91721355

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 91721355

    1/7

    T E C H N O L O G Y G U I D A N C E

    A N A L Y S I S O F B I O D I G E S T E R SA N D D E H Y D R A T O R ST O M A N A G E O R G A N I C S O N S I T E

    Food waste is pulped and dewateredexample above) prior to dehydrationby thermal means. Units can includepulping or be paired with stand-aloneequipment. A Somat dehydrator isshov/n below.

    ending organicsdisposalbansand/orcomm itments to divert food waste fromlandfills has led to fairlyaggressivemarketing hyvendorso f^ on site food wasteprocessingsystems.PartiZoNeale

    C URRENT interest in and/orgovernment mandates to di-vert source separated organ-ics (SSO) frequently outpacesdevelopment of locally avail-able composting and anaero-bic digestion capacity. Foodwaste, the predominant S S O in the com-mercial organics stream, is wet andheavy leading to financial and logisticalchallenges when trucking it from thegenerator to an often distant processingfacility. This reality has led to opportu-nities for on-site processing systemsthat either: 1) Substantially reduce theweight an d volume of the organics priorto hauling; or2 Biologically break downand liquefy the organics to the pointthat they can be disposed through theexisting sanitary sewer system, elimi-nating hau ling for this waste stream al-together. This dynamic has led to manyorganics generators being solicited withincreasingfirequencyby on-site systemvendors, particularly in sta tes like Mas-sachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont andCalifornia, which a re a t the forefront of

    implementing organics diversion poli-cies.For ge nerators subject to upcomingorganics dispo sal ban s (see Mas-sachu setts Sets the Table for an O rgan-ics Ban, December 2012) and who arenot already separating their organicsfor composting, on-site solutions app earto be a veritable silver bullet.As SSO generators and facility man-agers attempt to obtain informationabout on-site systems independent ofthe sales calls and marketing claims,they can encounter difficulty findin g ob-jective comparative studies tha t discussthe range of available options applica-ble to their site-specific considerations.The goal of this two-part article seriesis to provide an objective analysis for in-stitutional, commercial and industrial(ICI) generators of food waste. Part 1describes and discusses two categoriesof on-site processing technologies forthe ICI sector: biodigesters (otherwiseknown as wet systems) and dehydra-tors ( dry systems). Part 2 includescase studies of users of various on-sitesystem s. Not all commercially availab le

    20 BIOCYCLE OCTOBER 2013

  • 8/12/2019 91721355

    2/7

    In gen eral, on-site system s may effec-

    ng to the sales literatu re, un its be-3 000lbs or more of or-

    t to most ICI kitchens is the per-e sepa rating and hauling of

    use, perm itting requirem ents and com-ty of the purchase r to independently

    lts across solutions.

    Photocourtesy on nsite Waste Solutions

    The EcoVim 250 dehydrator installed tthe La Quinta Resort Spa processes250 lbs/day of food waste, yielding 25lbs of processed organics.Throughout the process of conductingresearc h for this a rticle, one of the mostchallenging aspects was to identify andsuccessfully contact distributors andvendors of the various technologies. Ofthe approximately nine biodigestercompanies contacted, only half returnedcalls despite repeated attempts. Thisnarrowed the universe of companiesprofiled. Also precluded from the re-search set were companies that did not

    have contact information in the U.S.and/or lacked reference facilities in theU.S. In the dehydration m arketplace,we found that changes in distributionagreements are quite common, leadingto confusion as to who is selling what,what party is responsible for mainte-nance, and difficulty reconciling differ-ing product claims. Unfortunately thisever-changing landscape m akes it verydifficult for potential customers to con-duct independent due diligence. Confir-mation of' product promises is compli-cated by the fact that many of thesesystems are distributed by resellers,equipment leas ing companies andwaste con sultants (separate from directdistribution), who often change th e sys-tem that they sell/lease for a myriad ofreasons. This distribution opacity hascreated confusion and uncertainty inthe marketplace.BASIC DESCRIPTIONSDehydrators and biodigesters em-ploy varying levels and different typesof technology. Dehydrators use a me-chanical/thermal approach that effec-tively sep arate s liquids from the solids.Dehydration sy stems can include pulp-ing within the dehydratoritself or canbe coupled with stand-alone pulpingand dewatering units to achieve maxi-

    For Precision Screening-J Composted Yard WasteJ Top Soil OperationsWaste Treatment ScreeningReclaiming Landfill Projects INDUSTRIES dditional Equipment SystemsCustomized to Your Specifications Bagging. Palletizing.v ' Soil Blending Systems Plusv^ Flow Feeders. Hammermills.v ^ D i s c S t > p . i r a U i i > k C'l ' , i-''. / i -

