Upload
darren-bridges
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
1/13
CDF
Stato del TevatronStato del rivelatoreUpgrades in corsoRichieste finanziarie (MOF)Stato analisi dati G. PunziStato computing S. Belforte
OUTLINERiunione CSN1
Roma: 17 Maggio, 2004
Franco BedeschiINFN-Pisa
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
2/13
Extended Tev goals
Luminosity plan 2002 Goals 2002/03 accomplished link Goals 2004 ~ 300 pb-1
Very likely Tevatron is performing very well P-bars injected from recycler!
Year Base plan luminosity/yr (fb-1)
Design plan
Luminosity/yr (fb-1)
FY02 0.08 0.08
FY03 0.20 0.22
FY04 0.31 0.38
FY05 0.39 0.67
FY06 0.50 0.89
FY07 0.63 1.53
FY08 1.14 2.37
FY09 1.16 2.42
Total 4.41 8.56
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
End FY
fb-1
Base plan
Design plan
Base plan ~ no recycler
link
Lmax = 2 x 1032
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
3/13
Design and Base Projections
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
9/29/03 9/29/04 9/30/05 10/1/06 10/2/07 10/2/08 10/3/09
Start of Fiscal Year
Inte
grat
ed L
umin
osit
y pe
r W
eek
(pb-1)
Phase 1(FY04)
Phase 2(Slip Stacking)
Phase 3(Recycler &
Electron Cooling)
Phase 4(Stacktail upgrade)
Phase 5(Tevatron upgrades
complete)
Phase 6(No upgrade-related studies)
Design Projection
Base Projection
We arehere
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
4/13
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
11/23/03 12/21/03 1/18/04 2/15/04 3/14/04 4/11/04 5/9/04
Pe
ak
Lu
min
osi
ty (
b-1
/se
c)
Meas
Design
Base
TeV Luminosity(current situation)
Peak luminosity Best 7.0 x1031 !!!
Delivered/on tape 500/400 pb-1/~100 bad due to COT
Analyses use data till Feb. 04 ~ 240 pb-1 > 2 x Run 1
Delivered
On tape
Integrated
Luminosity
Initial
Instantaneous Luminosity
7 x 1031
Luminosity vs. time
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
5/13
Startup luminosity
Current delivered luminosity is exceeding design goals
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
Days Since October 1
Inte
gra
ted
Lu
min
osi
ty (
pb
-1)
FY04
FY03
FY02
FY04 Design
FY04 Base
2002
2003
2004
DesignBase
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
6/13
COT problem
COT is experiencing an unexpected gain loss ~ 20%/yrChamber is currently operating at
strongly reduced gain to prevent further damage
New wire
SL 2 wire now
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
7/13
COT problem
Chamber expected to be very radiation hardExpected currents on SL1 is 4.5 mA/wire @ L = 2x1032
From 0.15 Coul/cm (2 fb-1) to 0.60 Coul/cm (8 fb-1)
Predict < 1% gain loss at 1 Coul/cm no problem …..
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
8/13
COT problem
Observations and diagnosis:Gain loss has z and phi dependenceReversing gas flow reverses pattern of damageDamage most likely caused by insufficient gas flow
Actions taken: Implement gas re-circulation system (80% re-circulated)
Old flow 20 SCF/hr 40 200 testing effectiveness now
Can push as high as 1000 SCF/hr this summer
Back up plans: Increase operating temperature 72 82 FChange gas Ar-CO2 (or even CF4 ?)
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
9/13
Trigger status
Continuously update to deal with higher luminosity December 2003: 10kHz, 300Hz, 55Hz had ~25% deadtime
L1: improve prescales and XFT
L2: cut on muons, faster code, SVT fast abort
L3: 64 more CPU’s, faster code
Now: L1/L2/L3 can run at 20kHz, 350Hz, 60Hz with low dead time, but…
SVT is dropped beyond 6x1031 …..Faster SVX readout
Road Warrior (mostly Italian work) to remove ghost track before fitters
SVT upgrade
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
10/13
Status CPR
M&S:PO’s completed~ All material at Fermilab
Module production started2 modules finished Italian techs at work
HV work in progressCables and patch panelsControl and monitor software
Timeline: Installation starts September 04Module construction ends in July
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
11/13
Status CPR
Performance of first two modules as expectedProduction at full speed
16 pe/MIP after full optical path
Source scan
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
12/13
Status SVT upgrade
Prototype AM Chip design ready for productionBid approval by INFN delayedHope to get into end of June slot at UMC
Chips back in 3 mo
Plan for production in early 2005With real design less patterns/chip more chips needed
Additional cost is 40 k€ on FY2005
Long range plans of SVT upgrade being made at CDFEven more chips may be needed, but with additional out side
contributions
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
13/13
MOF
History:250 k€ requested at September 2003 CSN1 meeting
Referees favorable, but only 150 k€ assigned INFN rep. promised 300 k$ = 250 k€ at IFC meeting in October
2003150 k€ already spent and accounted forPlan for use of additional 100 k€ already discussed with Fermilab
Mostly help on unexpected COT costs
Request:100 k€ now to complete FY2004 running cost contributions
Contributions to computing separateDiscussed in Belforte’s presentation
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
14/13
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
15/13
Tev 2003 Luminosity
Goals for 2003 Base goals:
200 pb-1 in FY 200310 pb-1/wk end of 2003
5.4x1031 typical
Stretch goals: 320 pb-1 in FY 200315 pb-1/wk end of 2003
7.6x1031 typical (~max achievable without Recycler)
Integrated luminosity goal achieved, but …
Half of shutdown in FY04Avg. lum. lower than predicted
FY04: Double data set
~150 pb-1
As of 5/6/03
~250 pb-1
As of 9/3/03
back
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
16/13
Tev goals beyond 2003
Fermilab long range plan (M.Witherell P5 presentation – March 26, 2003)
back
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
17/13
Silicon status
~ 92% operational~85% has low readout
error rate
92% Operational ladders
Error rate < 1%
Jan 04
Jun 03
Jan 02
Jun 02
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
18/13
CDF Data Acquisition System
Level 1 trigger pipelined and
“deadtimeless” fully synchronous designed for 132ns
operation on L1A, write data to 1 of 4
local L2 buffers Level 2 trigger
asynchronous L1 + supplemental info
Level 3 trigger full detector readout PC farm runs reconstruction output to mass storage
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
19/13
CDF Run II Trigger System
Level 1 trigger tracking calorimeter: jets & electrons, MET muons
Level 2 trigger L1 information (tracks, e, ) calorimeter shower max silicon information algorithms run in L2 processor
Level 3 trigger full detector readout “offline” processing
Det
ecto
r R
ead
ou
t p
ath
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
20/13
Summary of Run IIb specifications
Level 1 Accept rate: >25kHz (spec 50kHz) deadtimeless
Level 2 Accept rate: 750 Hz bursts to 1.1kHz L2 processing deadtime < 5% readout deadtime (on L2A) < 5%
Level 3 Accept rate: 85Hz Event builder rate: 400MB/s Output data rate: 40MB/s
Reminder: trigger & bandwidth rates estimated based upon Run IIa, significant underestimate possible (assumes linear growth in fake contribution)
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
21/13
DAQ/Trigger Summary These are the pieces of the
CDF Front-end, Trigger and Data Acquisition system we need to upgrade/update to carry out a high pT physics program TDC replacement XFT upgrade SVT upgrade L2 replacement Event builder/L3 upgrade
The remainder of the Run IIa CDF front-end/trigger/DAQ system will perform well throughout Run IIb