141

2009, 13(1), 141172

* **

(1)

(2)

(3)

*

**

142

2002

95

MIC Made

In Chung-Cheng MIC

MIC

96

2003Betz & Hackett, 1983; Coogan & Chen,

2007 Erikson ego identity

18-22

career self-efficacy

1998Borgen, 1984; Niles & Sowa, 1992

19982002

2005

2007Jeffrey & Craft, 2004; Sawyer, 2004

143

()

()

()

()

1976

2002

2004

2007

Sawyer2004

Lucas O'Hora

2003brain-based learning theory

personally enriching

Pike2003

participant-centered, instructor-led

Lucas O'Hora2003

144

()

Swain

19931991

Super

Super, 19902006

30% 40%

Betz Hackett1981

145

Bandura

Taylor Betz1983 Crites1981

Crites

(1)

(2)(3)(4)(5)

Taylor Betz1983

Betz, Klein, & Taylor, 1996; Betz & Luzzo, 1996

1987Hall, 1997

18 3 50

1

146

()

()

1.

Super

2.Holland

Holland Holland code

3.

4.

Donald J. Trump

(1)(2)(3)

5.

6.

147

7.

()

MM

()

1.

2.

3.

4.

148

1

I 1.

Holland

II 2. 3.

4. 5.

/635

III 6.

7.

IV 8.

149

96

30 PE

UE 15

30 PCUC 15

()PE

()PC

15

()UE

()UC

15

150

()

2006

Likert

50 Cronbach = 0.967

39 65.53% Cronbach =

0.95

()

Taylor Betz1983Career

Decision-making Self-Efficacy Scale, CDMSE

accurate self-appraisal gathering

occupational informationgoal selectionmaking

plan for the futureproblem solving Likert

50 1990 Taylor Betz1983

0.3 50 78.72%

Cronbach = 0.96

()

Kirkpatrick1994

90

14

2

151

2

9

3

A1

A13-242-43

A1 1 3-242-43

42 43

A 2 4 A1A6

B 2 3 B1B5

C 1 C1

D 1 D1

E 1 E1

14

152

() 4

4

3.71

4.07

3.95

.84

.71

.76

2

1

4.35

3.80

3.89

4.05

.66

.79

.76

.73

1

3

2

1.

3.95

2.

4.05

()

1.

153

(1)

A13-912-13

B3 3-4

27-29

(2)

C13-220-21

D13-22-3

2.

(1)

154

B1

B15-3

24-26 A4B4

A43-33-4

B43-315-17

D13-3

13-14

(2)

A24-27-8

B55-711-12

C11-325-26

155

3.

(1)

B55-61-3

D1 5-6

15-17

(2)

A55-123-5

B35-1418-22

C15-511-11

156

4.

(1)

A33-34-5

B45-410-11

(2)

A13-242-43

C13-7

2-5

D13-527-29

157

()

5

5

PE UE PC UC

M SD M SD M SD M SD

3.88

3.53

3.62

3.67

3.71

.65

.60

.59

.68

.67

3.56

3.37

3.26

3.30

3.48

.63

.66

.59

.58

.59

3.76

3.64

3.55

3.82

3.64

.67

.61

.68

.62

.60

3.79

3.42

3.40

3.59

3.59

.52

.70

.56

.56

.42

3.49

3.26

3.28

3.19

3.49

.54

.57

.51

.54

.43

3.47

3.22

3.38

3.28

3.47

.70

.67

.59

.68

.70

6 t

PE 1

PEUE

PCUC 2345

158

6

t p 1. PE PE 2. PE PC 3. PE UC

4. UE PC 5. UE UC

-2.55

*

2.82**

5.17

***

2.16*

4.76***

.02 .01 .00 .04 .00

6. PE UE 7. PC UC

.81 2.44

*

.43 .02

8. PE PC

.69

.50

*p

159

7

CDMSE SS df MS F p

()

CDMSE

921.25

520.67

433.40

889.38

581.78

17216.85

3

3

3

3

3

3

307.08

173.56

144.47

296.46

193.93

5738.95

10.69***5.20**

5.55**

10.13***

8.29***

10.33***

.000

.003

.002

.000

.000

.000

PEUEUC

PEUEUC PEUC PEUEPCUC

PEUEUC PEUEUC PEPC

CDMSE

1608.93

1869.07

1457.20

1639.20

1310.40

31122.13

56

56

56

56

56

56

28.73

33.38

26.02

29.27

23.40

555.75

CDMSE

2530.18

2389.73

1890.60

2528.58

1892.18

48338.98

59

59

59

59

59

59

14

()

1.

