Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002 を読む

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    1/20

    Benhabib et al. Avoiding Liquidity Trap, JPE2002

    1 Introduction 2

    2 4

    2.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

    2.2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

    2.3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

    3 9

    4 9

    5 10

    5.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

    6 13

    6.1

    . . . . . . 136.2 . . . . 15

    7 18

    8 Reference 19

    1

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    2/20

    Benhabib, Jess, Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe, and Martn Uribe, Avoiding Liquidity Traps,

    Journal of Political Economy, 2002

    1 Introduction

    20

    Talyer

    (1993) 1.5 0.5

    1

    Clarida, Gal, and Gertler 1998

    s

    Levin, Wieland, and Williams (1999)

    2

    Rotemberg and

    Woodford (1999)

    Leeper (1991), Bernanke and Woodford (1997), and Clarida et al. (2000)

    1

    R

    R = R()

    R = r + r

    1 R() > 1

    2

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    3/20

    L

    R(L) < 1

    Benhabib, Schmitt-Grohe , and Uribe (2001b) DGE

    L

    (, R())

    (L, R(L))

    3

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    4/20

    Woodford (1999)

    Krugman (1998)

    Woodford (1999)

    5 II

    III IV

    VVI VII

    Gesell

    2

    2.1

    4

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    5/20

    0

    ertu(c,M

    P)dt. (1)

    cMP u

    ucm > 0R(L)

    y > 0, limm

    um(y, m)

    uc(y, m) R(L).

    B R

    y

    P c + P + M + B = RB + P y.

    m = M/Pa = (M+ B)/P

    *1

    c + + a = (R )aRm + y. (2)

    =

    P /P

    y

    No-Ponzi-Game

    *1 a = (M+ B)/P t

    a =M+ B

    P

    M+ B

    P2P ,

    = P /P a = (M+ B)/P

    a =M+ B

    P a,

    Pc + P+ M+ B = RB + Py P

    c + +M+ B

    P=

    RB

    P+ y,

    a 0 = RM/P RM/P

    c + +M+ B

    P a =

    RB

    P+

    RM

    P a

    RM

    P+ y,

    a = (M+ B)P,m = M/P a = (M+ B)/P a

    c + + a = (R )aRm + y,

    5

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    6/20

    limt

    eRt

    0

    (R(s)(s)

    )dsa(t) 0. (3)

    Ponzi gameNPG

    NPG

    (2) (3) a(0) (1)

    (2) (3)*2

    uc = , (4)um = R, (5)

    = (r + R). (6)

    2.2

    R = R(). (7)

    *2

    maxc,m

    Z

    0ertu(c,m)dt,

    c + + a = (R )aRm + y,

    limt

    eRt

    0

    `R(s)(s)

    dsa(t) 0.

    H

    H(c,m,a,) = ertu(c,m) + [(R )a Rm + y c ],

    Hc = 0, Hm = 0,Ha = ,H = a

    Hc = e

    rtuc = 0,

    Hm = ertum R = 0,

    = Ha = ( R),

    a = H = (R )a Rm + y c .

    uc = ert, um = Rert = ert

    uc = , (4)

    um = R. (5)

    = ert + rert = ert, = ( R)

    = (r + R). (6)

    6

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    7/20

    R() > 1R() < 1

    3, R() 0, R() 0

    > r

    > r : R() = r + , R() > 1. (8)

    B = RB M P

    a = (R )aRm . (9)

    a(0)

    a(0) =A(0)

    P(0). (10)

    A(0) = M(0) + B(0) > 0

    limt

    eRt

    0[R(s)(s)]dsa(t) = 0. (11)

    > 0

    + Rm = a. (12)

    R 0 = R

    Benhabib et al. 2001a

    2.3

    c = y, (13)

    u (4) (5)m = l(c.R), lc > 0, lR < 0

    *3 y R

    *3 (4) (5) um(c,m) = Ruc(c,m)R cm

    lm = l(c,R)um(c, l(c.R)) = Ruc(c, l(c,R))

    cumc + ummlc = R(ucc + ucmlc).

    lc

    lc = Ruccumcumm Rucm

    > 0.

