13693780410001712061

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 13693780410001712061

    1/8

    Cryptococcosis outbreak in psittacine birds in Brazil

    T. F. RASO*, K. WERTHER*, E. T. MIRANDA$ & M. J. S. MENDES-GIANNINI$

    *Departamento de Patologia Veterinaria (FCAV/UNESP), Jaboticabal and$Departamento de Analises Clnicas, Faculdade de

    Ciencias Farmaceuticas (UNESP), Araraquara, SP, Brazil

    An outbreak of cryptococcosis occurred in a breeding aviary in Sa o Paulo, Brazil.

    Seven psittacine birds (of species Charmosyna papou , Lorius lory, Trichoglossus

    goldiei, Psittacula krameri and Psittacus erithacus) died of disseminated crypto-

    coccosis. Incoordination, progressive paralysis and difficulty in flying were seen in

    five birds, whereas superficial lesions coincident with respiratory alterations were

    seen in two birds. Encapsulated yeasts suggestive of Cryptococcus sp. were seen in

    faecal smears stained with India ink in two cases. Histological examination of the

    birds showed cryptococcal cells in various tissues, including the beak, choana,

    sinus, lungs, air sacs, heart, liver, spleen, kidneys, intestines and central nervous

    system. High titres of cryptococcal antigen were observed in the serum of an

    affected bird. In this case, titres increased during treatment and the bird eventually

    died. Yeasts were isolated from the nasal mass, faeces and liver of one bird.

    Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii serovar B was identified based on biochemical,

    physiological and serological tests. These strains were resistant (minimum

    inhibitory concentration 64 mg/ml) to fluconazole. This is the first report of C.

    neoformans var. gattii occurring in psittacine birds in Brazil.

    Keywords avian, Brazil, Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii, cryptococcosis,

    psittacine birds

    Introduction

    Cryptococcus neoformans is widespread in naturalenvironments, mainly in plant debris, soil and avian

    droppings [1]. On the basis of physiological, ecological

    and serological differences, C. neoformans has been

    subdivided in two varieties: C. neoformans var. neofor-

    mans (serotypes A, D and AD) and C. n. var. gattii

    (serotypes B and C) [2]. Recently, C. neoformans var.

    grubii has been described and comprises isolates of

    serotype A [3]. In Brazil, the two long-established

    varieties of the fungus are recognized as aetiological

    agents of human cryptococcosis [4,5].

    In birds, clinical disease is rare, although the

    presence of Cryptococcus spp. in the faeces hasfrequently been demonstrated [6,7]. Ante-mortem diag-

    nosis of cryptococcosis is difficult because clinical signs

    are not pathognomonic. Signs include weakness, de-

    pression, dyspnoea, anorexia, weight loss, diarrhoea,

    oral masses, blindness, incoordination, progressive

    paralysis and eventually death [8,9]. The most common

    lesion seen in post-mortem examinations is a gelatinous

    myxomatous material in the respiratory tract, abdom-

    inal cavity, sinuses and brain. C. neoformans may be

    seen in specimens stained with Gram or India ink as

    spherical cells surrounded by a thick mucopolysacchar-

    ide capsule that does not stain and is seen as a clear

    halo [10]. The species can be easily isolated, thusproviding the means for studies on its sexuality and

    its antigenic and genetic structures [2].

    In psittacine birds, at the time of this writing,

    cryptococcosis has been reported only in a moluccan

    cockatoo (Cacatua moluccenis) [11], a Major Mitchells

    cockatoo (Cacatua leadbeateri) [12], a thick-billed

    parrot (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha), an African grey

    Correspondence: Dr Karin Werther, Departamento de Patologia

    Veterinaria, Faculdade de Ciencias Agrarias e Veterinarias,

    Universidade Estadual Paulista, FCAV/UNESP, Via de acesso Prof.

    Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n8, Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, 14884-900,

    Brazil. Tel: '/55 16 3209 2664; Fax: '/55 16 3202 4275; E-mail:

    [email protected]

    Received 12 December 2002; Accepted 18 June 2003

    2004 ISHAM DOI: 10.1080/13693780410001712061

    Medical Mycology August 2004, 42, 355/362

  • 7/30/2019 13693780410001712061

    2/8

    parrot (Psittacus erithacus) [13] and a green-winged

    macaw (Ara chloroptera ) [14]. The present report

    describes an outbreak of cryptococcosis in psittacine

    birds in Brazil.

