 절차

- 잠수함 체계개발을 위한 각 단계별 산출물 및 검토 사항 - 잠수함 안전통제활동에 대한 계획 및 QCG 검토

- 잠수함 안전통제활동에 대한 QCG별 점검시트

출처(Defense & Technology (483), pp. 68-81, 2019)

- 잠수함의 복잡성: 일반 자동차 약 300배, 전투기의 약 30배

<- 개발단계 품질관리 관점의 변화