1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. , 9

2. 14:0014:05 (, ) 14:0514:10 KISTEP 14:1014:40 14:4015:45 () KIAT KISTEP 15:45~15:55 15:55~16:00 9 , ()( ) . 8 2.0: , . 2 3 4 . , , . . . R&D 17 GDP 1 . . 17 R&D . . . ? , . : 2014. 06. 24() 14:00~16:00 : KT 1 ( 100) : , : (), KISTEP() : KATH( ) 3. 2009 . . . , , . . . . , . . . . . 1.0 , 2.0 . IT . 5 . . . . . . . SNS . (Think Network) . . . , , , , , . 1 KIST, , , , 2 , . 4. 2009 6, 2010 ~ 2012, 2013 7, 2013 9 ~ , 1 Open Think Network . 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. , 2. 3. OSMU(One Source Multi Use) 5. IT () 6. [] [] 7. 2 2013 9. 10. M&A 11. 3.0 12. 1 2 3 4 > M&A , . (13.10.30,) (14.1.8,) (13.12.10, ) , 3,000 (14.1.29, ) 8. KBS 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3Oyq Ys6F-Y http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnFWEufEsdw - 3 (2014.03.01) - Flagship - (2014.03.20) , (2014.04.03) 20 , 11 100 : 80 : ) http://platum.kr/archives/21881 2, 3, 4, IP5 6 7 2014 , () )http://bit.ly/1vyQR0d 2.0: 2 1 2.0 2 , 2, , KISTEP , , , KAIST , , . 5 9. 4 7 IP' YTN IP IP() (IP) , IP, IP 29 IP , 29 7 IP IP IP 3 IP . R&D 18 , R&D 10,000 170 20 10. R&D R&D 55 R&D 18 R&D R&D R&D , 4.36% 3.39% 2.77% 1.84% < GDP 2012 > R&D, 1.05 3.44 1.8 10.83 < > OECD 11. 27.1% 33.9% < > 2.99 32.7 < > SCI +8.8% -10.7% -0.9% R&D 07~11 = () , ? 12. ? ? R&D ? Valley of Death 13. TLO,RTTC 1 NTB,IP-Market , LINC,MOT ,IPCEO 3.0% 2012 2015 2.2% ? , 2.5% R&D 2011 :2 1.3% , ? 14. (TLO),(RTTC) NTB, NTIS, IP-Market, ,,TIPS, ,,1,, ,LINC,,IP-CEO, MOT (KIAT), (KEIT), (NIA), (NIPA), , , , () , LINC, , IP CEO, MOT TLO, RTTC ,, TIPS NTB, NTIS, IP-Market, 15. 1. , LINC, , IP CEO, MOT TLO, RTTC , TIPS NTB, NTIS, IP-Market, TLO, RTTC, TLO(Technology Licensing Office), RTTC * * 2 , 3 * 16. TLO , / Techno Holdings () () 31 2 32 (2010~2014) 30 (2014~2018) 17. (2013) 2009 31 8 2013 2009 145 17 2013 () 64 79 800 943 6 31 475 MIT 1 9 2 7 (, TLO, ) () ( ) , * 32 () / ( , , , ) 18. 2. , LINC, , IP CEO, MOT TLO, RTTC ,, TIPS NTB,NTIS, IP-Market, R&D , , , , DB NTB 1.3% 2009 , 19. 3. , LINC, , IP CEO, MOT TLO, RTTC ,, NTB, NTIS, IP-Market, TIPS Valley of Death ( ) 20. 00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 263 99 99 72 64 90 82 74 843 85 19 14 5 6 15 8 8 160 348 118 113 77 70 105 90 82 1,003 () (-5) (-36) (-7) (35) (-15) 1,003 >> 729 !! =72.7% , Accelerator Start-Up Factory , 6 Demoday Post 20 >> 1 >> Accl 21. 1 , 2005 , : , : ( ) 2 3 11$ 3$ Office hour Demoday Post , 400 , 8 460 778 (9 ), 500 100 (11) 1,000 Business Incubator (/) Business Incubator 1998 2000 280 BI BI 279 5,123 1 6,592 12,046 279 BI 2000 2011 290 2010 2011 24807 20055 , Soft Power , , * BI 30% 2 51% 22. TIPS Tech Incubator Program for Startup + software networking BI TIPS (TI) 76% 20% 2013. 