    7

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    8/20

    (4)R*4

    = L(R), L < 0. (14)

    *5

    (7)(6) (14)R(14)(6)

    *6

    R() =L(R())

    L(R())[R() r]. (15)

    (R() > r)

    R

    > 0

    (9) (7) (12)

    a = [R() ]a, (16)

    (7) (11)R

    lR RummlR = uc + RucmlR.

    lR =uc

    umm Rucm< 0.

    *4 m = l(y, R)(4) = uc(y, l(y, R))L(R) = uc(y, l(y, R))L

    L(R) = ucmlR < 0.

    *5

    cm ucm > 0 BSUMonetary Policy and Multiple Equilibria, AER 2001

    *6 (7)R = R() (6) (14)

    = (r + R()), (6)

    = L(R()). (14)

    (14) t

    = L(R())R(). (14)

    (14) (14) (6)LR = L(r + R()).

    (15)

    R() =L(R())

    L(R())[R() r]. (15)

    8

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    9/20

    limt

    eRt

    0[R((s))(s)]dsa(t) = 0. (17)

    (10) (P(0) > 0, A(0) > 0)

    (15)(17) a

    3

    (15) R() = r + (8)

    R() > 1

    R(L) = r + L L <

    R() R(L) > 0 L

    L

    L/LR (15)

    R() rR() > 1

    (t) =

    L

    4

    L

    2

    9

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    10/20

    5

    5.1

    (12)

    + Rm = ()a, > 0. (18)

    () > 0, (19)

    (L) < 0. (20)

    L

    (18) (7) (9) a

    a = [R() ()]a. (21)

    a(t) = eRt

    0[R((s))(s)((s))]dsa(0),

    *7

    limt

    eRt

    0[R(s)(s)]dsa(t) = a(0) lim

    te

    Rt

    0((s))ds, (22)

    *7

    da

    dt= [R() ()]a, (21)

    da dt

    daa = [R() ()]dt,

    10

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    11/20

    *8

    = (19)(22)

    =

    L (20) (22)

    a(0)

    5.1.1

    Woodford (1999)

    A

    A= k, (23)

    k

    R(L) < k < R(). (24)

    L

    0 t

    [log a(s)]t0 =

    Zt0

    [R((s)) (s) ((s))]ds.

    log a(t) =

    Zt0

    [R((s)) (s) ((s))]ds + log a(0).

    elog a(t) = a(t) = eRt

    0[R((s))(s)((s))]ds+loga(0),

    = eRt

    0[R((s))(s)((s))]dsa(0). (22)

    *8 (17) a(t) (22)

    limt

    eRt

    0[R((s))(s)]dsa(t) = lim

    te

    Rt

    0[R((s))(s)]dse

    Rt

    0[R((s))(s)((s))]ds log a(0),

    = limt

    eRt

    0((s))dsa(0). (22)

    11

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    12/20

    A/A (a/a) +

    (9)*9

    + Rm = [R() k]a.

    () R() k (18)

    R() k (24)

    (19) (20)

    5.1.2

    P = RB

    P RB *10 RB P

    a = (B/P) + m

    + Rm = R()a, (25)

    () = R() (18)

    ()R()

    (19) R() > 0 (20) R(L) > 0

    limtt

    0R(s)ds <

    (11)

    limt

    a(0)eRt

    0R(s)ds = 0.

    *9

    a

    a+ = k = k

    a

    a.

    (9) a = (R )aRm a = 0

    0 = (R k +a

    a)aRm ,

    = (R k)aRm .

    + Rm = (R k)a.

    *10 RB

    12

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    13/20

    6

    6.1

    (12)

    > r

    M

    M= , (26)

    m

    m= . (27)

    (4)(5)(6)(13)(27) c,m,, 2

    (17)

    *11

    m =

    r + um(y, m)

    uc(y, m)

    1

    m+

    ucm(y, m)

    uc(y, m)

    . (28)

    m 2m

    mm = m

    *11 (4) uc(c,m) = t uccc + ucmm = (13)c = yy

    c = 0ucmm = (6)ucmm = [r + R](4) uc =

    ucmm = uc[r + R],

    ucm

    ucm = r + R,

    =ucm

    ucm r + R.