    O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 2 1

  • 8/12/2019 91721355

    3/7

    Photo cour tesy of BioGreen

    D E H Y D R T O R V E N D O R S ystem desc r ipt ions excerpted fromsaies iiterature, interviews andven-dor ciaims are summarized:Ecovim: Decomposing c i iamber is capabie of produc ing 180F durin gprocessing to ensu re end product isessen t ia iiy odor free ; End produc t can be used as a sou amendmentsuitable for use in landsc aping; Sys-t e m c a p a b le o f r e d u c i n g c o m -postable waste weight and volume by83 % to 93% depend ing on waste in-put; No negative environ men t dam-age from TSS or B OD.Somat: Decomposing chamber willheatthewaste,kiiianybacteriaandre -duce the waste matter by up to 93% ;Temperatures up to 180F ens ure end

    mum volume and weight reduction.With both approaches, the liquid por-tion is disposed of through the sewerand th e greatly reduced solid portion isdisposed of or diverted for recycling. Atlocations with higher volumes such ascollege cafeterias, preprocessing sepa-rately and then dehyd rating in the unitPhoto cour tesyo fGaia

    The Gaia dehydrator has an 8 to 11hour processing cycle and can beequipped with a tote lifter to emptyfood was te into the machine.

    product is odor free; End product is ideal for use as soil amendment.Gaia: Accelerates reduction pro-ce ss based on drying, steril izing andgr inding mixed food scraps and or-ganic waste; . During 8 to 11 hoursprocessing cycle, food waste weightand volume are reduced by up to 90perce nt; Pro prietary blower chambertechn ology that enables addit ion ofnew food scraps without loss of pro-cessing eff ic iency whi le uni t is oper-a t ing; Dou ble he lix shre dder andblade design prevents jamming andlowers maintenance co sts; Output is s te r i l i zed , d eh y d r a ted m a te r ia l .(Gaia recommends analysis of outputto determin e its best application. )

    is recommended for best results. Thethree companies most established inselling d ehyd rators are Somat, Eco Vimand Gaia although other machines areavailable. There are also hybrid sys-tems available such as the BioGreen.This system combines elements ofbiodigesters with dehydrators result-ing in a pelletized organicresidual by-product. Over-all, composters interviewedwho receive the output fromdehydrators expressed sat-isfaction with this feedstockas it contains valuable ni-trogen and carbon.

    Biodigesters rely upon ad-dition of proprietary biolog-ical agents and water toachieve their promised re-sults of accelerated decom-position. The systems ap-pear to break down theorganics enough to get them down thedrain (after adding water), which dis-tinguishes them from garbage dispos-

    BioGreen s hybrid system (shown at aninstallation in Boston) combineselements of biodigesters anddehydrators, resulting in a pelletizedorganic residual by-product.

    als (which directly macerate the mate-rials).Biodigesters all utilize additives,which in most cases are a proprietarymix of enzymes and microbes. (An ex-ception is EnviroPu re, which claims its BioMix does not con tain any m icrobes,bacteria or enzymes but instead iscompr ised of mine ra l s , n u t r i e n t s ,amino acids and vitamins.) The addi-tives in these systems essentially ac-celerate the decomposition processand, with the addition of incrementalam oun ts of wa ter, transform the or-ganic solids into a liquid within a 24-hour period. Many of the companies de-scribe the techno logy as wa ste towater although it should be noted th atthe water is gray wate r, which maycontain relatively high levels of bio-chemical oxygen demand (BOD) thatcan be corrosive to plumbing, detri-mental to wastewater treatment sys-tems and may contain high levels ofnonbeneficial bacteria.

    Many of these machines originated inSouth Korea and have been licensed tovarious entities to sell in the U.S. The

    Table 1. iodigesters ai idisciiargeto sewer)

    VendorCapacity/24 hours lbs)

    BioHitech America 800-3,000Green KeyEnv i roPure

    ow8rKno t

    300-2,000120-3,000

    110-2,000

    /Installs100+

    1550+-

    Footprint*Lx W inches)70x4476x48

    110x12069x48

    Weight*lbs)2 000

    1.6353 700

    1,500

    Power equirements208v - 30 amp

    3 phase220v - 60kz

    3 phase220v - 40 amp

    3 phase208v - 60hz

    3 phase

    WaterHot & coldHot & cold

    Cold

    Hot & cold

    Water Usagemax. ga l24/hrs)