5, 10, ( 24) (13) 30 (14) 218 / / , , & 3 VC, M&A (http://www.technopark.kr/) (TBI) R&BD RTTC 1997 1 6 , 18 BI , 1 , , 6 (2007) 23. (BI) + 1 280 18 1998 , 4. , LINC, , IP CEO, MOT TLO, RTTC TIPS NTB, NTIS, IP-Market, , ,,1 24. 1 : - - ():2 - 1/2 1 1 21300 ,2700 75, 80() 1, 12 -:1,000 -:2,000 - - - , , ,, - - - - - 5. TLO, RTTC ,, TIPS NTB, NTIS, IP-Market, , LINC, , IP CEO, MOT 25. () (11~12) 605 13 250 14 508 2,400 11: 524/ 294/ 911/ 805 12: 510/ 477/ 639/ 863 - - - - - - - - * , LINC, , IP CEO, MOT TLO, RTTC ,, TIPS NTB, NTIS, IP-Market, KIAT, KEIT, NIA, NIPA, , , , () 26. : 2013, 27. MOT IPCEO MAP ACTD LINC NTB RTTC TLO TIPS IP-Market 1 VS. TLO 1 . 2 . LINK 3 . R&D 4 . DB , DB ! DB COST 28. , ? ? ? R&D ? 29. R&D .. ? R&D ? R&D 4.15 1.49 1.84 0.38 High, Low 30. ! Dynamic Capabilities Entrepreneurship 31. ! , R&D , R&D Problem & Solution 32. Problem 1. , , ( ) HighRisk HighReturn LowRisk LowReturn Value HighRisk HighReturn LowRisk LowReturn Value Solution 1. , , () , IP (IP) , 33. : : 1 20 10 100% 110 102 20% 10 - (, ) - < - - Solution 1. Linear Model -> Network model R&D Manufacturing Marketing User Financial & Business Leadership 34. Problem 2. , , TIPS Solution 2. , , , , Tech-Shop Module Project TIPS TLO 35. Solution 2. CSO (Chief Scientist Office) - R&D 1,2 + ( CSO) , (3.0 ) Problem 3. : : Public Push Private Pull 36. Solution 3. IP Solution 3. Technology Push Market Pull , , 37. Problem 4. ($) (N) : (2013) 2009 IP M&A Solution 4. DB, 3.0 3.0 3.0 DB DB (NTB,TDB) IP() M&A() & 38. IP + , + 3.0 DB IP() M&A() ( ) ( ) (IP) , / , 3.0, DB (NTB,NTIS) IP() M&A() 39. () () (IP) / , 3.0, DB (NTB,TDB) IP()M&A() Flagship Project 40. Project 1. Bayh-Dole Bayh-Dole Act(1980), (2007) , , (SW ) Bayh-Dole 3 ( ) 41. Project2. 69 () , () 1 () () , 2 () (TLO) , TLO () 3 Project2. M&A 4 , : 5 , , : , 6 42. Project 3. RI , & IP R&D , IP R&D , IP Project 3. SOLUTION 1. RI - Small World ( ) Needs Solution 43. Project 3. SOLUTION 2. , & ! DB + SNS /SNS Project 3. 74 SOLUTION 3. IP IP R&D Road Map See d See d See d See d See d Need R&D Contest Road Map Seed R&D Project R&D R&D 44. Project 3. SOLUTION 4. Virtual Lab Cluster Virtual Lab Virtual Lab Virtual Lab Virtual Lab Virtual Lab Open Innovation Center Project 3. SOLUTION 5. / SNS => , 45. Summary P1. Bayh-Dole R&D 20% CSO IP P2. P3. KAIST () minhwalee@kaist.ac.kr Facebook: @koreaventure () http://www.kcern.org 46. 9 , 2014. 6. 24 47. 2014 9 : , : () 28 12 3 : : 2014. 6. 24 : ( ) : ( ) ( ) ( ) 48. . 1 . , 13 1. 13 2. 18 3. R&D 23 . 28 1. 28 2. 32 3. 35 4. 37 5. 47 6. 52 7. 58 . 60 1. 60 2. 63 3. 71 4. 77 5. 88 . 92 1. - : 92 2. 99 3. 103 . 116 1. 116 2. 3 119 121 49. 9 - 1 - . (1) , , 1 515 , 2 - 4 3 - 4 , , - M&A - 2002 10 , - , , (R&D) 55 18 R&D , GDP 1, 1.6% , 50. , - 2 - - 18 R&D 2 - , , , , , (TLO), , - - , , , , - , - , , , DB 51. 9 - 3 - - - , - 94% , , . - (2) : , , 2,000 3,000 - 1998, IMF - - , , , 52. , - 4 - - 1996 , 1997 1998 70% , - 1998 , , , - , - 1 2 1 21 , 280 5,000 - 53. 