8/11/2019 10anaf

1/16

124

TA

, ,

,

. 260,

92 , 168 . 14,5 ,

17,7 , 21,4 .

, .

.

,

,

,

, .

.

.

: ,

, ,

.

.

.

(Frichand, 2011).

, (Blasi, 1980, 1983, 1990). ,

: 159922.8:316628

8/11/2019 10anaf

2/16

125

, (Bergman,

2005).

. (Walker, 2005)

.

,

, .

.

.

(Walker, 2005).

.

(Blasi, 1993; Blasi & Glodis, 1995)

, .

, ,

.

(Blasi, 1980, 1983; Bergman, 2004).

(Blasi, 1983),

: , , ,

; ,

. ,

.

,

. ,

?

, , . (

Bergman, 2004, .37).

( . Pratt et al. 2003; Youniss &

Yates, 1997; Hardy & Carlo, 2005)

,

. , ,

8/11/2019 10anaf

3/16

126

(Hardy & Carlo, 2005).

, ..

.

,

, ,

, , ,

(Bleiberg, 1984;

Harter 1999; Stern, 1985, Winnicott, 1958, 1965; Harter, 2006).

, (Harter, 2006).

,

, (, 2009).

,

.

.

, .

. (Berger, 2008)

, ,

,

.

(Blasi, 1993; Blasi & Milton, 1991)

.

, , (Blasi & Milton, 1991)

.

.

(Harter, 1986,

1988; Blasi & Milton, 1991)

, ,

8/11/2019 10anaf

4/16

127

.

,

.

(Arnold, 1993)

,

.

( Arnold, 1993)

,

.

,

(, 2011). ,

(

)

( . Blasi, 2004; Hardy & Carlo, 2005; Lawford, Pratt,

Hunsberger, & Pancer, 2005; McAdams et al., 1997; Pratt & Arnold, 2006; Pratt

& Arnold, 2006),

( . Marozzo-Olson, 1998), (

. Steger, 2005). (Matsuba & Walker,

2005)

,

.

260

, . 14,5 . I

.

60 (30 30 ).

17,7 .

127. 63 III

(32 31 ),

(14 ) (16 ),

22 25 12

.

8/11/2019 10anaf

5/16

128

21,4 . II IV (-

: ) , . 73, 43

(31 12 ), 30

.

,

, .

- -,

, ,

.

.

. (Virtuous Qualities Scale)

2008 (Grundtner, Rode, Giebel, & Bock; 2008).

,

16

.

: ( = .72), ( =.73), ( = .75), ( = .69), ( = .76), (

= .75),( = .71), ( = .72) ( = .80).

=.80.

1 5 (1- ; 2- ; 3-

; 4- ; 5- ).

1 5.

.

(Moral self-concept measure) 2008 (Grundtner, Rode,

Giebel, & Bock; 2008).

.

, ,

( . /, /, / .).

.

( )

.

8/11/2019 10anaf

6/16

8/11/2019 10anaf

7/16

130

1. ,

N SD F(2,193) p

e 60 12.87* 6.883

71.563 .000 63 20.03* 6.648

73 25.82* 5.162

196 19.99 8.159

: * - 0.01 Bonferroni post-

hoc .

2

. (F(2,193)

= 4,763; p

8/11/2019 10anaf

8/16

131

2.85* 2.90 3.15* .59 .63 .63 4.763 .010

3.90 3.89 4.05 .77 .61 .72 1.044 .354

3.75* 3.78 4.07* .77 .75 .57 4.196 .016

3.49 3.65 3.42 .79 .65 .68 1.850 .160

2.95 2.91 2.86 .91 .79 .84 .196 .822

2.63 2.36* 2.79* .92 1.10 .96 3.173 .044

3.69 3.57 3.42 .87 .65 .84 1.899 .152

4.01* 4.03* 4.38* .54 .49 .39 13.312 .000

: , . ;*

- 0.01 Bonferroni post-hoc .

3.

, ,

. ,

.

3.

N SD t(194) p

104 19.64 7.55-.639 .524

92 20.39 8.83

0.05 (t(194)=2,147; p

8/11/2019 10anaf

9/16

132

4.

/ SD t(194) p

3.60 3.66 .51 .52 -.796 .427

3.07 2.88 .58 .66 2.147 .033

3.95 3.96 .75 .65 -.147 .883

3.84 3.92 .69 .73 -.792 .467

3.51 3.51 .73 .70 .044 .965

2.97 2.83 .82 .87 1.194 .234

2.60 2.61 .99 1.03 -.110 .912

3.52 3.59 .83 .75 -.552 .582

4.13 4.19 .51 .49 -.877 .382

: - , -

,

. 5

0.01 (t(60)=7,198; p

8/11/2019 10anaf

10/16

133

,

. .

