Our vision: Healthier communities, Excellence in healthcareOur values: Teamwork, Honesty, Respect, Ethical, Excellence, Caring, Commitment, Courage
Designing and conducting a model investigation of foodborne disease Prepared by Dr Craig Dalton
Public Health PhysicianFor Viet Nam Food Authority 8th June 09
2
Outline What does “the model” outbreak investigation
look like
How does the model outbreak support a model food safety system
What are the key needs to achieve the model foodborne outbreak system
3
Start with a story…..
Outbreak investigation is important because:
– Helps control current outbreak
– Helps us learn how to prevent future outbreaks
In 1993, as a trainee foodborne disease epidemiologist, I realised that my 9 year old niece knew more about the epidemiology of Salmonella in the USA than I knew about Salmonella in Australia!
I was trying to stop her brother putting this frog in his baby sisters mouth because it might cause salmonellosis.
She said: Uncle Craig,don’t worry about frogs - eggs are the main cause of Salmonella!
5
What makes a 9 year old so smart?
Good outbreak investigations
National database of foodborne outbreaks
Good communication of problem:
– Foods
– Food preparation errors
– Settings
Salmonella outbreaks, USA, 1992 80 Salmonella outbreaks
60 outbreaks due to S. Enteritidis
Eggs implicated in 22/25 (88%) with known food
Deaths in nursing homes
Recommendation: pasteurised eggs
What is the commonest
cause of salmonellosis in
Australia?
Questions we couldn’t answer…
Questions we couldn’t answer…
What is the major food handling error responsible for foodborne disease in Australia ?
? Lack of handwashing
? Temperature abuse
We needed a national outbreak database
Outbreak reportNo. ill: 35Bug: S. agonaAssociation:Relative risk of 9Vehicle: Egg rollsContributing factors:
Temp abuseSetting: Restaurant
Outbreak report
Outbreak reportNo. ill: 35Bug: S. agonaAssociation:RR of 9Vehicle: Egg rollsCont factors:Temp abuseSetting: Restaurant
10
Every outbreak is a lesson in prevention
A national database of foodborne outbreak data is a database of “lessons” in prevention.
Need good outbreak investigations to capture these lessons – expert teams that mentor
Standardised methods of investigation and documenting the outbreaks.
– Manuals that help standardise practice
– Standard case definitions, questionnaires
– Standard data entry forms for national database
– Can be online
11
12
Training and practice in
model outbreak
investigation methods
Standard
Outbreak Reports
• Pathogen
• Place
• Food
• Hygiene practices
13
Standardising questionnaires
NetEpi – web based questionnaires
Used in large distributed outbreaks
14
Using Outbreak Summary Data Summary data can inform policy work by other
agencies
Summarise by commodity or by aetiology
Important to feed back to regulation/intervention – complex web of food production and food safety
Broader attribution efforts
Benefits HACCP food safety programs based on causes
of foodborne disease in your own jurisdiction
Prioritise food safety policy based on true morbidity and mortality NOT media or local folklore
Assess effectiveness of prevention programs
16
The Model Foodborne Outbreak
Investigation
17
Steps of an outbreak investigation Establish the existence of an outbreak
Verify the diagnosis
Defining and counting cases
Determining the population at risk
Descriptive epidemiology
Developing hypotheses
Evaluating hypotheses
Additional epidemiological, environmental and laboratory studies
Implement control and prevention measures
Communicate findings
18
Establish existence of an outbreak Definition:
a) The observed number of cases of a particular disease exceeds the expected number.
b) The occurrence of two or more cases of a similar foodborne disease resulting from the ingestion of a common food.
19
Verifying the diagnosis
Diagnosis may be
– Syndromic e.g. vomiting and diarrhoea
– Laboratory
• Laboratory diagnosis helps ensure we are comparing “apples with apples” rather than parasitic diseases with bacterial diseases.
