19
Tagiadin Tasogiannos Statistics and Results from Foot Research Tagiadin John 13/07/2015 02/08/2015

Statistics and Results From Foot Research

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Here are the results from a little research (With 272 Participants) about foot types that took part on a Facebook group called " Archaeology & Prehistoric & Ancient Wonders” ( the link to the post: https://www.facebook.com/groups/Archaeology.Prehistoric/permalink/513454352137112/) .Also this file includes some information ,that could justify the results of this research , from Wikipedia and other sites.

Citation preview

  • Tagiadin Tasogiannos

    Statistics and Results from Foot Research

    Tagiadin John 13/07/2015 02/08/2015

  • 2 | P a g e

    Index Page 2Index

    Page 3Participation Percentages of each Contributing Country

    Page 4..Percentages of Participants from each Continent

    Page 5...Percentages of Foot types

    Page 6.......Results from each Country (Albania - Canada)

    Page 7....Results from each Country (Croatia - Greece)

    Page 8....Results from each Country (India - Jordan)

    Page 9....Results from each Country (Kenya -Myanmar)

    Page 10Results from each Country (Netherlands - Sweden)

    Page 11Results from each Country (Taiwan - Uruguay)

    Page 12Results from each Country (USA)

    Page 13Greek toes domination in India , Pakistan and

    Middle East Page 14Toes type influence by Greeks in Balkan Countries

    Page 15Greek toes in Asians, Mexicans and Italians

    Page 16Greek toes in Asians, Mexicans and Italians

    Page 17Diversity of Foot types in USA,UK and Canada

    Page 18..References

  • 3 | P a g e

    \

    2% 2% 2%

    1% 0%

    1%

    1%

    0%

    0%

    1%

    1% 1%

    3% 0%

    1%

    2%

    0%

    0% 1%

    1%

    0%

    2%

    4%

    0%

    16%

    1% 2%

    1%

    0%

    0% 0% 0%

    0%

    0%

    0% 0%

    0%

    0%

    0%

    3%

    0%

    0%

    1%

    1%

    0% 1%

    4% 0%

    0%

    2% 0%

    1%

    1%

    2%

    0%

    0% 0% 0%

    2%

    10%

    0%

    22%

    Participation Percentages of each Contributing Country

    Albania Unknown Arabia Argentina Armenia Eritrea Australia Bangladesh

    Belarus Bosnia Brasil Bulgaria Canada Croatia Chezh Republic Egypt

    Estonia Ethiopia Finland France FYROM Germany Greece Hungary

    India Indonesia Iran Ireland Israel Italy Japan Jordan

    Kenya Libya Lithuania Malaysia Malta Mansoura Mauritius Mexico

    Mozambique Myanmar Netherlands New Zealand Nigeria Norway Pakistan Philippines

    Poland Portugal Romania Scotland Serbia Spain Sweden Taiwan

    Tibet Slovakia Turkey UK Uruguay USA

  • 4 | P a g e

    Extra Info - 59 Countries contributed in this research.

    - From which 272 were the participants

    Europe 34%

    Asia 29%

    America 27%

    Africa 7%

    Unknown 2% Australia

    1%

    Percentages of Participants from each Continent

  • 5 | P a g e

    Extra Info - McKucisck believed that the Greek toe or aka Morton's toe appeared to

    be a dominant trait , which could justify the supremacy of this trait in the

    participants.

    Greek 43%

    Egyptian 30%

    Roman 14%

    Celtic 6%

    Greek and Roman 3%

    Unknown 2%

    Greek and Celtic

    1%

    Greek and Egyptian

    1% Germanic 0% Egyptian and Roman

    0%

    Egyptian and Celtic

    0% Roman and Celtic 0%

    Percentages of Foot types

  • 6 | P a g e

    Results from each Country

    Albania (5)

    2/5 Roman

    2/5 Greek

    1/5 Egyptian

    Arabia (4)

    1/4 Roman

    1/4 Greek

    2/4 Egyptian

    Argentina (2)

    1/2 Roman

    1/2 Egyptian

    Armenia (1)

    1/1 Egyptian

    Eritrea (2)

    2/2 Egyptian

    Australia (2)

    1/2 Roman

    1/2 Egyptian

    Bangladesh (4)

    1/4 Roman

    1/4 Greek

    2/4 Egyptian

    Belarus (1)

    1/1 Roman

    Bosnia (2)

    1/2 Egyptian

    1/2 Roman and Greek

    Brazil (3)

    2/3 Roman

    1/3 Greek

    Bulgaria (2)

    1/2 Egyptian

    1/2 Greek

    Canada (7)

    Greek 58%

    Egyptian 14%

    Celtic 14%

    Unknown 14%

  • 7 | P a g e

    Croatia (1)