A22-118-19

B52-120-21

160

D12-122-23

E12-625-27

2.

A1

A16-219-22

B26-912-13

A16-1026-30

A26-415-16

E16-429-31

3.

A1

161

A17-725-32B3

B31-116-24

D17-423-25

E17-616-8

Super

xx()

A43-95-8

B22-427-30

4.

162

A3

8-67-8

B58-517-18

Holland

B1

B18-431-31-8-51-5

()

1.

B3

B34-231-33 C1

C11-424-25

A11-121-27

B11-216-18

163

E11-1

22-23

2.

A35-614-15

D14-222-24

3.

B11-111-13

B21-117-19

B41-1

10-11

164

54

()

()

()

()

165

()

()

1.

2.

166

3.

()

1.

2.

14

1998

199830(1)

133-149

200334(2)

247-266

20026142-8

20058(3)55-71

167

1991

2004

35(4)375-392

1993

1987

1976

2002

1990

2006

2007

10(4)63-84

2006

6(2)91-107

Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1981). The relationship of career-related self-efficacy

expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of

Counseling Psychology, 28, 399-410.

Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy

expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of

Vocational Behavior, 23, 329-345.

Betz, N, E., Klein, K. L., & Taylor, K. M. (1996). Evaluation of a short form of form

of the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Journal of Career

Assessment, 4, 47-57.

Betz, N. E., & Luzzo, D. A. (1996). Career assessment and the Career

168

Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4,

413-428.

Borgen, F. H. (1984). Counseling psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 35,

579-604.

Coogan, P. A., & Chen, C. P. (2007). Career development and counseling for women:

Connecting theories to practice. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 20(2),

191-204.

Crites, J. O. (1981). Career counseling: Models, methods, and materials. New York:

McGraw-Hill.

Hall, H. (1997). Overcoming career barriers: A model of cognitive and emotional

processes for realistic appraisal and constructive coping. Journal of Career

Development, 24(1), 25-37.

Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity:

Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30(1), 77-87.

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San

Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Lucas, R. W., & O'Hora, M. (2003). The creative training idea book: Inspired tips

and techniques for engaging and effective learning. New York: NY, American

Management Association.

Niles, S. G., & Sowa, C. J. (1992). Mapping the nomological network of career

self-efficacy. Career Development Quarterly, 41(1), 13-21.

Pike, R. W. (2003). Creative training techniques handbook (3rd

ed.). Amherst, MA.

HRD Press Inc.

Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as a disciplined

improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12-20.

Super, D. E. (1990). A life-span, life-space to career development. In D. Brown, L.

Brooks, & Associates, Career choice and development (2nd

ed.) (pp. 197-261).

San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Taylor, K. M., & Betz, N. E. (1983). Applications of self-efficacy theory to the

169

understanding and treatment of career indecision. Journal of Vocational

Behavior, 22(1), 63-81.

170

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

171

The Effects of Creative Career Planning

Course on Undergraduate Students Career

Decision Efficacy

Ai-Tzu Li* Zi-Jing Nie**

The purpose of the study was to explore (1) the reaction of the student subjects

in the experimental group toward the creative career planning course, (2) the

difference in the career decision efficacy between the experimental group and the

control group, and (3) the influence of the course on the student subjects in the

experimental group after taking the course 3-4 months. The study utilized a

four-group quasi-experimental design and the interview method to collect data. The

participants of the experimental group were those who took the creative career

planning course in the fall semester, 2007. Results showed that the student subjects

in the experimental group were satisfied with the course and there was significant

difference between the experimental group and the control group. They perceived

that the learning climate was creative, vivid, and challenging. The course not only

was helpful in their career decision efficacy, but also enhanced their capability in

interpersonal relationship, communication skills, time management, and oral

presentation. Besides, they were able to use creative methods to solve problems, and

therefore, were more tolerated to stress and more confident in future career success.

Keywords: creative career planning course, creative teaching, career decision

efficacy

* Ai-Tzu Li, Associate professor, Department of Adult & Continuing Education, National Chung Cheng University

**Zi-Jing Nie, M.Ed., Department of Adult & Continuing Education, National

Chung Cheng University

172