    30033 4452320

    EffluentDischarged*gal/day)

    400-500415

    -_

    FrequencyO fSeeding month)

    23-_

    BiologicMicrobes

    & enzymesMicrobes

    & enzymesM i c ronu t r i en t s

    Microbes& enzymes

    'Dimen s ion s and specs for la rges t u n i t

    22 B I O C Y C L E O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3

  • 8/12/2019 91721355

    4/7

    ly the systems process and convert 1 gallon/4 lbs of

    Tables 1 and 2 summarize details onsed in th is article.Due to the relatively small installed

    systems. After interviewing mu l-district levels, regulato ry offi-

    d o it. Biodigester com-

    he install as replacingxture such as a slop sink,no permitting. As such,

    IO D IG E S T E R V E N D O R S

    chute is pictured o ne s biodigester. Units ran ge inty from 120 to 3 000 lbs/24-

    S YSTEM descriptions excerptedfrom saies literature, interviewsand vendor ciaims are summa-rized:BioHitech America:Eco-Safe Di-gester saves up to 50 percen t/month from reduced hauiing costs;iVlonitors pH and can introduce eitheracidic or alkaiine solution to restoreeffluents to near neutral levels; BOD,C O D , TSS levels typically under ac-ceptable limits; Can digest up to2,500 lbs/day, including vegetables,fruits,meat,fish,poultry, grains, cof-fee grinds, egg shells and dairyprod-ucts, with decomposition occurringwithin 24 hours; Approximately 100gallons of effluent are produced byevery 1,200 pounds of food diges ted.EnviroPure(wet): EPW oodWasteDisposal is self-contained, continualfeed system; By-products include nu-trient depleted gray water effluentsafe for disposal into municipal wastewater sewer systems (see Table 1 inmain article); Effluent can be reusedfor irrigation and agricultural applica-tions; Processes in batch or continual

    vendors often do not proactively con-tact the local wastewater agency re-gardin g acceptable discharge levels forB O D FOG (fats, oils, grease) and totalsolids levels unless requested to do soby the customer.Permitting authorities are cognizantof potential wastewater system issuestha t may stem from traditional garbagegrinding or macerating of food wasteprior to direct disposal into a treatm entplant's sanitary sewer system, e.g., po-ten t ial to cause s lugs, otherw iseknown as clogs. As such, many munici-palities explicitly prohibit this grindingwith direct disposal. As autho rities be-come more aware of the potential forproblematic new effiuent dischargesinto their sewer systems, a serious con-cern arises regarding potential damageto the plumbing systems over t ime.

    feed modes with complete decompo-sition offoodwas te typically within 24hours and available in operational pro -cessing capacit ies ranging from150lbs to 6,000lbs perd a y ; Utilizes allnatural EP-BioMix formulation thatprovidest h e natural bacteria present inthe food w ith critical nutrients requiredfor rapid breakdown offood.Green Key: Add food and in 24hoursa ll organic material breaks downinto a n odor-free, reusable waterefflu-ent; Permitting process is generallysimilar to installing a dishwasher, butmay vary as different municipalitieshavedifferent code requirements; Wa-ter effluent can be treated and col-lected for grey water e . g . toilet flush-ing or irrigation purposes).Power Knot: Unit, named LiquidFood Composter, decomposes foodwithin 24 hours; Discharge is safe toenter sewage syste m; Payback is typically 18 to 36 months; Wastefood is not being chopped but it is de-composed to such a degree that it be-comes a liquid and can exit the ma-chineonly through a fine meshscreen.

    W astewater from indu stries tha t gener-ate large amounts of food waste tend tocarry high levels of chemical and biolog-ical pollutants, especially BOD. Whenmixed in a sanitary sewer system withsulfates, norm ally prese nt in the humandigestive track , hyd rogen sulfide (H2S),can be formed. H2S is a corrosive andacidic gas that can corrode pipes no ta desirable outcome for those responsi-b le for main ta in ing p lumbing andwastewater systems. Municipalit iesand districts with smaller wastewatertreatment facilities and/or older build-ings with narrower drains are particu-larly vulnerable to these effects due tosmaller volumes and pipe sizes.