9 - 5 - 5,000 1) 2) - 1998 3 , , - , , , , , , , - 18 280 1 (3) , - MIT 1 9 2 54. , - 6 - 7 - 6 - 5% , 1% 500 - GDP R&D 2 25 - , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 55. 9 - 7 - , , - , - , - , , - SCI , 56. , - 8 - (4) R&D R&D R&D , , GDP , OECD - 2,000 1.5% - , , , - R&D , , - R&D 1990 57. 9 - 9 - , R&D , - , - 95% R&D R&D - , , R&D , - , - , , - 1 3, 2 2, 3 1 R&D , - 58. , - 10 - - , - R&D , , , - , (5) , , , - (Technology Push) (Market Pull) , (Public Push) (Private Pull) - , 59. 9 - 11 - - - - , , , () - - , , , - 60. , - 12 - , IP , (IP) , IP - IP IP - IP - IP IP - , - 1998 , - 2001 5000 , 61. 9 - 13 - . , 1. 40 (fast follower) - , GEM - 2007 1 GDP 2 , 7 2 [ ] : (2013) , , 62. , - 14 - - 2012 GDP 2.0% 189 117 , - , 15~29 40% , * 45.2%(2004), 41.3%(2009), 40,1%(2013) - 10 (/10 ) [ ] : , [ ] : 63. 9 - 15 - (first mover) * 1 GDP (11, Martin Prosperity Institute) - - , 18 1) - 18 , , 304 120 (: , 2012) - 15 2012 GDP 1.1% , GDP 2.3% - 18 140 - 4% 60% , 6% 54% 1) (2014), 2.0: 64. , - 16 - [] 18 : (2014) () , , [] : GEM Global Report 65. 9 - 17 - - , [ ] : GEM Report(2011) 70% , - (-)1 , 70 (-) 7 (, 2013) - 18 , - 50,000 60% , 3% 66. , - 18 - - 97 10 , 1,003 , 16 , 43 , 72.7% , , , . , , , , - : Stanford Silicon Valley, Harvard, MIT Route 128 Cambridge Science Park, Royal Institute of Technology Kista Science City 2. , R&D , 6000 70 10 - 2,000 23 - , , 115~170 , 6 70 . 67. 9 - 19 - [ ] , [ ] : (2013) 2) (technology commercialization) (2) 2) (2008), 68. , - 20 - - () (technology transfer) , , , , V. K. Jolly (, , , , ) , - , , , [ ] Jolly : (2008), , , - , 69. 9 - 21 - [ ] , , , , , (joint venture) (M&A) , , , , 3) 3) , .(, 2006) 70. , - 22 - [ ] : 71. 9 - 23 - 3. R&D R&D 4) [ ] R&D (2013 ) EU (%) 0.2 11.2 2.5 R&D (%) 5.1 12.4 4.4 : 2014 () R&D , GDP , - (R&D) 2012 GDP 4.36% 2, 6(55.5) . [ ] GDP R&D (2012 ) GDP R&D 4.36% 3.39% 2.77% 1.84% : 2014 () - R&D 2007 8.2 2012 16 14% 4) (2014), () 72. , - 24 - [ ] : 2014 () () 5 , 5) - IMD 08 31 12 22 9 - (12) IMD 5, 14 ( ) R&D - * ( ) R&D 5(07~11) SCI 8.8%, 8.4% 5) , 73. 9 - 25 - SCI () 2011 26,282 18,983 9.9% 5.6% (07~11) 8.8% 8.4% * ( ) 1 (08~11 ) OECD OECD 5 3.45 5.38 1 SCI 0.15 0.33 (3) (43) (20) * (Global Innovation Index) : (, ), (, ), (, ) R&D R&D 6) - R&D SCI 11, 5 , - R&D : 12 (2.2%), 15 (3.0%), 17 (3.5%) 6) (2013), IP 74. , - 26 - [ ] R&D - 2012 27.1% - 2011 6538 () 23.6% [ ] 75. 9 - 27 - 2011 4566 7253 13.9% 23.8% (07~11) 10.7% 0.9% R&D ( ) [ ] (%) 07~11 10.7% (09 49$ 11 59$) - 2011, 58.68$ ( 40.32$, 99$) - 16 7.5% ( ) 76. , - 28 - . 1. R&D ? GDP 3 1 - GDP 6 R&D GDP , GDP R&D - R&D R&D R&D 27.1% 33.9% - 3 , 32 10 1 2007 2011 R&D SCI 8.8% 10.7% , 0.9% 77. 9 - 29 - , [ ] (2012) : KIAT, (2013) , , , 3 78. , - 30 - , , [ ] - 2 2011 , 2012 2% 2015 3% , , , , 79. 