8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
1/14
Multiple Choice Problems
1. eThe correct answer is e because elasticity is -0.5Assume that the price of one hot tub is P, then an individual must have an income of at
least 100P in order to purchase a hot tub. Therefore, the quantity demanded at this price is
1000000100P!10000P. "upposin# further that the price of a hot tub doubles, the price
now becomes $P, therefore ma%in# the income required to be $00P. &uantity demanded
at this point decreases to 100000$00P!5000P. 'ecall that the formula for price elasticity
of demand is
$. b(. a
At a price of )100, the quantity of tic%ets demanded is $*+$(+!50
At the price of )110, the total quantity demanded is 1$+1$+!$5
8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
2/14
. bConsumers problems
1.a. es. 'ay prefers more to less of each #ood. This can be confirmed by ta%in# first
order derivatives of the utility function to show that the level of utility is
positively related to the amount of each #ood consumed.
/This value is positive
/this value is positive
b. hen utility is 2, the function can be written as
'ewritin# it in the form of y!m3c
The intercepts for this line will be
X Y
0 50100 0
At a utility level of 1
8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
3/14
'ewritin# in the form y!m3c
4ntercept coordinates are
X Y
0 100
100 0
hen !$, we can write the utility function as
'ewritin# this function in the form y!m3c
The intercept coordinates for this line will be
X Y
0 200
100 0
Plottin# the three curves in one #raphs
c. 6or any bundle, the indifference curve is a line passin# throu#h point /100, 0.
The resultant indifference map is a star shaped ray of indifference curves all
8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
4/14
passin# throu#h /100, 0. es, the utility is homothetic because each utility
function can be e3pressed as a function of the other.d. 4f 'ay7s income is less than )100, he will consume only #ood and nothin# of
#ood 8. 9ut if his income is above )100, he will consume only #ood 8 and
nothin# of #ood . :iven the utility function and the prices of #ood 8 and #ood
/both )1, we can derive his demand for #ood 8 as a function of his income. 6or
all income levels above )100, 'ay will consume 1 unit of #ood 8 for every
additional )1 of income. Therefore, 8!4-100, where 8 is the quantity of 8
consumed and 4 is 'ay7s income
$.
a The #eneral form of a consumption leisure bud#et line is
here ; is consumption levels, w is the wa#e rate, < is hours of leisure, T is total
time available and = is the part of income that is independent of wor%in# hours.:iven total time T, wa#e rate w, and 31 hours of leisure, the a#ent faces a bud#et
constraint #iven by the equation.
8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
5/14
b to solve for utility ma3imi>in# levels of 31 and 3$, we proceed as follows
=a3
s.t
6rom this problem, we can derive the lan#ra#e as
?ifferentiatin# this function with respect to , , and
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@1
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@$
!0@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@(
6rom 1 and $, we can solve for the e3pansion paths of 31 and 3$
6rom 1
6rom $
8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
6/14
quatin# the two
"ince is common on both sides it cancels out, leavin#
Bbtainin# reciprocals on both sides and then square roots results in
e can plu# equivalents of , and into the bud#et constraint to obtain their optimal values.
6actorin# out
?ividin# both sides by
8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
7/14
b At first, increasin# wa#e will cause an individual to wor% more and ta%e less
hours of leisure. This is the case because substitution effect is hi#her than income
effect hence wor% is relatively more profitable than leisure. Cowever, as wa#es
%eep increasin#, the substitution effect %eeps declinin# while income effect
increases until a point where income effect is bi##er than substitution effect. At
this point, an individual consumes more of leisure hours and less of wor%
True or False
1. 6alse. Dot all the sections of the AT; symboli>e ?'". Bnly the upward slopin# part of
the curve is associated with decreasin# returns to scale. The downward slopin# part is
associated with increasin# returns to scale.$. True. At =P1w1E=P$w$, the slope of the isoquant e3ceeds that of the isocost, implyin#
that the firm can maintain same level of output by increasin# the use of input 1 and
decreasin# the use of input $ until equilibrium is reached.(. True. henever the =; curve is below the AT; curve, it implies that an additional unit
of input will cost less than the previous unit, which means the avera#e cost is also
declinin#. Bn the other hand, if =; the A;, then the A; is increasin# because every
additional unit is costin# more, which implies hi#her costs on avera#eF Therefore, the
avera#e cannot increase when =; is declinin#.. 6alse. Avera#e cost is minimi>ed when y!10
'ecall that
At minimum, the derivative of the A; function is equal to >ero
8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
8/14
=ultiplyin# each term by
Ta%in# the square root on both sides
y!10.
5. 6alse. :iven that the inputs in this production function are perfect substitutes, the optimal
solution is a corner solution, implyin# that the firm ma3imi>es profit by usin# only one
input. Then, if the price of 31 doubles and that of 3$ triples, then the firm is better off
producin# usin# 31 only because it is cheaper. Therefore, the firm7s cost will only double.*. 6alse. "ince the firm shows decreasin# returns to scale, the effect of the ta3 and subsidy
do not cancel out. ssentially, the increase in inputs used due to the subsidy will result in
less than proportionate increase in output. This means that the overall impact is ne#ativeG
hence the optimal quantity has to chan#e.+. 6alse. 4f the firm is in a competitive mar%et, an increase in its output price must cause its
quantity to fall because buyers will shift to other firms.Production problems
1./a 4f the firm is e3periencin# a fi3ed proportions production function, the total
cost is equal to the sum of costs of both inputs.
/b :iven that the firm7s inputs are perfect substitutes, then the firm optimal
bundle is a corner solution, which means it can only produce with one input.
8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
9/14
As such, it chooses the input which has a lower cost. Cowever, the input costs
may be equal, in which case the firm is indifferent. Therefore, there are (
possible cost functions.
4f w1Ew$, T;!w1y.4f w$Ew1, T;!w$y4f w1!w$!w, T;!wy
$. :iven the production function y!min/$31, (3$ then the conditional demand for 31
isH
hen , the production function becomes y!min/$31, 1$
"ince the proportions are fi3ed, $31!1$
31!*T;!*w1w$
(. The total cost function is
Production function
This problem is a cost minimi>ation problem which is solved as follows.
=in
s.t
8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
10/14
6ormulatin# Bbtainin# 6irst order conditions
@@@@@@@@@@i
@@@@@@@@@@.ii
@@@@@iii
e can solve e3pansion paths of 31 and 3$ usin# equations 1 and $
6rom 1,
@@@@@@@@@@@@..iv
6rom $,
8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
11/14
@@@@@@@@@@@..v
quatin# iv and v
"ubstitutin# these values into equation ( one at a time
4ntroducin# the e3ponent on both sides
8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
12/14
=ultiplyin# throu#h by
;ollectin# li%e terms
The cost function will be
8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
13/14
.
:iven that H
a. Avera#e variable cost
b. =ar#inal cost
c. Avera#e cost is minimi>ed when the derivative of AI; is put to >ero
8/17/2019 Econ 301 Juliano
14/14
d. se, the supply curve can be derived from the mar#inal cost curve by ta%in# the
positively slopin# part of the curve. To do that we need to determine the turnin# point of
=; to %now where the supply curve be#ins by differentiatin# =; with respect to y and
puttin# it to >ero.