Ревью проектных документов – борьба за качество

Embed Size (px)

Text of Ревью проектных документов – борьба за качество

dragan2003@bk.ru

1 , , , , , . -

2 1981 IBM, M. Fagan, IBM best practiceSEI CMM KPA Peer Review :Peer Review - , : , , . ,

CMM Capability Maturity ModelPeer review Key Process Area 3 - Defined 3 ?

: re-work ( ) , : re-work

: , : :

: CMM Capability Maturity ModelPeer review Key Process Area 3 - Defined 4

CMM Capability Maturity ModelPeer review Key Process Area 3 - Defined 5 ?-

6 - ? - ? -?

7 , ? as to be?- ? - ?

8

9

10 - (+ ) JIRA

11-

( ) :1 - 2 - 3 - 1( " ?")1 , BRD, -12 \ . - 13 112 JIRA

On Review, () - Peer Review () . .

DOC2.0, , ( ), , Reviewed , / , Resolved,

13

14

. 1.3. - , (, , ..)12.03.2014Closed . 1.3. - , ( ) , .12.03.2014Closed15

16

17 JIRA

18 Karl Wiegers Webinar 5 Steps to Better Requirements Peer Reviewshttp://www.batimes.com/business-analyst-training/public-description-lead.html?Event_ID=WID00093Rebecca Burgess Use and profit from peer reviews of requirement documentshttp://www.batimes.com/articles/bad-ass-ba-peer-review.-part-1.htmlhttp://www.batimes.com/articles/bad-ass-ba-peer-review.-part-2.htmlhttp://www.batimes.com/articles/bad-ass-ba-peer-review.-part-3.htmlhttp://www.batimes.com/articles/bad-ass-ba-peer-review.-part-4.html Rational Unified Process - 3- CMMhttp://www.interface.ru/home.asp?artId=2312

19 dragan2003@bk.ru

20