20
Defining and counting cases Case definition
– Time, person, place
Case definition for salmonella outbreak
– Suspect : All persons with diarrhoea (3 or more loose stools) and abdominal cramps within one week of attending the feast.
– Confirmed case: suspect case with salmonella of same serotype isolated from stool.
Depending on local epidemiology of salmonellosis we may need salmonella serotyped or further subtyped to ensure were are comparing “apples with apples”)
21
Gastroenteritis after an awards ceremony Approximately 3000 attendees
Awards for State Emergency Services for Thredbo landslide disaster response
Reports from Hunter SES of diarrhoea 19 hours post lunch
» Outbreak reported 3 days after luncheon
22
Established outbreak & case finding Multiple bus loads of Emergency Volunteers
returned all over the state
Obtained a list of volunteer groups and contacted them asking about symptoms
Kept a team of 8 people back to 11pm calling organisers, tracking down and interview cases and well people.
Many reported diarrhoea, no other common link apart from the awards luncheon.
23
Verifying diagnosis
No specimens available at time of report
Clinical case definition:
– Attended luncheon at Governors mansion
– Onset of diarrhoea* within 3 days of luncheon
Collected specimens
– Drove to cases houses
– Left stool collection kit
– Paged us when stool sample ready for pick up
24
Remove barriers to specimen collection call twice daily to check
give written advice on how to collect stool specimens
provide containers, refrigeration block.
pick up from patients home
run a clinic
consider rectal swabs
25
Descriptive epidemiology 171 persons met the case definition
– defined as eating at the luncheon and reporting diarrhoea that lasted more than 9 hours or diarrhoea that was accompanied by abdominal cramps or vomiting in the 3 days after attending luncheon.
Median incubation period 9 hours – (range, 9 to 48 hours)
Median duration of illness was 24 hours (range, 1 to 96 hours).
26
Descriptive epi - Symptoms
Diarrhoea 100%
Abdominal cramps 72%
Nausea 30%
Vomiting 15%
Fever 5% So what pathogen is this symptom profile and incubation
period consistent with?
27
Environmental investigation Catered function prepared off site
It was the largest function ever catered by this caterer (3,000 people)
Cooked foods days ahead
Ran out of cool room space
Food for lunch delivered into tents from 4am in the morning and stored under tables and consumed from 1pm to 4pm (up 12 hours after delivery!)
No food for testing
28
Food specific attack rates – Awards Ceremony
Persons ate specified food
Persons did not eat specified foods
Food Ill/Total Attack rate
(%)
Ill/Total Attack rate
(%)
Relative
Risk
95% CI
Chicken 116/194 60% 9/34 26% 2.3 1.3-4.1
Ham 111/187 59% 17/38 45% 1.3 0.9-1.3
Beef 110/176 63% 19/49 39% 1.6 1.1-2.3
Potato salad 103/169 61% 22/53 42% 1.4 1.0-2.0
Pasta salad 90/141 64% 32/70 46% 1.4 1.0-1.8
29
Dose response for chicken consumed by those who reported ill after attending the luncheon
Chicken servings
N= 49
Ill Not ill
Relative risk
95% CI
0 1 8 Reference
1 17 17 4.5 0.6-29.4
2 7 1 7.8 1.2-50.9
30
Laboratory results Disaster! Stool samples lost for 2 days
Stool samples had low counts of clostridium perfringens spores (< 106 spores per gram)
Laboratory comes to our rescue with Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis
31
PFGE of C. perfringens outbreak .
Similar pattern suggesting common exposure
32
Prevention Food inspector blitz on caterers
Entered into our database
– Yet more evidence that “weekend” and “offsite” catering is associated with outbreaks due to inadequate temperature control
33
Was this a model outbreak?