    Enzymes pose another potentiallyproblematic element to many of the bio-logical systems. In one interview with awastewater enforcement officer, con-

    2 ehydrators

    apacity24 hours(lbs)125-3,300U p to 22066-4,400

    VentingNoNoNo

    processing

    WaterNoNoNo

    DrainYesYesYes

    Temp.CF )180180200

    Weight/Vol.Reduction( )83-93

    93U p to 90

    AcceptsUncoatedCardboard& PaperY e s ; u p to 15%

    YesYes

    Electric(volt)220

    208-480

    ContinuousOrBatchBatchBatch

    Continuous*

    ElectricityUs e(largest unit)16-20 kw3 k w400-1,400 kwh/day

    O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 2

  • 8/12/2019 91721355

    5/7

    BioHitech America utilizes microbes andenzymes to break down food waste inits biodigesters (two units shown side-by-side at a food bank installation inNe w Jersey).

    cern was expressed tha t using enzymesto liquefy organics only serves to breakdown the waste temporarily, with muchof the FOG congealing again furtherdownstream. Similar issues have beenraised about bacteria as a FOG man-agement tool. The fact that many ofthese chemical and hiological solutionsare new to the market means th at theseagents and the vendors who sell themare essentially self-regulated, whichcan lead to overly liberal interpretationof sewer regulations.

    RECONCILING PRODUCT CLAIMSWITH REALITYWaste ToWater The scope ofresearch for this article includedinterviewing vendors, users, con-sultants and wastewater offi-cials. Throughout this process,the most challenging aspect hasheen suhstantiation of the ven-dors' marketing claims. (In addi-tion, a number of companies, es-pecia l ly in the hiodiges termarket, appear to he activelymarketing systems hut are notaccessible via telephone or email.)Biodigester vendors use the claim, waste to water. All of the h iodigestersystems included in this study claim sig-nificant B O D and total suspended solids(TSS) reduct ion al though thisclaim is clearly the most difficultto independently confirm hecause:1) Levels vary depending on thetype of initial waste fed into themachine (some organics such asdough and dairy have inherentlyhigher BOD levels); 2) Levels aredepen dent on seed count of themicroorganisms (the amount ofbacteria present at any giventime); and 3) Very few indepen-dent studies of effluent character-ization are puhlicly availahle.Table 3 provides an example of a

    Organics RecyclingAuthority

    u J i v r S i G l l B / l / B L E B \ l f f l G Y S U S T A IN A B IL W e a r e the experts.. .

    with over 5 4 ye rsof articlesand reports on comp osting,anaerobic digestion,greeninfrastructure, com mu nitysustainability initiatives,national and global trends.

    I O Y L ESUBSCRIBE N OW www.BioCycle.netJust 4 9 = 12 printissues A l l online content(or call 510.967.4135 ext.21

    vendor's effluent claims. Bear in mindthat substantial amounts of water areadded to a substrate (organic waste)tha t already h as a liquid content of ap-proximately 85 percent w ater.Food Waste In Com post Out. Twoclaims found in the marketing materi-als of deh ydra tor systems are FoodW aste In, Compost Out and FoodWaste In, Potable Water O u t . First, theclaim th at th e residual is stable enoughto be directly utilized like compost isproblematic as the solid residual, if notadequately cured, can lead to large fun-gal colonies, odors and associated is-sues. Studies have shown tha t using d e -hydrated food waste as a soi lamend ment, e ither alone or mixed withcompost, creates an environment con-

    Green Key's literature notes that wa tereffluent from its biodigester (unit sho>vninstalled at a university dining hall) canbe treat ed and collected for greywater uses.ducive to fungus and attractive to a va-riety of unwelcome vectors (see FoodW aste Diversion At U rban University,December 2011). Interviewees have in-dicated the key variable influencingfungus growth is the moisture contentpresent in the residu al after a full treat-men t cycle, which appears to vary fi-omsystem to system. The o ther componentof all dehydration systems is the liquidportion that has heen captured in a va-por form, reconstituted in a vessel andthen disposed via a drain. omevendorsclaim that this water is potahle (onesalesperson isreported to actually drinkthe water at sales calls to prove it).Bearing in mind that that the liquidportion has m easurable B O D levels, it isadvisable that hoth the liquid and thesolid fractions are tested to ensure nodeleterious impacts.C O S T S V S B E N E F I T S

    A s with any add itional piece ofequip-ment in most commercial and institu-tional kitchen settings, space considera-tions are always a significant hurdle toovercome. Also, depending on whichmachine and/or technology a g eneratoris considering (biodigesters and dehy-

    24 B I OC Y C LE OC TOB E R 2 0 1 3

  • 8/12/2019 91721355

    6/7

    Table3 xampleo fbiodigestereffluent claimsWastewater DischargeCriteriaBiochemical oxygen demand (BOD)Fats,oiis grease FOGs)Total suspended solids (TSS)