    Materials and methodsClinical cases

    A breeding aviary in Sao Paulo, Brazil, imported many

    psittacine species from the Netherlands, Belgium and

    Germany in 1996 and 1997. Couples of birds were kept

    in 1.5)/3.0-m enclosures with sand floors and sepa-

    rated by metal fencing (Fig. 1a). Perches were made

    with twigs taken from nearby Eucalyptus spp. and were

    spread throughout the enclosure (Fig. 1a,b). Each

    enclosure was equipped with a stainless steel cage, a

    wood nest and stainless steel water and food containers,

    which were cleaned daily. Birds were fed fresh fruits and

    a commercial diet (Lorinectar; Aves Products, De-venter, the Netherlands).

    Seven birds died of cryptococcosis during a period of

    3 years in this aviary; six between August 1999 and

    May 2000 and one in 2002. Birds 1 and 2 were black-

    capped Lories (Lorius lory ), bird 3 was a Goldies

    lorikeet (Trichoglossus goldiei), bird 4 was a ring necked

    parrot (Psittacula krameri) and bird 5 was an African

    grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus ). These five birds died a

    few hours after showing incoordination and paralysis,

    and two birds had alterations related with the respira-

    tory tract and were submitted for treatment.

    A mass (approximately 2)/2 cm) was seen involving

    the upper beak and the infraorbital sinus (Fig. 2) of the

    sixth bird, a Goldies lorikeet. Structures suggestive of

    cryptococccal and inflammatory cells were detected by

    aspirative biopsy. Fluconazole (Zoltec; Pfizer, New

    York, NY) was prescribed for 30 days, at 8 mg/kg per

    os (p.o.)/single in day (SID) [15]. After that period, asecond aspirative biopsy was done and fluconazole was

    injected directly into the mass at the same dosage.

    Faeces were collected for smears throughout the

    treatment. This bird died 10 days after the beginning

    of the second period of treatment.

    Bird 7 was a Papua lori (Charmosyna papou) that

    had difficulty in closing the beak due to a gelatinous

    mass at the choanas. Biopsy of the mass was performed

    by aspiration and the faecal smears were examined. A

    Fig. 1 (A) Couples of birds were kept in enclosures with sand floor and separated by metal fence. Perches were made with Eucalyptus sp. twigs.

    (B) At prominence, perches chewed by the birds.

    Fig. 2 A Lorikeet (Trichoglossus goldiei) with cryptococcosis. Note

    a mass involving the upper beak (white arrow) and infraorbital sinus

    (black arrow).

    2004 ISHAM, Medical Mycology, 42, 355/362

    356 Raso et al.

  • 7/30/2019 13693780410001712061

    3/8

    treatment consisting of an intralesional injection of

    fluconazole (8 mg/kg SID) into the gelatinous mass was

    prescribed for 30 days. After 15 days of treatment, a

    biotherapeutic drug (Cryptococcus 30CH, Jaboticabal,

    Sao Paulo, Brazil) was also administered in the food

    (10 drops SID), prepared using the yeast aspirated from

    the mass [16]. After 45 days of treatment, the gelatinous

    mass had disappeared. Serum of this bird was assayed

    by latex agglutination test and high titres of crypto-

    coccal antigen were detected. Oral fluconazole was

    prescribed, but the bird died 21 days later.

    Pathology

    All birds were necropsied and organs collected for

    microscopic examination. Samples were fixed in buf-

    fered 10% formalin, processed and embedded in

    paraffin. Sections of 4 mm were stained with haematox-

    ylin and eosin (H&E) and with periodic acid-Schiff

    (PAS).

    Mycological and serological tests

    Faeces, organ fragments and aspirated biopsy materials

    from birds 6 and 7 were collected in sterile vials. After

    maceration, samples were stained with India ink,

    prepared with 20% KOH and plated on Sabouraud

    agar and Niger seed agar medium (manipulated by the

    laboratory of the university). Plates were kept at room

    temperature and monitored for 2/7 days. Brown

    smooth colonies on Niger seed agar were transferred

    to Sabouraud glucose agar and C. neoformans was

    identified by the API 20 C Aux System (Biomerieux,

    Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).The canavanine/glycine/bromothymol blue (CGB)

    medium test was used to determine the variety of C.

    neoformans [17]. Isolates were serotyped using the

    Crypto Check Iatron (Iatron Laboratories, Tokyo,

    Japan). Serum samples from bird 7 were analysed by

    the latex agglutination test for cryptococcal antigen

    (IMMY; Immuno-mycologics, Norman, OK) [18].