    1/1 Greek

    Czech Republic (2)

    1/2 Roman

    1/2 Greek

    Egypt (5)

    3/5 Greek

    1/5 Egyptian

    1/5 Celtic

    Estonia (1)

    1/1 Greek

    Ethiopia (2)

    1/2 Egyptian

    1/2 Unknown

    Finland (1)

    1/1 Greek

    France (3)

    2/3 Roman

    1/3 Greek

    1/3 Egyptian

    F.Y.R.O.M. (1)

    1/1 Egyptian

    Germany (4)

    2/4 Egyptian

    1/4 Greek

    1/4 Celtic

    Greece (9)

    Hungary (1)

    1/1 Celtic

    Greek 89%

    Egyptian 11%

  • 8 | P a g e

    India (38)

    Greek 44%

    Egyptian 29%

    Roman 20%

    Celtic 7%

    Indonesia (2)

    1/2 Celtic

    1/2 Greek

    Iran (5)

    3/5 Egyptian

    2/5 Greek

    Ireland (2)

    1/2 Roman

    1/2 Egpytian

    Israel (1)

    1/2 Egyptian

    1/2 Roman and Greek

    Italy (4)

    2/4 Greek

    2/4 Egyptian

    Jordan (1)

    1/1 Roman

    Kenya (1)

    1/1 Roman

    Libya (1)

    1/1Greek

    Lithuania (1)

    2/4 Greek

    2/4 Egyptian

    Jordan (1)

    1/1 Roman

    Kenya (1)

    1/1 Roman

  • 9 | P a g e

    1/1Greek

    Kenya (1)

    1/1 Roman

    Libya (1)

    1/1Greek

    Lithuania (1)

    1/1 Roman and Greek

    Malaysia (1)

    1/1 Greek

    Malta (1)

    1/1 Greek

    Mansoura (1)

    1/1Greek

    Maurtitius (1)

    1/1Greek

    Mexico (7)

    Malta (1)

    1/1 Greek

    Mozambique (1)

    1/1Egyptian

    Maurtitius (1)

    1/1Greek

    Myanmar (1)

    1/1 Greek

    Greek 86%

    Egyptian 14%

  • 10 | P a g e

    Netherlands (2)

    1/2 Greek

    1/2 Egyptian

    New Zealand (1)

    1/1 Roman

    Nigeria (1)

    1/1 Roman

    Norway (3)

    2/3 Egyptian

    1/3 Greek

    Pakistan (9)

    Philippines (1)

    1/1 Roman

    Poland (1)

    1/1 Roman and Egyptian

    Portugal (4)

    1/4 Celtic

    3/4 Greek

    Romania (1)

    1/1 Roman

    Scotland (2)

    1/1 Celtic

    1/2 Roman and Greek

    Serbia (2)

    1/2 Egyptian

    1/2 Greek

    Spain (5)

    4/5 Greek

    1/5 Egyptian

    Sweden (1)

    1/1 Greek

    Greek 60%

    Egyptian 30%

    Celtic and Roman

    10%

  • 11 | P a g e

    Taiwan (1)

    1/1 Greek

    Tibet (1)

    1/1 Greek

    Japan (1)

    1/1 Roman

    Norway (1)

    2/3 Egyptian

    1/3 Greek

    Slovakia (1)

    1/1 Greek

    Turkey (4)

    1/4Roman

    2/4 Greek

    1/4 Greek and Roman

    UK (24)

    Uruguay (1)

    1/1 Greek

    Greek 52%

    Egyptian 28%

    Roman 12%

    Celtic 4%

    Unknown 4%

  • 12 | P a g e

    Extra Info - Charts were used only in countries with more than 5 participants.

    USA (55)

    40%

    29%

    9%

    7%

    5%

    4% 2% 2%

    2%

    Egyptian Greek Celtic Roman Greek and Celtic

    Greek and Roman Green and Egyptian Egyptian and Celtic Unknown

  • 13 | P a g e

    Greek toes domination in India , Pakistan and

    Middle East

    We can observe that Greek toe is overmatching in countries

    like India and Pakistan and of course Greece, which proves on

    the one hand that Greek toe is a Greek trait and on the other

    hand that a big part of modern Indians and Pakistans may

    have a partial Greek origin. This can be proved by the

    existence of Indo-Greek Kingdom in modern Afghanistan,

    Pakistan and North Western India during the last two

    centuries BC and by the fact that Greek toes is an dominant

    trait.

    The Indo-Greek Kingdom or Graeco-Indian Kingdom[1] was

    a Hellenistic kingdom covering various parts of the northwest

    regions of the Indian subcontinent (modern Afghanistan,

    Pakistan and North Western India) during the last two

    centuries BC, and was ruled by more than 30 kings,[2] often in

    conflict with each other.

