Upload
djfjnk
View
8
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
f
Citation preview
SOCIOCULTURAL FACTORS
강 은 숙영어교육
2007067031
• Culture←→ Perception → Stereotypes or
Generalizations→ Attitudes →Motivation for the target language?
• Second Culture Acquisition Acceleration of the target language acquisition?
What is Culture? by Matsumoto
• Dynamic• System of rules• Groups and units• Survival• Attitudes, values,
beliefs, norms, and behaviors by a group
• Harbored differently by each specific unit
• Communicated across generations, relatively stable
• Potential to change across time
Perception → Stereotype
• Always subjective• The filtering of
information• Culture-modes of
perception
• prejudge & misjudge to judge a single member of a culture
• Potential to devalue people from the culture
Attitudes
Gardner & Lambert ’72
• The effect of attitudes on the target language learning
John Oller ’77• Positive attitudes
toward self, the native language group, the target language group
→ proficiency
Second Culture acquisition=acculturation
Four Stages of Cultural Acquisition• Stage 1: A period of excitement and
euphoria• Stage 2: Culture shock• Stage 3: Gradual recovery “ Culture Stress” • Stage 4: Full recovery
Second Culture Acquisition
• Anomie –Wallace Lambert (’67)• Feelings of social uncertainty or
dissatisfaction• The first symptom on the third stage of acculturation• A feeling of Homeless
→Mastery of a second language
SOCIAL DISTANCE &TEACHING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCE
배영아영어교육과
2007067032
SOCIAL DISTANCE
• Social distance: The cognitive and affective proximity of two
cultures that come into contact within an individual.
SOCIAL DISTANCE
John Schummansocial distance is consisted of following parameters:
• Dominance politically, culturally, economically
• Integration assimilation, acculturation, preservation
/ degree of enclosure
• Cohesiveness cohesiveness, size
• Congruence value, belief system, attitude
• Permanence intended length of residence in the
target language area
SOCIAL DISTANCE
• Language learning situation Bad Good
The TL group views the L2 group as dominant and the L2 group
views itself in the same way. Both groups desire preservation and high enclosure for the L2 group,
the L2 group is both cohesive and large, the two cultures are not congruent, the two groups hold negative attitudes toward each
other, and the L2 group intends to remain in the TL area only for a
short time.
The L2 groups is nondominant in relation to the TL group, both
groups desire assimilation for the L2 group, low enclosure is the goal
of both groups, the two cultures are congruent, the L2 group is small and noncohesive, both
groups have positive attitudes toward each other, and the L2 group intends to remain in the target language area for a long
time
The greater the social distance between two cultures, the greater the difficulty the learner will have in learning the second language
SOCIAL DISTANCE
Q. How can we measure the social distance?
• William Acton Human beings perceive the cultural environment through the filters and screens of their own worldview: Perceived social distance
• PDAQ (the Professed Difference in Attitude
Questionnaire)
SOCIAL DISTANCE
• Optimal perceived social distance ratio
The mastery or skillful fluency in a second language occurs somewhere at the beginning of the third-recovery-stage of acculturation• Optimal distance model culturally based critical-period hypothesis
TEACHING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCE
Hofstede’s framework for assessing culture
• Individualism vs. Collectivism loosely integrated vs. tightly integrated
• Power distance inequality in power and consider it as normal.
• Uncertainty avoidance strong uncertainty avoidance vs. weak uncertainty avoidance
• Masculinity vs. Femininity material success vs. interpersonal relationships
Thank you!