    All isolates were submitted to the broth microdilu-

    tion test, which was performed according to the

    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards

    (NCCLS) [19] with modifications [20], for in-vitro

    susceptibility testing of fluconazole (FLC). Broth

    microdilution testing was performed with RPMI 1640

    medium (Gibco, NY; Biomerieux) with L-glutamine,

    without bicarbonate and buffered with morpholinepro-

    panesulfonic acid (MOPS) at pH 7.0 with addition of

    2% glucose. An inoculum of 1)/106 to 5)/106 colony-

    forming units (c.f.u.) per ml was made as recommended

    by NCCLS and then diluted 1:10 with sterile distilled

    water. The final inoculum contained 0.5)/104 to 2.5)/

    104 c.f.u./ml [20]. One set of microplates was wrapped

    with film sealer to prevent medium evaporation,

    attached to an electrically driven wheel inside the

    incubator, and agitated at 350 r.p.m. The minimum

    inhibitory concentration (MIC) endpoint was defined

    as the lowest drug concentration exhibiting a reduction

    in growth of 50% or more compared with the growth of

    the control. C. neoformans ATCC 90012 (American

    Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) was included

    on each test as quality control strain.

    Results

    Structures of Cryptococcus spp. and inflammatory cells

    were seen in biopsy material from bird 6 before and

    after the treatment. Faecal smears from the same bird

    stained with India ink demonstrated the presence of

    Cryptococcus spp.

    The first aspiration biopsy of bird 7 also showed

    Cryptococcus spp. structures and inflammatory cells.Nevertheless, the second aspiration biopsy taken after

    30 days of treatment with fluconazole was negative. All

    faecal smears stained with India ink were negative for

    Cryptococcus spp. Serum latex agglutination titres were

    1:512 during treatment and 1:1024 when the bird died.

    Clinical, macroscopic and microscopic findings from

    all birds are shown in Table 1. Macroscopic and

    microscopic lesions were seen predominantly in the

    liver, respiratory system, spleen, kidneys and intestines.

    In investigation of the seven cases, the liver displayed

    hepatomegaly in four, hydropic and lipid degeneration

    in three, multifocal hepatitis with polymorphic inflam-

    matory cells in three, yellow areas in the capsule andparenchyma in three, loss of cellular architecture and

    massive destruction of parenchyma in two, congestion

    in one and thickened capsule and hyperplasia of biliary

    ducts in one. The lungs were congested and haemor-

    rhagic in four cases. A yellow gelatinous material

    replaced the pulmonary parenchyma in three. Oedema

    and inflammatory cell infiltration were seen in three

    cases, necrotic foci and calcification in two and

    emphysema in one. Air sacs were thickened with an

    adherent mass in one case and sinuses were filled with

    yellow material in one. Alterations in the kidneys

    included nephromegaly in three cases, tubular and

    glomerular degeneration with sclerosis in one and

    congestion in one. Macroscopic alterations observed

    in the spleen were splenomegaly in three cases, paleness

    in one and a presence of multiple white foci in one.

    Microscopic examination of spleen disclosed splenitis

    with heterophils in one case. One bird had congested

    intestines, with black material inside the lumen. Some

    additional alterations were seen only in single cases:

    2004 ISHAM, Medical Mycology, 42, 355/362

    Cryptococcosis outbreak in birds 357

  • 7/30/2019 13693780410001712061

    4/8

    Table 1 Clinical, pathological and histopathological findings from seven psittacine birds with cryptococcosis caused by Cryptococcus neofor

    Number of

    bird/species

    Sex Age

    (years)

