CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    1/17

    Design of Inverter Driven

    Induction Machines

    Daniel M. Saban, PE [email protected]

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    2/17

    2

    Overview

    The induction machine problem

    Stakeholders & design drivers

    Analysis & synthesis challenges

    Design rules-of-thumb & constraints

    Optimization and/or synthesis

    Common tools

    Selected approaches

    Inverter system consideration

    Opportunities

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    3/17

    3

    Induction machine

    Stakeholders and their perspectives

    Customers

    Sales & Marketing

    Manufacturing Engineering & Operations Application Engineering

    Product Development

    Opportunities

    Materials: improved and exotic

    Manufacturing processes and process control

    Design, analysis and optimization tools

    Size & Topology

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    4/17

    4

    Induction machine

    Temperature is everything Material limits (life)

    Insulation system

    Bearing system

    Material dependencies (performance) Cooling system

    Rules-of-thumb in design

    Cost is everything

    Operating cost: efficiency, power factor Initial cost: better material, more material

    Quality is everything

    Performance is everything?

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    5/17

    5

    IM analysis challenges

    Non-linear: saturation, core losses Winding harmonics

    Rotor/Stator slotting & skewing

    Material property variation (lot-to-lot) Dimensional variation & shift

    Manufacturing/assembly variation

    Rotor resistance End-leakage (consider frame)

    High-frequency impedance (bearing

    currents)

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    6/17

    6

    Proximity & Skin Effect

    Fundamental current injected into conductors

    1 turn per coil; 4.0 kW loss/pole

    4 turns per coil; 2.5 kW loss/pole

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    7/177

    Slot Ripple Eddy Current

    Current Sheet used to simulate total air-gap flux density No current injected into conductors

    Loss is due to induced eddy currents

    Used to analyze effect of wire transposition and aspect ratio

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    8/178

    IM design synthesis

    Clean sheet

    Single application

    Product family

    Existing laminations

    Brute Hp vs. finesse

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    9/179

    IM design synthesis challenges

    Knowns Full stator slots

    High conductivity conductors

    Small gap?

    Unknowns Rotor & stator aspect ratios

    Slot shape details

    Discrete values only

    Pole count

    Discrete wire sizes, non-linear cost function

    Winding details: number of turns, coils, pitch

    Integral numbers of slots, rotor/stator

    Lamination material, grade, thickness

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    10/1710

    Rules-of-thumb

    Stator current density 620 A/cm2 to 1 kA/cm2

    Highly dependant on cooling system

    Revise after thermal modeling Peak flux density of stator teeth, yoke

    ~1.7T, ~1.6T

    Revise upward for more power density

    Revise lower for higher efficiency

    Rotor current density

    Gap flux density: 0.5T to 0.8T

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    11/1711

    Common Design Constraints

    Rotor OD

    Stator OD

    Stack length

    Machine construction

    Cooling system

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    12/1712

    Manual Iteration

    IM design iteration

    LP FE

    matl propsdesign

    constraints

    mfg

    constraintsobjectives

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    13/1713

    IM design tools

    In-house Typically only lumped parameter (LP)

    May be tied to manufacturing or operations

    Some special versions of commercial software Commercial

    LP: PC-IMD (SPEED), VICA (support?)

    LP+FE: PC-IMD/FEA (SPEED), RMxprt (Ansoft)

    MCM: ??

    FE: Magnet (Infolytica), (Flux, Maxwell) Ansys/Ansoft

    System simulation: Matlab/Simulink, Simplorer

    (Ansoft), Easy 5

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    14/17

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    15/1715

    IM design optimization

    Inverter driven machines Pole count is now a free variable

    Stator & Rotor lamination design optimization can be decoupled

    Skewing penalizes machine

    Finesse approach Size machine, ignore details & discrete values

    Create response surface & narrow search space

    Optimize rotor and stator separately

    Second pass takes into account discrete values

    Requires dedicated code Key design points: torque corner point, max speed, max

    torque

    Best motor will deliver maximum torque for maximumdrive current

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    16/1716

    IM-Inverter system optimization

    Max torque-speed envelope (output)

    different than constant torque/power/slip

    power factor and efficiency variations

    Optimal motor leakage

    Harmonic ripple current

    Chopping frequency

    Fundamental AC current

    Peak transistor frequency

  • 7/30/2019 CEME708a_InvrtrDrvnIndctnMachn

    17/1717

    Opportunity

    Simple tools When to apply vs. other technologies (IM vs. PM)

    Rough sizing: stack length, stator od, rotor od

    Fit of test data for lamination family, or single design

    Models of different manufacturing techniques/defects Stray load loss - rotor/stator harmonic interaction

    Stator conductor eddy currents; large copper cross-

    section, high frequency

    Vehicle to adapt academic work into industrial setting Open source

    Widespread use

    Extensible framework