9 - 31 - [ ] , , [ ] 80. , - 32 - 2. TLO, RTTC, TLO RTTC - , , , 2008 2 - TLO(Technology Licensing Office) TLO( ) - TLO 10 3 81. 9 - 33 - [ ] TLO : (http://ttc.kiat.or.kr) TLO (Technology Licensing) , - 9, 6 - 5 1 , , - 31 , ETRI ETRI R&D 40% 82. , - 34 - - ETRI [ ] : KATH(2014) 31 145 - 32%, 26% , TLO, TIPS - 31 32 83. 9 - 35 - - - 31 , , , , , 3. NTB, NTIS, IP-Market, [ ] NTB, NTIS NTB(), NTIS() DB , DB DB - 5 () NTB R&D 84. , - 36 - [ ] IP-Market IP-Market() 2014 143 - SMART3 , DB - NTB, NTIS, TDB - IP IP , IP 85. 9 - 37 - , , IP - NTB 1.3% 4. - , , TIPS, , , 2014 - (http://www.bizmake.net/venture/index3d.htm) , 1998 - , , , 86. , - 38 - - , - , [ ] : , (2007) 2007 1,000 72% , 2 , 30% - , - 2008 20 10,000 2 1 87. 9 - 39 - 5,000 2008 (Accelerator) , , - Y-Combinator , 6 - , 3 6 [ ] 88. , - 40 - 20 1 - D.CAMP7) 1808) , () Y Combinator 1 2005 , , . - Y Combinator - 2 3 11 , , , [ ] Y Combinator - 400 , 8 , 460 , 778 ( 500 ) - (drop box), (air bnb) 100( 11) 1000 . 7) 2013 3 27 80 , , 8) , , 89. 9 - 41 - [ ] , , S&C , . IT ORANGE FARM , , IT , Aruworks HanRSS KStartup () : (Business Incubator) (http://www.bi.go.kr/) 2008 - 279 , 5123 1 6592 , 12,046 . (BI) 290 270 2000 90. , - 42 - - 5,000 BI BI - 3 1 2 , , TLO, , TIPS(Tech Incubator Program for Startup) TIPS 2013 5 . BI , TIPS - , 1 5 - , TIPS TIPS 10 - TIPS 13 30 14 218 . 91. 9 - 43 - [ ] TIPS 1997 1 6 18 - 250 100 , , , , , , - 18 1 - , 12,000 92. , - 44 - [ ] : (2007:25) 9) - : [ ] : KISTEP(2012), (http://www.guro.go.kr/work/digital/digitalvalley.jsp) 1964 1873 60 9) KISTEP(2012), 93. 9 - 45 - - 1 127 - , - 2000 , - 2002 - 2006 [ ] : 1998, - 10000 5000 , 94. , - 46 - () 1998 BI , , , - , , [ ] 95. 9 - 47 - 5. , , , 1 [ ] 20% 3 100% , , , 96. , - 48 - - , , , , , 1) , 2) - , IP, IP , IP 4 , , - 2 10 , 1 , , , 2 , , , 42 12, 7 61 10) - 100 10 10, 1 11) ( ) (http://www.changupnet.go.kr ) 2011 70% 9 10) , 2014 11) R&D , , 2014. 05. 21. 97. 9 - 49 - [ ] : (http://www.changupnet.go.kr) , , , , , - 40 100% , 1 6000, 1.86, 10 5000(3), , - ( ) () (3 ) (1~2) , , - ( ) , VC , (INKE ) - () () 9 ( 70% ) * () , , * () , (, ) 3 ( ) (http://www.changupnet.go.kr) 98. , - 50 - - 1, 1200 , , , - 5 , 3 , 5 63% 80% 45,000 400, 1,000 242 9(4%) 1 1 (http://www.changupnet.go.kr) 2008 , , , , , 1 50, 100 - 1 , , , , 5 12) , , , 1 - 10 1 12) [1 ] : , , 2012. 6. 27. 99. 9 - 51 - - , 1 1 1 25 20 / - 6 6,000 , 1 [ ] 1 34 2012 28 , 310 , , 45 40 7 3 , 9 : 100. , - 52 - 6. 13) , LINC , , IP-CEO, MOT LINC LINC , 3,800 3,000 LINC , - () () - () 402 - () , , , - : 70%, 5 - : 1 13) , 4 101. 9 - 53 - [ ] : - () CEO - () 254 - () 1 100 , 70% * , , , , , - () () 3 MIT, , LINC (LINC, http://linc.nrf.re.kr/) 102. , - 54 - - () , , - (): 12 ~ 16 / 5(2 + 3) * (1) / 2 * (2) / 3 - LINC 2012 1,700 , 120 51, 30 , 2013 2,184 , 150 - () 3 6,000 4 2 , 2(14~16) LINC 86(4 56, 30) LINC - ( ) , - ( ) , , - ( ) , - ( ) , , , (5) - () , , , - ( ) , 1 - , - 4 81% ( 103. 