    Clinical signs Pathology Histopathology Alterations

    Bird 1

    Lorius lory

    Fema le 3 Incoordination

    and paralysis

    Congestion and haemorrhage in left

    lung, yellow gelatinous mass (4 )/ 3

    cm) in right lung

    Hepatomegaly with yellow areas atthe capsule and parenchyma

    Splenomegaly with pale colour

    Congestion in the intestines and

    presence of black material in the

    lumen

    Lungs with congestion, necrotic foci an

    calcification

    Liver enlarged with hydropic and lipid

    degenerationSpleen pale and enlarged, lymphoid tiss

    Loss of the epithelial intestine and con

    Bird 2

    Lorius lory

    Fema le 3 Incoordination

    and paralysis

    Yellow gelatinous mass instead of

    pulmonary parenchyma between the

    two lungs and adherent to spin

    Hepatomegaly

    Loss of the hepatic cell architecture an

    destruction of the parenchyma

    Spleen unaltered

    Bird 3Trichoglossus

    goldiei

    Fema le 2 Incoordinationand paralysis

    Yellow areas at the capsule andparenchyma of the liver

    Nephromegaly

    Lungs with oedema and discrete inflamcell infiltration

    Liver with hydropic and lipid degenera

    congestion, loss of the cellular architec

    massive destruction of the parenchyma

    without alteration

    Kidneys with diffuse tubular and glom

    degeneration, sclerosis glomerular, oed

    congestion

    Bird 4

    Psittacula

    krameri

    Fema le 7 Incoordination

    and paralysis

    Yellow areas in the pulmonary

    parenchyma, congestion and oede-

    ma

    Thickened air sacs with adherent

    mass near ovary

    Thickened pericardial sac

    Hepatomegaly, ascitesPresence of multiple white foci in

    spleen

    Nephromegaly

    Brain congestion, haemorrhage at

    the skull

    Lungs with congestion and haemorrha

    Airsaculits

    Pericarditis with inflammatory cells

    Multifocal hepatitis with polymorphic

    inflammatory cells, thickened capsule a

    hyperplasia of the biliary ducts

    SplenitisKidneys congested

    2004ISHAM,MedicalMycology,42,355/362

  • 7/30/2019 13693780410001712061

    5/8

    Table 1 (Continued)

    Number of

    bird/species

    Sex Age

    (years)

    Clinical signs Pathology Histopathology Alterations

    Bird 5

    Psittacus

    erithacus

    M ale 1 Difficulty in flying Yellow gelatinous ma ss in the

    pulmonary parenchyma

    Liver congested. Splenomegaly

    Kidneys congested

    Necrosis of parenchyma of lungs

    Spleen with lymphoid tissue hyperplas

    Bird 6

    Trichoglossus

    goldiei

    Male 5 Mass in the upper beak,

    difficulty in

    closing the beak and

    dyspnoea

    Intraorbital sinus was

    affected

    Lungs with white foci,

    haemorrhagic areas, emphysema

    and oedema

    Hepatomegaly

    Splenomegaly

    Sinus filled with liquid yellow

    material

    Lungs with inflammatory cell infiltrati

    (heterophils) near to bacterial foci and

    congestion

    Choana, beak and nasal mass with nec

    sacs with inflammatory reaction

    (heterophils)

    Multifocal hepatitis with polymorphic

    inflammatory cells (heterophils), lipidic

    degeneration, thick capsule, hyperplasi

    biliary ducts

    Multiple white foci in spleen with heter

    hyperplasic tissue

    Bird 7

    Charmosyna

    papou

    Female 3 Gelatinous mass in the

    choana with difficulty in

    closing the beak

    lungs with haemorrhage, oedema

    and emphysema

    Hepatomegaly

    Splenomegaly

    Choana with destruction of the tissue

    discrete inflammatory cells. Pulmonary

    necrosis

    Multifocal hepatitis with heterophils an

    lipidic degeneration

    Spleen with hyperplasic of the lympho

    2004ISHAM,MedicalMycology,42,355/362

  • 7/30/2019 13693780410001712061

    6/8

    pericarditis and thickening of the pericardial sac,

    ascites, and congested brain with skull haemorrhage.

    Histopathological examination (Table 1) evidenced

    Cryptococcus spp. in the sinus, choana, beak, air sacs,

    lungs, liver, spleen, kidneys, intestines, cardiac fibres,

    brain, meninges and bone marrow (Figs. 3/7). Such

    cells were also present in the various gelatinous masses

    seen.