    (27)

    mm = ucmuc

    m + r R.

    13

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    14/20

    r + =um(y, m)

    uc(y, m).

    ucm > 0 umm < 0m > m m > 0m < m

    m < 0m

    m

    m

    m+

    ucm

    ucm = + r R,

    1

    m+

    ucm

    uc

    m = + r R,

    m = + r R1

    m+

    ucm

    uc

    .

    (4) (5)R = um/uc

    m =

    + r um

    uc1m

    +ucm

    uc

    .

    14

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    15/20

    6.2

    (7)

    L

    0 B(t) Begt, B 0. (29)

    B(t) = 0

    GDP

    (B = 0.6y, g = 0

    (29)g

    (11)

    (29)

    (7)

    m(4)(7) (13)

    m =uc(y, m)

    ucm(y, m)[r + (m)R((m))], (30)

    (m)um(y, m)

    uc(y, m)= R(),

    (17) (10)

    limt

    eRt

    0[R((m(s)))(m(s))]dsm(t) + e

    Rt

    0R((m(s)))ds B(t)

    P(0)= 0, (31)

    P(0)m(0) + B(0) = A(0). (32)

    (29) A(0) > 0B (30)(32)m

    P(0) > 0

    3 (30) (15) 1

    m L mL > m

    15

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    16/20

    (30)mL mL

    m mL

    (31)g < R((mL)) B = 0m

    mL

    > 0 (26) (7)

    (28)m (17)

    B (29)M(0) > 0

    limt

    e

    t0

    [um(y, m)

    uc(y, m)

    ]ds

    M(0) + e

    t0

    [um(y, m)

    uc(y, m)

    ]ds

    B(t) = 0. (33)

    m (33)

    (29)

    6.2.1

    m m

    16

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    17/20

    m m (7)

    (26)

    m m (30)m > m (28)

    m =

    uc(y, m)

    ucm(y, m)[r + (m)R((m))] for m m[

    1

    m+

    ucm(y, m)

    uc(y, m)

    ]1 [

    r + um(y, m)

    uc(y, m)

    ]for m > m.

    (34)

    m (34) m

    4 2 3 m (34) m

    m < m < m < mL m < m < mL

    L < < . (35)

    m, m, mL

    um(y, m)/uc(y, m

    ) = r + ,

    um(y, m)/uc(y, m) = r + ,

    um(y, mL)/uc(y, m

    L) = r + L.

    (m, mL) m m m

    (28) (30) 4 (28)(30)

    (m, mL

    )

    17

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    18/20

    m

    (31) m (34) m

    m

    (33)

    7

    Benhabib et al.

    (2001b)

    VVI

    Schmitt-Groh? and Uribe

    (2000)

    Benhabib et al. (2000)

    Buiter and Panigirtzoglou (1999) Gesell

    Gesell

    18

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    19/20

    Gesell

    Gesell

    8 Reference

    Benhabib, Jess; Schmitt-Grohe , Stephanie; and Uribe, Martn. Chaotic Interest Rate Rules.

    Manuscript. Philadelphia: Univ. Pennsylvania, Dept. Econ., 2000.

    . Monetary Policy and Multiple Equilibria. A.E.R. 91 (March 2001): 167?86. (a) . The Perils of Taylor Rules. J. Econ. Theory 96 (January/February 2001): 40?69. (b)

    Bernanke, Ben S., and Woodford, Michael. In?ation Forecasts and Monetary Policy.J. Money,

    Credit and Banking 29, no. 4, pt. 2 (November 1997): 653?84.

    Brock, William A. Money and Growth: The Case of Long Run Perfect Foresight. Internat.

    Econ. Rev. 15 (October 1974): 750?77.

    .A Simple Perfect Foresight Monetary Model.J. Monetary Econ. 1 (April 1975): 133?50.