9 - 55 - 8% ) , 61.5% ( 11.8%) - 4 40,663, 17,241 ( 30.6%, 18.9%) - 4 1 70.2% 1,484 - 4 3,561, 296 ( 26.8%, 37.7%), LINC - ( ) Two Track , , , IP, Learn-to-Code - ( ) , - ( ) , ( ) (http://www.changupnet.go.kr) 2002 2009 , 2010 - 2002 5 , 2014 200 104. , - 56 - , 2017 500( 5%) (2014 50 ) - 200 2 [ ] (2012 ) : (2012), 2012 CEO - , , - 5 - - , 1, 2, 3 , , 105. 9 - 57 - 2 3 / 2 3 - 60 10 IP-CEO IP-CEO , , IP-CEO - IP-CEO / , , , , - IP-CEO , - 1 1 - (Open Course) (Special Course) - , 1:1 , 106. , - 58 - [ ] IP-CEO (6T: IT, BT, NT, ET, ST, CT) 7 (Business Model) (Symbolic Systems) : IP-CEO 7. , , , , , , , , , , - 53 2 107. 9 - 59 - [ ] MAP KIAT, KEIT, NIA, NIPA, , , , 108. , - 60 - . 1. , , - - 2012 R&D , - R&D R&D - R&D R&D 109. 9 - 61 - [ ] , , - - , , , , , - - - , , 110. , - 62 - - - - , , - 3.0 DB , , - IP M&A [ ] 111. 9 - 63 - 2. (1) : ( ) , - - , - 95% R&D . - 2012 , 98% 89% * R&D : 97.9%(08), 98.6%(09), 96.5%(10) * , 2012 R&D 89% - , ( ) - - hobby theory(, ) 14) - A : , . 14) SCI , , 2014.04.11. 112. , - 64 - . , ...15) - - R&D . [ ] () 10.9 5.5 4.4 3.7 3.3 1999 2009 2012 1.97 1.58 1.32 A (%) 25.1 72.1 81.5 < 1 , 2011 > < > < R&D > : (2014) R&D . - , . 15) (2014), , KISTEP 113. 9 - 65 - [ ] SCI R&D . - SCI . - 3, 43 (, 2012) - R&D 08~11 3.7%, 8.3% () [ ] R&D , : KIAT,(2013) 114. , - 66 - - R&D ( ) 1.32% (4.06%) 3 1 (2013) (2) : [ ] (fast follower) (first mover) - (fast follower) R&D - GDP 2 , (first mover) - () 115. 9 - 67 - - , - 1 , - . - . (IP) , (IP) , - R&D , (interaction) 16) - LINC , , , , 16) (2013), 10 116. , - 68 - R&D - - R&D R&D [ ] : (linear) - - , - (linear) , 2 117. 9 - 69 - - , , R&D R&D - 10 1 , 10 2 20 - , - , . - . - 17) . - ( ) 2014, 4. 17) , : . '' , , , . 118. , - 70 - , , , // 18) R&D - , R&D , . - R&D 1 4 ( ), 2 2 (), 3 1 () . - , 3D , . - . (IP) , . - , R&D IP . - , IP . 18) (2014), 8 119. 9 - 71 - 3. (1) : , , ( , ) , , , , , - (TLO) , - , ( ) - 90% , - , , , 19) 19) (2014), , KISTEP 120. , - 72 - [ ] ( ) R&D () R&D - R&D , - R&D , - R&D ( ) R&D , - , * 5% 121. 9 - 73 - - , [ ] (2) : ( ) - , : , DB - , , : , , , - : VC M&A , - , Tech shop : 122. , - 74 - [ ] ( ) , , - - , - CSO - R&D 1, 2 CSO 123. 9 - 75 - - , , , - [ CSO] - CSO(Chief Scientists Office) 150 - - 70 40 , 40 - 70 IT , , , - CSO ( ) - , , - - 3.0 , 3.0 124. , - 76 - - - , .20) * (NSF) (NEDO) 5 . [ ] 20) (2014), , KISTEP 125. 9 - 77 - 4. (1) 3 : (Public Push) , R&D Public Push Private Pull . - , . - . [ ] Public push Private pull 126. , - 78 - (Technology Driven) . - (saturation) . - , . - , (Market driven) . , , . - . - , . R&D . - SCI . - . * (12, ) : 128 2,207 233 * (11, KIAT) : (0.81), (4.21) - , . - , 43. 127. 