    The kingdom was founded when the Graeco-

    Bactrianking Demetrius invaded the subcontinent early in the

    2nd century BC. The Greeks in South Asia were eventually

    divided from the Graeco-Bactrians centered in Bactria (now

    the border between Afghanistan andUzbekistan). But the

    Greeks failed to establish united rule in present-day north-

    western India. The most famous Indo-Greek ruler

    was Menander (Milinda). He had his capital

    at Sakala in Punjab, modern Pakistan, and he successfully

    invaded the Ganges-Yamunadoab.

    The expression "Indo-Greek Kingdom" loosely describes a

    number of various dynastic polities, traditionally associated

    with a number of regional capitals

    like Taxila,[3] (modern Punjab

    (Pakistan)),Pushkalavati and Sagala.[4] Other potential centers

    are only hinted at; for instance, Ptolemy's Geographia and the

    nomenclature of later kings suggest that a certainTheophila in

    the south of the Indo-Greek sphere of influence may also have

    been a satrapal or royal seat at one time.

    During the two centuries of their rule, the Indo-Greek kings

    combined the Greek and Indo-Iranian languagesand symbols,

    as seen on their coins, and

    blendedHindu, Buddhist and ancient Greek religious practices,

    as seen in the archaeological remains of their cities and in the

    indications of their support of Buddhism, pointing to a rich

    fusion of Indian and Hellenistic influences.[5] The diffusion of

    Indo-Greek culture had consequences which are still felt

    today, particularly through the influence of Greco-Buddhist

    art.[6]

    The Indo-Greeks ultimately disappeared as a political entity

    around 10 AD following the invasions of the Indo-Scythians,

    although pockets of Greek populations probably remained for

    several centuries longer under the subsequent rule of the Indo-

    Parthians and Kushans.[7]

    -From Wikipedia

  • 14 | P a g e

    Toes type influence by Greeks in Balkan Countries

    The possible influence from Greek toe trait might be relevant

    to the fact that Greek DNA (as an research presented) has

    stayed pure with only small inpurities.

    A striking demonstration of the persistence of the Greek

    genetic signature through time can be found in [1]. The figure

    on the right is the 4th principal component of variation in

    Europe and shows a strong cline centered in Greece. Not only

    is the Greek genetic legacy clearly detectible today, but it is

    detectible among not only the Greeks, but all their

    neighboring populations of partial Greek ancestry

    Figure 2. Hidden patterns in the geography of Europe shown

    by the first five principal components, explaining respectively

    28%, 22%, 11%, 7%, and 5% of the total genetic variation for

    95 classical polymorphisms (1, 13, 14). The first component is

    almost superimposable to the archaeological dates of the

    spread of farming from the Middle East between 10,000 and

    6,000 years ago.

    The second principal component parallels a probable spread

    of Uralic people and/or languages to the northeast of

    Europe. The third is very similar to the spread of pastoral

    nomads (and their successors) who domesticated the horse

    in the steppe towards the end of the farming expansion,

    and are believed by some archaeologists and linguists to

    have spread most Indo-European languages to Europe. The

    fourth is strongly reminiscent of Greek colonization in the

    first millennium B.C. The fifth corresponds to the

    progressive retreat of the boundary of the Basque

    language. Basques have retained, in addition to their

    language, believed to be descended from an original

    language spoken in Europe, some of their original genetic

    characteristics. (From ref. 1, with permission of Princeton

    University Press, modified.):..

    -From http://dienekes.awardspace.com/

    The rest of the text can be found on the references page on

    the last page.

  • 15 | P a g e

    Greek toes in Asians, Mexicans and Italians

    It is now proved that South Italians are Greeks (link about

    South Italians been Greeks can be found in the references

    page) proved so this settles Italy. A research had shown that

    the 90% of the Ainu people have Greek toes , could Greeks

    colonized a place in Asia and breed with Asians? I am not sure

    about this ,but I am sure that Greeks had a lot colonies

    around the world.

    Greek cities are labeled in red.

    Greek colonies are labeled in Blue

    In Ancient Greece, colonies were sometimes founded by

    vanquished people, who left their homes to escape

    subjection at the hand of a foreign enemy; sometimes as a

    sequel to civil disorders, when the losers in internecine

    battles left to form a new city elsewhere; sometimes to get

    rid of surplus population, and thereby to avoid internal

    convulsions; and sometimes as a result of ostracism. But in

    most cases the motivation was to establish and facilitate

    relations of trade with foreign countries and further the

    wealth of the mother-city (in Greek metropolis). Colonies

    were established in Ionia and Thrace as early as the 8th

    century BC.[10]

    More than thirty Greek city-states had multiple colonies

    around the Mediterraneanworld, with the most active

    being Miletus, with ninety colonies stretching throughout

    the Mediterranean Sea, from the shores of the Black

    Sea and Anatolia (modern Turkey) in the east, to the

    southern coast of the Iberian Peninsula in the west, as well

    as several colonies on the Libya coast of

    northern Africa,[11] from the late 9th to the 5th centuries BC.