    Strains were identified as C. neoformans because of

    the characteristic patterns of sugar assimilation, cyclo-

    heximide intolerance, urease production and growth at

    378C. Strains produced brown pigment in the Niger

    seed medium. The CGB test was positive, indicating

    that the strains all belonged to C. neoformans var.

    gattii. Agglutination tests with Crypto Check demon-

    strated that all strains were serotype B. All strains were

    resistant to fluconazole (minimum inhibitory concen-

    tration (MIC), 64 mg/ml).

    Discussion

    This paper provides the first report of C. n. var. gattii

    infection in three species in the family Loriidae and two

    species in the family Psittacidae in Brazil. There are few

    reports in literature concerning cryptococcosis in

    psittacine birds [11/14].

    In the seven birds described here, only two cases of

    superficial lesions were seen; the other birds had

    discrete neurological signs with no clinical evidence of

    disseminated cryptococcosis. Clinical diagnosis of

    cryptococcosis in birds is difficult due to non-specific

    signs. In our cases, primary infection probably occurred

    in the upper respiratory system and then spread

    haematogeneously to other organs. Also coelomic

    dissemination may have occurred between organs

    within close proximity. In most previous reports, initial

    colonization was thought to have occurred within the

    respiratory tract. It has been suggested that the upper

    respiratory tract may be particularly susceptible to

    initial colonization because of its lower temperature

    [8,10]. In the cases presented here, however, dissemi-

    nated infection was predominant, indicating that the

    body temperature of the birds was not a barrier to

    further ingress.

    The superficial lesion seen in birds 5 and 6 was a

    gelatinous mass occupying the choanas, sinus and

    upper beak. To date only one such case of aviansuperficial infection has been reported. In this case,

    cryptococcosis was localized at the infraorbital sinus of

    a Beccariss crowned pigeon [21]. Gelatinous material

    was also seen in the lung lesions of three of our birds.

    In the present report, some birds showed inflamma-

    tory cells, predominantly heterophils, close to the yeast

    cells. Peripheral inflammatory response in cryptococ-Fig. 3 Photomicrography of the lungs showing C. neoformans in the

    lumen of the blood vessels (PAS, 20x). Bird 1.

    Fig. 4 Photomicrography of the heart showing C. neoformans

    between the muscle fibres without inflammatory reaction (PAS,

    40x). Bird 1.

    Fig. 5 Photomicrography of the medullar space, showing Cripto-

    coccus neoformans at the meninges and around the spinal cord

    without inflammatory reaction (HE, 4x). Bird 2.

    2004 ISHAM, Medical Mycology, 42, 355/362

    360 Raso et al.

  • 7/30/2019 13693780410001712061

    7/8

    cosis is usually minimal, consisting of epithelioid

    macrophages or multinucleated giant cell and hetero-

    phils [10]. An interesting feature of these infections with

    C. neoformans was that sometimes there was noinflammatory reaction and in other cases we were

    able to observe a reaction only in some organs.

    However, all birds experienced aggressive dissemination

    to internal organs.

    Confirmation of cryptococcal infection can be made

    by culture or by demonstrating a positive titre for

    cryptococcal antigen in the serum. Analysis of serum

    samples from bird 7 showed that serology could be

    useful in ante-mortem diagnosis of avian cryptococco-

    sis. It may also be useful in monitoring the efficacy of

    treatment. Though fluconazole is generally effective

    against C. n. var. gattii [22] we found that titres of

    cryptococcal antigen in serum evidenced an apparentlypoor response to antifungal therapy, a finding that

    corresponded well with the in-vitro resistance to

    fluconazole seen. This predictive value of such titres

    has previously been reported by Aller et al. [23].

    The diagnosis of cryptococcosis when birds were

    alive permitted a tentative treatment in two cases. Bird

    6, which had a large mass involving the upper beak,

    was treated for 30 days with fluconazole alone, but no

    improvement was observed. In bird 7, the infected mass

    at the choana was treated with fluconazole in combina-

    tion with a biotherapeutic drug. The mass disappeared

    completely after 45 days, but the use of two drugs

    concomitantly does not allow defining which one was

    effective. Even though the mass had disappeared, the

    presence of high antigen titres in the serum showed that

    the animal was still infected. The progressive increase in

    cryptococcal antigen titre in bird 7 and the eventual

    fatal outcome showed that the fluconazole therapy had

    failed. Continued infection was confirmed at necropsy.