Common pathogen
Good and rapid case finding
Aggressive collection of stool specimens
– Did not rely on health clinics or hospitals
Epidemiological techniques including dose-response analysis helped identify the chicken
Close liaison with laboratory enabled novel testing that confirmed cause
34
Benefits of OzFoodnet Oubreak Register
35
National Outbreak Register
• Outbreak register
• Centralized collection of outbreak reports
• Retrospective
• Data collected one quarter in arrears
• Accuracy and completeness
• Data accessible through ad hoc data requests
36
Outbreak Register – Key Fields Outbreak sequence number
Year, first case onset, last case onset
State
Number ill, hospitalised, died
Setting food prepared
Mode of transmission
Vehicle
Remarks
37
Outbreak Register – Data
Updated to September 2007 (except VIC)
4688 outbreaks
– 638 (14%) foodborne or suspected foodborne
– 3598 (77%) person to person
– 108,421 people ill
– 3058 hospitalised
– 120 deaths
38
Foodborne Outbreaks, 2001- Sep 2007
638 foodborne or suspected foodborne outbreaks
– 10,424 people ill
– 815 hospitalised
– 13 dead
Setting
– 40% in restaurants
Aetiology
– 31% Salmonella species
• 73% Salmonella Typhimurium
– 39% Unknown
39
External Data Requests Requests received from
– Industry partners
– Government partners
– General public
– Academics
Many parties interested in the data
40
Case Study: Egg Associated Outbreaks
41
Egg-Associated Outbreaks
75 egg-associated outbreak reports from January 2001 to April 2007
– 1222 cases, median 9.5 (2-213)
– 361 hospitalised, 3 deaths
Data provided to FSANZ Standards Development Committee (developing primary production standard)
42
Egg-Associated Outbreaks, 2001 – April 2007
4
11
6
9
18
16
11
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Year
Nu
mb
er o
f O
utb
reak
s
43
Enhanced Data, Egg-Associated Outbreaks
Collected enhanced data on 67 of 75 egg-associated outbreaks
58% (39/67) associated with uncooked eggs
84% (56/67) Salmonella Typhimurium
37% (25/67) had environmental testing of farm– 76% (19/25) of these were positive for Salmonella (many
serotypes)
28% (19/67) - sampled eggs from farm– 31% (6/19) of tested eggs were positive for Salmonella
Outbreak register helps define risk factors, environmental conditions and completeness of public health response
44
Key Themes Increase in egg-associated outbreaks
• Catering industry (raw egg use)
• Bakeries including “Vietnamese Style”
• Private homes (raw egg use)
Improving investigation
• Same strains in patients & farms
• Greater understanding of egg types and sources
Intervention for prevention
• Egg Food Safety Summit
• Primary Production & Processing Standard
45
Evidence supports government statements on eggs
46
Deaths by setting (n=20)
Restaurants20%
Commercial manufactured
25%
Aged care20%
Fair, temporary
5%
Hospital 15%
Commercial caterer
5%
Contaminated primary produce
10%
47
Integrating high risk foods and setting risk
Ministerial Policy Guidelines on Food SafetyManagement in Australia: Food Safety Programswww.foodsecretariat.health.gov.au/pdf/food_safety.pdf
48
Data used for decision making… Summaries of multiple outbreaks of Individually Quick Frozen Oyster
meat from Japan and Korea were used to convince regulators that the risks posed by these foods was too high.
Standard setting for foods such as– chicken
– meat,
– eggs,
– dairy products and
– seafood.
Deaths associated with foodborne outbreaks in aged-care facilities and hospitals supported Food Safety Programs for Service to Vulnerable Persons
Data used for quantitative risk assessment
Number of outbreaks of “unknown pathogens” highlights need to improve specimen collection and laboratory capacity
49
Summary Good outbreak investigation requires:
– Training
– Mentoring
– Lots of practice
– Standardised case definitions, data handling and reporting
– Enthusiastic field investigation including environmental inspection and clinical specimen collection
All outbreaks summarised in national database to provide ongoing lessons for prevention.
50
Thank you Acknowledge the assistance and work of others
in investigation of these outbreak, compiling data and contributing presentation material - Mary Osbourn, Philip Bird, Martyn Kirk, Katie Fullerton and OzFoodnet epidemiologists.