9 - 79 - - 2011 6538 () 23.6% - 2011 4,032 , 9,900 5,868 21) - 16 7.5% ( ) - SCI IF (Impact Factor) (BT ) * 5 IF(11, NSI DB) : /(10.86), /(7.25), (2.51), (2.2) - (50.7%), BT - BT , , ICT , . [ ] < (09, OECD)> 50.7% 14.3% 11.1% 8.8% 8.3% 38.1% < , KISTEP(12)> BT IT ET NT 30.9% 11.3% 9.5% 7.2% : , KISTEP(2012) 21) (2013), IP 128. , - 80 - - , ( ) . . [ ] 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 171 (60.6%) 178 (67.4%) 151 (65.1%) 127 (68.3%) 66 (55.9%) 21 (42.0%) 77 (27.3%) 67 (25.4%) 50 (21.6%) 37 (19.9%) 35 (29.7%) 18 (36.0%) 8(2.8%) 3(1.1%) 4(1.7%) 5(2.7%) 1(0.8%) 2(4.0%) 282 264 232 186 118 50 : . - (IP ) IP , R&D IP . - , . . - 40% , 50% . * (KIAT, , 2013) : 2007 86(37.9%), 2011 80(36.8%) 2011 : 59(53.6%) / 21(14.8%) 129. 9 - 81 - - , , TLO .22) - ( ) , 3 . - , (BI 2 51%) . [ ] (11) : KIAT, (2013) . - . - 54.7% , 44.3% (11)23) - 22) (2014), , KISTEP 23) 130. , - 82 - , . OECD 26(world Economic Forum, 13) - 2.5% OECD 4.8% .(11) [ ] OECD (11) : KISTEP(2014), - . * R&D (KISTEP) : 1.97%(99)1.58%(09)1.32%(12) - , , .24) * , 13%, 8% . 24) (2014), , KISTEP 131. 9 - 83 - [ ] () (2011, : ) : (2014), , KISTEP . - 10 14.1(11) OECD, , . [ ] : 8 (2014) - ( ) , 25) 6 . * 41/60, 23/60(13, IMD) - ( ) (, 25) 30% 85.7%, 81% 132. , - 84 - , ) SCI .26) * 22.3%(13), 45% 2011 - ( ) * (ERC) (14, ) : 5%, 5% , . (2) : . - . - : (13, 27) 5 100 . 17 172 . 26) 8 (2014) 133. 9 - 85 - [ ] ( ) - , . ( ) . - . * SCI(100) ( , 12, ) : (87.4), (57.6), (46.2), (25.0), (10.8) - , . - , , 27) 134. , - 86 - * (SCI ) (, ) : (11) 20.6% (12) 67.8% (17) 82% (LINC ) * () , , , () /, , , , , , , . - , . - , - . - - ( ) 28) - : Niels Reimers 29) - NSF , - (ERC) 27) (2013), 10 28) (2014), , KISTEP 29) 135. 9 - 87 - (IP ) , (IP) Private pull (demand driven) - . ( ) - R&D . - TIPS . - () : 3035% . (R&D ) R&D - R&D R&D * 1% R&D 0.51.1% , 1% 0.060.07% R&D () 136. , - 88 - 5. (1) : 3 , , (Critical Mass) , (Transaction Cost) 2009 [] : (2014), IP - , 137. 9 - 89 - IP-Market DB NTB, NTIS TDB (2) : [ ] 138. , - 90 - 3.0 DB - NTB, NTIS, TDB 3.0 DB API - DB DB IP M&A IP [ ] () : (2014) 139. 9 - 91 - 5 () NTB 30) DB , R&D NTB , - : 5060% (1.2 /) 100% (2 /) - ( ), NTB , NTB DB , , [ ] NTB : (2014), 5 () 30) (2014), 5 () 140. , - 92 - . 1. - : (1) , 31), 32) 2000 , - : , - : , R&D , , ( ), - SW 31) ( 21) 32) , (), 141. 9 - 93 - - 38.4(2013, ) 15.4, 3.7 R&D (2013, 16.9) , - , , - , , - , , - , 3 - () () ( ) (2013, 2.4) , , - , , GPS, 142. , - 94 - - , , , - (2) - (Bayh-Dole Act): 1980 (, , ) - (Bayh-Dole Act, Birch Bayh Robert Dole ) - R&D - Bayh-Dole Act , , - , 1980 - 1980 28,000 5% (, 2005) - , , , 143. 9 - 95 - , - - - , , , - 1983 - [ ] (1980) , , ( ) (1984) , (1986) ( :GOGO) (CRADAs) (1989) ( :GOCO) CRADA, GOGO CRADA GOCO (1995) CRADA CRADA CRADA : (2013) 144. , - 96 - 1999 - () - R&D (99, ) - SW (07, ) , , (EU Framework Program 7) , , - , 3 (, 2013) 3 , (, 2013) 145. 9 - 97 - [ ] : : : : ( ) : (2013) (3) - () , (, , ) () - , 3 - , - , - 146. , - 98 - - , , - (2~3), 2 ( ) , - , [ ] Bay-Dole 147. 