    Therapeutic levels of antifungal drugs that are

    suggested for humans or other animals are not appro-

    priate for these birds, due to resistance problems.

    Further studies are needed to determine appropriate

    therapy for avian cryptococcosis, as well as the best useof antigen serology, paralleling the use made in human

    cases.

    Cryptococcus n. var. neoformans has a cosmopolitan

    distribution and is usually associated with bird excreta,

    especially that of pigeons. On the other hand, C. n. var.

    gattii (the infectious agent in our cases), is frequently

    associated with blooming Eucalyptus spp. in tropical

    regions [1,24,25]. The yeast might have come from

    eucalyptus trees that are sometimes used as perches in

    bird enclosures. Nevertheless, attempts to isolate C.

    neoformans from the trees were not successful, perhaps

    because the trees were not blooming. In a similar case,

    an unsuccessful attempt to isolate this yeast fromeucalypt trees was made after a kiwi died of crypto-

    coccosis [26]. In a park in Sao Paulo, Brazil, material

    from 12 eucalypt trees was collected monthly and C. n.

    var. gattii was isolated for 2 consecutive years from

    only one tree and C. n. var. neoformans was isolated

    from another tree, indicating that these microorganisms

    exist in urban areas [27].

    The authors believe that the twigs of eucalypt used as

    perches for the birds were the source of infection.

    Psittacine birds have the habit of chewing wooden

    objects, such as the perches (Fig. 1b). Possibly the birds

    had extensive contact with cryptococcal inoculum. The

    idea that these birds might have been infected prior to

    importation seems unlikely because of the time elapsed

    between importation and the death of these birds. Also,

    bird 5 was born in the breeding aviary. No difference in

    infection rates nor types was observed related to the sex

    or the age of the birds.

    Human cryptococcosis frequently develops after

    exposure to dust derived from contaminated avianFig. 7 Photomicrography of the lungs showing C. neoformans with

    inflammatory cells (HE, 40x). Bird 5.

    Fig. 6 Photomicrography of the kidney showing a massive infiltra-

    tion of C. neoformans at the parenchyma (HE, 20x). Bird 3.

    2004 ISHAM, Medical Mycology, 42, 355/362

    Cryptococcosis outbreak in birds 361

  • 7/30/2019 13693780410001712061

    8/8

    droppings [8,25]. One immunosuppressed patient is

    known to have developed cryptococcal meningitis as a

    result of contact with a pet cockatoo [28].

    Control of this disease is best accomplished by

    adequate ventilation and frequent removal of bird

    droppings and organic debris. After cryptococcosis

    was diagnosed in our birds, hygienic measures were

    implemented in the breeding aviary. All the nests and

    perches were removed and incinerated, and the upper

    layer of sand was removed from the enclosures. As

    another infection control measure, birds undergoing

    therapy were kept in isolation. Although we treated

    birds in this study, we suggest that the value of such

    therapy be carefully considered given the zoonotic

    potential of this organism and the poor prognosis

    associated with disseminated cryptococcosis infection

    in birds.

    References

    1 Lazera MS, Cavalcanti MS, Trilles L, et al. Cryptococcus neofor-mans var. gattii / evidence for a natural habitat related to

    decaying wood in a pottery tree hollow. Med Mycol 1998; 36:

    119/122.

    2 Casadevall A, Perfect JR. Cryptococcus neoformans. Washington:

    ASM Press, 1998: 325/350.

    3 Franzot SP, Salkin IF, Casadevall A. Cryptococcus neoformans

    var. grubii: separate varietal state for Cryptococcus neoformans

    serotype A isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37: 838/840.

    4 Lacaz CS, Rodrigues MC. Sorotipagem de Cryptococcus neofor-

    mans. Rev Bras Med 1983; 40: 297/300.

    5 Correa MPSC, Oliveira E, Duarte R, et al. Criptococose em

    criancas no Estado do Para, Brasil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1999;

    32: 505/508.

    6 Griner LA, Walch HA. Cryptococcosis in Columbiformes at the

    San Diego Zoo. J Wildl Dis 1978; 14: 389/394.7 Irokanulo EOA, Makinde AA, Akuesgi CO, Ekwonu M. Crypto-

    coccus neoformans var neoformans isolated from droppings of

    captive birds in Nigeria. J Wildl Dis 1997; 33: 343/345.