    Limits mg/L)300-500100-150300-500

    Effluent mg/L)25-30G-10

    25-35Source: nviroPure

    dration systems alike), access to a drainand/or plumbing (hot and cold or justcold) are considerations. The relativelyhigh amount of water required for hiodi-gesters is cited by users as both cost andsustainab ility considerations.Akey ben-efit cited by vendors of dehydration sys-tems is that they effectively split thewaste into its two basic components,solids and liquids, and process them sep-arately. As an example, a typical dehy-drator will convert 250 pounds of foodwaste into 25 pounds of sterile organicbiomass and 25 gallons of water.Dehydrators are engineered to maxi-mize energy efficiency although theamount of electricity required is higherrelative to a biodigestion system. Anoth-er aspect of dehyd rators th at has been cit-ed as a implementation challenge is thatmost units are batch systems, which canlead to large amounts of organic wasteneed ing to be stored while waiting for theuninterruptible process to finish. Biodi-gesters, on the other hand, are continu-ous feed systems; waste may be added atany time as long as there is sufficientroom in the vessel.

    Inset photo of the Power Knot illustrateshe types of food w aste that the unitinstalled adjacent to the range] canprocess.When compar ing dehydra tors andbiod igeste rs, the significant differencesare whatgo sin and wh at comes out. De-hydrators typically do not require addeda ter as they vaporize the liquid via hightemperature, providing the generatorwith an organic residual that typicallyshows an 85 to 95 percent reduction inolume and weight . This res idual ,though, still requires off-site transport,which represents a discreet cost. Biodi-

    gesters, on the other hand, work byadding water to biochemically slurriedwaste and g etting rid of it via the sewer.Although hauling is avoided with biodi-gesters, vendors charge for their propri-etary biological additives, which areadded at intervals rangingfi omcontinu-ously to once every three to four months.Another cost component for these sys-tems is the required regular replacementof the media added to the vessels (woodor plastic chips) tha t essentially serve asa habitat for the microorganisms.One of the key sus tainab ility benefits ofdehydrators vs. biodigesters is that amuch larger fraction of nutrient value inthe organics is retained. The water th at isdisposed (condensate)bydehydration sys-tems does contain BODs although theselevels have not been flagged as a majorconcern. Effluent from biodigesters, onthe other hand, is raising red flags in thewastewa ter com munity because if the liq-uid that is being discharged into thewastewater treatment system does, infact, carry high levels of BOD and sludge,then the cost of the disposal is essentiallybeing transferred from the generator tothe municipal ratepayers.On-site organic waste solutions forlarger organics generators are appeal-ing on economic, logistical and hy-gienic levels, but the promise of aproverbial "silver bullet" solution todealing with large am ounts of organ-ics simply does not exist. Indeed, w ithevery system reviewed and re-searched there are tangible benefitsalthough none are without costs andopaque product claims. Ultimately,wh at is clear is that as a resu lt of thelight regulatory environm ent govern-ing dehydration and biodigestion sys-tems coupled with their relatively newappearance on the market, the customerbear s the responsibility to verify and val-idate vendor claims. As one individualwho has had experience with these sys-tems said...buyer be aware

    Zo ealehas spent the bulk of hercareerasan equity mutual fund manager and advo-catefo rsocially responsible investment. Shecurrently wo rks as a business consultantand is a founder and director of Save ThatStuff Organ ics an organics solutions affili-ate of Save That Stuff Inc. Zo is Treasurerof MassR ecycle and chairs the OrganicsCommittee for that organization.

    Thisenvironment lly benefici lbiocatalyst contains acomplex

    mixtureofnatural nutrients,vitamins, andtrace elements

    specifically designedtodisallowth e formationo f H2S, ammonia ,

    merc pt ns an d sk toletoeliminate odorsan d corrosion

    problems naturally.

    Natural. Biodegradable.Safe.Non-Toxic.Not masking agent oressential o il.

    OC TOB ER 2013 25

  • 8/12/2019 91721355

    7/7

    C o p y r i g h t o f B i o C y c l e i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f J G P r e s s , I n c . a n d i t s c o n t e n t m a y n o t b e c o p i e d o r

    e m a i l e d t o m u l t i p l e s i t e s o r p o s t e d t o a l i s t s e r v w i t h o u t t h e c o p y r i g h t h o l d e r ' s e x p r e s s w r i t t e n

    p e r m i s s i o n . H o w e v e r , u s e r s m a y p r i n t , d o w n l o a d , o r e m a i l a r t i c l e s f o r i n d i v i d u a l u s e .