Upload
csi2009
View
351
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presented by Nadia Manning (IWMI) at theCGIAR-CSI Annual Meeting 2009: Mapping Our Future. March 31 - April 4, 2009, ILRI Campus, Nairobi, Kenya
Citation preview
Assessing the feasibility and potential impacts of smallholder AWM interventions
in SSA and SA
Partners: IWMI, IFPRI, SEI, FAO, IDE, CH2M Hill
Agricultural Water Management (AWM)
Landscape Analysis
The opportunity
• 40-80 billion US$
• Smallholder agricultural water management is a promising investment option to improve the livelihoods and food security of the rural poor
The challenge• Despite documented success stories adoption
rates remain low. Adoption at large scale in a sustainable manner, and targeting poor (particularly women) remains a challenge.
• Irrigation investments mixed success rate, particularly in SSA
• Where to invest, how?
Project Goal
To stimulate and support successful pro-poor, gender-equitable AWM investment, policy and implementation strategies through concrete,
evidence-based knowledge and decision-making tools.
Three Key Outputs
1. Criteria, methodology and tools for selecting
AWM interventions (technologies & approaches);
2. M&E Framework for evaluating economic, social
and environmental impacts of AWM
interventions;
3. National agricultural water management
investments guides that offer AWM intervention
guidance for donors, policy-makers and
implementers
Ethiopia, Ghana, Burkina, Zambia, Tanzania ;
2 states in India (MP, WB).
Project Impact Pathway
15-20 years
5-10 years
5 years
Project
Completion
Vision of Success: Livelihoods of 65 million poor women and men farmers in SSA and SA are significantly improved
Target: Beneficiaries multiplied through broader uptake and financing of project recommendations
Target: Livelihoods of 1 million smallholder farmers enhanced in project’s priority locations
Outcome: Measurable changes in AWM investment, policy and implementation strategies by the project’s boundary partners
Outcome: Clear guidance from the project facilitates successful AWM policy, investment, and implementation strategies in the project’s priority locations
Output: Results synthesized, packaged and communicated to policy makers, investors and implementers
Output: Cohesive set of AWM knowledge products and decision-making tools
Po
st P
roje
ct
Tim
efr
am
e
Dir
ect
Infl
uen
ce
An
ticip
ate
d I
mp
act
Dir
ect
Infl
uen
ce
An
ticip
ate
d I
mp
act
Learning from existing
information
Learning from field experiences
/scenario development
Outscaling and strategizing
Synthesizing, disseminating and reaching out
Activity Schematic
Activity 1: inventory
1.1 Inventory of technologies and approaches on farm and community scale
1.2 Inventory of lesson learnt on watershed level impacts
1.3 Synthesis of literature and existing information
Outputs
• Inventory database
• Documentation of lessons learnt
• Report cards per technology
Activity 2: Constraint and opportunity analysis
2.1 Development of methodology for Rapid Participatory Opportunity and Constraint Analysis
2.2 Identification of field sites
2.3 Opportunity & constraint analysis at farm level: at least 20 sites
2.4 Opportunity & constraints analysis at community level: at least 30 sites
•analyze the technological, biophysical, social and institutional landscape in which AWM technologies operate
•understand the opportunities, constraints and impacts of their use
Activity 2: Opportunity and Constraint analysis
2.5 Impacts at watershed level, 3 comprehensive watershed studies, nested approach
2.6 Adoption scenarios and environmental impacts at watershed level
2.7 SynthesisOutputs• Opportunity & constraints assessment tools /
methodology at farm, community & watershed scale• Application of methodology at >20 farm sites, >30
small reservoirs, >3 watershed sites • Intervention briefs by technology & intervention
approach
Activity 3: Scaling up, evaluating potential
3.1 Data Harmonization
3.2 Mapping biophysical & socio-economic opportunities & constraints
3.3 Mapping gender, Irrigation & crop control
3.4 Assessment of geographic suitability domains
3.5 Assessment of AWM potential and their impact
Activity 3: Scaling up, evaluating potential
3.6 AWM Impact – cost model
Outputs
• Data accessible through searchable web-portal
• GIS based suitability domains
• Maps & tables of potential impacts under different adoption scenarios
• AWM investment cost-benefit analysis tool
Activity 4: AWM Strategic support
4.1 Distillation of the key messages
4.2 Project workshops (inception, midterm & synthesis)
4.3 Web-based data dissemination
4.4 Country policy dialogues
4.5 Dissemination to NGO’s and other implementing agencies
Activity 4: AWM Strategic support
4.6 Project Monitoring and Evaluation: internal and external M&E
Outputs
• Criteria for high potential areas, guidelines for AWM interventions, tools to estimate costs and benefits
• Intervention briefs, journal articles, dissemination materials, website, blog
Three Key Outputs
1. Criteria, methodology and tools for selecting
AWM interventions (technologies & approaches);
2. M&E Framework for evaluating economic, social
and environmental impacts of AWM
interventions;
3. National agricultural water management
investments guides that offer AWM intervention
guidance for donors, policy-makers and
implementers