    8 Ritchie BW, Dreesen DW. Avian Zoonoses: proven and potential

    diseases. Part II. Viral, fungal, and miscellaneous diseases.

    Compend Small Anim 1988; 10: 690/695.

    9 McCluggage DM. Zoonotic Disorders. In: Rosskopf WJ Jr,

    Woerpel RW (eds). Diseases of Cage and Aviary Birds , 3rd edn.

    New York: Williams & Wilkins, 1996: 535/547.

    10 Oglesbee BL. Mycotic Diseases. In: Altman RB, et al (eds). Avian

    Medicine and Surgery. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1997: 330/

    331.

    11 Fenwick B, Takeshita K, Wong A. A moluccan cockatoo with

    disseminated cryptococcosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985; 187:

    1210/1212.

    12 Raidal SR, Butler R. Chronic rhinosinusitis and rhamphothecal

    destruction in a Major Mitchells cockatoo (Cacatua leadbeateri)

    due to Cryptococcus neoformans var gattii. J Avian Med Surg

    2001; 15: 121/125.

    13 Rosskopf WJ, Woerpel RW. Cryptococcosis in a thick-billed

    parrot (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha). Proceeding Assoc Avian

    Vet 1984; 281/188.

    14 Clipsham RC, Britt JO. Disseminated Cryptococcosis in a macaw.

    J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983; 183: 1303/1305.

    15 Carpenter JW, Mashima TY, Rupiper DJ, eds. Exotic Animal

    Formulary. Kansas: Greystone Publications, 1996: 108.

    16 Ministerio da Saude Farma copeia Homeopatica Brasileira. Sao

    Paulo: Atheneu Editora Sao Paulo, 1997.

    17 Kwon-Chung KJ, Polacheck I, B ennett JE. Improved diagnostic

    medium for separation of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neofor-

    mans (serotypes A and D) and Cryptococcus neoformans var.

    gattii (serotypes B and C). J Clin Microbiol 1982; 15: 535/537.

    18 Gordon M, Vedder D. Serologic tests in the diagnosis and

    prognosis of cryptococcosis. JAMA 1966; 197: 961/967.

    19 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference

    method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts.

    Approved standard M27/A. Wayne, PA: National Committee for

    Clinical Laboratory Standards, 1997.

    20 Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Berenguer J, Martinez-Suarez JV, Sanchez

    R. Comparison of a spectrophotometric microdilution method

    with RPMI-2% glucose with the National Committee for Clinical

    Laboratory Standards reference macrodilution method M27-P for

    in vitro susceptibility testing of amphotericin B, flucytosine, and

    fluconazole against Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Che-

    mother 1996; 40: 1998/2003.

    21 Ensley PK, Davis CE, Anderson MP, Fletcher KC. Cryptococ-

    cosis in a male Beccaris crowned pigeon. J Am Vet Med Assoc

    1979; 175: 992/994.

    22 Espinel-Ingroff A. Clinical utility of in vitro antifungal suscept-

    ibility testing. Rev Esp Quimioter 2000; 13: 161/166.

    23 Aller AI, Martin-Mazuelos E, Lozano F, et al. Correlation of

    fluconazole MICs with clinical outcome in cryptococcal infection.

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother2000; 44: 1544/1548.

    24 Ellis DH, Pfeiffer TJ. Natural habitat ofCryptococcus neoformans

    var. gattii. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28: 1642/1644.

    25 Sorrell TC. Cryptococcus neoformans variety gattii. Med Mycol

    2001; 39: 155/168.

    26 Hill FI, Woodgyer AJ, Lintott MA. Cryptococcosis in a north

    island brown Kiwi (Apteryx australis mantelli) in New Zealand. J

    Med Vet Mycol 1995; 33: 305/309.

    27 Montenegro H, Paula CR. Environmental isolation of Crypto-

    coccus neoformans var. gattii and Cryptococcus neoformans var.

    neoformans in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Med Mycol 2000; 38:

    385/390.

    28 Nosanchuk JD, Shoham S, Fries BC, et al. Evidence of zoonotic

    transmission of Cryptococcus neoformans from a pet cockatoo to

    an immunocompromised patient. Annal Intern Med 2000; 132:

    205/208.

    2004 ISHAM, Medical Mycology, 42, 355/362

    362 Raso et al.