9 - 99 - 2. (1) 2 (, 2012) - , - , - - 20~30 , , , - ( CEO) TLO - , , TLO (Cambridge Cambridge enterprise Ltd., Imperial Imperial Innovation, Auckland Univ. Uniservice, 148. , - 100 - HKUST R&D Corporation, Ltd., Tokyo Univ. CASTI, Hebrew Univ. Yissum ) - [ ] : (2008) - ( ARCH) - - , - SBIR/STTR(SBIR: Small Business Innovation Research, STTR: Small Business Technology Transfer) R&D 2% , 149. 9 - 101 - Lab2Market fund (UCLA), Validation fund (MIT, Harvard), Illinois Ventures (UIUC) - 600 (40 million EURO) University challenge seed fund , ( : 2009 8 -> 2013 31, 2009 17 -> 2013 145) , - : (, TLO, ) - : , - : , ( 32) - : () , / - : ( , , , ) - (2) : , 150. , - 102 - : - , - EXIT , : : , - TLO - TLO : (TLO) , TLO : : , : - 151. 9 - 103 - - M&A - - , : , , : , 3. (1) R&D R&D R&D - , (Public Push, Technology Push) 152. , - 104 - - - - R&D 08~11 3.7%, 8.3% () - 80~90% (, 2014) R&D , Market Pull, Private Pull , R&D - R&D 1 4 ( ), 2 2 (), 3 1 () R&D R&D , R&D , , (interaction) , - (2) (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) 153. 9 - 105 - ( ) 2014 40 67 23,000 - , , - 7 , , , [ ] : Fraunhofer Annual Report(2012) 1949 3 , , 2012 154. , - 106 - 19 ( 2 8000), 3 1 , 3 2 ( 9:1 ) let the market decide ( ) (Max Planck) 80% , 84% , - 56900 , 46900, 38500 33) [ ] : (2012) , - , , () , 33) R&D, 2014.1.5 155. 9 - 107 - ( IKTS )34) - , 35) - R&D , BMW, , , ( ) , (, 2007) 1973 - 55% , - , - 34) 35) 156. , - 108 - - - , () - , 3 Spill-over Effect - , , (, 2007) 157. 9 - 109 - (3) 18 R&D 40% , [ ] 5 R-I Duo System: - Research Industry, R-I - , - 158. , - 110 - , , IP - , , LG, SK [ ] R-I Duo System: - R-I - R-I 2 3 R-I - Small World Network Theory36) 36) ' (Small World Network Theory)' . 159. 9 - 111 - [ ] Small World Theory , - , , SNS, , , 160. , - 112 - , , [ ] , & IP RFP IP , IP IP IP IP - IP , IP 161. 9 - 113 - R&D , 7~8 - [ ] IP , IP - R-I - IP IP R-I IP , R-I 162. , - 114 - Virtual Lab Virtual Lab , R&D RFP 2 - [ ] IP Virtual Lab , IP M&A, 163. 9 - 115 - , SNS , , , , R&D (Teresa Amabile) [ ] / SNS => , 164. , - 116 - . 1. 1 GDP R&D 4 2 - 1) , 2) , 3) , 4) [ ] 165. 9 - 117 - 1. 1-1. R&D 20% R&D , 1-2. , 2. 2-1. CSO(Chief Scientist Office) , , CSO 166. , - 118 - 2-2. , 3. 3-1. , 3-2. 4. 4-1. 167. 9 - 119 - DB 4-2. IP IP IP IP 2. 3 (1) - , (, , ) () (2) 168. , - 120 - , , (3) , Research Industry, R-I , IP IP IP IP , R-I Virtual Lab , , 169. 9 - 121 - [] GEM(2011), GEM Global Report KISTEP(2012), KISTEP(2014), STEPI(2013), : IP (2013), IP (2013), 10 (2014), () (2014), 5 () (2014), KSF , , R&D , 2014.2.12. (2005), , , 2005. (2014), , (KISTEP) (2014), 8 (2008), (2012), , , 2012.10. (2014), , 2014.5. (2012), R&D , STEPI, 2012.12. (2011), , technology+ management 2011.9. 8 (2014) 170. , - 122 - (2007), (2012), 2012 (2013), (2014), 2.0: (2014), IP (2013), , ISSUE PAPER 2013-13, 2013. (2009), R&D , , 2009.2. (2011), , , Vol.5 No.4. 