.

.

.

,

.

0.01 (t(64)=2,698; p

8/11/2019 10anaf

11/16

134

7.

N SD t(64) p

32 21.31 4.36

2.698 .009 .

34 17.12 7.71

8.

, ,

, , .

0.01.

, , ,

.

.

, .

8.

/

/ SD t(64) p

3.71 3.40 .52 .46 2.573 .012

2.96 3.15 .57 .64 -1.294 .200

3.94 3.37 .61 .81 3.203 .002

3.71 3.43 .78 .77 1.481 .143

3.71 3.25 .62 .68 2.861 .006

3.18 3.36 .69 .77 -1.036 .304

2.27 3.42 1.03 1.03 -4.517 .000

8/11/2019 10anaf

12/16

135

3.78 3.29 .64 .62 3.139 .003

4.28 3.63 .41 .64 4.846 .000

: ,

.

.

.

,

.

.

, , ,

.

. , , .

,

.

. .

, .

, ,

, .

.

,

,

.

, .

8/11/2019 10anaf

13/16

136

, ,

. , , ,

, ,

, ,

.

, .

. , ,

. ( . Kneevi, 2003; ,

2000; Warren, 2008).

,

.

, .

.

( . Derryberry & Thoma, 2005;

McDaniel, Grice & Eason, 2010).

8/11/2019 10anaf

14/16

8/11/2019 10anaf

15/16

138

Harter, S., 2006. The Self. : Eisenberg, N. ed. Handboo of child psychology. 3, NJ:

Wiley & Sons, p. 505-570.

, ., 2009. . .

:

Kneevi, G., 2003.koreni amoralnosti. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju

Marzocco-Olson, L., 1998. The Assessment of Moral Integrity among adolescents and

adults. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison, ( : www.

umn.edu, 2008)

Matsuba, M.K., & Walker, L.J., 2005. Young Adult Moral Exemplars: The Making of Self

Through Stories.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15 (3), p. 275-297.

McDaniel, B.L., Grice, J.W., & Eason, E.A., 2010. Seeking a multi-construct model of

moralityJournal of Moral Education, 39 (1), p. 37-48., ., 2000. .

. :

Pratt, M.W., & Arnold, M.L., 2006. Growing into Generatiity: Adolescent Roots of a

Generatie Self in Emerging Adulthood. Notre Dame Symposium

on Personality and Moral Character

Pratt, M.W.; Hunsberger, B.; Pancer, S.M. & Alisat, S., 2003.A Longitudinal Analysis

of Personal values Socialization: Correlates of a Moral Self-Ideal in Late Adolescence.

Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Steger, M.F., 2005.Deelopment and validation of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire: A

Measure of Eudaimonic Well-Being. Doctoral dissertation, The Graduate School

of the University of Minnesota ( 2008, : www.umn.edu)

Walker, L.J., 2005.Lin between moral nowledge and moral action. : Exploring Human

Development: A Tool Kit, (). Worth Publishers.

Warren, E.A., 2008. Modeling Moral Personality: Moral Chronicity, Moral Identity,

and Moral Cognition. Doctoral Dissertation. The Graduate School of Arts and

Sciences, Columbia University, ( : www.umn.edu, 2008)

8/11/2019 10anaf

16/16

139

Ana FRICHAND

MORAL SELF-PERCEPTION OF ADOLESCENTS

Summary

This research examines differences in moral self-perception of

adolescents with different age, gender, type of behaior and family. The total

number of participants is 260, where 92 are girls and 168 are boys. The aerage

age of participants from early adolescence is 14.5 years, from middle adolescence

is 17.7 years, while the aerage age of participants from late adolescence is 21.4

years. All participants are Macedonians, with Orthodox religion.

The results indicate that older adolescents, adolescents who do notmanifest asocial or antisocial behaior and adolescents who lie with their

parents who are in marriage are choosing moral alues and irtues as more

central and more important to their moral self-perception compared to younger

adolescents, and to their peers who manifest asocial or antisocial behaior and

those who lie in institutions for children without parents and parental care. No

differences are registered according to gender of adolescents.

Key words: MORAL SELF-PERCEPTION, MORAL vALUES AND

vIRTUES, ADOLESCENCE, ASOCIAL AND ANTISOCIAL BEHAvIOR