    There were two similar types of colony, one known as an

    - apoikia (pl.: , apoikiai) and the other as

    an ov -emporion (pl.: , emporia). The first

    type of colony was a city-state on its own; the second was a

    Greek trading- colony.

  • 16 | P a g e

    The Greek city-states began establishing colonies around

    900[12] - 800 BC, at first at Al Mina on the coast of Syria and the

    Greek emporium Pithekoussai at Ischia in the Bay of Naples,

    both established about 800 BC by Euboeans.[13]

    Two flushes of new colonists set out from Greece at the

    transition between the "Dark Ages" and the start of the Archaic

    Period, one in the early 8th century BC and a second burst of

    the colonizing spirit in the 6th century. Population growth and

    cramped spaces at home seem an insufficient explanation,

    while the economical and political dynamics produced by the

    competitive spirit between the frequently kingless, newly

    introduced concept of the Greek city-states, striving to expand

    their sphere of economical influence better fits as their true

    incentive. Through this Greek expansion the use of coins

    flourished throughout the Mediterranean Basin.

    Influential Greek colonies in the western Mediterranean many

    of them in today's Italy included Cyme, Rhegium (Rhegion)

    by Chalcis and Zankle (c. 8th

    century),Syracuse by Corinth/Tenea (c. 734 BC), Naxos by

    Chalcis (c. 734 BC), Massalia(the later Marseille, France,

    c. 598 BC) and Agathe (shortly after Massalia)

    byPhokaia, Elea (Italy) and Emporion (nowadays Spain) by

    Phokaia/Massalia (c. 540 BC and early 6th

    century), Antipolis (nowadays France)

    by Achaea, Alalia(Corsica) by Phokaia/Massalia (c. 545 BC)

    and Cyrene (Cyrenaica, nowadays Libya) by Thera (762/61 and

    632/31 BC).[14]

    The Greeks also colonised modern-day Crimea on the Black

    Sea. Among the settlements they established there was the

    city of Chersonesos, at the site of modern-

    day Sevastopol.[15]

    The extensive Greek colonization is remarked upon

    by Cicero when noting that "It were as though a Greek

    fringe has been woven about the shores of the

    barbarians."[16]

    Several formulae were generally adhered to on the solemn

    and sacred occasions when a new colony set forth. If a

    Greek city was sending out a colony, an oracle, especially

    one such as the Oracle of Delphi, was almost invariably

    consulted beforehand. Sometimes certain classes of citizens

    were called upon to take part in the enterprises; sometimes

    one son was chosen by lot from every house where there

    were several sons; and strangers expressing a desire to join

    were admitted. A person of distinction was selected to

    guide the emigrants and make the necessary

    arrangements. It was usual to honor these founders of

    colonies, after their death, as heroes. Some of the sacred

    fire was taken from the public hearth in the Prytaneum,

    from which the fire on the public hearth of the new city was

    kindled. And, just as each individual had his private shrines,

    so the new community maintained the worship of its chief

    domestic deities, the colony sending embassies and votive

    gifts to the mother-city's principal festivals for centuries

    afterwards.

    -From Wikipedia

  • 17 | P a g e

    Diversity of Foot types in USA,UK and Canada

    The diversity of foot types in USA,UK and Canada can easily get proved by the fact

    that they constitute an migration target from people all around the world.

  • 18 | P a g e

    References -The statistics were obtained by the participation answers by the

    members of the Facebook group named Archaeology & Prehistoric &

    Ancient Wonders from the post:

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/Archaeology.Prehistoric/permalink/

    513454352137112/

    -The information used in page 13 from Wikipedia can be found in this

    link :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Greek_Kingdom

    -The information used in page 14 from Dienekes can be found in this

    link :

    http://dienekes.awardspace.com/articles/greekadna/

    -The information used in page 15,16 from Wikipedia can be found in

    this link :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonies_in_antiquity

    -The information used in page 15,16 about South Italians being Greeks

    and Ainu people having Greek feet can be found here:

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/kristinakillgrove/2015/07/23/dna-study-

    pinpoints-when-the-ancient-greeks-colonized-sicily-and-italy/

    and here:

    http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/suppl_1/i182.3

    P.S. Thanks to everyone who participated

  • 19 | P a g e