2011.4. (2007), 2007 25 (2008), , , 2008.7. (2009), , , 2009.7. (2007), , 2007.6. 171. [ ] 2014-05-26 11:05 2 . . . , . . . . , . ( TCB) . , . TCB . 2000 . , IP . (Open Innovation) 3 . , NTB DB 172. . 2008 56%, 495% . 2009 . 40% . . 2 . . . . . IP M&A . IP M&A . . , , . G . 2000 . . . . . 2000 . NTB, TDB 3.0 . () . . . 173. [] , 2014-05-30 30 . 1 515 2 . 4 3 . . 4 . . . . . . M&A . . 2002 10 . . . (R&D) 55 17 R&D , GDP 1 . 1.6% . . 17 R&D 2 . 174. . . , , , (TLO), , , . . . . . . . . , , , , . . . . . . . . . . . DB . . . 94% . , . . . , . 175. [ ] , , 2014-06-09 10:52 2000 . 3000 . 1000 . , , . . 1996 , 1997 1998 . 1998 IMF . . 70% . . 1998 . . . . , 176. . 1 . 2 1 21 ! . . 280 . 5000 . . 5000 21 . , . 1998 3 , . , . . , , . . , , . 18 , 280 , 1 . . 177. < - > 2014-06-11 11:31 , . . , . . . MIT 1 9000 2 7000 . 6 . . . 5% . 1% 400 . GDP R&D 2 25 . . , , , , , , , , . . . . 178. . . . . . , . , . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . SCI . . . 179. [ ] 2014-06-16 11:05 . , , . . . (Technology Push) (market Pull), (Public Push) (Private Pull) . , . . . . . . . . , . , () . . . . 180. . . . . . . . . ? (IP) . IP . IP . IP - IP . IP IP . . . . . 1998 . . 2001 . 5000 . . . 181. [ ] : 2014-06-24 . . GDP 1 25 . . . . 1) 2) 3) 4) 4 8 (Flagship Project) . #1 : . . 1) 20% 2) . 90% . . . 20% . . . . 182. #2 : . , . 1) CSO(Chief Scientist Office) 2) . GDP 2 Top. CSO . CSO . . #3 : . . . 1) 2) . . #4 : . . (DB) . , , . IP() . IP . 1) 2) IP . . IP . 8 . . 183. - 1 - 14:0014:05 (, ) 14:0514:35 , 14:3515:45 () KIAT KISTEP 15:4515:55 () 15:5516:00 / 9 [ ] ()( ) (KISTEP, ) , , 24() . (KAIST ) R&D 18 GDP , OECD , R&D . . , KIAT , KISTEP , , , . 184. - 2 - [ ] 9 , . . () R&D 1 18 . R&D . . R&D 33.9%, 27.1% . 32 29000 . R&D . 5% R&D 20% . R&D R&D . R&D . , . 185. - 3 - . (CSO) R&D . . KIAT , . , , . . , , 3 . , . EEN(Enterprise Europe Network) (EKN) . [ ] " R&D " YTN , ' ' , " " R&D 1 '' ? ' ?' 9 186. - 4 - [ ] < ()> . . . , KIAT , KISTEP , , , . < > , . . . . . , . . , . . GDP R&D 6 . . , . . . , . . 187. - 5 - < KIAT > NTB . . 10 DB . . . . 2 , . 8 40 . . . , . ( , ) . < ()> ? ? < KIAT > . 40 . . . < KISTEP > 6 . . , . . . . . . . , , , 188. - 6 - . . 5 . Real Time Peer Review System . R&D . . . . . . R&D actor . . . . , connected economy . < ()> . . < > . . . . 5 . . . . . . ARCH 40 . . . , 189. - 7 - . . 1 30 KIAT 31 . , , . < ()> . ? < > . , , . . < > . 350. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , , , , . . . . . . BI . BI . . . , . BI 190. - 8 - . . BI 3 BI . BI , , "Pre-BI, Main-BI" Post-BI" . , . BI . . . . < > 2007, 2 . . . , . 14 . , . . 1000 . . . ? . . . . . . . . , . . CSO . . . . . EEN . . EEN . . . . 191. - 9 - . . , . 192. , 11 2014 6 24 21 2014 6 30 () 2014-000091 (135-855) 28 12 3 02-577-8301 02-577-8302 www.kcern.org , 2014 ISBN 979-11-952630-2-8 10,000