    Buiter, Willem, and Panigirtzoglou, Nikolaos. Liquidity Traps: How to Avoid Them and How

    to Escape Them. Discussion Paper no. 2203. London: Centre Econ. Policy Res., August 1999.

    Clarida, Richard H.; Gal?, Jordi; and Gertler, Mark. Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some

    International Evidence. European Econ. Rev. 42 ( June 1998): 1033?67.

    . Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory.

    Q.J.E. 115 (February 2000): 147?80.

    Fuhrer, Jeffrey C., and Madigan, Brian F. Monetary Policy When Interest Rates Are Bounded

    at Zero. Rev. Econ. and Statis. 79 (November 1997): 573?85.

    Krugman, Paul R.Its Baaack: Japans Slump and the Return of the Liquidity Trap.Brookings

    Papers Econ. Activity, no. 2 (1998), pp. 137?87.

    Leeper, Eric M. Equilibria underActive and Passive Monetary and Fiscal Policies. J.

    Monetar y Econ. 27 (February 1991): 129?47.

    Levin, Andrew; Wieland, Volker; and Williams, John C. Robustness of Simple Policy Rules

    under Model Uncertainty. In Monetar y Policy Rules, edited by John B. Taylor. Chicago: Univ.

    Chicago Press (for NBER), 1999.

    Lucas, Robert E., Jr. Money Demand in the United States: A Quantitative Review.Carnegie-

    Rochester Conf. Ser. Public Policy 29 (Autumn 1988): 137?67.

    Obstfeld, Maurice, and Rogoff, Kenneth. Speculative Hyperinflations in Maximizing Models:

    Can We Rule Them Out? J.P.E. 91 (August 1983): 675?87.

    Orphanides, Athanasios, and Wieland, Volker. Price Stability and Monetary

    Policy Effectiveness When Nominal Interest Rates Are Bounded at Zero.Finance and Economic

    Discussion Series, no. 98-35. Washington: Board Governors, Fed. Reserve System, June 1998.

    19

  • 8/9/2019 Benhabib et al., "Avoiding Liquidity Trap",JPE2002

    20/20

    Reifschneider, David, and Williams, John C.Three Lessons for Monetary Policy in a Low In?ation

    Era. Finance and Economic Discussion Series, no. 99-44. Washington: Board Governors, Fed.

    Reserve System, August 1999.

    Rotemberg, Julio, and Woodford, Michael. Interest Rate Rules in an Estimated Sticky Price

    Model.In Monetar y Policy Rules, edited by John B. Taylor. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press (for

    NBER), 1999.

    Schmitt-Grohe , Stephanie, and Uribe, Martn. Price Level Determinacy andMonetary Policy

    under a Balanced-Budget Requirement. J. Monetar y Econ. 45 (February 2000): 211?46.

    Shigoka, Tadashi. A Note on Woodfords Conjecture: Constructing Stationary Sunspot Equi-

    libria in a Continuous Time Model. J. Econ. Theor y 64 (December 1994): 531?40.

    Stock, James H., and Watson, Mark W.A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher

    Order Integrated Systems. Econometrica 61 ( July 1993): 783?820. Taylor, John B. Discretion versus Rules in Practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conf. Ser. Public

    Policy 39 (December 1993): 195?214.

    Wolman, Alexander L.Real Implications of the Zero Bound on Nominal Interest Rates.Man-

    uscript. Richmond, Va.: Fed. Reserve Bank Richmond, December 1999.

    Woodford, Michael. Monetary Policy and Price Level Determinacy in a Cashin-Advance Econ-

    omy. Econ. Theor y 4, no. 3 (1994): 345?80.

    .Price-Level Determinacy without Control of a Monetary Aggregate.Carnegie-Rochester

    Conf. Ser. Public Policy 43 (December 1995): 1?46.

    .

    Control of the Public Debt: A Requirement for Price Stability?

    Working Paper no.5684. Cambridge, Mass.: NBER, July 1996.

    . Price-Level Determination under Interest-Rate Rules. Manuscript. Princeton, N.J.:

    Princeton Univ., April 1999.

    20